Imperialism, Nation and Class Struggle

National-Revolutionaries - "Red Nazis", "Bolsheviks in disguise", "Nazi-Maoists", "Stalinists of the Right" or "Conservatives of the Left"? Our political opponents have been confused since the post-war national revolutionary movement came into being. Ideological pigeonholes and old dogmas no longer hold true and the old taboos of the traditional political camps are shaken when confronted with national revolutionary positions. There are nationalists who make no secret of their nationalist radicalism, but at the same time have elevated the class struggle against the capitalists to the highest principle. How is this possible? How can a nationalist stand for the class struggle against the capitalists? A revolutionary socialist class struggle for the nation? "They are controlled by the East!" cries the so-called "nationalist" right, for whom the protection of private property over the means of production has always taken precedence over the freedom of the nation. They have always seen the class struggle as a tool of an enemy foreign power, intended to destroy the so-called unity of the people. "They are Nazis in a new guise!" cry both the Marxists and the liberals, for whom people and nation have at best a tactical meaning and whose dream goal is the levelled "one world", free of ethnic and cultural differentiations, without independent nations. However, new problems require new questions and new questions require new answers. The fronts of the 19th century (which on closer inspection were also different from what school historians would have us believe), are no longer the fronts of today. The world of the last twenty years of the 21st century is at a point where these new fronts are becoming increasingly clear. Classes, ideologies, social forces, they are all in turmoil.

The New "One World" Imperialism

Today, when we speak of the nation, when we fight for its liberation, when we see nationalism as a progressive, emancipatory force, our opponent is different from the one who confronted the nationalists of the 19th century. It is no longer a question of freeing the merchant and the industrial citizen from the shackles of feudal restrictions; it is no longer even primarily a question of freeing some "small" nation from the rule of a "large" one. Even the concept of imperialism as the antithesis of national liberation can no longer be defined exclusively in terms of individual states.

Certainly, there is American imperialism, the imperialist neo-colonialism of England and France, there are also imperialist elements in German politics. However, all these phenomena, which the socialists of the 1960s were still railing against, are today becoming more and more evident for what they really are: different aspects or facets of one and the same multinational globalist corporate imperialism that penetrates into the very ends of the globe!

The capitalism of the 19th century was the grandfather of this corporate imperialism. It began as the competitive capitalism of individual entrepreneurs. Family fortunes were invested, increased, strengthened by bank loans, and factories were built that in the Netherlands are associated with names like Philips, Unilever, Shell, and so on. The origin, development and inner regularity of this were excellently described by Karl Marx in his economic works. This stage of capitalist development had already been completed for several decades when Lenin wrote his book "Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism" in 1916. In it he accurately described what Marx had already foreseen: the course of capital concentration in the industrialised countries, which at the end of the 19th century gradually began to replace competitive capitalism. This was caused by the concentration of the economy under conditions of free competition, as Marx had described in his work "Das Kapital". The imperialist phase of capitalism was characterised by the concentration of productive forces as a result of ruinous competition, which led to the formation of cartels, trusts and monopolies, as well as the increasing incorporation of bank capital and industrial capital and thus the complete placing of national state apparatuses at the service of the capitalist classes. While competitive capitalism was still characterised by the export of goods, imperialism was characterised by the export of capital: investments were made in so-called "backward" countries; wages, land and raw materials were cheap here, new markets could be developed locally.

The imperialist states, which primarily included England, France, Germany and the US, secured these interests through military aggression ("gunboat policy") and the colonial conquest of entire continents. In this period, for example, British and French colonial rights were extended to large parts of North and Central Africa, parts of Africa and Oceania were colonised by the German Empire, and the third-ranking former colonial power Spain was crushed by the US, with the establishment of US colonies on former Spanish colonial soil (Philippines, Puerto Rico, etc.). Conflicts of interest between these national imperialisms and their national capital groups then led to the First World War; a thoroughly imperialist war, for which the blame must be laid not on one nation (e.g. Germany), but on the interests of conflicting national capitals.

The period from 1914 to 1945 can be seen as a time of great upheaval, as a transition phase to the nocturnal phase of capitalism. Lenin was mistaken when he considered the imperialism of his time, represented by individual states, to be the highest and final stage of capitalism. On the contrary, the human mill was turned further, the bulldozer was driven even more brutally over tribes, peoples and nations, even more nature and raw materials, people, material, soldiers and citizens, workers and peasants were sacrificed to the Moloch of capitalist industrial development. The revolutionary-socialist hope of Lenin and the Bolsheviks for the end of times proved to be false.

At the end of the Second World War, the USA had become the dominant power in the imperialist camp, the former European competitors had torn each other apart and eaten each other up. However, European capital was still there, in the colonies, in the production units, stocks and real estate that had remained intact, in the money that had been invested in neutral countries. Thus, although the US took over the political and military leadership of the Western world and was certainly the most powerful economically, the US capitalists could not easily absorb European capital. On the contrary, after a phase of increasing export of US capital to Europe, a phase of increasing reciprocity in the export of capital began, the creation of joint subsidiaries (not only in the Third World) and the amalgamation of the largest banking and industrial groups around the world through a thousandfold network of holdings and cooperatives. After competitive capitalism and old imperialism, the third stage of the capitalist system has been reached, multinational imperialism, or globalism!

"One World" of Dead Souls

This new type of imperialism created globalist instruments to coordinate its activities and gain complete control over all the peoples of the world. These instruments include:

- NATO and friendly/allied pacts such as SEATO, ANZUS, etc. as military instruments of domination.

- The World Bank and the infamous "International Monetary Fund" (IMF) as the central levers of global economic control, which have brought almost all the nations of the world into dependence through their lending policies and all manner of financial manipulations.

- Associations such as the "Trilateral Commission", "World Economic Forum" and the "Bilderberg Conference" as consultative bodies of important state, economic and trade leaders, media representatives etc. from the Western industrialised countries.

