Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NATO. Show all posts

Wednesday, 31 August 2022

Time to Overthrow the Collective West

The Socialist Motherland Party has resolutely stood in support of the People of the Donbass to live as they wish to. This has put us in direct opposition to the regimes of the UK, EU, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand - which for simplicity can be referred to as the Collective West.

The party standing in opposition to the Ruling Class and puppet politicians of the Collective West with regards to the Nato-Russia proxy war in the Ukraine, DNR, LNR and Crimea, is a continuation of our permanent position of standing for freedom against tyranny.  What makes the current situation different is the censorship of corporations such as Google, Microsoft and Facebook, which makes open discussion of the machinations of the Collective West difficult.

We have been banned on numerous sites, but even so, are still able to reach out to like-minded people. 

Fight back.

What YOU can do to help us in the fight against censorship is to post our articles, spread the ideology of freedom and actively create a sea of profiles which can be activated whenever our presence is threatened.

But far more importantly than just keeping our Internet activity going, we must get back into leafleting, postering and communicating in the real world.

The old order is crumbling.  We stand against the nato proxy war, the manufactured cost of living crisis, the assault on childhood and biological reality, and so do a growing number of people.  This is a time of possibility for us. We can build the Party, spread the ideology, and save the nation.  But only if all of us do are part.

Monday, 4 July 2022

The SMPBI stands with Donbass and against the 'liberal world order'


The SMPBI stands unapologetically with the people of the free sovereign nations of the Donetsk People's Republic (DNR) and the Lugansk People's Republic (LNR) and the heroic fighting forces of the Russian Federation and Allies.

We wholeheartedly oppose the culture-destroying 'liberal world order' and its military formation, NATO.

To understand the current proxy war against the free world by the corrupt collective west,  it is important to understand the background to the conflict:



Timeline of The Ukrainian Coup

The background and implications of the 2014 far-right coup in Kiev, which overthrew the pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, is critical for understanding the current Ukraine-Russia war. This coup was openly supported by US and European imperialism and implemented primarily by far-right shock troops such as the Right Sector and the neo-Nazi Svoboda Party. 

It represented the temporary culmination of long-standing efforts by US imperialism to install a puppet regime on the borders of Russia and brought the world a major step closer to a war between the largest nuclear powers, the US and Russia. Ukraine has since been systematically built up as a launching pad for a NATO war against Russia.

The regime change prompted the outbreak of an ongoing civil war in the east of Ukraine, between Russian-backed separatists and the US-backed Ukrainian army, that has claimed the lives of tens of thousands and displaced millions. 

In the US, the coup was a catalyser for an ever more aggressive campaign against Russia and a significant shift to the right among layers of the upper middle class. US imperialism and NATO have funded the Ukrainian state and far-right forces with billions of dollars.

The German ruling class seized upon the coup as a pretext for aggressively stepping up its campaign to remilitarise and justify the crimes of fascist forces. For the first time since the end of World War II, representatives of a German government were seen on photos with avowed Ukrainian neo-Nazis.

Internationally, pseudo-left forces such as the International Socialist Organization (ISO) in the US, the New Anti-capitalist Party of France (NPA), and the Russian Socialist Movement (RSM) supported the coup, falsely proclaiming it a “revolution.” The ICFI and WSWS alone advanced a principled, socialist opposition to this imperialist operation, warning the working class of its dangerous consequences.

Why is Russian President Putin talking about “denazifying” Ukraine? It is necessary to reconstruct the last ten years of the history of that country to understand how politics, shows and military formations of Kiev have been assembled, step by step, towards a unique project, a project that feeds on Nazi fanaticism. It is a true story, which even the Western media have told in the past but today they brand it as fake news. Oligarchs, showmen and military leaders have brought the Ukrainian people under a government that is openly inspired by National Socialist dogma.

First of all, a step back in history: during the Second World War the Nazis and the Ukrainian Nazi gangs of Stepan Bandera killed 1.6 million Jews. Today Stepan Bandera is celebrated in Ukraine as a national hero. The Nazi-inspired military formations are part of the Ukrainian National Army and their pennants often depict the face of Stepan Bandera. As the Wiesental Centre noted, from the end of the Second World War to the present day, not one of the Ukrainian Nazi war criminals has ever been prosecuted.


2011, Burisma Group

Since 2011, the match between Kiev and Washington has been played on oil, gas and dollars. Burisma Group, a Ukrainian energy company, keeps a low profile. Burisma is an oil and gas company that has been operating on the Ukrainian market since 2002. The head office is located in Limassol, Cyprus. The company holds 20 licenses for hydrocarbon production in all major Ukrainian oil and gas basins. This company was founded by Mykola Zlochevsky who sold Burisma to Igor Kolomoisky’s Privatbank group in 2011. 

In April 2014, Hunter Biden, son of the current US president, joins the Burisma board of directors. Biden Jr, who doesn’t speak a single word of Ukrainian and has no idea about the oil business, is guaranteed a salary of $50,000 a month. As of April 2014, Burisma’s board of directors was made up of at least 6 members: 2 Ukrainians and 3 Americans 1 Polish. Anzelika Pasenidou and Riginos Kharalambus directly represented Kolomoisky. The others were David Apter, Devon Archer and Hunter Biden, the youngest son of then US Vice President Joe Biden. Hunter Biden joined the Burisma board in April 2014. Peter Flaherty, president of the National Legal and Policy Center, (NLPC) a US government oversight group said, “Even though there was no conspiracy or coordination between the two, Hunter Biden was clearly in Kolomoisky’s network ”. Ukraine’s Attorney General Viktor Shokin will open an investigation into Burisma’s accounts and salaries paid to the board of directors. At an event at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York in 2018, Biden seemed to boast about it, saying that during a visit to Kiev – likely in December 2015 – he told Ukrainian officials: “We’re leaving in six hours . If the prosecutor’s not fired, you’re not getting the money. ” “Well, son of a bitch,” Biden continued. “He got fired.” Shokin was indeed fired, but not until March that year.

Another council member becomes Aleksander Kwasniewski, former president of Poland. Under his presidency, Poland first joined NATO in 1999 and then joined the European Union (EU) in 2004. 

Former Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski acknowledged in 2014 that his country left the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA ) of the United States operated a secret prison on its territory after 9/11. The European Court of Human Rights ruled in July 2014 that Poland had allowed the CIA to torture al-Qaeda suspects in a secret detention center in 2002 and 2003, when Kwasniewski was president.


February 2014

Coup d’etat in Kiev. The change of regime is caused by the clashes in Euromaidan square. Nazi-inspired paramilitary formations also participate in the combat. Among these there is also the Azov battalion: after the change of government, it will be integrated into the Ukrainian army.

Regime change in Kiev is favoured by interference in Ukrainian internal affairs in Washington, Warsaw, Berlin, Paris and London. The Russian-European border has once again become a line of friction that highlights rival sides on the verge of entering a collision course. Albania, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, the Baltic States have already joined NATO. Russia is surrounded.

In early March 2014, US President Barack Obama issued an executive order stating that anyone who challenged the legitimacy of the new Ukrainian government was subject to US sanctions, including US citizens.


May 2014

The US approves the “Russian Aggression Prevention Act of 2014” which authorises the President to provide direct military assistance to Ukraine worth $100 million, including anti-tank and anti-aircraft weapons and small arms, based on a needs assessment and the capabilities of the Ukrainian armed forces. It also encourages intelligence sharing with Ukraine. The law provides for the recognition of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova as “Major Non-NATO Allies”, effectively equating them to Alliance members.


The role of George Soros

In May 2014, three months after the Kiev coup, George Soros revealed to CNN reporter Fareed Zakaria that he was responsible for setting up a foundation in Ukraine that contributed to the coup against President Viktor Ianukovitch and the establishment of a US-backed junta:

“I created a foundation in Ukraine before the country became independent from Russia. This foundation has continued to operate and has played an important role in recent events, ”Soros explained.


