Showing posts with label Strasserism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Strasserism. Show all posts

Monday, 22 July 2019

Total Planetary War and the Task of Questioning

by Peter Wilberg



Imperialism: still ‘the highest stage of capitalism’
Is the EU an empire? No. Is it not rather the weak confederation of nations under US economic and political hegemony of the sort that Hitler long predicted that Europe would become in the event of a German defeat? Yes. Is China a full-fledged empire? No - and will not be for a long time yet. Is the US an empire? Most definitely and in every sense of the word 'empire' - the most powerful empire the world has ever faced - and one with a history of outright colonialism reaching back to its earliest history (Mexico, Hawaii, The Philippines etc.)

It should therefore surely be obvious by now that essentially there is only one game in town - how to respond to and resist the Moloch and monstrosity that is US imperialism and the US-raeli empire. This Empire has a long, brutal, cynical and genocidal history, responsible for 20-30 millions deaths since 1945 - and that forgetting its long history of earlier imperial war crimes, not least at the end of WW2, and including the bombing and rape of not only German but French cities and civilians).

What both the British and all other peoples of the world face today is just the apogee of that imperial history, an apogee which is also an expression of the acute contradictions and conflicts of capitalism and their expression in competing factions of the ruling elite in the U.S. and that of other countries too, including Britain and those of the EU.

In this context, therefore even to talk of terms like 'globalism' or 'globalists' is misleading. That is because the US Imperium is now openly engaged in a form of total war on the entire globe and all its nations and peoples. This includes, of course, the American people who have long been subjected to total censorship of the media, and exploited by Wall Street, The Fed., the medical-, agro- and military- or CIA-run cyber-industrial complexes such as the web, Google etc. - as well as a massive prison-industrial complex, all backed up by total militarised-police preparedness for any form of internal insurrection.

This Total Planetary War of the US Empire is aimed at all competing nations and powers, and brooks not the smallest elements of opposition or hesitation even from its vassal 'Allies' (including both the EU and Britain). And its allies even include even the Visegrad group - all of them unquestioningly pro-US, pro-NATO, and pro-Israel. Indeed Israel declared the Czech Republic its “best friend” in continental Europe and the US has forces on Polish soil.

The Empire's war is a 'globalist' war only in the sense that it is a war aimed at nothing less than total economic, corporate, cultural, ecocidal, military, intelligence, media, information and cyber control over the entire globe - using any and all means.

US Imperium is thus the sole 'spectre' currently haunting the entire world - not communism or socialism, and certainly not 'liberalism' - which only serve to disguise rampant economic neo-liberalism and militarised police violence and murder even of countless American citizens. And what a spectre it is - for this global Imperial war is an 'omnicidal' war and which now threatens all life on the planet.

Its most powerful tool is not military and financial power but media-sustained ignorance - agnosis. Ignorance not just on a political or even a geo-political level but on a profound spiritual and philosophical level - perpetuated by the destruction of all true education.

Historical knowledge and inner knowing or gnosis are the greatest enemy of the Empire. Thus it has successfully, and in a deliberate way, planned long ago, also used its universities to eradicate it. (One need only be aware that there is barely a single economics professor in the US who has even read Marx). It is for this reason that purely economic, political or even military opposition or resistance to The Empire is, by itself, futile.

Instead one question remains in this situation, long ago asked by Heidegger.

"How is it possible to preserve a tradition [the tradition of gnosis] that has been underground for so long?"

The best that Heidegger hoped for was that historical knowledge, deep thinking and gnosis would survive in small 'cells' - comparable to the small groups of monks in the Dark Ages who preserved the remnants of classical Greek philosophy preserved and enriched by Islamic scholars and left over from the burning of ancient texts, the destruction of the library of Alexandria - and the violent persecution and murder of philosophers by the wave of Christian fanaticism unleashed by Constantine's 'conversion'.

Brexit or Remain then, is not the question of the day. That question, at its heart, is, as Gilad Atzmon reminds us: Athens or Jerusalem?

But there is far more even to this question than meets the eye. For the question contains questions within questions that have not yet even begun to be touched upon in human thinking. That is why when Heidegger spoke of ‘preserving’ a ‘tradition’ he did not mean going back to it but seeking a new foundation and beginning for it - what he called ‘The Other Beginning’.


"What is to be done?"

This new and totally ‘Other’ beginning requires above all deeper and new ways of thinking. Deeper thinking, in turn requires deeper levels of questioning dialogue too - which is a quite different matter from polemical debate.

Yet questioning dialogue cannot in any way be deepened and renewed unless the entire focus of political thinking, parties and organisation is shifted from an obsession with competing ideologies and their ready-made 'solutions' or 'policies'?

Mere debates or polemics based on agreement or disagreement about political policies, positions and solutions assumes we already know what the essential questions are for which these policies or positions are intended as a solution.

Thus the old pattern of establishing and sticking to a militant party-political position or policy on particular questions - and then recruiting militant party adherents to it, needs to be unlearned. Instead it is the questions themselves that need to be rethought in a deeper way - one that transcends old frameworks, formulae and ideologies. Only in this way can a genuinely new thinking arise that prepares for ‘The Other Beginning’ - one that responds to the questions now confronting humanity - by questioning them more deeply.

Yet instead of this, what I see along the entire spectrum of Alt-Left groupings is a regression to a form of discourse based on ideological identity politics - as expressed, for example through the need for ideological brand identities such as Strasserism. Juche-ism, Hoxha-ism, Green Syndicalism, Stalinism - and, what amounts to the same thing, 'Marxism-Leninism' (a term coined by Stalin).

I do not see how any of these '-isms' can be reconciled with Marx's famous words: "I am not a Marxist" - or with any form of ideological identity politics oriented towards establishing, advancing and defending a 'position' and pitching one form of political brand identity or ‘-ism’ against some other - like 'Liberalism'. Marx himself did not present utopian recipes for change but instead sought an ever-deeper understanding of the underlying but still inadequately addressed questions hidden under the surface behind social, economic and political beliefs, systems and events.

In a word, I find myself once again affirming another saying of Marx:

"Question everything!"

A trite example: when and why did the term 'Liberalism' become the fashionable new term for Capitalism? Or when and why did the term ‘cultural Marxism’ become a new ‘meme’ within the Alt-Right and Alt-Left - when in reality those figures most often associated with it were among the most hard-hitting critics of degenerate capitalist pop-culture, i.e. of cultural capitalism and its global mono-culture of consumerism and commodification - a phenomenon which has now reached a point at which even personal identity has now become a mere marketplace of gender identities to be invested in, exchanged and flaunted like shares or personal commodities!

As in advertising capitalism offers an illusion of ‘diversity’ that conceals a homogenous uniformity. A 100 brands of identical toothpaste or washing up liquid - no different in principle from varieties of branded gender identities all manufactured from the same virtue-signalling ingredients!


Politics and Philosophy…

Even the geopolitical question posed to humanity by the rampant destructive hegemonism and tyranny of the US Empire is therefore far from being a merely geopolitical question, as even 4PT of Dugin recognises - why else would he write a book on Heidegger, now censored (see Alexander Dugin Martin Heidegger, the Philosophy of Another Beginning), like his other books, by Amazon? Because he recognised that politics and philosophy cannot in any way be separated - that all philosophy is political and all politics is philosophical - rooted in metaphysical assumptions and beliefs.

This is one reason why I wrote an essay critiquing the standard 'medical model' approach to politics. For what this model forecloses is any attempt to question and understand the deeper nature and meaning of the 'illness' symptomised by political and geopolitical events and realities. Idealistic or utopian political 'cures' for this illness, old or new, are, from this perspective merely a form of ideological pill-popping or drug-pushing - and the political militancy that accompanies them is all-too-often a mere symptom of despair in the face of still unthought questions - unthought because they involve, at least in part, also essentially deep metaphysical and philosophical questions - many of which have also remained unthought throughout human history.

This history is of course far more than just a political-economic history or a history of class struggle. It is also a history of theo-political cultures and conflicts. That is why, as I argue in From New Age to New Gnosis, it is no accident that today’s Iraq had its roots in the ancient Sumarian civilisation of Mesopotamia, Syria in the Assyrian civilisation, Europe in Greek civilisation - and Iran in Persian civilisation.

And what is capitalism itself if not a theopolicial cult or religion itself - combining a monotheism of money with the worship of technological know-how serving cyber-control and the corporate arms industry. And what is modern 'science' except an anti-religious cult which has become a new religion and cult in its own right? Today however, it is only in Russia and Iran that we see the struggle against The Empire of Money understood - if only by just a few clerics and prominent thinkers such as Dugin - as a spiritual-philosophical and religious struggle and not a merely 'national' one.

Thus in contrast to the cult of Juche - which seeks to turn the nation itself into an artificial and atheistic state religion, and its Leader into a god - the Islamic Socialism of Iran has deep roots in the gnostic tradition of Shi-ite Islam. It is not a godless 'modernist' socialism of the ‘Marxist-Leninist’ sort - and nor does its supreme leader claim omniscience or divinity of any sort - something that goes entirely against the grain of Shi-ite orthodoxy, which respects knowledge and truths still hidden from view by the so-called 'occultation' of the 12th Imam.

