Imperialism, Nation and Class Struggle

National-Revolutionaries - "Red Nazis", "Bolsheviks in disguise", "Nazi-Maoists", "Stalinists of the Right" or "Conservatives of the Left"? Our political opponents have been confused since the post-war national revolutionary movement came into being. Ideological pigeonholes and old dogmas no longer hold true and the old taboos of the traditional political camps are shaken when confronted with national revolutionary positions. There are nationalists who make no secret of their nationalist radicalism, but at the same time have elevated the class struggle against the capitalists to the highest principle. How is this possible? How can a nationalist stand for the class struggle against the capitalists? A revolutionary socialist class struggle for the nation? "They are controlled by the East!" cries the so-called "nationalist" right, for whom the protection of private property over the means of production has always taken precedence over the freedom of the nation. They have always seen the class struggle as a tool of an enemy foreign power, intended to destroy the so-called unity of the people. "They are Nazis in a new guise!" cry both the Marxists and the liberals, for whom people and nation have at best a tactical meaning and whose dream goal is the levelled "one world", free of ethnic and cultural differentiations, without independent nations. However, new problems require new questions and new questions require new answers. The fronts of the 19th century (which on closer inspection were also different from what school historians would have us believe), are no longer the fronts of today. The world of the last twenty years of the 21st century is at a point where these new fronts are becoming increasingly clear. Classes, ideologies, social forces, they are all in turmoil.

The New "One World" Imperialism

Today, when we speak of the nation, when we fight for its liberation, when we see nationalism as a progressive, emancipatory force, our opponent is different from the one who confronted the nationalists of the 19th century. It is no longer a question of freeing the merchant and the industrial citizen from the shackles of feudal restrictions; it is no longer even primarily a question of freeing some "small" nation from the rule of a "large" one. Even the concept of imperialism as the antithesis of national liberation can no longer be defined exclusively in terms of individual states.

Certainly, there is American imperialism, the imperialist neo-colonialism of England and France, there are also imperialist elements in German politics. However, all these phenomena, which the socialists of the 1960s were still railing against, are today becoming more and more evident for what they really are: different aspects or facets of one and the same multinational globalist corporate imperialism that penetrates into the very ends of the globe!

The capitalism of the 19th century was the grandfather of this corporate imperialism. It began as the competitive capitalism of individual entrepreneurs. Family fortunes were invested, increased, strengthened by bank loans, and factories were built that in the Netherlands are associated with names like Philips, Unilever, Shell, and so on. The origin, development and inner regularity of this were excellently described by Karl Marx in his economic works. This stage of capitalist development had already been completed for several decades when Lenin wrote his book "Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism" in 1916. In it he accurately described what Marx had already foreseen: the course of capital concentration in the industrialised countries, which at the end of the 19th century gradually began to replace competitive capitalism. This was caused by the concentration of the economy under conditions of free competition, as Marx had described in his work "Das Kapital". The imperialist phase of capitalism was characterised by the concentration of productive forces as a result of ruinous competition, which led to the formation of cartels, trusts and monopolies, as well as the increasing incorporation of bank capital and industrial capital and thus the complete placing of national state apparatuses at the service of the capitalist classes. While competitive capitalism was still characterised by the export of goods, imperialism was characterised by the export of capital: investments were made in so-called "backward" countries; wages, land and raw materials were cheap here, new markets could be developed locally.

The imperialist states, which primarily included England, France, Germany and the US, secured these interests through military aggression ("gunboat policy") and the colonial conquest of entire continents. In this period, for example, British and French colonial rights were extended to large parts of North and Central Africa, parts of Africa and Oceania were colonised by the German Empire, and the third-ranking former colonial power Spain was crushed by the US, with the establishment of US colonies on former Spanish colonial soil (Philippines, Puerto Rico, etc.). Conflicts of interest between these national imperialisms and their national capital groups then led to the First World War; a thoroughly imperialist war, for which the blame must be laid not on one nation (e.g. Germany), but on the interests of conflicting national capitals.

The period from 1914 to 1945 can be seen as a time of great upheaval, as a transition phase to the nocturnal phase of capitalism. Lenin was mistaken when he considered the imperialism of his time, represented by individual states, to be the highest and final stage of capitalism. On the contrary, the human mill was turned further, the bulldozer was driven even more brutally over tribes, peoples and nations, even more nature and raw materials, people, material, soldiers and citizens, workers and peasants were sacrificed to the Moloch of capitalist industrial development. The revolutionary-socialist hope of Lenin and the Bolsheviks for the end of times proved to be false.