The role of the Azov Battalion

The unit was formally founded by Andriy Biletsky in May 2014. But Biletsky acts in a context of continuity having been the leader of both the Patriot of Ukraine (founded in 2005) and the SNA (founded in 2008). The SNA is known for carrying out armed attacks, murders, violence and terrorist acts. In 2010, Biletsky claimed that Ukraine’s national purpose was “to lead the white races of the world in a final crusade … against Semitic-led Untermenschen [the lesser races].” The Azov Battalion is the only neo-Nazi-inspired military unit framed in a regular army in the world.

It was privately funded, together with the far-right Pravy Sector party, by Igor Kolomoisky (credited with triple citizenship with Ukrainian, Cypriot and Israeli passport), a billionaire energy magnate and then governor of the Dnipropetrovska region. Igor Kolomoisky was the owner of one of the largest Ukrainian financial institutions – PrivatBank. Kolomoisky financed the killing of every Russian-speaking pro-independence fighter in Donbas with $ 10,000 in bounty (Kolomoisky was governor of a district) and was subsequently pursued by a war crimes arrest warrant issued by the Russian authorities. Kolomoisky was only one of the main financiers of the neo-Nazi Azov battalion and the Ukrainian neo-Nazi party Pravyj Sektor but he would also have financed the neo-Nazi volunteer battalions Aidar, Donbas, Dnepr 1, Dnepr 2 and Carpantian Sich


March 2014

Begins his activity in Ukraine. On March 3 Brigadier General Joel Harding, a thirty-year career behind him in the American secret services, just a few days ago was appointed director of the NATO NSE Strategy Centre for Ukraine. Harding wrote the white paper on which the US military’s cyber defence doctrine is based, pioneered the field of cyber warfare, developed NSA means and methods. Its task is the management of the IIO (Inform and Influence Operations) which consists in developing communication activities capable of making “the public think and act in a way that is favourable to the objectives of the mission”. This is done through the application of perception management techniques that target the emotions, motivations, and reasoning of the public. A schedule that could explain Zelensky’s journey from TV star who plays “The good president” to “effective president”


May 2014

The Azov unit is formed as a military group of volunteers by the ultra-nationalist Patriot of Ukraine gang and the neo-Nazi group of the National Social Assembly (SNA). Both groups engaged in xenophobic and neo-Nazi ideas and physically assaulted migrants, the Roma community, and people who opposed their political views.


November 2014

The Azov Battalion is officially integrated into the National Guard of Ukraine. It is the only openly neo-Nazi military unit framed in a regular army in the world. The main financier of Azov Battalion is Igor Kolomoisky.


November 2014

The United Nations General Assembly approves a motion presented by Russia condemning the attempts to glorify Nazi ideology and the consequent denial of war crimes committed by Nazi Germany, including the Holocaust. Only three votes against United States, Ukraine and Canada. Europe abstains. The resolution also noted and condemned the increase in racist attacks around the world and proposed universally applying the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, adopted at the UN in 1969 but never actually applied by the signatory states. The votes registered 115 votes in favor, 3 against and 55 abstentions. The United States, Canada and Ukraine opposed this resolution, while abstentions came mainly from EU countries (including Italy) and some North African countries.


December 2014

The Ukrainian parliament renounces Ukraine’s non-aligned country status by stating that the previous non-aligned status “has proved ineffective in ensuring Ukraine’s security” and has decided to deepen Ukrainian cooperation with NATO “in order to achieve the criteria required for membership in the alliance “.


2015

Dmytro Yarosh, the leader of the neo-Nazi “right sector” party, was appointed military adviser to Colonel-General Viktor Muzhenko, then Ukrainian chief of staff. Yarosh is the commander of the paramilitary branch of the Right Sector, the Ukrainian Voluntary Army, which has never come under government control.


April 2015

In Yavoriv, Ukraine, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt are present at the start of combined training between American soldiers and Ukrainian National Guard troops. Numerous military exercises between NATO members and Ukraine were planned in 2015. Among these was Operation Fearless Guardian (2,200 participants in total, including 1,000 US troops). The training centre is the Yavoriv Training Centre, near Lvov, under the responsibility of the 7th Army Training Command of the United States, based in Grafenwöhr, Germany. The goal is to transform Ukrainian ground forces from Soviet doctrine to Western doctrine in order to meet NATO standards. The forces for this initiative are usually deployed by the United States Army National Guard. Initially, support was provided by the 173rd Airborne Brigade, as it was based in the European Theatre. Upon completion of the first rotation, the 173rd Airborne was replaced by elements from the California National Guard and 3rd Infantry Division.


April 2015

Personnel and equipment from the 173rd Airborne Brigade arrive in Yavoriv, in the Lvov oblast, on the border with Poland, to launch the “Fearless Guardian” operation. The Fearless Guardian is reported to have trained the fledgling Ukrainian National Guard (INCLUDING THE AZOV BATTLE) under the Congress-approved “Global Contingency Security Fund”. Under the program, the United States was to train three battalions of Ukrainian troops over a six-month period between April and October 2015. Colonel Nick Ducich, commander of the 79th Combat Squad of the California National Guard Infantry Brigade, agreed. is deployed in Ukraine with 54 instructors to train Ukrainian ground forces. Ducich headed the Joint Multinational Training Group-Ukraine, (JMTG-U), in Yavoriv for 14 months. The California National Guard, troops from 6th Squadron, 8th Cavalry Regiment and 2nd Brigade Combat Team of the 3rd Infantry Division of Fort Stewart, Georgia, and multinational partners also participated in the training operations. of Canada, Lithuania, Poland and Great Britain.


US funding

Since the outbreak of fighting in 2014, 2015 and 2016, the United States has committed $266 million in training and equipment to help Ukrainian forces secure the border and operate more effectively. NATO sources reported in 2021 that US-led JMTG-U troops had trained over 20,000 troops for Army Force Ukraine so far.


Zelensky’s climb

In 2015, the 1 + 1 TV channel began broadcasting “Sluha Narodu”, “Servant of the People”, the TV serial with which Zelensky began the rise to power that will make him, as an actor, president. The owner of the television network is Igor Kolomoisky. The San Tommaso srl real estate is based in Cantù in Italy, whose total shares have been held since 2015 by the Cypriot company Aldorante Limited, owned by Zelensky. Sole director of the real estate whose only assets, as revealed by the Ukrainian investigative journalism organization Slidstvo, appear to be a luxurious 15-room villa in Forte dei Marmi. The administrator is the 44-year-old Ukrainian Ivan Bakanov, friend, partner and future coordinator (2019) of Zelensky’s electoral campaign who, after taking office, will appoint him head of the state security services.


2016

In October 2016, Andriy Biletsky (Azov Battalion) founded the far-right National Corps party, whose main base is Azov veterans. Throughout the year at the Yavoriv Combat Training Centre, on a rotating basis, units of the US National Guard continued the training of the Ukrainian military in order to adapt the Kiev troops to NATO compatibility.


2017

The training of the Ukrainian military continues in order to adapt the Kiev troops to NATO compatibility in Ukraine. The 45th Combat Team of the Oklahoma National Guard Infantry Brigade replaced the 79th Combat Team of the California National Guard Infantry Brigade at the Yavoriv Combat Training Centre.


October 2017

After specific training at Fort Bliss, Texas, the unit, consisting mainly of soldiers from the 2nd Squadron, 101st Cavalry based in Niagara Falls, arrived in Ukraine to take over from the 200 departing members of the 45th Guard. Oklahoma Army National Infantry Brigade Combat Team.


November 2017

Since November 2017, soldiers from the Syracuse-based 27th Brigade have been serving in Ukraine to help train and mentor Ukrainian army units. The New York soldiers are part of the Joint Multinational Training Group – Ukraine, known as JMTG-U.


2018

In January 2018, Azov launched its road patrol unit called National Druzhyna, a kind of neo-Nazi military police, to “restore” order in the capital, Kiev. Instead, the unit carried out pogroms against the Roma community and attacked members of the LGB community, anti-fascist militants and human rights activists. Ukraine is the only nation in the world to have a neo-Nazi background in its military and police forces.