That is why it is also important to understand that it is only in Iran and to some extent also in Russia that we see some recognition that the battle being fought is a spiritual one. No wonder that Iran was the main target to be taken out at the end of the list of less challenging regime-changes hatched by the Imperium well before the Mossad-CIA false flag of 9/11 - and as preparation to seize the wealth of Russia.


On Brexit again...

Long ago, I made my position on Brexit pretty clear. It was a way to turn Britain into an overseas territory of the US-raeli Empire, one which supports the economic war being waged against not just North Korea and China but primarily against Iran and Russia. Is this not now perfectly clear for all to see?

Is the EU the enemy? Or is it the ZIO-US-EU-NATO alliance against Russia. Does the EU have independent nukes that can strike Britain. No. Does Israel have submarines that can nuke both Britain and Europe. Yes. Something to think upon maybe? Is the EU or Russia engaged in a military encirclement of Britain. No. Is it engaged in the military encirclement of Russia? Yes. Is the EU imposing economic sanctions on Britain? No. On Russia? Yes.

And what an irony it is to have just seen Britain itself seizing an Iranian oil tanker on the grounds that is was ignoring oil sanctions on Syria that apply only to EU countries!

Is it not time therefore, to sign up for a spiritual-philosophical jihad against the US-raeli Empire, instead of protecting British Imperialism - along with its centuries old strategy of doing everything to prevent the emergence of a new Eurasian civilisation, one unburdened by the waves of migration fostered by The Empire's wars of aggression, military-backed coups, and corporate neo-colonialism - and that in every continent of the world?

My biggest question to the SMPBI therefore: what good is talk of socialist proletarian nationalism if this nationalism is not fundamentally and primarily anti-imperialist - anti-USraeli, anti-Zionist, anti-Ziocon, anti-ZOG? This question is also what makes Iran so important. For the Trotskyists would have us believe that Iran is a reactionary capitalist theocracy. In fact its economy is now more socialist than that of Cuba! See: https://thesaker.is/what-privatisation-in-iran-or-definitely-not-that-privatisation/

And so it is that Iran now finds itself in the same position that Cuba has always been in and that Germany found itself in already in 1939 - under economic blockade, and explicit threat of 'obliteration' (total obliteration through of Germany having (see Germany Must Perish, 1941!) having heen the main goal of Churchill and his Zionist backers). No wonder then, that the Iron Curtain of brazen Amazon and now also YouTube censorship has come down not only on so-called 'Holocaust deniers' but also on any challenge to the mainstream US., British and Zionist account of the 20th century and its two world wars.

Summary: one does not need to be a Muslim or Islamic socialist to sign up for an educational, cultural and philosophical as well as political jihad against the Empire - instead of ranting against and scapegoating its meek and subservient EU vassal states. One only needs to expose, as Goebbels taught, the 'Big Lies' of the Zionist press, media and cyber-giants that prevail as much (if not more) in Britain that in the countries of the EU. The big problem with the Europe - as with Britain - it that it still tries to ensconce itself in a blind and delusory bubble world - one in which the total global war being conducted by The Empire is not even recognised by a media-indoctrinated populace, let alone fiercely resisted or fought. And yet all other issues - ecological, environmental, social and economic - are secondary to this War - being mere effects of it. The only exception to this the understanding that even to conduct any fight against Imperialism and for sovereign nationhood is ultimately impossible without sovereign national and public money creation - something both Iran and Russia still need to learn.


So what can be done?

The basis of all ‘evil’, even that of the Imperium itself - is ignorance - agnosis. This takes two forms: firstly unquestioned belief systems such as neo-liberalism, Christian Zionism, US exceptionalism and ‘Manifest Destiny’ etc., i.e. those of the warmongers in the ‘Deep State’ - and, secondly, the economic, cultural, philosophical and historical ignorance that both lies behind and is necessary to sustain these belief systems.

‘Trumpism’ is nothing but the fully revealed face of this ignorance in both its sides. For the ignorant rulers of the Imperium, ignorance is therefore also their biggest ally - and sustaining their own and other’s ignorance is their main weapon of defence. Hence the censorship, distortion and erasure of historical knowledge. Indeed the clearly stated plan of the Imperium is now is to use the media and cyber-censorship to eradicate all sources of historical knowledge that could expose the lies - and lies by omission - being constantly being churned out by the media. Yet the sad fact is that even many of these lies are an expression of ignorance on the part of ruling elites and the media themselves.

Yet given current plans for total global cyber-censorship via Google and other cyber-giants, perhaps we need to consider preparing to return to old-fashioned low-tech method of paper leafleting on the streets. Not in order to rant against Trotskyism to a youth population most of whom (even here in the Czech Republic) have never even heard of a man called Stalin!) but in order to lay out in simple fashion the historical facts surrounding each of any number of issues given - or not given - publicity in the Imperial Media - whether this be the 'Holocaust', Israel and Palestine, Russia, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, the arms industry and the Sauds, the deaths caused by both austerity politics and The Empire's economic sanctions and blockades, the concentration camps which constitute the corporate prison industry in the US, not to mention the whole history of Anglo-US-Israeli war crimes - or the really existing magic 'money-tree' of central banks such as the Fed (which feeds an annual 36 billion dollars of interest payments to Wall St at taxpayers expense - and at the expense too of even the most minimal investment in the real economy).

For when all is said and done, what chance has any European or British political party of leading a process of social transformation among a populace that is steadily but surely being reduced in a highly planned way and using the most advanced technologies to a state of almost total historical ignorance of the sort we already see in the U.S. itself - where literally millions of Christian Zionists, ignorant even of the history of Christianity itself, regard Trump as 'the chosen one' - and so are gagging for global Armageddon through the likes of Pompeo (himself a Christian Zionist). Never has it been more important to see our struggle as a war for knowledge and truth, even if only based on the simplest leaflet-style listing of historical facts. For what use is a 'Workers' Party' without even the most elementary workers' education?

For what use a vehemently anti-Trotskyist platform to people who have never heard the name Trotsky or Stalin in their lives? What appeal has a pro-Palestinian or anti-Zionist stance for the masses who know nothing about the Nakba - or even the nature and history of Zionism itself? The list could go on and on... So maybe it is time to forget the political and ideological dressing on the cake - and begin by just informing people of historical knowledge and facts they don't and increasingly won't have a chance to learn from anywhere else (including the internet). In a word, less preaching to the converted and those ‘in the know’ and instead just talking to people - by which I simply mean all those (and there are many who I am sure that each of us know personally) who don't even know what they don't know. Yet even this is not enough…


Making ‘another beginning’ …
For any individual or group of individuals wishing to find ways of responding to the challenges facing the world today, the greatest danger I see lies in the need, borne of insecurity, to cobble together or latch onto an admixture of ideological and political ‘answers’ or ‘policies’. Instead the first step should be to humbly admit to there being many questions that remain to be asked and formulated. To admit to the existence of important but still unasked questions is not a mark of ignorance but of courage.

Therefore I suggest to any individuals or groups of individuals such as the SMPBI with an earnest and passionate desire to change the world that they should begin by each seriously asking, and seeking to formulate as best they can, what they regard as the most important questions that they still have. Only by pooling and then discussing a set of questions can they then truly work together, through dialogue - in making ‘Another Beginning’. Finding the right questions requires thought and effort of another sort entirely to coming to or debating a set of ideological positions or political policies. Yet if a political group were to begin its life and work again in this other way - by first coming to a decision on what they see as the most important but still unasked or unanswered questions are (whether to do with socialism or anything else) then stating those questions publicly and inviting authentic dialogue around them would indeed be something revolutionary in itself. The ‘other thinking’ that Heidegger spoke of is all about questioning. It transcends the polemics of mere agreement or disagreement on what policy or political stances to adopt or decide upon. Instead it is all exploring the most decisive questions.

Thursday, 9 August 2018

Judaism is not a Race, it is a Religion - its Secular form is Capitalism


A response to the post: http://socialistworkerspartyengland.blogspot.com/2018/08/zionism-is-anti-semitic-zionism-is-pure.html



Some historical comments

1. “Our Party is opposed to the racism which targets people because of their origins or origins of their forebears.” An important and necessary statement which I entirely agree with.

2. “We identify Global Zionism as an ideology of terror, built on a sickening appropriation of a religious system which is ardently ethno-nationalist, turning it into a dogma of supremacist hatred.”

To talk about Zionists “turning” Judaism into a “dogma of supremacist hatred” is historically incorrect. Jewish holy books, the Talmud and Torah both contain “a dogma of supremacist hatred”. Hence not only demanding interest on loans (...but only on loans to Gentiles) but also killing, robbing and even committing acts of genocide and paedophilia against Gentile “cattle” are NOT considered to be against Jewish Law. It is also clearly stated in the Jewish scriptures stated that Jews are destined by God to rule over all non-Jewish peoples, who will serve as their slaves. Judaism provided the very model of Hitler’s supremacist biological racism.