The goal, the "One World" controlled by inscrutable multinational globalist bodies is now within their grasp! It is not the result of an ominous "world conspiracy", but results from the development logic of capital (which was never understood by the right-wing parties; the reason why they had to resort to mystifications of conspiracies to explain simple processes). The interdependence of capital increases day by day, as does the dependence of the peoples on the decisions of the IMF and the big banking centres. For the sake of higher profits, the importance of capital utilisation cries out for globally standardised production processes, consumer behaviour, ways of life; for global psychological calculability and thus for the disappearance of all mental and cultural differentiations.

This 'brave new world' of the multinationals will be a world without cultural diversity, without national sovereignty and regional autonomy, without democratic decision-making and without workers' rights. It will be planned and structured down to the smallest detail, realising Ernst Jüngers' chilling horror vision of "planetary planned landscapes". It will reduce the human being to the functions of production and consumption, it will leave no room for individuality, creativity outside the global culture industry and no self-determination for the people. Its supreme principle will be the rationality of capitalist profit. Their ideologies are - even now - liberal cosmopolitanism, progressivism and the idolisation of industry and technology. Their archenemy is and remains: NATIONALISM!

Class Struggle as Revolutionary Task

If nationalism is anti-capitalist, it must finally free itself from the reactionary imagination of the political right. This means, above all, that all ideas of the "peoples community" (volksgemeinschaft) and "national solidarity" under the umbrella of the capitalist system must be definitively rejected. For the people are divided into the stooges of imperialism and its ideologies, on the one hand, and those who suffer and partly fight against imperialism, on the other. This division is - from its objective causes - a division into social classes since the basis of imperialism is determined by one class alone, namely the capitalist class from whose womb it emerged.

The class struggle is therefore not a Marxist "instrument of division" against the people, but exists objectively and is perceptible every day in the conflicts between the different social classes. Today, more than ever, it is the task of true national revolutionary politics to make people aware of this class struggle, to intensify it and to orientate it.

The beneficiaries of the imperialist system in each country are the direct representatives of the multinationals, the directors, commissioners and managers of the respective banks and companies, as well as their accomplices in political parties, trade unions, the media and the cultural sector. The deceived are the broad strata of the people, the workers who have been deprived of their identity and culturally enslaved. They are economically exploited and politically impotent. It is necessary to persuade these misled people to fight against the globalists. This can be done on the basis of the objectively existing economic contradictions, which have become increasingly evident in recent years.

The economic contradictions of the working class in particular against the capitalists have been elaborated excellently by Karl Marx: the workers produce surplus value which the capitalists appropriate. The producers are thus deprived of the fruits of their own production. Moreover, in the capitalist production process they are constantly exposed to the constraints of profit maximisation for the capitalists, with all its consequences: rationalisation, high work pressure, industrial accidents and waste of personal labour power. In times of crisis, the capitalists and their state withdraw previous social concessions, resulting in poverty and impoverishment. From these contradictions arises an anti-capitalist potential for conflict, which can manifest itself in daily small-scale wars in the factory, but also in mass actions of the workers, employees, etc. on the streets. That is where the national revolutionary struggle can and must begin!

Imperialism is based on a system of continuous industrial production, creation of surplus value, reinvestment, increased production, etc. The bearers of production are the workers, without whose labour there would be no existence. The carriers of production are the workers, without their labour the system could not exist. There can be no war in the world without weapons produced by the workers. No ship, no aeroplane, no car is available, no electricity flows through the wire without the power of the labourer. Thus the worker has in his hands the weapon to pull the rug out from under imperialism and thereby liberate both himself and the nation, the people. The sharpening of the antagonisms between the exploited and the exploiters, the raising of the class struggle to a higher level, can lead to the working class refusing to work in one country or another and thus attacking the basis of the system. Political strike, general strike, factory occupation are thus among the main instruments of the class struggle, which must ultimately lead to the national liberation struggle.

The political-strategic awareness of the link between personal suffering and the imperialist world system arises no more or less spontaneously today than it did 80 years ago, when Lenin, in his writing "What to do?", pointed out the necessity of the link that the spontaneous (economic) workers' movement must make with revolutionary theory. The lever for establishing this link is the revolutionary organisation, the creation of which is an increasingly urgent task for national revolutionaries.

It is the workers and the other simple layers of the people who have every interest in freeing themselves from this system, which means social liberation from the capitalist economic system and thus liberation from the imperialist world system. The bourgeoisie, on the other hand, is today anti-national to the bone (and that means, above all, liberal), because everything it has to lose after a socialist workers' revolution, it has gained through this globalist system. This also applies to the much-quoted 'small', 'medium' and 'anti-monopoly' capitalists, even now that their days are numbered due to the wave of bankruptcies. What is overlooked, however, is that these capitalists also benefited to the end from the ruling system, which guaranteed them private ownership of the means of production, protection from exploitation and, in most cases, a decent living. They are allies of the system and not of the people; for the sake of profit they have always been prepared to betray their nation. One cannot serve both the moneybags and the nation. Individual pursuit of profit is liberalist behaviour and service to the nation is socialist behaviour (the former characterised by individual, the latter by collective interests); both are mutually exclusive.

Conclusion:

Capital has now organised itself internationally and is striving for the completion and unification of the world. The struggle for the preservation of peoples and cultures as a national revolutionary task must therefore be directed against international capital, globalism. Nationalism is thus an anti-capitalist struggle; a class struggle!