The Centuria Group is born

Centuria is an organisation made up of cadets and alumni of the Academy that describes itself as an elitist “military order” and has expressed the goal of reshaping the Ukrainian army along far-right ideological lines. Academy cadets and graduate officers who are part of this organization add the white supremacist symbols Sonnenkreuz and Wolfsangel (or Doppelhaken) to their insignia. The Wolfsangel, in addition to being the symbol of the Azov Battalion, was widely used in Nazi Germany. It was the symbol of various Nazi military organizations and units, including the 2nd SS Panzer Division “Das Reich”, the 4th Panzergrenadier Division of the SS Police, the 34th SS Volunteer Grenadiers Division “Landstorm Nederland”, the Nazi guerrilla movement “Werwolf ”, as well as a number of Wehrmacht units and the Wehrmacht’s“ People’s Charity ”. The display of these symbols has the function of creating a patriotic aristocratic scale among the officers. The slogan of the Centuria organisation is “Virtus et Honestas”.


March 2018, Zelensky from TV to politics

The political party “Servant of the People” is born, a name “copied-pasted” from the name of Zelensky’s show on Kolomoisky’s TV. Throughout the year at the Yavoriv Combat Training Centre, on a rotating basis, units of the US National Guard continued the training of the Ukrainian military in order to adapt the Kiev troops to NATO compatibility.


January 2019

Soldiers from the 278th Armored Cavalry Regiment of the Tennessee Army National Guard at the Yavoriv Combat Training Center were “actively involved” in assisting military training, base renovations, multinational relations and “To raise awareness of the community”.


April 2019

Zelensky is elected president. After years of exile, first in Israel then in Geneva, to escape the investigation into the bankruptcy of Privabank and money laundering, Zelensky’s victory means for Kolomoisky, owner of the channel that broadcasts the TV series that made Zelensky famous and created his party , the possibility of returning home. Zelensky’s first act on his first day as President of Ukraine was to appoint Andriy Bogdan, a lawyer and close friend of Igor Kolomoisky, as his cabinet chief. That is, he placed him at the head of his presidential administration. (In office until 11 February 2020). The second act is the appointment of Ivan Bakanov, a friend and partner in the administration of his offshore companies, as head of the security services. They are his people of absolute trust.


Zelensky and Kolomoisky again

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meets billionaire oligarch and former business partner Ihor Kolomoisky. Prime Minister Oleksiy Honcharuk, Chief of Cabinet Andriy Bohdan (Kolomoisky’s lawyer) and Energy Minister Oleksiy Orzhel at the formal meeting table.


April 2021

A march was organised by the far right in central Kiev to honour the Nazi military unit that harks back to the acclaimed national hero war criminal SS Bandera. The President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky condemned it via his official website, without however taking any concrete measures within the armed forces.


December 2021 Ukraine and NATO

Between 20 and 30 December 2021, NATO’s Combined Resolve XVI international military maneuvers took place in Germany in Hohenfels, Bavaria. Thousands of NATO troops participated but also troops, which should not have been there: those of Ukraine which, of NATO, are not and should not be part of. Purpose of the exercise? “To test the capabilities of the United States and its allied forces, including Ukraine, on their ability to work in a joint and multinational environment against adversaries.”

This was the most advanced training phase following years of activity of NATO’s Joint Multinational Training Group-Ukraine. On the pitch men and vehicles from the United States, Italy, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Slovakia, Serbia, Lithuania, Greece, Bulgaria and Poland. How to be surprised by the Russian reaction? “10 days to recreate the battlefield without any break,” said 1st Sergeant Patrick Flanagan, senior observer at the Joint Multinational Readiness Centre.

“From start to finish you are completely immersed in this operational environment.”

The exercise was handled by the Joint Multinational Readiness Center, the only US Army combat training centre located outside the United States. A centre that provides mobile training capability to the European military and Ukraine and trains leaders, personnel and units up to the level of Brigade Combat Teams, the multinational partners, to dominate in the conduct of Ground Operations anywhere in the world, now and in the future. ”

Sunday, 23 August 2020

Why the west wants a Colour Revolution in Belarus



Following the re-election of President Lukashenko, with the humiliating defeat for the poodle of the globalists, Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, the global media has come out in military unity to attack the legitimate government of Belarus.  The colour revolution which was supposed to bring down Lukashenko and install a pro-EU, pro-NATO puppet regime, which would submit to the will of the World Bank, IMF and global capitalism, failed.  But just like the defeat of the European Union at the Brexit Referendum, the losing globalisers have refused to accept the choice of the working class voters, and instead are on the offensive to reverse the democratic decision made at the ballot box.

Why is Belarus under attack?

There are a number of reasons why Lukashenko is hated by the liberal capitalist globalisers.


  • Coronavirus non-Lockdown

(source belta.by)
MINSK, 21 August (BelTA) – As of 21 August, 68,256 patients previously diagnosed with COVID-19 recovered and were discharged from hospitals in Belarus, BelTA learned from the press service of the Belarusian Healthcare Ministry.

A total of 70,111 people have tested positive for the coronavirus in the country so far.

Belarus has performed 1,455,885 tests.

As many as 632 COVID-19 patients suffering from a number of chronic diseases have died in Belarus.

Belarus has a population of 9.5 million.  The UK has a population of 68 million.  The number of deaths attributed to corona virus in Belarus is roughly 1% of the number of deaths attributed to the virus in the UK, but the population is roughly 1/7th .  Whereas the UK regime has wrecked the UK economy, put the population under house arrest for months, has made the wearing of muzzles mandatory (with nonsensical exceptions which make the situation ludicrous), has helped to destroy traditional shops for the benefit of online oligarchs such as Amazon's Jeff Bezos, and has committed to vaccinating the entire population (with vaccine refusers being denied employment, access to transport etc), Belarus has done none of these things.

Belarus has proven that the corona virus plandemic is a lie, and that the lockdown in the UK and across the EU was pointless.  As the UK continues to follow the propaganda coming out of the World Health Organisation, Belarus continues to defy them, and to do so without mass fatalities.  The globalisers who are using the virus to impose a global reset to prevent the collapse of capitalism, are not going to sit idly by and let a European country which rejects their economic disease to openly show that their virus isn't a deadly plague, and that their 'reset' is a power grab to reverse decades of progress in Workers' Rights and Job Security.

Concerning the non-lockdown, Lukashenko was quoted in Sputnik (27th April) as saying:

“There is no need to do so, although we do not deny that we have people who are sick. We have not closed the country, we have not stopped production. And, what I can tell you for sure is, if we created a panic, we would be in real trouble....“What could happen after isolation?...Yes, someone will get sick, be taken from their homes and treated. Everyone else is sitting in their apartments, their stuffy apartments, exhausted, angry, frustrated, frightened and intimidated. Now they need to be released, it’s necessary to end the isolation regime. But the virus is still out there, people are getting sick. In France up to 400 people [a day] are dying, in Britain it’s 600. They open the gates and let people out, and [weakened] people get attacked by the roaming virus. And you’ll have a second wave of infection,”

Speaking to Mir TV, President Lukashenko exposed the Coronavirus Plandemic as a ploy by the global rulers to retake control from a population which has been steadily waking up to the injustices of capitalism and the anti-democratic and illiberal tendencies of the liberal democracies:

“I once asked the question: is this pandemic, this coronavirus, a man-made phenomenon? I don’t know the answer yet, but I have my suspicions. Are politicians and others using this situation for their own purposes? You and I both know the answer to that question. You already see how it is used today…Doesn’t it seem to you that the powerful forces of the world would like to remake the world, without a ‘war’ (Emmanuel Macron has already called it a war), through this so-called ‘corona-psychosis’, or ‘info-demic’? Many people are asking: ‘what will happen after the pandemic?’”

Lukashenko accurately referred to the corona virus as a 'psychosis', stating that 

“The civilised world is going nuts. It is absolute stupidity to close state borders...“No one is talking about the virus. In the villages, the tractor will heal everyone. The fields heal everyone.”