3. Long before Zionism became a powerful movement, Jews played a central role in the development of modern capitalism - arguably even more so that Lutheranism or Calvinism. For a thorough account and analysis of this role (which contains not one iota of racism) see Werner Sombart’s classic work entitled The Jews and Modern Capitalism.

NB Friedrich Engels himself stated that Sombart was the only economist who had fully understood Marx’s Capital. Sombart’s book should absolutely be a part of the SMPBI literature page.

4. Why no reference to Marx’s own essay “On the Jewish Question” - which makes no reference to Zionism at all? Or to the views of Disraeli - who believed in both a Jewish and an Aryan ‘master race’.

5. “Would the Zionist elite take a natural hostility of Europeans to usury and turn it into a vehicle of repression and discrimination against the Working Class Jews of Europe, in order to achieve their long sought after goal of the creation of Israel as a base to gain mastery of the world?”

Question: just how many “Working Class Jews” were there - if by this is meant proletarians? Not that many. Their preferred trades were petit-bourgeois mercantilism, tax collection for rich landowners, wholesaling and retailing, banking and the professions. But the Zionists explicitly encouraged Hitler to increase repression of the Jewish population of a whole, following Herzl’s maxim that “Our best friends are the anti-Semites” (i.e. they serve our purposes best).

6. “German Socialism under leaders such as the Strassers, was the ideology of a radical republican workers movement.” I suggest doing a bit more research about the Strasser brothers - both of whom were members of the Freikorps - which fought to bring down Germany’s first workers’ republic (the Munich Council Republic). They were also both anti-semitic, albeit for anti-capitalist rather than racist reasons. But their opposition to usury and Jewish finance capitalism was completely shared with Hitler - who was the first leader in modern history to nationalise the country’s central bank and pay workers with labour certificates - an idea supported by Marx. Nevertheless, it is of course true that there were those in the NSDAP who wanted to go further in a socialist direction and nationalise the big industrial concerns.

7. Reference is made to the Hitler’s “National Capitalist NSDAP war machine”. A ‘war machine’ that was massively outnumbered by Germany’s neighbours, and even more so by its combined war enemies (...by a factor or 97 to 1) can hardly have been intended for aggressive purposes. See the important video by Gerd Schultze Rhonhof based on his book: 1939 - The War That Had Many Fathers Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof

8. “After the 1934 murders of the Socialist leaders, the NSDAP moved from a movement for the social well-being of the people into a military formation.” In fact Hitler accomplished, in just 4 years, the most massive and rapid improvement in the “social well-being of the people” in history. But faced with an army whose loyalty could not be relied upon, an SA that wanted to replace it with street fighters who picked on Reds and Jews - but were seen as wholly ill-equipped to fill important military functions, Hitler saw no alternative but to create a high-quality “military formation” - the SS. The SS were regarded with absolute contempt by both the army and SA alike - but proved to have such necessary loyalty and soldierly qualities to defeat vastly superior enemy forces, saved the German army from numerous defeats - and whose officers always went first in battle. Yet since the SA were three times bigger than the standing army and more politically conscious, it can be hypothertically argued that Hitler was wrong to block Röhm’s attempt to take it over - and also to reject Strasserist demands for a ‘second revolution’ of a more socialist nature. But all this would have been difficult in practice and is a bit to easy to say in retrospect - given that the economic blockade of Germany had already begun and war preparations against it were already in motion. In this sense Germany at that time can in this sense be compared to Russia today - simply resisting Imperialism. And World Jewry had already declared war on and imposed trade boycotts on Germany good and shops in 1933 - resulting in counter-boycotts of Jewish businesses.

9. Ernst Jünger was neither a socialist, National Bolshevik or a Nazi, but a uniquely original thinker and writer whose main value - despite his anti-liberalism, but like that of Marx - was “free individuality”. He also had a close relationship with Martin Heidegger. I recommend also his novel Eumeswil for the literary section of the SMPBI site.

10. “Corbyn has spoken about the machinations of Zionism. Now the Zionists are coming for him. They are liars who are scared of a Labour Leader who is willing to discuss the Zionist deals with the Hitlerist Nazis.”

Note: Hitler ended up seeing exactly where Zionism would lead, broke his ‘deal’ with the Zionists - and instead enlisted Arabs into the SS.

“The Zionists WILL destroy Corbyn. His weakness will see to that. When he is gone, a neo-Blairite will be put in charge and Zionist rule will be back with a vengeance.”

Agreed.

My main point. I believe it is just as important - if not more important - to distinguish individual Jews from Judaism as it is to distinguish anti-Semitism from anti-Zionism. For without the total assimilation of Jews, which Marx argued for (and which many German Jews wanted in opposition to the Zionists) Zionism is a natural outgrowth of Judaism - and correctly understands itself as such (a tiny and irrelevant minority of eccentric rabbis notwithstanding).

Marx himself was the very epitome of a decidedly anti-Judaic ‘Jew’ - and was also not innocent of making ‘anti-Semitic’ remarks of such a ‘politically incorrect’ nature that today they would have him hauled before a court. And anti-Judaism - like anti-Zionism - is no more a form of ‘racism’ than being anti-Islamic or anti-Christian. Judaism, like Islam or Christianity, is not a race but a religion, albeit one whose secular form - as Marx pointed out - is capitalism itself.


First Comment:

Thank you Peter.  This raises a lot of good points.  The idea that it is 'racist' to oppose the RELIGION of Judaism, is of the same level of lunacy as the argument that it is 'racist' to oppose Islam.  One might as well throw in the other Desert Superstition, Christianity, and call criticism of that RELIGION, 'racist' (although, for some reason that one doesn't fit the pattern!)  According to political correctness, anything which goes against globalism, is racist, and anything which supports nature is inherently evil - eugenics (not wanting to create life which suffers when gene theraphy can cure the ailment before it takes effect); the fact that having a Penis is a pretty strong indiction you are a Man, no mater how much make-up you put on; the extended family etc.  We fall into their traps at our peril....

Friday, 20 April 2018

It's Hitler's Birthday. Time for some Strasserism

Hitler was born on the 20th April 1889, making him 129 years old today. To mark the day, it is time to learn a bit more about the real National Socialists who were replaced by the Nazis under the direction of the birthday boy.

Our way is the Socialism of the Isles. But that does not mean we cannot have an interest in ideas from further afield.

Read the following to get an understanding that Social Nationalism / Strasserism / authentic National Socialism has nothing to do with the Nazis or the sad caricatures of today, the neo-nazis:

....

Gregor Strasser
Thoughts about the Tasks of the Future
1926 June 15

Lying on a sickbed for a few weeks and months does have its good side . So much that in the trivialities of everyday life does not get a hearing now has the chance to rise slowly from the unconscious to the conscious mind where it is tested and is winged by imagination, so that it acquires form and gains life . In general, people often make the mistake of assuming that practical action—the incessant preoccupation with daily necessities—is not founded in the mind . They therefore like to set up an invidious comparison between the thinker and the doer ! It is true that the currents of the mind and the soul do not become conscious when one is resolutely grappling with the tasks of the day and trying, by freshly setting to work, to solve all questions in a practical way !
So it is a comfort every now and then to have the leisure to look beyond the tasks of the day and of the near future and to plumb the depths of the question toward whose solution we are resolutely dedicating our life's work . When would this be better than during the many lonely hours of the sickbed, when the hands of the clock seem to stand still and the night never to end—until it becomes finally, finally morning again ! This new dawn, the fact that again and again the dawn comes, is the deep consolation, is the blessed certainty which makes the night of the present bearable for us—and even if the hours, years, never seem to end—the dawn does come, my friends, and the sun comes, the light !

Such thoughts of the lonely nights, thoughts about the National Socialist tasks of the future—I will briefly survey them here—such thoughts have surely occurred to most of our friends in similar hours and in a similar way—thoughts which at the moment are not yet the subject of our work, but whose undercurrents are flowing, whose blood runs through our work .


I. The Spirit of the Economy
We are Socialists, enemies, mortal enemies of the present capitalist economic system with its exploitation of the economically weak, with its injustice in wages, with its immoral evaluation of individuals according to wealth and money instead of responsibility and achievement, and we are determined under all circumstances to abolish this system ! And with my inclination to practical action it seems obvious to me that we have to put a better, more just, more moral system in its place, one which, as it were, has arms and legs and better arms and legs than the present one !
And yet it is not enough to change a system, to replace one economic system by another— necessary above all is a CHANGE OF SPIRIT ! The spirit which is to be overcome is the SPIRIT OF MATERIALISM ! ! We must achieve an entirely new kind of economic thinking, a kind of thinking which frees itself from the present conceptions rooted in money, in property, in profit and false success ! It is an indication of the Marxist, the false Socialism, that its way of thinking is exactly that of capitalism . For this reason I have said for years that the two form a spiritual unity, only with reversed signals ! National Socialism, which stems from organic life itself, casts aside the mendacious words of a theory remote from the world, as well as the dead ideas of a declining civilization !