At the end of the Second World War, the USA had become the dominant power in the imperialist camp, the former European competitors had torn each other apart and eaten each other up. However, European capital was still there, in the colonies, in the production units, stocks and real estate that had remained intact, in the money that had been invested in neutral countries. Thus, although the US took over the political and military leadership of the Western world and was certainly the most powerful economically, the US capitalists could not easily absorb European capital. On the contrary, after a phase of increasing export of US capital to Europe, a phase of increasing reciprocity in the export of capital began, the creation of joint subsidiaries (not only in the Third World) and the amalgamation of the largest banking and industrial groups around the world through a thousandfold network of holdings and cooperatives. After competitive capitalism and old imperialism, the third stage of the capitalist system has been reached, multinational imperialism, or globalism!

"One World" of Dead Souls

This new type of imperialism created globalist instruments to coordinate its activities and gain complete control over all the peoples of the world. These instruments include:

- NATO and friendly/allied pacts such as SEATO, ANZUS, etc. as military instruments of domination.

- The World Bank and the infamous "International Monetary Fund" (IMF) as the central levers of global economic control, which have brought almost all the nations of the world into dependence through their lending policies and all manner of financial manipulations.

- Associations such as the "Trilateral Commission", "World Economic Forum" and the "Bilderberg Conference" as consultative bodies of important state, economic and trade leaders, media representatives etc. from the Western industrialised countries.

The goal, the "One World" controlled by inscrutable multinational globalist bodies is now within their grasp! It is not the result of an ominous "world conspiracy", but results from the development logic of capital (which was never understood by the right-wing parties; the reason why they had to resort to mystifications of conspiracies to explain simple processes). The interdependence of capital increases day by day, as does the dependence of the peoples on the decisions of the IMF and the big banking centres. For the sake of higher profits, the importance of capital utilisation cries out for globally standardised production processes, consumer behaviour, ways of life; for global psychological calculability and thus for the disappearance of all mental and cultural differentiations.

This 'brave new world' of the multinationals will be a world without cultural diversity, without national sovereignty and regional autonomy, without democratic decision-making and without workers' rights. It will be planned and structured down to the smallest detail, realising Ernst Jüngers' chilling horror vision of "planetary planned landscapes". It will reduce the human being to the functions of production and consumption, it will leave no room for individuality, creativity outside the global culture industry and no self-determination for the people. Its supreme principle will be the rationality of capitalist profit. Their ideologies are - even now - liberal cosmopolitanism, progressivism and the idolisation of industry and technology. Their archenemy is and remains: NATIONALISM!

Class Struggle as Revolutionary Task

If nationalism is anti-capitalist, it must finally free itself from the reactionary imagination of the political right. This means, above all, that all ideas of the "peoples community" (volksgemeinschaft) and "national solidarity" under the umbrella of the capitalist system must be definitively rejected. For the people are divided into the stooges of imperialism and its ideologies, on the one hand, and those who suffer and partly fight against imperialism, on the other. This division is - from its objective causes - a division into social classes since the basis of imperialism is determined by one class alone, namely the capitalist class from whose womb it emerged.

The class struggle is therefore not a Marxist "instrument of division" against the people, but exists objectively and is perceptible every day in the conflicts between the different social classes. Today, more than ever, it is the task of true national revolutionary politics to make people aware of this class struggle, to intensify it and to orientate it.

The beneficiaries of the imperialist system in each country are the direct representatives of the multinationals, the directors, commissioners and managers of the respective banks and companies, as well as their accomplices in political parties, trade unions, the media and the cultural sector. The deceived are the broad strata of the people, the workers who have been deprived of their identity and culturally enslaved. They are economically exploited and politically impotent. It is necessary to persuade these misled people to fight against the globalists. This can be done on the basis of the objectively existing economic contradictions, which have become increasingly evident in recent years.

The economic contradictions of the working class in particular against the capitalists have been elaborated excellently by Karl Marx: the workers produce surplus value which the capitalists appropriate. The producers are thus deprived of the fruits of their own production. Moreover, in the capitalist production process they are constantly exposed to the constraints of profit maximisation for the capitalists, with all its consequences: rationalisation, high work pressure, industrial accidents and waste of personal labour power. In times of crisis, the capitalists and their state withdraw previous social concessions, resulting in poverty and impoverishment. From these contradictions arises an anti-capitalist potential for conflict, which can manifest itself in daily small-scale wars in the factory, but also in mass actions of the workers, employees, etc. on the streets. That is where the national revolutionary struggle can and must begin!