Lukashenko is called a dictator, yet he was the only leader in mainland Europe to not force his people into curfews, lockdowns, quarantines and the wearing of muzzles.  Belarus has observed Social Distancing, but life has continued as normal, complete with uninterrupted sports and cultural events.  Whilst Boris Johnson, Nicola Sturgeon and Mark Drakeford have behaved as dictators, telling people who they can associate with, in what numbers, where and for how long, have brought in punishments for not being muzzled on public transport, for having parties, for even attending weddings and funerals(!), Lukashenko has overseen a free people living in normality (not the Orwellian new  normal, but actual normality).  The response of Belarus to the plandemic has been sane, with far fewer deaths per capita due to the virus than the west, and without the destruction of the economy and accompanying loss of life due to related factors.  This has caused the ire of the west.

  • Gas
As written by Вера Ключинская:

There is a big game of the strong world to capture control and influence levers. This game turned out to be Belarus, as the last uncontrolled state in which a land gas pipe is running into Europe. This is a local moment.

The riots are provoked in all gas nodes: Bulgaria, Belarus, Khabarovsk (Siberia).

The colour revolution that is being ignited here is a means, a tool that is destroyed by the state, not to revive later.

The whole attribute - fingers, ribbons, flowers, dresses, slogans - are belletrics for suckers of hamsters and goldfish.

Everything is carried out literally according to the methods of Jean Sharpe and Edward Lowfak on the violent overthrow of power. It is naive to believe that what is happening is natural protests. Everything has been calculated in advance, prepared, and leaders are financially stimulated.

Global.

Zbignnev Bzezinsky, quotes from the Houston project.

′′ The new world order, under the hegemony of the United States, is created against Russia, at the expense of Russia and on the debris of Russia. The main method is to dig with each other in inter-capacity wars.

The Ukrainian will think that he is fighting for his freedom, while he is completely dependent on us. And Russians will think they defend their interests, return selected lands.

All this we will do under the pretext of fighting for sovereignty, national ideals. At the same time, we won't allow either side to self-determine based on national values and traditions.

In this war of fools, the Slavic jerk will weaken themselves and strengthen us, conductors of turmoil, allegedly standing aside and not involved in bloody events.

In return of national values, we will give patriotism - patriotism of balalaki and drunk tears.

We won't allow any high tech. This will lead to a complete decline in the industry, which we narrow down to the production of essential items for a limited contingent of slaves to mining our raw materials.

For engineers, qualified workers, teachers, doctors, we will create such conditions that they will flee their own country.

Our main motto is to put the youth in place, and you will defeat any nation. We will deprive their society of their youth by molesting her sex, year, violence, alcohol, smoking, drugs.

Hitler was a stupid boy, he acted openly. We won't have any traces. We will sow among peoples fear for a life that will cost nothing, fear for their workplace, fear for the future. We will be in fear and will be governed by peoples.

We will give every puppet president under the guise of democratic transformation. The power structures will be directly subordinated to the president, which means to us. We will be pulling the ropes for the implementation of our grandiose plan.

Slavicism - Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians are the most disobedient peoples in the world. They can be destroyed but not conquered. That's why this seed is subject to elimination.

Due to global warming, climate zones are being shifted. Slavs on their territories are temporary guests. We will drive them far north. There will be a reservation with a compact population.

Are you fighting for such a future???

(Original text: Идёт большая игра сильных мира сего по захвату рычагов управления и влияния. В эту игру оказалась втянута Беларусь, как последнее неподконтрольное государство, по территории которого проходит сухопутная газовая труба в Европу. Это-локальный момент.
Беспорядки спровоцированы во всех узловых газовых точках: Болгария, Беларусь, Хабаровск.
Цветная революция, которую здесь разжигают, это - средство, инструмент, которым разрушают государство, не для того, чтобы потом возродить.
Вся атрибутика - кулачки, ленточки, цветочки, платьица, лозунги - это беллетристика для лохов хомячков и золотых рыбок.
Всё проводится буквально по методичкам Джина Шарпа и Эдварда Лоуфака по насильственному свержению власти. Наивно полагать, что происходящее - это стихийные протесты. Всё заранее просчитано, подготовлено, а лидеры финансово простимулированы.
Глобально.
Збигнев Бжезинский, цитаты из Хьюстонского проекта.
"Новый мировой порядок, при гегемонии США, создаётся против России, за счёт России и на обломках России. Главный метод - стравливать друг с другом в междоусобных войнах.
Украинец будет думать, что борется за свою свободу, в то время, как полностью попадает в зависимость от нас. И русские будут думать, что отстаивают свои интересы, возвращают отобранные земли.
Всё это мы будем делать под предлогом борьбы за суверенитет, национальные идеалы. В то же время мы не дадим ни одной из сторон самоопределиться на основе национальных ценностей и традиций.
В этой войне дураков славянское быдло будет ослаблять себя и укреплять нас, дирижеров смуты, якобы стоящих в стороне и не участвующих в кровавых событиях.
Взамен национальных ценностей мы дадим патриотизм - патриотизм балалаек и пьяных слёз.
Мы не допустим никаких высоких технологий. Это приведёт к полному упадку промышленности, которую мы сузим до производства предметов первой необходимости для ограниченного контингента рабов, добывающих нам сырьё.
Для инженеров, квалифицированных рабочих, учителей, врачей мы создадим такие условия, что они будут сами бежать из своей страны.
Наш главный девиз - разложите молодёжь, и вы победите любую нацию. Мы лишим их общества их молодёжи, растлив её сексом, роком, насилием, алкоголем, курением, наркотиками.
Гитлер был глупым мальчиком, он действовал открыто. У нас не будет следов. Мы посеем среди народов страх за жизнь, которая не будет стоить ничего, страх за своё рабочее место, страх за будущее. Страхом мы и будем управлять народами.
Мы под видом демократических преобразований дадим каждому марионеточного президента. Силовые структуры будут напрямую подчинены президенту, а значит - нам. Мы будем дёргать за верёвочки для осуществления нашего грандиозного замысла.
Славянство - русские, белорусы, украинцы - самые непокорные народы в мире. Их можно уничтожить, но не покорить. Вот почему это семя подлежит ликвидации.
В связи с глобальным потеплением сместятся климатические зоны. Славяне на своих территориях - временные гости. Мы изгоним их далеко на север. Там будет резервация с компактным населением.
Вы боретесь за такое будущее???)

  • Resisting IDPol 'liberal reforms' and refusing to be turned into a NATO base to attack Russia
The EU is now talking about assisting regime change to get rid of Lukashenko and install someone who fits with their 'values'.

Belarus upholds natural values.  There are no drag queen story times in Belorussian libraries!  The transgender fad which is destroying the youth of the west is almost unheard of in Belarus, with only about 4 people per year recorded as having changed sex.  There is no discrimination based on sexuality, but nor is there nonsense which imposes the transgender agenda on mainstream society.  Marriage is between a man and a woman. Adoption is limited to heterosexual couples.  The EU has tried to pressure Belarus into falling in line with the idpol fascism of the west, but Belarus has held fast to traditional societal norms.

The traitor, Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, is in the pay of the EU and was employed by them to pull Belarus into the EU orbit, breaking its unity with Russia.  She was also supposed to bring Belarus into NATO, putting the mercenaries of global capitalism right onto the Russian border.  Tikhanovskaya would have done to Belarus what Zelensky has done to the Ukraine - turned it into a vassal of the EU, itself a proxy of the USA.

The EU and NATO have their eyes on Belarus.  If they succeed in overturning the re-election of President Lukashenko,  they will break her like they broke the Ukraine. She will lose her sovereignty, culture, control of her borders. She will have her economy ruined as everything she owns is privatised and bought up by foreign oligarchs. Unemployment, poverty and degeneracy are what she will get in return.  Lukashenko isn't perfect, but the alternative is a disaster.

As reported by Tvr.by (21.8.10):

The situation at the agro-industrial complex "Dzerzhinsky" is calm.  Alexander Lukashenko has seen for himself that all the employees - about 4,000 people - are at their workplaces. After all, the customers do not wait! They only took a pause to ask the President their questions.

The conversation turned out to be open. The Head of State reminded that time is not easy: oil and gas disputes, pandemics, elections and many other challenges. This excites people and requires clear answers to what is happening in the country and abroad. 

Many enterprises today have to work under pressure. There's a massive pressure. The position of the President is unambiguous: those who want to work must carry out their duties peacefully. But no one will force anyone! 