We have to learn that in the economy of a people it is not profit. not gain, which are important—but only satisfying the needs of the members of this people ! ! This and nothing else is the task of a "national economics ! " We have to learn that the ideas "world trade"—"balance of trade"—"export surplus" are ideas of a declining epoch which have in the end reduced themselves ad absurdum, because they violate the eternal law of organic life and were born out of speculation, not out of necessity, not out of the soil ! We have to learn that it is a betrayal when speculative production, with all its means of touting and advertising, creates an artificial need, a betrayal of human labor, of human life ! For artificially stimulated covetousness creates ever-increasing aspirations, and increased aspirations double human slavery, which is slavery of the mind, which instead of the soul has taken up mastery over life ! What do people know today about life ? ! They run around and tire themselves out, torment themselves, strive and drudge like galley slaves—in order to lead a life of horrifying emptiness ! It is not that this new economic system which we want produces more. What is at stake is certainly not higher production, which Marxism demands, but the human soul ! ! And production, economy have only the one task: to meet the economic needs of individuals, rejecting goods which owe their demand only to artificial stimulation, rejecting also the prodding of "profit and gain" !

We have to learn that WORK IS MORE THAN PROPERTY ! ACHIEVEMENT IS MORE THAN DIVIDENDS ! ! It is the most unfortunate heritage of this capitalist economic system that all things are evaluated according to money, according to wealth, property ! The decline of a people is the inevitable result of the application of this standard, since selection according to property is the mortal enemy of race, of blood, of life ! We have never left a doubt that our national Socialism breaks this prerogative of the owner and that the liberation of the German worker shall also extend to SHARING PROFIT, SHARING PROPERTY AND SHARING ACHIEVEMENT! ! But it would mean measuring again with the old standards if one left it at that and did not stress that revolution of the spirit which guides us against the spirit of the present system ! We consciously oppose valuation according to property with VALUATION ACCORDING TO ACHIEVEMENT . This is the only valuation which we recognize ! ! We consciously place WORK higher than PROPERTY ! We focus on ACHIEVEMENT not dividends, and we recognize RESPONSIBILITY, not riches or splendor, as the crowning of human striving . That is a new world view, a new religion of economics . It establishes with certainty that the horrid rule of the golden calf is at an end and that the differences among individuals and the differences among rights—are differences in achievement, differences in degree of responsibility, differences which come from God and which are sacred ! !


II. The Spirit of Society and of the State

And just as our fight against the form of the capitalist economy is at the same time a fight against the spirit of this capitalist economy, which must he rooted out in its outward expression and in the heart of every individual; so our fight against the form of society and of the present state is also a life or death struggle against the SPIRIT of this society, this state : AGAINST LIBERALISM AND FALSE DEMOCRACY !

The spirit of our National Socialist idea has to overpower the spirit of liberalism and false democracy if there is to be a third Reich at all ! Deeply rooted in organic life, we have realized that the false belief in the equality of man is the deadly threat with which liberalism destroys people and nation, culture and morals. violating the deepest levels of our being ! National thinking gnaws at the basis of life itself, destroys the blood, destroys the sacred order which is based on the distance which is created by inequality and which has nothing in common with the present social structure ! For hierarchy, of which I am speaking here, depends exclusively on the achievements of the individual for the community . We have to reject with fanatical zeal the frequent lie that people are basically equal and equal in regard to their influence in the state and their share of power ! People are unequal, they are unequal from birth, become more unequal in life and are therefore to be valued unequally in their positions m society and m the state ! But this inequality in turn has only one standard can and must have only this one standard : the achievement of the individual for society, for the nation, for the state .

And thus I reach a demand which at first glance may seem utopian, but which results inevitably from what I have said, and which has occurred to various friends in a similar way . The demand for unequal distribution of rights according to achievement for the state requires the elaboration of a process of selection according to which such achievements are to be measured . In the folkish movement there is much talk about the emergence of a new group of leaders, and this demand touches what I said, but the ways which are recommended for a solution : these blood tests, Nordicization, and so forth, and so forth, appear to my practical mind somewhat dubious as to possibility, value and even effect ! Another way, however, a thoroughly German, Prussian way of which my friend Pfeffer reminded me on one occasion, is suited as no other : selection by the army !
This requires that military service be voluntary, a right and not a duty . The practical way would be that by law every German Citizen would have to serve the state for one year during this year he would not, as the supporters of a compulsory year of labor service want, build roads or do other mass work, but would learn a trade, so that there would not be a single German who had not had at least a year's training in a trade ! The selection of the best . however, would be reserved to the trade of arms, which would last for TWO years and therefore attract only those most willing to sacrifice and which would bring with it the mortal danger of war and therefore demand all the heroic virtues. Entrance is voluntary and not dependent on any force . Who doubts that those Germans who voluntarily apply for the army, which removes them from private life twice as long the civil service, which further does not, like the latter, include practical advantages for practical life, but on the contrary, after an infinitely more severe service, means danger to life in war-who doubts that these Germans would be the best of their people, the racial best, whose achievements for the state now and in the future would ...

Otto Strasser
THE FOURTEEN THESES OF THE GERMAN REVOLUTION

I. The German Revolution denies before God and the world and obligation toward the "peace treaties" of Versailles and Saint-Germain, treaties based on the lie of Germany;s guilt and instituted through brute force, The German Revolution wages ceaseless and fanatic war, with all means, until it brings about the complete abrogation of these dictated treaties and all agreements based on them.

II. The German Revolution proclaims the freedom of the German nation in a strong German state which embraces all the German peoples of central Europe, and which, from Memel to Strassburg, from Eupen to Vienna, embraces Germans of the motherland and of the unredeemed territories, and because of its greatness and ability, for,s the backbone and the heart of white Europe.

III. The German Revolution refuses to rule over and exploit foreign peoples and nations. It wants no more and no less than sufficient living space for the young nation of Germans, and insofar as the fulfillment of this deepest natural right of life conflicts with the same right of other peoples and nations, the German Revolution recognizes the decision of war as the will of fate.

IV. The German Revolution declares that it is the sole purpose of the state to gather together all the forces of the nation and to employ them uniformly in guaranteeing the life and the future of this nation. It accepts every means which furthers his purpose an denies every means which hinders it.

V. The German Revolution therefore demands the harshest use of a strong central authority against all disruptive or disturbing organizations, whether political, party, or religious. The centralized state of the German nation binds together in the most powerful unity those forces which grow out of regional and particularist traditions.

VI. As an appropriate extension of the high tasks of the state, the German Revolution gives free scope for the development to the forces of occupational self-government, which have been inhibited and suppressed by a lifeless liberal system. It values the living organization in professional and occupational chambers above an artificial parliamentarism, just as in anything and everything, it values the personal responsibility of leadership over the irresponsibility of an anonymous mass.

VII. The German Revolution proclaims that the German nation is a community of fate. But it is aware that a community of fate is not only a community of need but also a community of bread and therefore affirms all of the demands which follow from this recognition according to the fundamental principle: "The common good before the individual good."

VIII. The German Revolution therefore rejects the individualistic economic system of capitalism; and the overthrow of capitalism is the prerequisite to the success of the German Revolution. With the same decisiveness of the German Revolution affirms the corporative economic system of socialism, processing from and concluding with the knowledge that the purpose of any economic system is solely the satisfaction of the needs of the nation, not riches or gain.

IX. The German Revolution therefore declares its superior property right in all land and mineral rights. Landowners are only leaseholders of the nation, and are accountable to the nation and to the state, because the nation as a whole defends the property.

X. On the basis of the same right, the German Revolution proclaims the right of all workers to share in ownership, profit and management of the economy of the nation, which every folk comrade serves. His personal share in property, profit and management id either earned or limited by increased output, greater responsibility. The German Revolution knows ad recognizes the motive force of personal interest, but incorporates this force into a larger machinery for the good of the nation.

XI. The German Revolution sees this good of the nation neither in the accumulation of material goods, nor in a limitless improvement of the standard of living, but exclusively in the recovery and maintenance in the health of that God-given organism, the Nation. Only thus can this German nation fulfill the task entrusted to it by fate.

XII. The German Revolution sees this task as the full development of the unique folkish character and therefore fights with every means against racial degeneration or foreign influence in culture, and for folkish renewal and purity, for German culture. This fight applies particularly to the Jews, who, in combination with the international powers of freemasonry and ultra-Montanism, are destroying, partly compelled by their nature, partly internationally, the life of the German soul.

XIII. The German Revolution therefore also fights against the rule of Jewish Roman law and for a German law which has the German and his honor as its axis and consciously affirms and values the inequality of man. This German law recognizes as citizens only folk comrades and measures all according to the good of the whole.

XIV. The German Revolution overthrows the world view of the great French Revolution and shapes the face of the twentieth century. It is nationalistic - against the enslavement of the German people; it is socialist - against the tyranny if money; it is folkish - against the destruction of the German soul - but it is all of these only for the sake of the nation. And for the sake of those nation for the German Revolution recoils from no battle, finds no sacrifice too great, no war too bloody, for Germany must live!Thus we youths feel the heartbeat of the German Revolution pounding, thus we front soldiers see the face of the near future before us and experience, humble-proud, the role of the chosen ones, to fight, to win the battle of the twentieth century, satisfied to see the meaning of the war, the Third Reich.