National revolutionaries must recognise the objectively existing contradictions between the workers and the capitalist system and mobilise the enormous power of the working class for the national liberation struggle. They must make the workers aware that social liberation cannot be achieved without national liberation, the task of which is to liberate one country after another from world capitalism. The escalation of the class struggle is in no way directed against the interests of the nation, but rather serves them. If capital today is internationalist and its ideology globalist, then the working class as a counterpart of capital must be nationalist (in the sense of anti-imperialist solidarity of the people fighting for liberation). And vice versa: the class struggle of the workers against capital is directed against an internationally intertwined power and thus benefits the liberation of the peoples from this power!

NO NATIONAL LIBERATION WITHOUT THE LIBERATION OF THE WORKING CLASS!

NO SOCIALISM WITHOUT THE LIBERATION OF THE NATION AND THE RECONQUEST OF NATIONAL IDENTITY!

PEOPLES OF THE WORLD, UNITE IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST GLOBALIST CAPITAL - NATIONAL LIBERATION EVERYWHERE!

No To Sex Self-ID. Stop the GRA Reform Now

From the Government website:

Reform of the Gender Recognition Act
Closes 19 Oct 2018

Opened 3 Jul 2018

Contact
0300 200 3343

gra.consultation@geo.gov.uk

Overview
This consultation seeks your views on how best to reform the process of changing one’s legal gender. The consultation focuses on the Gender Recognition Act 2004. We are not proposing any amendments to the Equality Act 2010.

This consultation does not consider the question of whether trans people exist, whether they have the right to legally change their gender, or whether it is right for a person of any age to identify with another gender, or with no gender. Trans and non-binary people are members of our society and should be treated with respect. Trans people already have the right to legally change their gender, and there is no suggestion of this right being removed. This consultation simply asks how best Government might make the existing process under the Gender Recognition Act a better service for those trans and non-binary people who wish to use it.

To make the process of filling in the online consultation easier, we recommend first downloading and reading the full consultation document (PDF), before starting the online survey.

Having started the online survey questions, you can save your answers and come back to it later.

You don't have to answer all of the questions. You can choose the ones that apply to you, or are important for you. Leave answers to the questions you don't want to respond to open.

Download the consultation document HERE (English version).
Download the consultation document HERE (Welsh version).

....

The Reform to the GRA puts Women in danger.  It is profoundly Homophobic, treating homosexuals as people in the 'wrong' body, who need to have surgery to align their bodies to their minds so they can have faux heterosexual relationships with people who are the same sex as them, only without surgery!

The Reform to the GRA puts children in danger.  It encourages parents, doctors, schools to go along with an ideology which leads to surgery and permanent damage, for what is in most cases a passing fad.

SMPBI says, No to Sex Self-ID.  Unfortunately, there is no option to scrap GRA altogether and end the trans madness. - this will take a revolution to achieve.  But in the meantime, to protect our nation (impressionable children, women, homosexuals, mentally disturbed individuals caught up in the mania (especially those with autism), indeed everyone), complete the GRA form and say NO to this madness.  The consultation ends in a week.  Get busy!

....

From Manfridayuk.org:

The following pictures were taken on September 30th, when British women stood up and demanded that they were heard.

...........

From Lily Maynard's excellent site:

Transwomen are Men

by Lily Maynard

The media circus is full of high-profile men claiming to be women. Most of them didn’t ‘transition’ until mid-adulthood and there’s a very good reason for this. Parents twenty years ago realised that childhood, the teenage years – and even the early twenties – are times of tumultuous change for growing humans.

Puberty was unpleasant for most of us; hellish for some of us, but often these men have an idealised fantasy version of the elusive girlhood they feel they were denied: a ‘Victorious‘ style time of pillow fights, bubblegum and girlish confidences.

‘The Gender Speaker’ a late-transitioning man who works in Transgender Awareness Training, has this to say:

  “I had missed out on the teenage years, getting all dressed up for a night out, wearing strappy tops and mini skirts.” He seems to imagine that being a teenage girl is just one long femininity-performing trip to the disco. The reality? A friend of middle-child told me three days ago that she’d started wearing a big fluffy fleece jacket belonging to her father because, “I’m sick of men staring at my tits”.  She is twelve years old.

In addition to convincing themselves that all the problems they’ve faced in life could have been avoided if only they had been born female, these men also like to consider themselves experts on both ‘sides of the fence’, hence Arundel’s blogpost ‘How Women can be More Successful in a Male World’;  Munroe Bergdorf’s:  “Women are getting feminism wrong”  and Juno Dawson’s tagline for his 2017 book ‘The Gender Games’ – The problem with men and women… from someone who has been both.”

Think about it carefully for a moment. Is it really likely that there is no history of child transition- back in the ancient literary archives of the last century and beyond- because young people ‘didn’t have the words’? Were men all inarticulate idiots back in the days of Chaucer, Milton, Shakespeare, Dickens, Whitman and Tolkein? Were Sappho, Benn, Shelley, Brontë, Dickinson and Woolf unable to ‘find the words’ they needed to articulate their experiences? There is a rich and profound history of writing by same-sex attracted people throughout history, but the culture of transgenderism is new and is perpetuated almost entirely by men.

Despite decades of male privilege these men suddenly demand to be addressed as and viewed as women, while in the next breath claiming, ‘I’m still the same person inside’ or ‘I was always a woman”.  However they protest to the contrary, it seems that their view of womanhood is a vague, elusive feeling that manifests itself through red lipstick, gently waved hair and tits.  This is such bullshit that it is hardly a surprise that many women are offended by the claim. Woman is not a costume, it is a biological fact and to say so is not ‘defining women by their vaginas’. Woman is not something you can ‘identify’ in and out of, it is a physical state of being.

When did it become an act of hatred to state the obvious?

Let’s be really clear here, I don’t care what these men choose to wear, how they style their hair and who they do or don’t fuck. They should be safe in public spaces; they should have the same rights to housing, jobs and earned respect as anyone else. They should feel safe. Nobody deserves to be threatened, hit, or assaulted for the clothing they wear or their sexual preferences. I’m all for diversity and breaking the bonds of social convention. Men can wear make up, of course they can! Bloody good for them! It just doesn’t make them women. This current trend isn’t about ‘gender bending’, and it certainly isn’t about challenging the boundaries of gender or breaking down stereotypes.