The resonance topic being discussed today is the creation of the Opposition Coordination Council. Such a political headquarters is illegal. The activities of alternative bodies are unacceptable. The Prosecutor General's Office initiated a criminal case over public calls for the seizure of power. Today the employees of the agro-industrial complex learned first-hand about the development of the situation. 

On the whole, the President noted that there are no closed themes in communication with the people. And the dialogue is important, while labour is the key to the success of the economy and the well-being of Belarusians.

and in Belta.by (21.8.20):

While talking to the staff of Agrokombinat Dzerzhinsky on 21 August, Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko commented on the developments in and around Belarus and the role of Western states in them, BelTA has learned.

“They were masterminding this mess. Russia was afraid of losing us. The West decided to use us against Russia, as we see it now. They want to establish this Baltic-Black Sea corridor, a sanitary cordon – three Baltic states, we and Ukraine. We remained the only missing part,” the head of state said.

“The USA is planning and running all this, while Europeans are playing along. They are doing what they are told. A special centre was set up near Warsaw. We are fully aware of what they are doing there. Their tanks are on standby. When the situation is tense nearby and tanks and jets are set in motion, it is for a reason,” the Belarusian leader emphasized.

Aleksandr Lukashenko stated that some people in Belarus were paid, some were brainwashed, which resulted in this mess. “Meanwhile military drills are underway abroad. What is that supposed to mean? They are getting ready for invasion, if needed,” the head of state said.

The president noted that he had unraveled the plans of his opponents and those who are behind them at the very beginning. “They admit now that they had no program, nothing. They wanted to reach their goals on the back of emotions. They failed. Sometimes having worked for a quarter of a century is a good thing. I knew what they were up to in advance,” the Belarusian leader said.

The head of state noted that at first they demanded a vote recount, but shortly after that they dropped this idea and started demanding a new election. “They realised that it is impossible to rig 80% of votes. They lose anyway. They urge to call a new election. Do you know what it means to spend another half a year on it? They will wreak havoc and brainwashed even some workers. Why should we dance to someone's tune? We held the election, let us live peacefully. Do you want to talk, do you want a dialogue, as they suggest? I am already holding a dialogue with you. I will maintain a dialogue only with labour collectives,” Aleksandr Lukashenko said.

In addition to fanning up tensions inside the country, now they are starting to put pressure using the force of weapons, the head of state said.

Given these conditions, a large number of military personnel had to be transferred to the western direction, the Grodno area in particular, Aleksandr Lukashenko said. “Tomorrow you will see. I will go there to inspect how things are," the president said.

“They have set a goal to cut off this territory, Grodno, first of all. Polish flags have been flying there recently,” the Belarusian leader said. "The Fatherland is in danger today. We cannot be complacent. Nato is no weak force. This is why I warned the Russian president about the situation in Belarus. We have a full understanding, we have appropriate treaties in the CSTO and the Union State,” Aleksandr Lukashenko noted.

According to the president, these are not only Belarusian problems, as some people in Russia say. “The Belarusian problem is no less important for Russia than for Belarus today. They aim at Russia in the first place. They want to crush us first. It will not work! We will fight back,” said Aleksandr Lukashenko.

According to the head of state, the current situation is influenced by both internal and external factors. “I am not trying to intimidate anyone, but this is what is really happening. We have to take this into consideration and resist resolutely. There is no escaping it,” the president said.

“At the same time, I want to preserve peace and calm for those who want to work. I do not want to introduce a martial law in the country. It is not normal. I want us to live peacefully, just like before. This is my major task – to respond to them over there and to stabilise the situation,” the Belarusian leader emphasised.

Aleksandr Lukashenko stated that some people in Belarus have already sobered up, including Yuri Voskresensky, a representative of the campaign of an alternative candidate. He gave an interview where he laid their plans bare. “He said how they were preparing. They had no program, nothing. Everything was based on emotions, these ribbons… However, they did not think that Lukashenko would respond. We responded,” the head of state said.

“Therefore, we should have our head screwed on right. We should keep in mind that we have only one country. People like Lukashenko come and go. Listen, we all are here only for some time. Therefore, it is not about Lukashenko, but about people who want to bring a peaceful and calm Belarus to its knees because it stands on their way, it is about those who want to create a sanitary cordon and cut us off from Russia, to isolate Russia. Naturally, neither Putin nor I will agree to it. We will give a toughest response to these attempts. We know where these orders are coming from,” the president said.

The Belarusian head of state urged Western leaders to pay attention to the situation in their home countries, first of all. As a case in point Aleksandr Lukashenko cited the yellow vests movement in France, riots and murders in the USA, protests against coronavirus restrictions in Germany. “Why have they got concerned over Belarus? This is a convenient way to draw attention away from their own issues. We see that. Therefore, just ignore these statements. They mean nothing. This is an attempt to aggravate the situation here,” the head of state said.

According to Aleksandr Lukashenko, during the phone conversations of the Russian president with his counterparts from France and Germany, the Western side suggested discussing Belarus at an OSCE session. “Look, I know what the OSCE is about. I told Putin: listen, we will be left alone in the OSCE, while others will pressurise and bully us pushing for their initiative. We will bog down in these talks, and this is what they want. They want us to do nothing else but these talks,” the president said.


.......

The Socialist Motherland Party stands unequivocally with the Workers of Belarus and the democratically-elected government of President Alexander Lukashenko.

#StandWithLukashenko
#FightNATO
#StopTheEU

Tuesday, 19 November 2019

Zionism is not just bad for Jews and Palestinians, it is a sickness which destroys everyone it touches


The media in Britain has yet again proven it has not sense of irony.  On the day that the arch-Zionist regime headed by US President, Trump, has declared that it approves of the theft of Palestinian land by the Zionist state which occupies that area of west Asia, the UK operating media has chosen to attack the leader of the Labour Party for historical opposition to that criminal entity.

Labour leader, Corbyn, is accused of antisemitism(!) for not berating Ismail Patel at a 2008 Palestine Solidarity Rally where he stated,

“we see the impact of Zionism on Palestinians, but it has had a devastating effect on the Jewish community itself: it has made them immoral in justice.”

The thoroughly Zionised media in Britain condemns Corbyn for concurring with a statement which is self-evidently correct.  Zionism is an ideology which has destroyed an entire nation in the west of Asia, and has corrupted every nation where it has been allowed to take root.  The UK is a perfect example of Zionist degeneracy, with what amounts to the religion of global capitalism enshrined in law.  Criticism of the right of the global banking criminals to set up a global headquarters hiding behind the mythology of a people who existed two millenniums ago, is illegal in all but name in the UK.  All politicians have to visit occupied Palestine to pay homage to the cult of Zionism which uses myriad lies and diversions to ensure the unjust economic rape of the globe goes unopposed, nay, to ensure that those who do not worship at the altar of open borders capitalism are attacked until they do submit.

Palestine has been crushed, with the majority of the population forced into exile, the remaining trapped people forced to live in conditions which make it appropriate to refer to the Gaza Strip as the world's largest concentration camp. 

Those who have resisted the imposition of a Rothschild central bank (the laundering operation for the theft of wealth from the people of every nation where one exists) have been sanctioned, had their legitimate governments changed by fake revolutions, been bombed, or a combination of the above.  The list of countries destroyed in order to bring their economies into the global capitalist stranglehold include Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, the Sudan, Libya, Syria, Cuba, Korea, Venezuela, Bolivia amongst many, many others. There are only a small number of free nations left in the world, all of them under attack.

When Corbyn was a back bencher with principles, he stood by Palestine, he opposed the EU, he campaigned against the military machine of the Zionist cult (NATO).  Since he became leader of his party, he has turned 180 degrees on the EU unbelievably supporting membership of that capitalist organisation, he has gone silent on the North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation, so it would come as no surprise if the man who used to have strong and socialist beliefs but has abandoned all of them in his lust for the position of Prime Minister, should see his next volte face come in the form of a trip to the occupation state to pay fealty to the Zionist regime.  Corbyn used to be a man we could respect, but with each capitulation he becomes ever more indistinguishable from the rest of the pampered parasites in parliament.  We would love to have Corbyn prove us wrong by taking a firm stand against Zionism.  He could make a bold statement by outright refusing to join the pilgrimage to the holy site of the Zionist death cult, and by declaring g that a Labour government would recognise the State of Palestine and declare illegal the brutal apartheid regime in Tel Aviv.  We won't hold our breaths.