Imperialism is based on a system of continuous industrial production, creation of surplus value, reinvestment, increased production, etc. The bearers of production are the workers, without whose labour there would be no existence. The carriers of production are the workers, without their labour the system could not exist. There can be no war in the world without weapons produced by the workers. No ship, no aeroplane, no car is available, no electricity flows through the wire without the power of the labourer. Thus the worker has in his hands the weapon to pull the rug out from under imperialism and thereby liberate both himself and the nation, the people. The sharpening of the antagonisms between the exploited and the exploiters, the raising of the class struggle to a higher level, can lead to the working class refusing to work in one country or another and thus attacking the basis of the system. Political strike, general strike, factory occupation are thus among the main instruments of the class struggle, which must ultimately lead to the national liberation struggle.

The political-strategic awareness of the link between personal suffering and the imperialist world system arises no more or less spontaneously today than it did 80 years ago, when Lenin, in his writing "What to do?", pointed out the necessity of the link that the spontaneous (economic) workers' movement must make with revolutionary theory. The lever for establishing this link is the revolutionary organisation, the creation of which is an increasingly urgent task for national revolutionaries.

It is the workers and the other simple layers of the people who have every interest in freeing themselves from this system, which means social liberation from the capitalist economic system and thus liberation from the imperialist world system. The bourgeoisie, on the other hand, is today anti-national to the bone (and that means, above all, liberal), because everything it has to lose after a socialist workers' revolution, it has gained through this globalist system. This also applies to the much-quoted 'small', 'medium' and 'anti-monopoly' capitalists, even now that their days are numbered due to the wave of bankruptcies. What is overlooked, however, is that these capitalists also benefited to the end from the ruling system, which guaranteed them private ownership of the means of production, protection from exploitation and, in most cases, a decent living. They are allies of the system and not of the people; for the sake of profit they have always been prepared to betray their nation. One cannot serve both the moneybags and the nation. Individual pursuit of profit is liberalist behaviour and service to the nation is socialist behaviour (the former characterised by individual, the latter by collective interests); both are mutually exclusive.

Conclusion:

Capital has now organised itself internationally and is striving for the completion and unification of the world. The struggle for the preservation of peoples and cultures as a national revolutionary task must therefore be directed against international capital, globalism. Nationalism is thus an anti-capitalist struggle; a class struggle!

National revolutionaries must recognise the objectively existing contradictions between the workers and the capitalist system and mobilise the enormous power of the working class for the national liberation struggle. They must make the workers aware that social liberation cannot be achieved without national liberation, the task of which is to liberate one country after another from world capitalism. The escalation of the class struggle is in no way directed against the interests of the nation, but rather serves them. If capital today is internationalist and its ideology globalist, then the working class as a counterpart of capital must be nationalist (in the sense of anti-imperialist solidarity of the people fighting for liberation). And vice versa: the class struggle of the workers against capital is directed against an internationally intertwined power and thus benefits the liberation of the peoples from this power!

NO NATIONAL LIBERATION WITHOUT THE LIBERATION OF THE WORKING CLASS!

NO SOCIALISM WITHOUT THE LIBERATION OF THE NATION AND THE RECONQUEST OF NATIONAL IDENTITY!

PEOPLES OF THE WORLD, UNITE IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST GLOBALIST CAPITAL - NATIONAL LIBERATION EVERYWHERE!

Globalism weaponises migration. Sovereign Socialism defends humanity everywhere.

Open borders fanatics - whether liberal capitalist globalist, dribbling idpol globalist, or liberal trotskist globalist (there isn't much difference really) - scream hysterically when Working Class people do not share their fetish for destroying sovereignty and making the entire world a slave state utterly defenceless against the greedy parasites who think only in terms of how to use human beings to make more money for them.  The Socialist Motherland Party has a policy of closing the borders, so that our country becomes self-sufficient in economic, cultural and all other important areas.  We do not have this policy because we are xenophobic, but rather because we understand that borders protect people.  Borders protect the Working Class from greedy capitalists who use immigrants as cheap labour to drive down wages and working conditions.  Borders protect people in other countries from exploitation and from the brain drain of the most skilled being stolen by corporations who are more than happy to leave untrained Workers on the scrap-heap in one country while trained Workers from another country are removed, thus weakening the country they leave.

Socialism is about what is best for the people.  Internationalism is a spirit of cooperation and mutual respect, which can only exist between Free Socialist Nations with absolute control of their own borders.  Internationalism doesn't exist under Capitalism.  What exists is the opposite of Internationalism - and that is Globalism.  Globalism means the end of sovereignty, the end of security of labour, the end of a standard of living which is liveable, and the end of culture as all peoples are reduced to economic units to be used and abused and ultimately thrown away when they no longer make profits for the global ruling class.