I’ll say it again and again and again; for no matter how often I say it I’m accused of speaking with hatred – I do not hate men for thinking they can become women. I am angered by their audacity and yes, part of me pities their confusion but this is not about hating men, it is about hating a harmful ideology.  I hate the idea that women are expected to accept that ‘woman’ is some sort of inner girly feeling that can be appropriated by a man who believes that growing his hair, wearing a blouse, taking hormones and- sometimes- undergoing surgery, means that he somehow understands a collective experience of womanhood and has the right to speak on behalf of women.  It does not. No man has that right and no man who cares about women would try to claim that right.

It’s intensely conservative and individualistic. Woman as a concept rather than the messy reality of life. Self transformation rather than tackling narrow confines of sexist stereotyping of both sexes’.    

                                                                                     Dr Mary Chadwick

So now we’re going to look at a few high-profile men who claim to be women. I’m not going to say anything ‘hateful’ about them, because- let me say it one more time- I don’t actually hate them or wish them harm. I’m just going to state a few facts.  I’m taking a deep breath here and reminding you that the Junos and Indias and Shons of this world are not women. They are men. They were raised as men and they grew up as (gay) men. All three of them worked in media before transition and are no strangers to male privilege.

DAWSON

In 2013 James Dawson published ‘Being a Boy‘.  The Amazon blurb claims: ‘former PSHCE teacher James Dawson expertly guides boys through puberty’.  In 2013, Dawson was a bit of a gay role model.  Of his novel ‘Cruel Summer’ he said “Why wouldn’t straight people want to read about a devious, sexy young chap?” In 2014 he published ‘This Book is Gay‘ and became a School Role Model for the charity Stonewall. In 2015 he announced he was going to transition, telling the Independent ‘I just want to be one of the girls’. By 2017 he had reinvented himself as Juno and was claiming”A lot of gay men are gay men as a consolation prize, because they couldn’t be women.’

Dawson’s ability for doublethink is apparent in that he can see no irony in saying of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, “I can’t imagine that she’s dying to hear my views on growing up as a black person because it’s something I have no experience of.”

WILLOUGBY

Jonathan Willoughby was in his mid-40s- divorced and the father of a teenage boy- when he disappeared from the world of broadcasting and returned several years later as India.

Infamously, he tried to force a kiss on singer/songwriter Ginuwine in a 2018 episode of Celebrity Big Brother and accused Ginuwine of transphobia when he wouldn’t kiss him back. When women in the ‘Big Brother’ house angered him, he declared loudly- in an unfortunate choice of words-  “I am a woman! Let that penetrate!” His goalpost for womanhood seems to be undergoing surgery, telling Pink News in 2017,  “Unless you are transitioning, stay out of the ladies. Pulling on a frock as and when the mood takes doesn’t cut it. You don’t have a God-given right to go into female-only spaces.” The irony of this seems to be lost on Willoughby, who appears to make the rules up as he goes along, while being photographed in the Ladies’ toilets.

FAYE

In 2014, aged 26, Sean Faye was writing articles for the Guardian about being a man who wore make up.  In 2015 he claimed ‘I’m not a man, I never was’. A year later he wrote an article for the BBC on International Women’s Day in which he saw no irony in speaking of a world in where ‘femininity is still in flight from male definition, ridicule and violence’.

“Trans women live under the same system of patriarchy as other women,” writes Shon in the Guardian: in an article where he demands access to women’s  refuges and domestic violence centres ‘because I now exist as a woman’. Faye seems to genuinely believe that woman is a costume. He once told a woman on Twitter, ‘I’m a woman because I say I am, you’ve lost… enjoy your erasure”.

You may have conveniently forgotten about your 27 years of male privilege, but Shon baby, it still shows.

This list could go on. And on, and on. Don’t get me started on Riley J ‘I could start a fire with all that straw,‘ Dennis and even Lily ‘TERF TERF TERF‘ Madigan. The fact that some of these men are too young and disturbed for me to feel comfortable writing about them in depth doesn’t lessen the harm they are doing to women with their entitled appropriation.

These men are representing women. The last decade has seen an explosion in men who claim to be women and the internet is bursting with men who believe that it is quite reasonable to demand that they are referred to as women and that women who disagree with them should STFU. This is not progressive; it is nothing new. This is what men have always done to women. Shut up, TERF.

So, if I might disagree with Bergadof for a moment when he claims that,“What makes a woman ‘a woman’ has no definitive answer, nor does it need one”, I think we really do need to ask a few questions.

So what IS a woman?  How do we define ‘woman’?

Is it that she grows young inside her (but some women never have kids!) and feeds them with her breasts (but some women can’t lactate!)?

Is it her womb (but some women have had a hysterectomy!) or her breasts (but some women have lost breasts to cancer!) or her chromosomes (but some women are intersex!) or her menses (but some women never menstruate!)?

Is it her penis? No. Stop right there. Let’s get this perfectly clear. Women do not have penises. None of them.  Ever. We have a word for people who were born with penises. That word is men.

” But these days it’s really complicated to define ‘woman’.”

But wait, no it isn’t actually. It isn’t at all. We all know what a woman is. A woman is an adult human female. We all came out of one. And no, that’s not to say that women who are sterile, or have had a mastectomy, or a hysterectomy are not women: of course it isn’t. NOBODY HAS EVER SAID THAT.

Pay attention class. Are you ready for a blackboard meme? Good. Magdalen Behrns introduced me to this wonderful, spectacularly succinct phrase. The fact that this phrase is fast becoming controversial sums up the absurdity of the current state of gender politics.