As Ismail Patel correctly stated in 2008, Zionism has a devastating effect - on everyone.

Monday, 22 July 2019

Total Planetary War and the Task of Questioning

by Peter Wilberg



Imperialism: still ‘the highest stage of capitalism’
Is the EU an empire? No. Is it not rather the weak confederation of nations under US economic and political hegemony of the sort that Hitler long predicted that Europe would become in the event of a German defeat? Yes. Is China a full-fledged empire? No - and will not be for a long time yet. Is the US an empire? Most definitely and in every sense of the word 'empire' - the most powerful empire the world has ever faced - and one with a history of outright colonialism reaching back to its earliest history (Mexico, Hawaii, The Philippines etc.)

It should therefore surely be obvious by now that essentially there is only one game in town - how to respond to and resist the Moloch and monstrosity that is US imperialism and the US-raeli empire. This Empire has a long, brutal, cynical and genocidal history, responsible for 20-30 millions deaths since 1945 - and that forgetting its long history of earlier imperial war crimes, not least at the end of WW2, and including the bombing and rape of not only German but French cities and civilians).

What both the British and all other peoples of the world face today is just the apogee of that imperial history, an apogee which is also an expression of the acute contradictions and conflicts of capitalism and their expression in competing factions of the ruling elite in the U.S. and that of other countries too, including Britain and those of the EU.

In this context, therefore even to talk of terms like 'globalism' or 'globalists' is misleading. That is because the US Imperium is now openly engaged in a form of total war on the entire globe and all its nations and peoples. This includes, of course, the American people who have long been subjected to total censorship of the media, and exploited by Wall Street, The Fed., the medical-, agro- and military- or CIA-run cyber-industrial complexes such as the web, Google etc. - as well as a massive prison-industrial complex, all backed up by total militarised-police preparedness for any form of internal insurrection.

This Total Planetary War of the US Empire is aimed at all competing nations and powers, and brooks not the smallest elements of opposition or hesitation even from its vassal 'Allies' (including both the EU and Britain). And its allies even include even the Visegrad group - all of them unquestioningly pro-US, pro-NATO, and pro-Israel. Indeed Israel declared the Czech Republic its “best friend” in continental Europe and the US has forces on Polish soil.

The Empire's war is a 'globalist' war only in the sense that it is a war aimed at nothing less than total economic, corporate, cultural, ecocidal, military, intelligence, media, information and cyber control over the entire globe - using any and all means.

US Imperium is thus the sole 'spectre' currently haunting the entire world - not communism or socialism, and certainly not 'liberalism' - which only serve to disguise rampant economic neo-liberalism and militarised police violence and murder even of countless American citizens. And what a spectre it is - for this global Imperial war is an 'omnicidal' war and which now threatens all life on the planet.

Its most powerful tool is not military and financial power but media-sustained ignorance - agnosis. Ignorance not just on a political or even a geo-political level but on a profound spiritual and philosophical level - perpetuated by the destruction of all true education.

Historical knowledge and inner knowing or gnosis are the greatest enemy of the Empire. Thus it has successfully, and in a deliberate way, planned long ago, also used its universities to eradicate it. (One need only be aware that there is barely a single economics professor in the US who has even read Marx). It is for this reason that purely economic, political or even military opposition or resistance to The Empire is, by itself, futile.

Instead one question remains in this situation, long ago asked by Heidegger.

"How is it possible to preserve a tradition [the tradition of gnosis] that has been underground for so long?"

The best that Heidegger hoped for was that historical knowledge, deep thinking and gnosis would survive in small 'cells' - comparable to the small groups of monks in the Dark Ages who preserved the remnants of classical Greek philosophy preserved and enriched by Islamic scholars and left over from the burning of ancient texts, the destruction of the library of Alexandria - and the violent persecution and murder of philosophers by the wave of Christian fanaticism unleashed by Constantine's 'conversion'.

Brexit or Remain then, is not the question of the day. That question, at its heart, is, as Gilad Atzmon reminds us: Athens or Jerusalem?

But there is far more even to this question than meets the eye. For the question contains questions within questions that have not yet even begun to be touched upon in human thinking. That is why when Heidegger spoke of ‘preserving’ a ‘tradition’ he did not mean going back to it but seeking a new foundation and beginning for it - what he called ‘The Other Beginning’.


"What is to be done?"

This new and totally ‘Other’ beginning requires above all deeper and new ways of thinking. Deeper thinking, in turn requires deeper levels of questioning dialogue too - which is a quite different matter from polemical debate.

Yet questioning dialogue cannot in any way be deepened and renewed unless the entire focus of political thinking, parties and organisation is shifted from an obsession with competing ideologies and their ready-made 'solutions' or 'policies'?

Mere debates or polemics based on agreement or disagreement about political policies, positions and solutions assumes we already know what the essential questions are for which these policies or positions are intended as a solution.

Thus the old pattern of establishing and sticking to a militant party-political position or policy on particular questions - and then recruiting militant party adherents to it, needs to be unlearned. Instead it is the questions themselves that need to be rethought in a deeper way - one that transcends old frameworks, formulae and ideologies. Only in this way can a genuinely new thinking arise that prepares for ‘The Other Beginning’ - one that responds to the questions now confronting humanity - by questioning them more deeply.

Yet instead of this, what I see along the entire spectrum of Alt-Left groupings is a regression to a form of discourse based on ideological identity politics - as expressed, for example through the need for ideological brand identities such as Strasserism. Juche-ism, Hoxha-ism, Green Syndicalism, Stalinism - and, what amounts to the same thing, 'Marxism-Leninism' (a term coined by Stalin).

I do not see how any of these '-isms' can be reconciled with Marx's famous words: "I am not a Marxist" - or with any form of ideological identity politics oriented towards establishing, advancing and defending a 'position' and pitching one form of political brand identity or ‘-ism’ against some other - like 'Liberalism'. Marx himself did not present utopian recipes for change but instead sought an ever-deeper understanding of the underlying but still inadequately addressed questions hidden under the surface behind social, economic and political beliefs, systems and events.

In a word, I find myself once again affirming another saying of Marx:

"Question everything!"

A trite example: when and why did the term 'Liberalism' become the fashionable new term for Capitalism? Or when and why did the term ‘cultural Marxism’ become a new ‘meme’ within the Alt-Right and Alt-Left - when in reality those figures most often associated with it were among the most hard-hitting critics of degenerate capitalist pop-culture, i.e. of cultural capitalism and its global mono-culture of consumerism and commodification - a phenomenon which has now reached a point at which even personal identity has now become a mere marketplace of gender identities to be invested in, exchanged and flaunted like shares or personal commodities!

As in advertising capitalism offers an illusion of ‘diversity’ that conceals a homogenous uniformity. A 100 brands of identical toothpaste or washing up liquid - no different in principle from varieties of branded gender identities all manufactured from the same virtue-signalling ingredients!


Politics and Philosophy…

Even the geopolitical question posed to humanity by the rampant destructive hegemonism and tyranny of the US Empire is therefore far from being a merely geopolitical question, as even 4PT of Dugin recognises - why else would he write a book on Heidegger, now censored (see Alexander Dugin Martin Heidegger, the Philosophy of Another Beginning), like his other books, by Amazon? Because he recognised that politics and philosophy cannot in any way be separated - that all philosophy is political and all politics is philosophical - rooted in metaphysical assumptions and beliefs.

This is one reason why I wrote an essay critiquing the standard 'medical model' approach to politics. For what this model forecloses is any attempt to question and understand the deeper nature and meaning of the 'illness' symptomised by political and geopolitical events and realities. Idealistic or utopian political 'cures' for this illness, old or new, are, from this perspective merely a form of ideological pill-popping or drug-pushing - and the political militancy that accompanies them is all-too-often a mere symptom of despair in the face of still unthought questions - unthought because they involve, at least in part, also essentially deep metaphysical and philosophical questions - many of which have also remained unthought throughout human history.