The following post by Peter Freitag sums up what it means to be against unlimited migration, and how this isn't a racist issue, but an anti-Capitalist one which Socialists who have not been blinded by identity politics and menshevik lies, fully understand.......

OK lets be fucking clear about this whole migration topic. It is not because people do not care for these poor people that they don’t want masses coming in.

It is first off, because the actual poor people don’t want to see more of the already insufficient resources spent on them, as not a single fucking EU country strays from maintaining a certain level of poverty to give companies and employers leverage, divided amongst even more people.

If the EU and it’s member states really wanted to make morally integer decisions, they would first off, abolish poverty on their own territory, they would actually trial every company and it’s shareholders, if involved into slavery and/or destabilisation of another country/region for the sake of maximising profits.

This way, the resistance of residents of the EU would be reduced and there would be drastically less people needing to flee.

Another issue, be it just felt or not, we Europeans take pride in our freedoms and our free to chose lifestyle. So it should be absolutely no surprise, that if some backward preachers and/or religious activists, from any religion those people bring with them, are trying to convert people to a lifestyle that we successfully rejected centuries ago from our own predominant christian churches, there is anger flaring up.

I for my part will absolutely never allow any whatsoever fricking belief to dictate my sexlife for one or how men and or women need to dress and behave. To be specific, I am totally positive, that in a society, where women need to hide themselves away under garments so that men don’t get tempted, these men are all wimps.

In our society as in many other, men take pride in their ability of self-control, it is part of their showcasing of their mental and moral resilience, it is a quality for them.

So if these people who come from a background where this quality seems not to exist in men, come over here, it is their duty to step up their game and not us to lower our standards to accommodate them!

By the way, this BS about women needing to hide away, has started to be pushed by a growing number of wanna be holy men only some 50 years ago, I learned not so recently.

Everyone to their beliefs, but I will never lower my standards to make such people feel comfortable, if not for myself, it would still be that these people should never feel comfortable about this, as it is forcefully legitimised injustice through twisted belief!

Call me intolerant if you like, call me an infidel if you must, but I never killed anyone for my beliefs and I believe in such ways, that I don’t need anyone else to believe the same to be happy. First achieve what I am able to, then come and criticise me!

The Peterloo Massacre changed NOTHING

Today marks two hundred years since capitalists murdered 18 Working Class people among nearly 700 injured by state-ordained terrorism in the Peter's Field area of Manchester.

The names of those murdered at the order of Manchester Magistrate, William Hulton:

John Ashton (Stabbed to death)
John Ashworth (Stabbed and trampled to death)
William Bradshaw (Gunned down)
Thomas Buckley (Stabbed to death)
James Crompton (Trampled to death)
William Dawson (Stabbed and crushed to death)
Edmund Dawson (Stabbed to death)
Margaret Downes (Stabbed to death)
William Fildes (Trampled to death, age 2)
un-named Gaunt (Beaten to death prior to birth during brutal attack on her pregnant Mother)
Mary Heys (Trampled to death)
Joshua Hyde (Murdered by being shot)
Sarah Jones (Beaten to death)
John Lees (Beaten to death)
Martha Partington (Asphyxiated)
Arthur Neil (Beaten to death)
John Rhodes (Stabbed to death)
Joseph Whitworth (Shot to death)

These names are not taught in schools.  Working Class people are taught to recite the names of the Ruling Class oppressors, from such trivia as the wives of the 'king' Henry Tudor, to the names of bourgeois politicians and other criminals who form the Establishment.  We must remember our people who have been brutalised and destroyed by our class enemy - and to hell with the official 'history' which glorifies the crimes of the exploiters and traitors.

The Peterloo Massacre is called a defining moment in British politics, but it is nothing of the sort.  The perfectly reasonable requests of those peacefully gathered in Manchester on this day two hundred years ago, have all ultimately been ignored:

Suffrage

The rotten boroughs may have been scrapped, but now elected MPs simply ignore the instructions of the voters, making the vote irrelevant.  The class which derided the ability of the Working Class to make decisions for ourselves, continues to describe us as stupid (as having inferior intellect to them by virtue of birth).  They reluctantly allowed universal suffrage, but as is increasingly obvious by the refusal to implement the Working Class orders for Britain to leave the EU ('Brexit'), due to us not 'understanding' what we were voting for(!), voting means nothing.