There is no such thing as a woman with a penis, whether she is a lesbian or not, (I discuss intersex in my article‘What makes somebody ‘real’ trans part 2′, so I won’t digress here) but this argument is especially trying for lesbians because obviously, quote Jessie: “Euw… penises.”

So, why should we say men are women when they tell us they are?  Well, basically it seems to come down to being ‘nice’.   It’s kinder not to remind them that they aren’t really women. We know they’re confused, bless them, so most of us go along with it – because it’s ‘mean’ not to and we have been trained to put the needs of men and boys before our own since we were little girls.

And there’s one more thing we need to get clear. Right now. This is not harmless. This is not just ‘being nice’ to a few confused and vulnerable individuals, it’s far, far bigger than that. This is about your rights. And if you’re a bloke reading this, this is about your mother’s rights, your sisters’, your friends’, your daughters’… this is about Women’s Rights. Yes. THIS IS A WOMEN’S RIGHTS ISSUE! Why? Because this:

The Fight Against Trans-Fascism is a Fight For Decency

Trans-Fascism is a serious danger to Society.  Lesbians have rightly pointed out that the obscene 'Cotton Ceiling' ideology is a misogynistic (potentially rapist) attack on Women who do not want to have sex with Men - putting pressure on them to do so with the threat of accusation of 'transphobia'.  Transphobia is a nonsense word, but like so many before it, is destined to become a punishable 'hate crime' in the liberal dystopia we live under.  There is a very real possibility that Lesbians who do not submit to sex with men in dresses, could be hounded from jobs, and even arrested as hate criminals for not allowing themselves to be raped.

Children are the target of Trans-Fascists, with the liberal indoctrination system of 'school' sending in trans terrorists to corrupt their minds, and the media pumping brainwashing propaganda into their minds via the TV and 'music' industry - all of which, of cause, is designed to create more confused individuals, who declare themselves to be 'non-binary' (another nonsense term) and ready for genital mutilation.

Effeminate Gay Men are Men, just as Butch Lesbians are Women.  To say that people with traits associated with the opposite sex are trapped in the wrong body and need surgery to become aligned with the right one, is profoundly homophobic.

Men suffering from autogynephilia get aroused by cross-dressing, and/or fantasise about having sex as a woman.  This fetishism usually is expressed as transvestism, and it harms no-one.  The Trans-Fascists have appropriated Transvestites into their 'spectrum' of 'transgenders', promoting the idea that if a man likes to dress as a woman (usually in clothing associated with prostitutes, and hardly flattering to women), then he IS a woman, and needs surgery to align him to the right body!

Lesbians, Gays, Transvestites, Children - all are under attack.  The sexualisation of children to make profits in surgery and for hormone companies is a form of paedophilia.  Adults are being bombarded with so much propaganda that it has become normal for people to say 'they' and 'their' when speaking of a single individual.  For children, the impact of the Trans-Fascist agenda, is to break their mental health and make them easy prey to the Trans Industry - an industry which has the full cooperation of the music industry, news and entertainment media, school system, law, government, and more besides, in grooming them just as all paedophiles groom their victims.

Fight back. Educate yourself, your friends, your family, about the Trans-Fascists and what they are doing.  Stop the Trans-Fascist Paedophile Terror.

Below is a good source of literature for you to study. The folder contains a range of printable stickers and leaflets aimed at fighting the Trans-terrorists.  The UK Thought Police do not want these stickers placed in Women's spaces (Toilets, Make-up Shops, Women's Changing Rooms in Clothes Shops, Women's Refuges/Shelters, Women's Changing Rooms in Swimming Baths/Gyms) or in places such as Schools, Council Offices, Shopping Centres, Bus/Rail Stations/Shelters, or in fact anywhere at all (especially places with CCTV).  The police state mentality has now made it dangerous to distribute literature in the form of stickers, unless you are wearing a hoodie and finger-print protecting gloves and carry bottled water to apply stickers rather than DNA-rich saliva. The information below is for your own education, so with that in mind, download and make use of the material for your own interest:

Download Printable Arsenal for Education

Global Capitalists are Killing Europe with Genocidal Mass Migration

The European Union is a lie.  It is neither a Union nor in any way an institution which serves the interests of Europeans.

When we voted to leave the EU on the 23rd June 2016, we did so not out of any animosity to Europe, but out of fear of the despotism of the EU.  The EU is not Europe.  The EU is anti-Europe.  As Europeans, we British understand that by voting to leave the EU, we were voting to get away from a dangerous institution headed by corporate criminals and genocidal globalisers.  Policies emanating from the EU prove that we were right to leave and that it is in the interests of all Europeans that all parties and people across the EU who seek to leave that body, are helped to do so.  Europe will not live until the EU is dead.

On International Migrants Day (18.12.17) Dimitris Avramopoulos (the unelected European Commissioner for Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship) wrote:

'The EU has granted protection to more than 700,000 people last year. They have found safety in Europe, but we also need to make sure they find a home. This is not only a moral imperative. It is also an economic and social imperative for our ageing continent'

The nonsense written here is that the EU needs immigration because the population is ageing due to decades of liberal extremism leaving millions of Europeans dead before birth as the women who should have been their mothers have pursued careers in place of the most rewarding of all jobs - raising the next generation.  The EU continues to push the neo-liberal lunacy of abortion on demand and of the right of all to be wage-slaves, whilst simultaneously demanding we accept millions of immigrants to fill the population gap.  This is genocide.  It doesn't matter if it is Chinese people taking over Tibet, Israelis wiping out Palestine, or 'refugees' populating the void left by millions of murdered European infants, Genocide is Genocide.

As for the claim that the EU has granted protection to 700,000 people in the last year, the policies of 2010 Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize winner Angela Merkel, have created fear across the EU, directly contributing to the UK voting to leave.  The mass immigration of over a million 'refugees' in a single year (2016), including a large number of terrorist sleeper cells, has led to the calm and happiness of Europe being shattered.