..........

And of course, it would to be remiss to leave out the man who replaced national SOCIALISM with the form which ended in the destruction of Europe in 1945.
Hitler: Founder of Israel

Saturday, 3 March 2018

Otto Strasser and Social-Nationalism

OTTO STRASSER AND SOCIAL-NATIONALISM
By Nikolas Rahl

THE ORIGINS OF STRASSERISM

To understand Strasserism and Social-Nationalism as a whole, we must examine the roots of the
movement. To understand the roots of the movement, we must take a look at the main ideologue
and figure head of the movement - Otto Strasser. It must be briefly noted that many involved in
the tradition of National Socialism seem to confuse the Strasser brothers involved with the
NSDAP. It must also be clarified that most of Strasserist theory comes from Otto Strasser, the
man who was chased into exile by the Gestapo; and although his brother Gregor was a treasured
and valuable character in the history of the NSDAP, his inability to see that Hitler could not be
influenced led to his ultimate demise in The Night of the Long Knives.

Otto Johann Maximilian Strasser was born on September 10th, 1897 in the town of Windsheim,
Bavaria. Otto Strasser and his older brother Gregor were born into a bourgeois family and were
both raised Catholic. When he was 17 years old, on August 2 1914, Otto had joined the Bavarian
Army as a volunteer. He was not politically active prior to this point. It is worthwhile to note,
however, that Otto's father Peter, was involved in Revolutionary Christian Socialism, a
Socialism opposed to Marxism that never gained much traction in Germany. During his service
on the front lines in The Great War, Otto had risen through the ranks to Lieutenant and was
wounded twice. For his service to his country in the First World War, Otto was awarded an Iron
Cross of the first and second class as well as a Medal of Merit.

When the Great War had ended, Otto returned to Germany in the year 1919. Not yet ready to
give up on military service, he joined the German Freikorps. Through involvement with the
Freikorps, Otto was there personally to help put down the revolt that resulted in the Bavarian
Soviet Republic. Otto saw Eisner, the leader of the Bavarian Soviet Republic, as a direct threat to
his German fatherland and a puppet of Bolshevism. At the same time, Otto had begun to sense a
problem growing from within his own fatherland, yet had not managed to put his finger on
precisely what was wrong. It is around this time that Otto had joined the SPD, the German
Social-Democrat party looking for answers. He became very active in the SPD, and had
personally helped put down the Kapp-Putsch. It was later that year when he had participated in
putting down a worker's uprising in the Ruhr that he realized that the SPD was too much of a
reformist (and not revolutionary enough) party for him, and no amount of change could have
come from the SPD.

At this time the disillusioned Strasser had joined a radically left wing splinter faction of the SPD,
the Independent Social Democrat Party, also referred to as the USPD. It is here that we begin to
see the first real roots of Strasserism and Social-Nationalism. Throughout his activities with this
party he had the opportunity of meeting radical Communists such as Grigory Zinoviev and at the
same time he had started to study the work of Conservatives such as Arthur Moeller van den
Bruck and Oswald Spengler. This led him to attend many young nationalist and conservative
revolutionary meetings. It is needless to say that Otto's meetings and studies in this time period
had a profound impact on his own ideology.

Elsewhere in Germany, 1925, other activities involving the NSDAP had been heating up. Adolf
Hitler, who had been sentenced to prison for his involvement in the Beer Hall Putsch, was just
getting out of jail and looking to take control of his party again. While Hitler had been in jail, the
National Socialist German Worker's Party (NSDAP) did not cease its activity. Around this time
Otto's older brother, Gregor, who had been a member of the party for some time now, had taken
over the reins of the northern faction of the party and was successful in recruiting a great deal of
Northern German workers over from the KPD as well as many unaffiliated German workers who
were experiencing the tough times of the Weimar Republic. During this time Gregor had been
preaching for a more radically socialist movement and many of Gregor's followers had
considered Gottfried Feder's 25 Points to be outdated. This would lead to conflict with a
Hitlerite faction that would form in the south of Germany; however that will be touched on later.
It is in this year of 1925 that Gregor had invited Otto to join the party, seeing in his brother's
ideas something that could restore Germany and bring the masses of Germans up from the abyss
of the Treaty of Versailles. Otto enthusiastically accepted his invite. It was agreed that Otto
would be the main ideologue for the party while Gregor would be the organizer. It is noteworthy
to mention here, that Otto had not been a complete stranger to Hitler. He had met with him as
early as 1920, and had negative impressions of him from his first meeting. Commenting on this
meeting, he said of Hitler that "He has no political convictions, only the eloquence of a loud
speaker" (Otto Strasser, Hitler and /, Page 25).

It is then, no surprise, as to why Otto had joined enthusiastically when he realized the influence
of Hitler in the party was diminishing. It is this time when Otto had written his 14 Theses which
came to be the official program of the Northern Faction of the NSDAP and was to replace
Feder's 25 Points. This was the first defiance the Northern Faction had shown to Hitler and it is
again worthwhile to note that the majority of the NSDAP in the north did not see Hitler as the
leader of the party, but instead pledged allegiance to simply the National Socialist idea.

Together, Otto and Gregor founded the publication the Kampfverlag ("Fighting Publications"),
out of which they issued several journals - all espousing a radical socialist program which had
defied Hitler's newly found alliance with the industrialists and aristocracy of Germany. In many
of the journals and papers issued from the Kampfverlag the Strassers advocated and organized
support for strikes. Later during this period in time when Ernst Rohm advocated for a second
revolution, the Krupp Corporation had referred to those inspired by the Strassers' ideals of
Social-Nationalism as "National-Bolsheviks" (obviously to mock Niekisch's movement which
was developing around the same time).

It is important not to lose sight of our topic here however, which is Otto Strasser. It is inevitable
following the Northern Faction's submission to the south, the result of the many people who
switched sides at the last minute such as Heinrich Himmler and Joseph Goebbels, that Otto
would come into direct conflict with Hitler. In 1930, the trade unions of Saxony declared a full
scale industrial strike. Otto came out in full support of the strike in his paper the Arbeitsplatt
("Work Platform") and rallied a sufficient number of Northern S.A. men to defend the strikers
from strike breakers. The party leader in Saxony, Martin Mutschmann, was an unabashed
supporter of Hitler and ordered Strasser to cease support for the strikes in his paper and to
withdraw all S.A. men from the lines. Otto Strasser and the S.A. men who remained loyal to him
defied Mutschmann and so defied Hitler himself. In reaction to Strasser' s defiance, Hitler had
ordered the Kampfverlag shut down and the complete liquidation of all papers published out of
it. Strasser refused the ultimatum and as of July 4th, 1930, he ceased to belong to the National
Socialist Party. He had immediately set up a new organization called the Combat League of
Revolutionary National Socialists, otherwise known as The Black Front. This new organization
made it clear that it would never forsake either its nationalist or anti-capitalist principles.

Otto had urged men like his brother Gregor and Rohm to join him, but both saw the ground that
Hitler's party was gaining and thought they could influence him. Although it is notable that
many S.A. men who remained loyal to Strasser had joined up with him. Among unique features
in the newly formed Black Front was the fact that Strasser and his men replaced the party salute
of "Heil Hitler!" with "Heil Deutschland!" and had vowed absolute allegiance to the National
Socialist idea rather than a supposedly infallible "Fuhrer". The party could not gain enough
traction in Germany to compete with the NSDAP, and ultimately with Hitler's consolidation of
power The Black Front was banned. Known members were jailed and Otto Strasser was marked
as a wanted man. Otto Strasser spent 12 years in exile in which he wrote his two most well-
known works, Hitler and I and Germany Tomorrow, which contain the bulk of Strasserist
ideology. Let us examine those works and Strasserist ideology here.

STRASSERIST AND SOCIAL-NATIONALIST THEORY

In the following sections we will examine the crux of the issue in this paper; that is, the political
theories and ideas that Otto Strasser had for Germany.

1. Social (Economic) Justice

Let us begin with one of the main distinctions of Strasserism from Hitlerian tendencies within
National Socialism, which is the concept of private property. It is the belief of those in the
Strasserite tradition, that private property - that is, property owned by one individual (or many
through stock trading) with the owner's unchallenged right to do with this property as he wills -
is not compatible with the ideology of nationalism, as Strasserists see the nation as an organism
in itself and it is a crime against natural law that one part of the organism should exercise its
functions as to damage the organism as a whole. Therefore, those who call themselves Social-
Nationalists claim that the nation, and therefore the people as a whole, has the superior claim to
property, specifically in the means of production. Today we are witnessing the final stages of the
capitalist system, the system in which the idea of "property makes free" has caused a traitorous
bourgeoisie to transplant offshore thousands of jobs with the sole reason being for profit, thus
leaving thousands of workers at home unemployed and either homeless or collecting benefits
from the welfare state to provide for themselves. To usurp the nation and its people out of their
economic future and social prosperity is high treason that stems from the right of individuals to
do as they will with exclusively owned means of production.