This history is of course far more than just a political-economic history or a history of class struggle. It is also a history of theo-political cultures and conflicts. That is why, as I argue in From New Age to New Gnosis, it is no accident that today’s Iraq had its roots in the ancient Sumarian civilisation of Mesopotamia, Syria in the Assyrian civilisation, Europe in Greek civilisation - and Iran in Persian civilisation.

And what is capitalism itself if not a theopolicial cult or religion itself - combining a monotheism of money with the worship of technological know-how serving cyber-control and the corporate arms industry. And what is modern 'science' except an anti-religious cult which has become a new religion and cult in its own right? Today however, it is only in Russia and Iran that we see the struggle against The Empire of Money understood - if only by just a few clerics and prominent thinkers such as Dugin - as a spiritual-philosophical and religious struggle and not a merely 'national' one.

Thus in contrast to the cult of Juche - which seeks to turn the nation itself into an artificial and atheistic state religion, and its Leader into a god - the Islamic Socialism of Iran has deep roots in the gnostic tradition of Shi-ite Islam. It is not a godless 'modernist' socialism of the ‘Marxist-Leninist’ sort - and nor does its supreme leader claim omniscience or divinity of any sort - something that goes entirely against the grain of Shi-ite orthodoxy, which respects knowledge and truths still hidden from view by the so-called 'occultation' of the 12th Imam.

That is why it is also important to understand that it is only in Iran and to some extent also in Russia that we see some recognition that the battle being fought is a spiritual one. No wonder that Iran was the main target to be taken out at the end of the list of less challenging regime-changes hatched by the Imperium well before the Mossad-CIA false flag of 9/11 - and as preparation to seize the wealth of Russia.


On Brexit again...

Long ago, I made my position on Brexit pretty clear. It was a way to turn Britain into an overseas territory of the US-raeli Empire, one which supports the economic war being waged against not just North Korea and China but primarily against Iran and Russia. Is this not now perfectly clear for all to see?

Is the EU the enemy? Or is it the ZIO-US-EU-NATO alliance against Russia. Does the EU have independent nukes that can strike Britain. No. Does Israel have submarines that can nuke both Britain and Europe. Yes. Something to think upon maybe? Is the EU or Russia engaged in a military encirclement of Britain. No. Is it engaged in the military encirclement of Russia? Yes. Is the EU imposing economic sanctions on Britain? No. On Russia? Yes.

And what an irony it is to have just seen Britain itself seizing an Iranian oil tanker on the grounds that is was ignoring oil sanctions on Syria that apply only to EU countries!

Is it not time therefore, to sign up for a spiritual-philosophical jihad against the US-raeli Empire, instead of protecting British Imperialism - along with its centuries old strategy of doing everything to prevent the emergence of a new Eurasian civilisation, one unburdened by the waves of migration fostered by The Empire's wars of aggression, military-backed coups, and corporate neo-colonialism - and that in every continent of the world?

My biggest question to the SMPBI therefore: what good is talk of socialist proletarian nationalism if this nationalism is not fundamentally and primarily anti-imperialist - anti-USraeli, anti-Zionist, anti-Ziocon, anti-ZOG? This question is also what makes Iran so important. For the Trotskyists would have us believe that Iran is a reactionary capitalist theocracy. In fact its economy is now more socialist than that of Cuba! See: https://thesaker.is/what-privatisation-in-iran-or-definitely-not-that-privatisation/

And so it is that Iran now finds itself in the same position that Cuba has always been in and that Germany found itself in already in 1939 - under economic blockade, and explicit threat of 'obliteration' (total obliteration through of Germany having (see Germany Must Perish, 1941!) having heen the main goal of Churchill and his Zionist backers). No wonder then, that the Iron Curtain of brazen Amazon and now also YouTube censorship has come down not only on so-called 'Holocaust deniers' but also on any challenge to the mainstream US., British and Zionist account of the 20th century and its two world wars.

Summary: one does not need to be a Muslim or Islamic socialist to sign up for an educational, cultural and philosophical as well as political jihad against the Empire - instead of ranting against and scapegoating its meek and subservient EU vassal states. One only needs to expose, as Goebbels taught, the 'Big Lies' of the Zionist press, media and cyber-giants that prevail as much (if not more) in Britain that in the countries of the EU. The big problem with the Europe - as with Britain - it that it still tries to ensconce itself in a blind and delusory bubble world - one in which the total global war being conducted by The Empire is not even recognised by a media-indoctrinated populace, let alone fiercely resisted or fought. And yet all other issues - ecological, environmental, social and economic - are secondary to this War - being mere effects of it. The only exception to this the understanding that even to conduct any fight against Imperialism and for sovereign nationhood is ultimately impossible without sovereign national and public money creation - something both Iran and Russia still need to learn.


So what can be done?

The basis of all ‘evil’, even that of the Imperium itself - is ignorance - agnosis. This takes two forms: firstly unquestioned belief systems such as neo-liberalism, Christian Zionism, US exceptionalism and ‘Manifest Destiny’ etc., i.e. those of the warmongers in the ‘Deep State’ - and, secondly, the economic, cultural, philosophical and historical ignorance that both lies behind and is necessary to sustain these belief systems.

‘Trumpism’ is nothing but the fully revealed face of this ignorance in both its sides. For the ignorant rulers of the Imperium, ignorance is therefore also their biggest ally - and sustaining their own and other’s ignorance is their main weapon of defence. Hence the censorship, distortion and erasure of historical knowledge. Indeed the clearly stated plan of the Imperium is now is to use the media and cyber-censorship to eradicate all sources of historical knowledge that could expose the lies - and lies by omission - being constantly being churned out by the media. Yet the sad fact is that even many of these lies are an expression of ignorance on the part of ruling elites and the media themselves.

Yet given current plans for total global cyber-censorship via Google and other cyber-giants, perhaps we need to consider preparing to return to old-fashioned low-tech method of paper leafleting on the streets. Not in order to rant against Trotskyism to a youth population most of whom (even here in the Czech Republic) have never even heard of a man called Stalin!) but in order to lay out in simple fashion the historical facts surrounding each of any number of issues given - or not given - publicity in the Imperial Media - whether this be the 'Holocaust', Israel and Palestine, Russia, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, the arms industry and the Sauds, the deaths caused by both austerity politics and The Empire's economic sanctions and blockades, the concentration camps which constitute the corporate prison industry in the US, not to mention the whole history of Anglo-US-Israeli war crimes - or the really existing magic 'money-tree' of central banks such as the Fed (which feeds an annual 36 billion dollars of interest payments to Wall St at taxpayers expense - and at the expense too of even the most minimal investment in the real economy).

For when all is said and done, what chance has any European or British political party of leading a process of social transformation among a populace that is steadily but surely being reduced in a highly planned way and using the most advanced technologies to a state of almost total historical ignorance of the sort we already see in the U.S. itself - where literally millions of Christian Zionists, ignorant even of the history of Christianity itself, regard Trump as 'the chosen one' - and so are gagging for global Armageddon through the likes of Pompeo (himself a Christian Zionist). Never has it been more important to see our struggle as a war for knowledge and truth, even if only based on the simplest leaflet-style listing of historical facts. For what use is a 'Workers' Party' without even the most elementary workers' education?

For what use a vehemently anti-Trotskyist platform to people who have never heard the name Trotsky or Stalin in their lives? What appeal has a pro-Palestinian or anti-Zionist stance for the masses who know nothing about the Nakba - or even the nature and history of Zionism itself? The list could go on and on... So maybe it is time to forget the political and ideological dressing on the cake - and begin by just informing people of historical knowledge and facts they don't and increasingly won't have a chance to learn from anywhere else (including the internet). In a word, less preaching to the converted and those ‘in the know’ and instead just talking to people - by which I simply mean all those (and there are many who I am sure that each of us know personally) who don't even know what they don't know. Yet even this is not enough…


Making ‘another beginning’ …
For any individual or group of individuals wishing to find ways of responding to the challenges facing the world today, the greatest danger I see lies in the need, borne of insecurity, to cobble together or latch onto an admixture of ideological and political ‘answers’ or ‘policies’. Instead the first step should be to humbly admit to there being many questions that remain to be asked and formulated. To admit to the existence of important but still unasked questions is not a mark of ignorance but of courage.