The petty dictator continues:

'We must also enhance legal channels for economic migration with a more ambitious Blue Card for highly skilled workers and kick-start targeted labour migration pilot projects in key third countries.'

We were told that the EU would be a better place for Europeans.  If there are skills shortages, the solution is to train the people of Europe to do jobs which are necessary.  The EU Commissioner conveniently forgets the mass unemployment of his own country, Greece.  If the EU worked for Europeans, there would be a programme of assisted internal migration from countries of high unemployment to areas of labour shortage.  There are 38 Million unemployed Europeans in the EU - to claim that we need immigration is a disgusting and brazen lie.  In any case, those entering the EU are not highly skilled, but mostly workshy illiterates.  There is no mass influx of Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, or any other highly educated people, only people obsessed with a primitive ideology which is wholly at variance with the European mindset (and is rejected by decent Muslims worldwide who nonetheless are associated with it by the lying media), or otherwise people of no value who have come to live the easy life at our expense.  The lie that the refugees are from Syria is an insult to that beleaguered land of proud and courageous people - the only 'Syrians' coming are terrorist filth from the US/UK/EU/Saudi/Israeli created 'Islamic State'

The enemy of the European people speaks of border defences being no solution (even though Hungary has proven the exact opposite) and makes the sickening anti-democratic statement that:

'Migration is our new reality. The time has come to start thinking, talking and acting about migration in a more comprehensive and long-term way, putting in place policies aimed at promoting integration and inclusion.'

Migration destroys Working Class areas. The Ruling Class do not put refugees in areas where they live. The 'positive DISCRIMINATION' policies do not take jobs, housing, money from the Ruling Class, but rather from the Working Class who see themselves pushed out by newcomers who are given preferential treatment at our expense.

The EU is marching in lockstep with the George Soros Open Society Foundations and is implementing the Kalergi Plan for the annihilation of Europe.  They want a cultureless country of wage slaves with no allegiance to any country in the EU.  This will be followed by attacks on other parts of the world, with the end goal for a fully rootless planet in which there are no borders, so there is nothing to stop economic servitude, exploitation and the total domination of the Global Ruling Class.  If they succeed in Europe, nowhere in the world will be safe. We have to stop the rot here and now.

Smash the EU.  For Global Freedom, For the Working Class of Every Nation.

Women in the Struggle - Against Patriarchal Reaction

The following is the work of Comrades across the English Channel in France. It is printed here as a recognition of the reactionary drive to push Women into a position of subjugation. The liberal bourgeois 'feminists' who excuse the brutality of Islam, are no different from the rightwing extremists who openly call for White Sharia, with Women made to 'know their place', in the kitchen and the bedroom, with voices silenced, opinions denied, access to work halted, and of course a complete ban on any political action, even calling for the vote to be snatched away.

The work below can be found in its original French at the site: http://nazbolia.blogspot.co.uk/

Since the advent of Christianity and Judeo-Monotheistic religions, woman has become the slave of the will of men, obliged to be subdued and placed at the bottom of the social ladder, just like an animal. A pretty woman had to be careful not to be seen as a bewitching witch lest she end up going mad at the interrogation before being burned alive by the Holy Inquisition.

For centuries the European woman 's life suffered shameful judgements and all catastrophes were blamed on them (sterility, helplessness, sickness, witches' history, bad harvests, etc.), the French Revolution enabled us to free ourselves from the " Influence of the Church, The years following the events of 1789 and the social changes eventually gave us the right to vote, to speak, to choose our destiny and to have the same rights as men. Women will gain their rights in May 1968 and sexual liberation, the triumph of the Left over the Republican Right and the evolution of progressive ideas, will give us access to politics and put us on an equal footing with men.

Although today European women have come a long way in the struggle for their fundamental rights, we are now seeing a return to religious obscurantism with the rise of Islam and reactionary Christian fanatics who would like a return to the past, to see us attached to a table leg, 2 feet from a man who owns us, prohibited from speaking.

We women in Europe are more numerous than men and we are lucky enough to have access to several areas of our choice, although there is a lack of work and many trades are closed to us, there is nothing to stop us from revolting against the past, but instead we have acculturated bitches who are subjected to their new masters. Our liberation has served us to express our wish to return to the rand bobonne at home and our Catholics rising in advance of this possible return to the slavery of women.

It is up to us to choose our destiny, so as not to end up at a foot of the table with a veil on the face and a chastity belt as a wedding gift.

Judaeo-monotheism must be the main enemy of woman, and pagan values, our liberating sword.

It was not a long time ago, when women were denied the right to speak, to laugh, to vote and to take their destiny into their own hands.

The man of reaction, of pastism and of (moral) values have always sought to bar the way and to hinder the progress and evolution of our continent, keeping women miserable and deliberately stultified by the powerful march of the time .

It was the diverse leagues of the Left which changed our continent and showed us the path of emancipation, we could finally dream of another society that will respect us as well as men, no more, no less than the recognition of our role as a woman in this human world.

In 1944, the right to vote granted to women will change the whole of society and give to women an important input of the political choices that the people will make during the various elections. Women will have to take an interest in politics and the rights they can gain.

In May 68 women became freer and truly respected, to be able to say without the opinion of the man "No" to a political system that seemed to ignore them, to take charge of their lives and to be equal to men. Beauty will no longer be obliged to wash the dishes,to be the servant of the lord, her husband's wife, the maid of his master, the secretary of his boss, they will choose what they want to be.

During the post-war years, many women around the world will engage in various revolutionary groups (RAF, Red Brigade, FARC, IRA, ETA, Japanese Red Army, Action Direct, etc.)
until the Berlin Wall Falls and the Red block collapses and the hopes of a more just society collapses with it.