Furthermore, in the Strasserist view it is not enough to restrict the flow of capital from the
nation. Strasserists wish to create a true Volksgemeinschaft ("People's Community"), and it is
thus necessary that the capital be in the hands of the people themselves. Therefore, the
socialization of private enterprise is necessary, a most bold demand that many nationalists will
shy away from; but nevertheless will otherwise fail at creating a true community of the people.
This socialization will be nothing like Marxist collectivism, as Strasser made it quite clear that
this type of economy is modeled after the traditional European guild system. Marxism, he
claimed, will fail because of its liberal origins and its lack of roots in anything traditional. Otto
made it quite clear that he intended to give the German workers a say in their enterprise.

Let us view some quotes from both Gregor and Otto to reinforce this position:

Whoever recognizes the truth of the saying 'Property makes free ' , whoever affirms the
necessity for a sustaining stratum in any satisfactory social order must look forward to
the new order which will aim at the deproletarianization of the people, and at our
liberation from the social and economic monopolies under whose harrow no sort of
freedom is possible. (Otto Strasser, Germany Tomorrow, Page 65)

We have to learn that work is more than possession, that achievement is more than
dividends. The most deplorable legacy of the capitalist economic system is that it has
taught us to judge all things by the standards of money, ownership, possession. The decay
of a people is a necessary outcome of applying such a standard of value, for selection by
ownership is the mortal foe of the race, of blood, and of life. We have no shadow of doubt
that under National Socialism this privilege of ownership will be annulled, and that the
liberation of the German worker will go so far as to include a share in profit, a share in
ownership, and a share in management. (Gregor Strasser, Germany Tomorrow, Page 245,
Appendixes)

1. DISTINCTION FROM CAPITALISM

a. There is no private property in the means of production. They can neither be bought
nor sold, so that even though there may be persons who possess large quantities of
commodities or money (wealth in this sense being both possible and permissible) nothing
like 'capitalism ' can come into existence.

b. The staff of workers and the State are equally privileged partners with the manager,
who is not a capitalist but merely a fief-holder.

c. The need for economic and systematic production is enforced upon the manager
because his partners out-number him.

d. Every German citizen is one of the joint possessors of the entire German economy.
(Otto Strasser, Germany Tomorrow, Page 164)

Otto Strasser also makes it clear as to how this differs economically from Marxism:

a. The personal initiative of the responsible managers is preserved, but it is incorporated
into the needs of the community.

b. Within the systematically planned management of the whole national economy by the
State (organically safeguarded by the equal third of influence which the State has in
every industrial enterprise) the wholesome rivalry of the individual enterprises is
maintained.

c. The treatment of State and economic enterprise, that is to say of official and industrial
manager, on an equal footing is avoided; so is the arbitrary power of the State which
deprives the worker of his rights.

d. Everyone engaged in an enterprise is, in virtue of his being part-possessor as a citizen,
one of the immediate and influential possessors of his enterprise, his workshop, and can
exert this possessive right in full measure on the supervisory council of the concern. (Otto
Strasser, Germany Tomorrow, page 165)

Strasser gave details as to how this "factory fellowship," as he called it, would work. He stated
that managerial workers have a right to 49% of the profit, while workers, in addition to their
wages, engage in a 10% profit sharing. This model will not only ensure a future of economic
justice for the people but will also increase productivity. As can be observed, in a purely
capitalist enterprise, a worker's wages and employment in general is never assured. There are
multiple factors which will decide if a worker gets a raise or not, and a general increase in
productivity is not the sole or most important factor. A large factor that goes into the thought of
raising a worker's wages is the condition of the market at the time, a market that the worker
himself has no control over and a market in which the capitalist alone has a say in through his
privilege of ownership. In the model of socialization and profit sharing, the worker now throws
off his role as the object of the economy and now becomes its subject; the harder he works, the
more money the enterprise as a whole makes and so he is guaranteed a share in those profits.

Naturally, as a socialist, Strasser had advocated for both universal healthcare and education. He
states that there must be no artificially created handicaps in life, especially those which arise
from social class. He writes as a firm conservative, and although he thoroughly repudiated the
idea of innate human equality all throughout his writings, he was always a supporter of the idea
that equality of opportunity is absolutely necessary.

Perhaps one of Strasser's most revolutionary and important Socialist plans for Germany was his
plan for a complete "life insurance." This term "life insurance" is not to be confused with the
privatized concept of payments to family members in case of the death of a supporter, but rather
this insurance is meant to guarantee a man's life by the very virtue of being part of the German
community. This means that, in times of unemployment, a man is guaranteed a job through
employment by the state. A man's health and education is insured, as stated before by taxed
subsidized State healthcare and education. In this insurance scheme for which Strasser also used
the term "National Insurance," a man is guaranteed his post in life no matter what ills may befall
him. In Strasser's own words:

In contrast with, the existing methods, the whole complicated system of insurance and
support would be replaced under socialism by a unified life insurance. Every citizen
would thereby be insured in a way that would guarantee him a sufficiency whatever
happened, and no matter whether he (or she) was temporarily or permanently unfitted.
(Otto Strasser, Germany Tomorrow, Page 175)

He stated that this simple, albeit very necessary form of insurance on one's life, is
accomplishable by the merging all the existing private (therefore capitalist) insurance companies
into a national insurance agency under direction of the Reichsbank. Furthermore, the Reichsbank
was to be the new nationalized banking system of Germany and was to be established in order to
eliminate usury and professional loan sharking which are all too common practices within a
privately controlled (therefore capitalist) banking system.

In addition to socialism, Strasser advocated for a strong autarkic economy. Dependence on
foreign trade, he argued, specifically American finance capital, was the road to the enslavement
of a nation.

2. Structure of Government and the Estates System

Like most nationalists, Otto Strasser held a special contempt for the party system. However,
Strasser considered himself a democratic man to the very end. In a world where our bourgeois
media has made a party system almost synonymous with the term "democracy" it is hard to
picture a democratic system operating under any other mode other than the corrupt party system.
It is however important to dispel here the myths which have been forced upon people by the
controlled media and realize that America is not the democratic paradise it claims itself to be. It
is merely a system in which you are given choice A or choice B, whereas both are controlled and
lobbied by corporate and banking interests, interests which run counter to those of the nation as a
whole and most usually run counter to the well-being of humanity as a whole.

Realizing this, to be a Strasserist requires that one calls for the destruction of political parties
which seek only to fracture the people among a countless myriad of different petty interests.
How is this done? Is there to be a one monopoly party such as the one practiced under the Hitler
system, or perhaps such as the North Korean party dictatorship? No, the liberation of the people
only comes about with the abolishment the party system in general, and Strasserists object to a
one party monopoly as much as a multi-party system that keeps the people fractured and
splintered. So how does a state with no party work? The answer is simple. A revert back to the
traditional system of estates. Strasserism repudiates the pseudo-democratic notion of innate
human equality at every step and realizes that since no two humans are equal in ability they must
differ in what they can do for the community as a whole.

Strasserists therefore seek to establish a new estates system, a new democratic system, based on
the skills and experience of the members in question. In the Strasserist system there will be five
major circles and vocational councils to govern the life of citizens all operating on the basis of
one person, one vote. The five major councils are as follows: The Worker's Council, The
Peasant's Council, The Council of Liberal Professions, The Council of Industry and Trade, and
The Council for State employee and Officials.

When writing about this, Strasser went on to elaborate that each council is to be made up of
specifically twenty-five members and all are elected for three years.

This is not the furthest extent of government, however. Any logical person reading this naturally
asks questions such as: what about a president (or general leader)? Was Strasser to be a "Fuhrer"
much like his Hitlerian counterpart? The answer to this question is no as well. Strasserists
demand the election of a president for lifetime. This president is to be the supreme representative
of state power. Once elected this president would be held accountable to the vocational councils
and the estates (which we will later elaborate upon), but Strasserism repudiates the American and
liberal idea that it is necessary to switch presidents every four or so years to give the illusion of
freedom and democracy.

Directly under the president is an institution which Otto Strasser called "The Great Council."
The Great Council was to consist of all the presidents from the German provinces as well as five
ministers of the state and the presidium of The Reich Chamber of Estates. The Reich Chamber of
Estates would constitute ten members, all elected and then nominated for their post, one of which
will oversee the Chamber as the presidium. These three bodies, the President for a lifetime, The
Great Council, and lastly the late mentioned Chamber of Estates all equally have a share in
national political decisions. Therefore a law will have to have the approval of two out of three of
said bodies before it is able to come into effect.

It is worthwhile to note that none of these officials were to be privileged above the folk in
general; they were to share with the masses both economic hardship as well as prosperity.

3. Federalism

Otto Strasser had made it clear that he wished to keep Germany a federal Germany. He, by no
means, supported the current division of provinces that Germany was held under though. He was
of the opinion that, despite his respect for Prussian ideals, Germany's current federal division
was a result of Prussian hegemony over the rest of Germany. As Strasser states in Germany
Tomorrow.