Therefore I suggest to any individuals or groups of individuals such as the SMPBI with an earnest and passionate desire to change the world that they should begin by each seriously asking, and seeking to formulate as best they can, what they regard as the most important questions that they still have. Only by pooling and then discussing a set of questions can they then truly work together, through dialogue - in making ‘Another Beginning’. Finding the right questions requires thought and effort of another sort entirely to coming to or debating a set of ideological positions or political policies. Yet if a political group were to begin its life and work again in this other way - by first coming to a decision on what they see as the most important but still unasked or unanswered questions are (whether to do with socialism or anything else) then stating those questions publicly and inviting authentic dialogue around them would indeed be something revolutionary in itself. The ‘other thinking’ that Heidegger spoke of is all about questioning. It transcends the polemics of mere agreement or disagreement on what policy or political stances to adopt or decide upon. Instead it is all exploring the most decisive questions.

Monday, 11 March 2019

Guest article: Whither England?, by Piers Mellor

WHITHER ENGLAND? Brexit and its Implications

53570920_1240177026141565_632161624819499008_n

WHITHER ENGLAND?

Brexit and its Implications

“But in the days that are now passing over us, even fools are arrested to ask the meaning of them; few of the generations of men have seen more impressive days. Days of endless calamity, disruption, dislocation, confusion worse confounded: if they are not days of endless hope too, then they are days of utter despair. For it is not a small hope that will suffice, the ruin being clearly, either in action or in prospect, universal. There must be a new world, if there is to be any world at all!” – THOMAS CARLYLE, 1850
On March 29, 2019, the United Kingdom is scheduled to withdraw from the European Union.
The “Leave” position prevailed on June 23, 2016 by a comfortable margin of 4% (51.9% to 48.1%, at a turnout of 72%). The “Leave” vote was primarily represented by white working-class communities facing political and economic marginalisation from neoliberal policies of social mobility. On the other hand, the liberal professional classes and immigrant communities overwhelmingly voted “Remain”.
The centrist British political establishment, state-controlled media, prominent mainstream academics, and most of the financial sector campaigned thoroughly in favour of the “Remain” position. The “Remain” faction, with backing from such heavyweight international actors as the IMF, George Soros, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and various multinationals, was confident of victory, but underestimated the level to which popular sentiment had been mobilised against the EU by a combination of stagnating employment prospects and the mass immigration from the Middle East to EU countries in 2015 – initially precipitated by NATO destruction of sovereign states and support for jihadist terror gangs, and used as a convenient absolvere by subsequent waves of economically motivated migrants.
Meanwhile, the most visible advocates of the “Leave” position were in many ways far removed from their core demographic, being chiefly from a faction of the ruling class who can broadly be described as the protectionist wing of capitalism; elements of big business who saw their interests better served outside the EU from the position of making trade deals, and corporate media organs closely aligned to them. As might be expected from this, the arguments for the “Leave” position were framed in reactionary terms as a project of bourgeois petty-nationalism and nostalgia for the British Empire. The socialist arguments against EU membership on the grounds of the bloc’s anti-worker character and constitutional commitment to capitalism rarely if ever appeared in mainstream discourse.
Fast forward three years and we have the spectacle of a parliamentary system that has delegitimised itself beyond the point of no return, exposed to all who are not wilfully blind as an instrument aimed at thwarting popular will and protecting the right of speculators to play games with people’s lives and destinies. At the time of writing it appears the machinations of Westminster will ensure that if Brexit takes place at all, it will do so in terms that in no way curtail the free movement of capital and labour. Indeed, such is the Establishment’s addiction to free movement, it has shown itself willing to exchange membership of the EU for literal vassalage – being tied indefinitely into a customs union from which no future Westminster administration will have the agency to withdraw of its own volition – to ensure the financial “freedoms” of Maastricht and Lisbon.
Reactionaries in both camps have sought to commandeer the popular discourse and channel dissent in directions that can be accommodated and used to their benefit. Bourgeois “Left” elements who have been incorporated into globalisation are promoting a “Euro-liberal” narrative; essentially following the lead of the Fourth International after the Second World War, and the 1960s New Left, they have abandoned the idea that international capitalism can be overthrown and believe their best bet is to support a system they see as anaesthetising its worst effects.
Simultaneously, reactionary “Right” elements such as UKIP demonstrate a position based on historical ignorance, decrying the EU as a “new USSR” but lauding the World Trade Organisation which is simply another instrument of the Atlanticist foreign policy community, being the successor to the 1947 General Agreement for Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Moreover, the British state itself has been a plutocratic and globalist entity since its inception in 1707 and has always spread liberal economics throughout its sphere of influence. Successive Westminster administrations have had the most influence in convincing the rest of the EU to adopt neoliberal economic policies, as well as calling for Turkey to become a member of the bloc.
Brexit, in whatever form it takes, will not in itself change current demographic trends – at current levels of immigration the Muslim population of Britain is predicted to treble by 2050, and to increase by half again even if immigration is reduced to zero – but it will eliminate one of the main obstacles to radical redistribution of wealth and power faced by any future National Revolutionary leadership, namely the EU competition laws that forbid nationalisation of banking, energy and public services. In addition, the meta-narrative that presently constitutes the political basis of NATO’s eastward expansion and strategy of encirclement against Russia will be severely compromised by Britain’s departure from the EU, possibly to the point of being internationally untenable.
Whatever happens after March 29, it seems certain that ruling class factions will continue to discredit themselves with internecine fighting, and their attempts to assuage mass popular discontent will instead only serve to exacerbate it. It also appears likely Brexit will be followed by a second referendum on Scottish independence, which if successful is likely to leave Wales and Ulster in a precarious constitutional position. Suddenly, the idea of English independence from Westminster (recent polls place public support for a devolved English assembly at 41%, despite the idea not being supported by any major political party and receiving no promotion from the mass media), with the potential for direct democracy that gives people the chance to take charge of their own lives, rather than being subject to the whims of an oligarchic parliamentary system, no longer seems a mere pipe dream!
It is our ultimate hope that a sovereign England, free from the triple hydra of Atlanticist control, Zionist subversion, and Salafist colonisation, will one day take its rightful place in a “Europe of a Hundred Flags!”
Freedom! Justice! Revolution!
Piers Mellor, New Resistance England
March 2019

First comment from the editor:
Thank you Piers for sending us this article, and for your permission for us to publish it.   
As advocates for a unified Socialist Motherland for the entire British Isles, we would have to take issue with the idea of splitting England away from the rest of the country.  England is a mixture of peoples, just as are Scotland, Wales, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the other nations and regions - and we have a unity of ancestry which makes our similarities far more important than the minor differences, which really go no deeper than dialect and local customs.
That said, it is an absolute fact that the enemies of sovereignty have gone too far in their globalist machinations, and that when (as is to be expected) Brexit is denied, there will no longer be any excuse for obeying the ruling class, the liberal collaborators and the pro-EU, pro-NATO rats who infest the media, civil service etc.
The old left-right divisions are falling apart. The SMPBI stands shoulder to shoulder with NR as defiant opponents of the EU and europhile fifth columnists, as we do with the CPGB-ML, the CPB-ML, SLP and others who will not submit to the fake democracy in Westminster, Holyrood etc. The battle lines now are those of us who cherish freedom as a deep social and organic reality, versus those who cherish freedom of movement and goods as a shallow capitalist individualist farce.
The great betrayal is showing no sign of slowing. The great resistance has to increase in ferocity and strength to ensure that the likes of Soros, Goldman Sachs etc are defeated, and the victory of the People is ensured.



Please comment at:
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/smpbiforum/guest-article-whither-england-by-piers-mellor-t115.html

UNRWA are terrorists

The SMPBI has been campaigning since the 7th October Massacre in Israel for the paliarstinan terrorists to be exposed for the murdering filt...