The triumph of the Capitalist system over the Socialist system triggered the arrival of the Right-Nationalist demands in Eastern Europe and the West.

Globalisation and the invasion of the capitalist model allowed religious and political extremes to redo their apparitions and pointed to the Communist system and the Capitalistic System which they sustained during the Cold War.

Today, women only retain only the fact of being able to say no to their men, to make love with who they want and to be able to wear masculine clothes, they do not vote practically anymore, they are disinterested in politics, in history, and how they won their rights.

The woman begins little by little to become again what she has fought, that is, subjected to the choices of her men, as if they could not think for themselves. Today there are more and more veiled European women, who walk 3 meters behind their men, following like bitches to which one would have hung a leash. There is another example, we have to the Right-Nationalist women who struggle to return to be good little women in the home, pious and naive , As well as, Extreme left we have these pro-LGBT women who demonstrate for the right of Muslims to the Burqa and the Niqab in public places ... This is the world turned upside down. Women like Louise Weiss must be turning in their graves.

We are the daughters of the revolutionary women who, as of yesterday, were still going down the streets with red flags in their hands, struggling for their rights and political and cultural changes. We must remember that we can be a political force And not only consumers of perfumes, make-up, pretty boots and trendy decocts, we refuse to be objects used to serve the capitalist system, we have our free will and we will fight to keep it,

The patriarchal society has for years considered the girl as a doll, a useless object or a food processor, the choices are wide. It is common to see in some families the young girls who serve and cleanse the table and do the dishes, while the boys and the father are discussing at the table. This marks the education of the female child and conditions it to its future role as a submissive woman, who will reproduce the same pattern with her future children. The little woman with a whole manual of the perfect submissive, a library of books like "Martine cooks" conditions the girl to have all the reflexes of the perfect woman.

"Barbies", dolls and false cooks are tools for conditioning the woman during her childhood.

The education of our children must be a priority for us, we can not afford to continue to have generations of stupid and ignorant young girls conditioned to be vulgar consumers and objects of consumption.

At the table, they must also listen to the serious conversations of the parents, and in the same way as boys they must participate in sports activities, read enriching books, films or intelligent and interesting cartoons.

Why SWPE is anti-Abrahamic

SWPE fights for the best possible future for the people of the coming Federal Republic of England and Cymru.  As Socialists we naturally are concerned with the economic aspects of the struggle for the People, but we are not blinkered into seeing economics as the sum total of the struggle.

The People are more than economic units.  It is the Capitalist worldview which has no respect for Culture, Family, Spirituality; this is true whether the particular variant of the Global Capitalist threat calls itself 'Free Market' or Trotskyite.  SWPE stands for the protection of all that is healthy and wholesome, and for the absolute obliteration of all that is harmful and destructive.

Monotheism represents a break from the natural, which can be observed in daily life as a fountain of mental ill-health.  The Abrahamic cults of Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Baha'i and others, emphasise the separateness of the People from 'God', with the central God being all powerful, all present and all knowing, controlling all aspects of life and having created humanity for the purpose of serving it. This is the most fundamental justification for the Class system, with the sole purpose of existence being to worship the deity - and by extension the clergy and the Ruling Class who are divinely appointed as representatives of the omnipotent/omniscient/omnipresent deity which uses subterfuge to make its existence known, and needs intermediaries to speak for it!

SWPE is not atheistic. We accept that nature itself is a marvel which goes beyond human comprehension.  Science can tell us much about the physical world, but it cannot answer questions as to why we are here, or to even what the nature of here is.  There is an argument in scientific circles as to the possibility of the universe being holographic.  A good discussion on this subject can be found at the following address:
https://soundcloud.com/motherboard/are-we-living-in-a-simulation

SWPE asserts that the Abrahamic religions are systems of control, used to enforce the rule of the self selected 'elite' and to keep dissenters in fear.  As the world has become more technologically advanced, the power of Priests, Rabbis and Imams has become less plausible, with the only power left in the hands of the clergy being the threats of damnation and excommunication for those who question the will of the elite.  The Baha'i path of having no strict leadership structure is infinitely preferable to the other three main Abrahamic faiths, but this does not alter the fact that as with the others, it too paints a poisonous and perilous picture of a world in which the people are not a part of the deity, but apart from it.

SWPE understands the human need for understanding of our own existence.  Scientists are motivated by this desire, just as people who express religion are, and often there is overlap between the two. We advocate a re-evaluation of our Heathen roots, with our own form of Shinto thrown into the mix.  It does us no good to consider ourselves as inferior beings who exist only to serve our spiritual masters. In the pre-Christian religions of the Britons and Germanics who form the Celtic-Anglo-Saxon-Norse peoples of England and Cymru, the Gods were fallible like we are.  They were the embodiment of nature in forms which allowed for communication and rudimentary scientific exploration.

We oppose the Abrahamic cults for a number of reasons, namely:

• The Abrahamic cults are universalistic, which makes them useful weapons for the implementation of a global tyranny
• They are anti-nature, placing humans in a position of power over the planet, allowing for an ever growing number of crimes against the environment
• They endorse animal cruelty, with the sick and depraved practices of halal and kosher being prime examples
• Promise of rewards in the afterlife for conformity to the wishes of the religious authorities in the here and now (The Omnipresent Omnipotent deity's voice on Earth!), leads to the devoted swallowing all manner of politically determined nonsense - for example, the Saudi interpretation of Islam has led thousands to suicide for passage into Heaven, and millions of innocent people to be murdered (mostly other Muslims); the Pope's recent shift in favour of identity politics encourages devout Catholics to support the liberal poison which is destroying the entire western world
• They all recruit by fear-mongering and domination.  Judaism, Jehovah's Witness and others use the cruel method of 'shunning' to force compliance, destroying families by breaking the faithful away from their own kin who do not believe.  Christian clergy teach children that they will be condemned to eternal torture if they leave the faith, and that any children they have themselves will be consigned to hell by default unless they are subjected to the same mind control as their parents.  In Islam, apostasy is more immediately punished by the use of murder.
• The Abrahamic cults are supremely arrogant.  The believers consider non believers as stupid, as evil, as sinners who deserve to be punished.  This extends beyond just people who don't believe in the unholy Bible/Talmud/Koran/Kitab i Aqdas/Book of Mormom/NWT/Divine Principle etc to those who believe in the Abrahamic Cult, but to a different version of it. Catholic vs Protestant vs Orthodox, Sunni vs Shia vs Wahabi, Ultra Orthodox vs Karaite vs Reform, Unitarian vs Haifan vs Alif - these and many more subdivisions claim to be the 'truth' and the only 'truth' with others being heretics.  Millions of lives have been lost in wars for religious purity (in reality wars for political and economic domination using religion as a distraction), and as this is being read lives are being lost under the justification of cleansing the world of non believers.
• Misogyny - the belief in original sin, whereby the supreme deity created a man (Adam) and when Adam got bored of bestiality, created him a present of a woman (Eve) for his enjoyment. The deity then placed a couple of forbidden trees in easy reach and created a talking snake (Lucifer) to trick Adam's plaything into eating the fruit of knowledge, so that it could throw Adam and Eve out of Eden to be punished in a brutal world that they were not prepared for, and all their descendants likewise forever.  The eating of the fruit was not 'god's' fault for leaving the fruit in reach, nor 'god's' fault for creating the 'devil' to tempt Eve, nor Adam's fault for demanding a woman to use as a sex object, but only Eve's!  For this reason, women in strict Muslim countries have to wear Burkas, women in strict Christian settings are considered inferior, and in all cases are considered property of men and never as equals.
• Homophobia - Homosexuality is a variation of sexuality which occurs rarely in nature, but it does occur.  Sometimes it is the result of child abuse.  In modern times it is mainly a result of Identity Politics Trotskyite SJWs and liberal imbeciles making it fashionable so as to break down society.  But all this aside, genuine natural homosexuality does exist.  According to Abrahamics, homosexuality is a 'sin' punishable by death.  All the cults have murdered people for this 'vice', some are still murdering people for the crime of not being heterosexual.
• Worship of Authority.  In the UK, the Ruling Class claim the Divine Right to Rule, because they are descended from an old Israeli king called David, who claimed to be descended from the made up figure of Adam, who was a plaything of the deity until he got bored and sent a talking snake to his garden to ruin his life!  There never was an Adam!  The chances of the UK monarchy being related to an irrelevant king from the ancient desert lands of the Middle East, are pretty slim, and in any event do not matter on jot.  Take away the unholy sanction for the Ruling Class to control us, and their power becomes obvious as that of a gang of criminal parasites, and the support of the monarchists becomes obvious as False Class Consciousness / Stockholm Syndrome / lunacy
• SWPE has had to throw out Christian Identity types for peddling the nonsense that the English People (Anglo Saxons, no mention of the Celts!) are the true Israelites, and that the Bible is our history!  According to these types, all the depravity in the Bible, all the misogyny, all the war crimes, all the brutality, the homophobia, infanticide, usury, all the supremacist sickness - all this is fact, and it is our responsibility because, yawn, we are the sons (not daughters, of course) of Adam, and our menfolk have the right to treat women as inferiors because the deity says that is what women are!  The Christian Identity types are notoriously anti-Jewish, not because of any problems in the despotism in the pseudo-religious texts, but because the modern Jews are 'impostors' stealing our culture, heritage and criminal history!  It would be funny but for the fact that these types take all this nonsense very seriously.
• The only worthy bits of the Abrahamic Cults are those tracts stolen from Heathens, so once we isolate the Heathen parts of the religions, we are left with pieces of mythology which we can identify with.  Why go to the bother of de-Abrahamising the unholy cults, when we can go straight to our own mythology and dispel with the cults altogether?
• The vast waste of money in building temples, mosques, churches etc, could have been used to help the People.  Organised Abrahamism is organised theft, stealing from the believers on threat of damnation or bribe of posthumous reward.
• Liberalism and Globalism use the religious idea that all men are descended of Adam, and therefore there can be no borders to people OR MONEY - making the global victory of Capitalism divinely ordered.

As Nietzsche put it:

"The Christian conception of God--God as god of the sick, God as a spider, God as spirit - is one of the most corrupt conceptions of the divine ever attained on Earth. It may even represent the low-water mark in the descending development of divine types. God degenerated into the contradiction of life,instead of being its transfiguration and eternal Yes! God as the declaration of war against life, against nature, against the will to live! God-the formula for every slander against "this world," for every lie about the "beyond"! God-the deification of nothingness, the will to nothingness pronounced holy

We can see through the scientific advances into genetics, that nature is not a thing of chance, but something very clearly crafted and organised.  We know that nature is a delicate balance which has to be respected, and that the arrogant belief that only humans matter so all other creatures can be destroyed at will, is damaging to all of us.

We believe in nature.  We have no time for a heredity Ruling Class. We do not accept the concept of Open Borders. We value our Culture. We respect Science.  We believe in the equality of men and women.  We are not homophobic.  We see ourselves as an indivisible part of what is termed the Divine, and not separate from it.  We support Carl Gustav Jung's assertion that there is a Collective Unconscious for each People and that our unity among ourselves should be celebrated as well as our distinctness from others.  Abrahamists negate all that is wholesome and that is natural. Abrahamists preach a mixture of violence against non believers and cowardice when it comes to self preservation. We embrace Heathenism and Science because they link us to our past, present and future, and give us an anchor in a sea of globalisation where the forces of anti-nature - Capitalism, Trotskyism, Abrahamism - are our greatest enemies.