I have, indeed, too much respect for the Prussian spirit, and am too keenly aware of the
important part it has played in German history, to be moved by any anti-Prussian
resentment such as I might be supposed to have imbibed in my Bavarian homeland. But
my knowledge of the German character and of German history have convinced me that
the Prussian particularist solution was no more than an arbitrary expedient which did
not cease to be an arbitrary expedient because it was advocated and adopted by
Frederick the Great and then by Bismarck. My general understanding of historical
interlacements convinces me, indeed, that in the epoch of the (liberal) national State
there was no other way by which the Reich could be established than by the hegemony of
Prussia. But the same understanding now informs me that the time is ripe for a revival of
the old (conservative) idea of the Reich, an idea whose mystical interconnexion with the
rebirth of the West is overwhelmingly confirmed by the history of the last thousand years.
(Otto Strasser, Germany Tomorrow, Page 185)

Due to the cultural and religious diversity of the Germans, Strasser stated that this new federal
Germany must not be and cannot be ruled from one central spot. He proposed that the new
federal Germany indeed must be unified, but a degree of autonomy must be practiced by each
federal subdivision. Otto was never clear on how he planned to divide up the provinces, only that
the divisions should clearly be respective of tribal, cultural, and geographic entities. In addition,
each province was meant to have its own president who, as stated before, will serve on The Great
Council.

4. Anti-Semitism

For many nationalists, the question of anti-Semitism is an important one primarily because Adolf
Hitler, who is constantly equated as the prime inspiration for modern day nationalism by our
liberal and bourgeois media, was known for his steadfast anti-Semitism. When thinking of
Hitler's socialist counterpart however, the question that springs to mind is thus: Did Otto Strasser
endorse any sort of anti-Semitism? This is quite a difficult question to answer accurately as Otto
Strasser's opinions on Germany's Jewish minority varied throughout his ideological career. In
the beginning of his career, Otto had taken an anti-Semitic stance comparable to that of Hitler's
own stance. In the 14 Theses as well as other essays Strasser was publishing out of his papers,
Otto made it clear that his National Socialist movement fought against "Jewish decay" and the
rule of "Jewish Roman Law".

Much later in time, however, particularly after his break with the Hitler Faction, Strasser
attacked Hitler for what he called "His ruthless and inhuman anti-Semitic campaign." Otto
Strasser actually dedicated an entire chapter in his work Germany Tomorrow to the Jewish
problem. In it he claims that while Jews are indeed foreign to Europe, they are endowed with the
same rights as the Germans. Thus Strasser goes on to elaborate on his solution for "The Jewish
Problem."

Unlike with Hitler's regime, Otto Strasser supported the right for German Jews to do one of the
following: 1) They may stay within the greater nation of Germans but be marked as foreigners
and thus only enjoy the rights of such. 2) They may be deemed national minorities and given
their own autonomous states within a federal Germany where they will be able to exercise a
degree of autonomy over their own people. 3.) They may repudiate both their Jewish religion and
identity and assimilate into the German nation. Otto Strasser made it clear it should be up to each
individual Jew what he or she wishes to do.

Let us note here that Otto Strasser at this time supported the movement known as "Zionism" as a
movement dedicated to the national and ethnic conscious of the Jewish people as National
Socialism was for his own German people. However, due to Strasser's anti-imperialist stance it
is likely that were Strasser around today he would be a most ardent champion of anti-Zionism.
Otto's stance on imperialism is best defined by the quote "For us, National Socialism has always
been an anti-imperialist movement and the spirit of which was to be limited to conserve and
ensure the life and development of the German nation without any tendency to dominate other
peoples and other countries."

5. Strasser: Clericalist or Secularist?

It has been mentioned previously in this essay that both Otto and his brother Gregor were born
into Catholic families. This, however, says very little about Otto's religious views later in his
life, as we can observe the profound religious shift of the Catholic born Hitler whose later
religious views reflected an almost deification of the concept of Social Darwinism. Was the same
to be true of Otto Strasser? Did he reject Catholicism in favor of Darwinism, or perhaps support
a German Pagan revival?

The truth of the matter is that Otto Strasser remained a Catholic until his dying breath. From
Strasser's writings, it is more likely for us to believe that Strasser had remained such a steadfast
Catholic because he equated Christianity with Western civilization. This is not an altogether
inaccurate viewpoint either, considering that Western civilization has been vastly Christian for
the past thousand years.

Even if the reader is not a Christian, that should not dissuade him or her from realizing the value
of Strasser's ideas. Although a firm Catholic, Otto Strasser had supported a secular state all
throughout his political career. He wrote in Germany Tomorrow that he held a respect for all
truly German religions (although at one time scorning Alfred Rosenberg for his Paganism in
Hitler and J). He spoke of the separation of church and state in his book Germany Tomorrow.

A separation of the main Church in a country from the State would likewise be beneficial
to other religious communities, and would favour the growth of all genuine religious
movements, with whose internal affairs the State should never interfere. (Otto Strasser,
Germany Tomorrow, Page 206)

6. A United Europe

This idea is short and simple and therefore not much need be said about it. Otto Strasser
imagined a European state, a united European state where each European nation would maintain
its own identity, custom, and laws, but this European state would be bound and unified by the
European ideal and to prevent future conflicts between them. Each European nation is to enter
into this union on its own accord. This union is to be given a unified military force, much like
NATO, though of course, differing in form. Strasser made it clear that Russia and the USA are to
have no part in this union, as they are not part of Europe. To end this essay, as well as
demonstrate Strasser's want to preserve the diversity of Europeans within this United States of
Europe, let us conclude with an inspiring and hopeful quote from Strasser:

She [Europe] is full of inner vitality which has its source in her national and cultural
differences - and this is something which Mr. Dulles and other apostles of a so-called
'integration Policy For Europe ' have failed to take into account. It is that blessed
individuality of each nation of our Continent - it is those rich shades and degrees of
difference between us; whether they be cultural, economic, military or political - which
go to make up the foundation of Europe 's greatness - which give shape and colour to the
culture, to the soul of Europe!! We Europeans are sick unto death of hearing this idiotic
demagoguery about how 'necessary ' it is for Europe to 'unite '!! We are Spaniards and
Italians; Frenchmen, Germans and Poles. We are Swiss, Danes and Swedes - we are
Dutchmen, Greeks, Bulgars, and Liechtensteiners - and only therefore and in so far as
we 'Europeans. ' The moment in which Europe allows herself to be forced, for practical
considerations, into one great hodgepodge unit ( 'Your production would be so much
cheaper, ' we are told by the Baruchs, the Dulles and the Monets - while they figure
gleefully how much more interest their 'United Europe ' could pay to the World Bank) -
will be the moment in which Europe relinquishes her meaning and her mission; just as
England would sacrifice her meaning and her mission if she gave up the commonwealth.
( Otto Strasser, "The Role of Europe")

With Nationalism again growing in Europe, let us hope that they remember the call of Otto
Strasser and do not get foolishly led into anymore brother wars nor get tricked into capitalist
financial enslavement either by manufacturing capital or finance capital.


Bibliography

Reed, Douglas. Nemesis: The Story of Otto Strasser. London: Jonathan Cape, 1940.

Reed, Douglas. The Prisoner of Ottawa: Otto Strasser. London: Jonathan Cape, 1953.

Southgate, Troy. Otto Strasser - The Life and Times of a German Socialist. London: Black Front
Press, 2010.

Southgate, Troy. Tradition & Revolution: Collected Writings of Troy Southgate. Aarhus,
Denmark: Integral Tradition Publishing, 2007. See particularly Chapter 6: "Social-Nationalism
and the Strasser Brothers - Revolution vs. Reaction."

Strasser, Otto. Germany Tomorrow. London: Jonathan Cape, 1940.

Strasser, Otto. Hitler and I. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1940.

Strasser, Otto. Die deutsche Bartholomauesnacht ("The German St. Bartholomew's Night").
Zurich: Reso, 1935.

Strasser, Otto. "The Role of Europe." In Policy and Debate: from The European, edited by
Oswald Mosley. London: Euphorion Books, 1954.

Strasser, Otto. "The 14 Theses of the German Revolution." In Forgotten Ideals: National
Socialism Before 1933, edited by Troy Southgate. London: The Rising Press, 1996.

Friday, 30 October 2015

Open response to question about SWPE and 'National Socialism'

The following was prompted by a question asked about SWPE and how it relates to pre-Night of the Long Knives 'National Socialism.'  As pointed out by the questioner, National Socialism died in the summer of 1934. The brutal war of 1939-45 with all the horrors that were part of it, were by the design of Capitalists in London, Washington and Berlin, with the addition of the USSR as combatants fighting initially out of self defence as the territories they governed were attacked.  By the outbreak of the Second World War, all the genuine National Socialists were either dead or marginalised, or had betrayed the ideology and become paid accomplices of the Capitalist war machine.   Thank you to Steve for your question.

Our ideology is what we term Real Socialism.  We say Real Socialism because what often passes for socialism is nothing but decadent liberalism, hedonism and forced globalism.  Very often, the so-called socialists of today (such as the UK Labour Party and the rapist-apologist moslem-hugging SWP) are pushing ideologies based on nothing but economics, making them a variant of the capitalists they feign to oppose.  Real Socialism puts economics in its correct place as a part of the bigger picture, and not as the over-riding factor.  Where the confusion comes in with people who call themselves Socialists, but are really globalist liberals, is that they fail to understand that a country is more than just a geographical area, but an area with a people tied to it.

Socialism is National in every aspect because it is a belief in achieving the best which is possible for the maximum number of people in the Nation.  The Nation is the extended family - the Nacio / the People.    We fully endorse Walther Darré's concept of Blood and Soil.  Ironically and which must be to the chagrin of any globalist liberals who bother to look into the origins of their ideology, Darré's work can be seen as the blueprint for the sensible aspects of the Green movement.  Mass migration is damaging to the planet, destroying the ecology of each place that the locust like mass of people moves to.  A sustained environment needs a constancy of population, not the addition of millions of outsiders who are an extra drain on natural resources, and who add to the criminal waste of agricultural land through the increase in building of accommodation to house them.  Borders are beneficial to nature. Open borders allow for global exploitation and the ruination of the planet.

Socialism is International because it supports the continuity of free Nations, as opposed to the nation destroying fraud of the globalists.  International cooperation is beneficial to everybody involved.  We support a free Europe of free nations, in which each country acts in the way which best suits its own people.  Peace is beneficial to the people, war is only beneficial to the Capitalists in the armaments industry and speculative markets.  We would abolish the EU and after that the UK.  We support a Europe in which England sits side by side with our neighbours (Ireland, Scotland, Wales, France, the Netherlands, Flanders, Wallonia etc), as free and mutually respectful neighbours, not as inmates of the same prison cell.

We oppose the free movement of people and goods because both undermine the ability of each country to be self-governing.  The Strasserites were anti-war and favoured International cooperation.  Hitler was a Capitalist Imperialist who favoured a war of aggression to build an empire in eastern Europe on the corpses of the rightful peoples of that area and the Germans he would use to secure it.  The hated EU is Hitler's legacy and like the real National Socialists who Hitler had murdered, we want nothing of such anti-people entities.

The National Socialists post-1934 betrayed the Socialist Revolution of the previous year, and adopted a Germanised version of Italian Fascism.  We are not Fascists - we are anti-Fascists, understanding that Fascism is Corporatism, which means the rule of the corporations over the people (which is what we have today in what many term the New World Order).  Because Hitler was a Fascist and a wrecker of the original (national) Socialism of Germany, we have no truck with his distortion of Socialism.

The Strasserites were good people who paid the ultimate price for staying true to their ideals.  They held fast to the principles of Socialism as a means of overthrowing the usurious exploitative system of Capitalism.  The much slandered Ernst Röhm was amongst those murdered in 1934 - officially for his homosexuality (which was blatantly hypocritical considering many of those around Hitler were of the same sexual orientation), but really because he was a danger to the Capitalist backers of Hitler, and unlike the man who ordered his brutal murder, a genuine revolutionary.  The Strasserite faction was heavily influenced by the works of Ernst Niekisch, who we also have points in common with, but that doesn't make us National Bolsheviks or Strasserites!

Our ideology is rooted in the English soul, and in the greater European family, which is why we are proud of the Germanic, Nordic and Celtic strands which make up our people.  We do not limit ourselves to just Englishness, but we do see the need to keep ourselves anchored in our heritage.  This again steers us towards Strasserism, as the ideal of the Revolutionary National Socialists was for Germany to be restored to a federation of free nations which existed before the German State was created.  We propose the return of the ancient nations of Mercia, Kernow, Kent, Northumbria, Anglia and a federalised pan-Saxon nation including Wessex, Essex and Sussex, all under the umbrella of England.  Hitler went so far as to abolish Austria and the Sudeten territories, crushing native diversity in a drive for uniform obedience to his 'thousand year empire', which under close examination would have become something similar to the EU had it succeeded.

We don't use the term National Socialism, because to do so is to needlessly duplicate two terms which are really indistinguishable:

Nationalism which doesn't put the people first, is not Nationalism, and the same can be said for Socialism - the two are one.  Hitler was a Capitalist who wore the clothes of nationalism but made the people in his care into servants of the global war machine.  Corbyn claims to be a Socialist but wants open borders which will crush the Working Class under a flood of parasites who we will be forced to pay for, whether through taxes to pay their benefits lifestyle, or in jobs taken by them at our expense.


Further Reading:

Blood and Soil, by Anna Bramwell: http://aryanism.net/downloads/books/anna-bramwell/blood-and-soil.pdf
Hitler and I, by Otto Strasser (complete text): http://mailstar.net/otto-strasser-hitler.html
Otto Strasser's "New Europe", by Kerry Bolton: http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/05/otto-strassers-new-europe-part-one/ http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/05/otto-strassers-new-europe-part-one/
Ernst Röhm: http://spartacus-educational.com/GERroehm.htm
The Anti-Hitler Underground within the German Conservative Revolution, by KR Bolton: http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2015/volume_7/number_2/the_anti_hitler_underground.php

Tuesday, 18 November 2014

Basics of Strasserism








The Factory Fellowship 
The Owner is to be paid solely through stock in order for them to be kept responsible to the factory.
The Workers are to be paid by stock and wages 
Part of the profits if the industry goes to the State.
Workers are paid according to their achievements in the industry
The Workers and owners are to come to an agreement on how the business is to be ran
If the Workers and the Owners can not come to an agreement the state must step in to settle it.

This does away with private ownership of the means of production and divides industry into the hands of the workers and leaders. 

Autarky:
The State is to have a monopoly on international trade
The move from the gold standard to a national currency
Focus solely on national issues 

Guilds
Handicraft enterprises, small shops, and also the liberal professions, will therefore be incorporated into guilds.
The State will require a tax from each guild
The guild is able to grant the title master to skilled members of the trade.
No one may start up a profession without this title 
The Guild can regulate the number of acolytes that each guildsman can take on

Federationism
A federation of European nations that maintain autonomy should be formed to create a unified Europe 


Vocational Estates are basically a form of worker's control over the state by giving each trade a house in a senate/parliamentary body. 

 Avoidance of mandatory drafting and militarism 

 The diversity of human beings
No nation is better than the other
Equal rights for all human beings are mandatory
Each nation has its own characteristics 
Each nation has different needs  

Immigration and national minorities:
Persons of different racial origin from the majority may be described as foreigners. 
Groups of persons of various racial stamps may be deemed to constitute national minorities.
Persons belonging to different stocks may be incorporated into the main body of the nation by assimilation.

Tuesday, 13 May 2014

An answer to the speculation about the SWPE


There has been much speculation over the past view days as to the nature of the SWPE.  As links have been posted on various sites which will lead those who are debating the purpose of the SWPE to here, the answers to the various allegations follow.

  • Is the SWPE a joke, set up to annoy Marxists?

No!  The Socialist Workers' Party of England is a genuine Socialist organisation.  The party has been in existence in its current form for a short while, but dates back to 1988 when the British Socialist Party was formed.  The SWPE combined the BSP with the Free Workers' League, which was formed in 1993.  The FWL was very active in the 1990s and 2000s, with its own publication, the Workers' Voice.  Stagnation and a drop-off in activism in both the FWL and the BSP led to the merger into the SWPE.

  • The SWPE has been active this year with the NF.  Why would a Socialist organisation rub shoulders with Nationalists?

The SWPE does not believe in the false divisions which pit Nationalist against Socialist.  We are not Marxists.  We fully understand that the Nation is the People and that the People is the Nation.  We stand alongside everyone who rejects Globalism, whether in its Capitalist or Communist form.

  • The SWPE has been called Beefsteak Nationalist - Brown on the outside, Red on the inside.  Is this true?

This accusation is due to our support for the excellent Socialist Phalanx forum, which is a forum for Left Wing Nationalists and Revolutionary Socialists.  The SWPE is not Brown on the outside and Red on the inside, we are Red right through!  Those who wish to gain an understanding of what real Socialism and Left Wing Nationalism is all about, should visit Socialist Phalanx from the links tab above.

  • Is the SWPE 'applied Strasserism'?

This is an intriguing question.  Certainly we have a great deal of respect for Gregor and Otto Strasser.  We have much respect for many non-Globalist Socialists from other countries.  Our main inspiration remains with the great thinkers who have come from within the English nation.  We are the Socialist Workers' Party of ENGLAND and although we do look beyond our shores to those who fight against the Global scourge, we are firmly rooted in our own land.  Socialism is about what is best for the people.  It has to be focused upon our own people and cannot be a caricature of other lands.

  • The SWPE is courting disillusioned Marxists at the same time as standing with left-leaning elements in the National Front.  Is this true?

This is true.  We are more than happy to welcome into the fold those who have been seduced by Marxism, but who have woken up to the falsehood of Globalism.  We are also very keen to work with anti-Reactionaries who reject the right wing aspect of Nationalism (Monarchy, Capitalism, Stock Market economics, Imperialism etc).

We hope this clears up some of the questions being debated online and we thank those who have come here as a result of this debate for taking the time to do so.

UNRWA are terrorists

The SMPBI has been campaigning since the 7th October Massacre in Israel for the paliarstinan terrorists to be exposed for the murdering filt...