Democracy

(Drawing By Samuel William Fores - acknowledgements to National Portrait Gallery)

The revolutionaries who were judicially murdered in 1820 (John Brunt, William Davidson, James Ings, Arthur Thistlewood, Richard Tidd, RIP) understood the futility of bourgeois democracy, whereas the proto-trotskyite leader at Peterloo, Henry Hunt, clung on to pie in the sky reformism.  On this day we honour the memory of our comrades who were murdered by the state for daring to demand proletarian democracy, and we spit on the memory of the treacherous scum who followed the safe path and paved the way for their deaths (including those who betrayed them during the course of the kangaroo court convictions).

Taxes on Food, aka the 'Corn Laws'

The corn laws were repealed - eventually - but since then VAT on food has been introduced and the destruction of agricultural land has seen food poverty accelerate to the point where food banks are a necessity for millions of Working Class people.  Membership of the EU makes this worse, and the parasites in parliament are doing all they can to ensure the EU-wide corn laws stay in place.

A Living Wage and Liveable Working Hours/Conditions

The protesters at Peterloo wanted an end to the import of cheap labour, an end to working hours which made a life outside work impossible, and an end to mechanisation which was destroying jobs even then.  In modern Britain, we have zero hours contracts (the so-called Gig Economy) which see people forced to live in poverty with no job security whatsoever.  Those who have full-time work are forced to work overtime hours which - although officially illegal - are expected by employers.

Joseph Johnson of the Manchester Patriotic Union, wrote in August 1819 the following words:

"Nothing but ruin and starvation stare one in the face in the streets of Manchester and the surrounding towns, the state of this district is truly dreadful, and I believe nothing but the greatest exertions can prevent an insurrection."

Aside from the possibility of insurrection which is woefully unlikely due to the overwhelming apathy and despair of the down-trodden people, the words of 1819 are perfectly applicable to 2019.

It is absolutely disgusting and a mockery of the memory of those murdered by capitalists in 1819, that today in Manchester capitalist-neo-trot fanatics used the event to call for open borders, which are themselves the backbone of capitalist exploitation and the sure way to keep the people in poverty through fear of unemployment.

The Peterloo Massacre revisited at Orgreave, 18th June 1984

For those who say Peterloo was an isolated incident, it is only necessary to look back at the police brutality in the Miners' Strike to see that nothing has changed.  Like Peterloo, the authorities sent butchers on horseback to assault peaceful protesters, and then mobilised the media to slander the victims of establishment tyranny.  It is in part due to the Peterloo Massacre that the unarmed police were formed, so that the people would be somewhat safer from the brutality of the ruling regime and their paid mercenaries.  But even that small victory which doubtless saved the lives of hungry Miners in the 1980s, has now been reversed with the police routinely being better armed than the military.

Peterloo Changed NOTHING, it is up to us to make change happen

The Working Class are more exploited than ever.  Our living standards are collapsing along with our life expectancy.  Those who were murdered in 1819 have been followed by many more, and the collaborators in parliament and the media defile their names by uttering them.  We need a better future than the capitalists are willing to give us.  We are not asking for more, like Oliver Twist in the Dickensian workhouse; We are demanding more, nay, we are demanding EVERYTHING.

Don't fall for the rhetoric of the labour party, the loony trots and the pathetic social democrats. Fight for Freedom, for Socialism.  Make a difference. Join the only party that remembers those who fell in 1819, and which will ensure the crimes do not go unpunished.  Join the Socialist Motherland Party.

Activism means taking Actions

How many people moan about the state of the country, but do nothing?  Just about everyone.  As long as this pathetic mentality prevails, we are doomed.

The arch-enemies of the people, (the politicians who refuse to obey the instructions of the electorate to break the UK from the EU empire, whilst simultaneously bleating on about 'democracy') have done more than any foreign military in history to wreck and subjugate our homeland.  The titles of the parties are irrelevant - Labour, Tory, Lib-dem, SNP, Plaid Cymru, etc - all are self-serving, empire-serving and ultimately, finance-serving.

The despicable UK government has crushed the Working Class population.  We have had our employment opportunities wiped out by the deliberate introduction of Zero Hours Contracts, which make a mockery of the already lamentable Minimum Wage; our manufacturing base has been sold to multinational corporations who have simply closed it down and made a fortune in the process; our agricultural land has become industrialised, with food production such that nothing is safe to eat; prices of everything have risen so quickly that we find ourselves unable to afford to live beyond subsistence level.  All this has occurred alongside draconian legislation forbidding criticism of the Establishment and of those the liberal disorder they have fomented to crush us.

The hated UK-regime is not satisfied with ruining our standards of living, they are after our very land itself; land without which we cannot survive.  Our Green Belts are being abolished in order to allow greedy capitalist builders to concrete over every last bit of the UK; transforming our 'green and pleasant land' into a massive network of housing estates, akin to the southern English town of Reading.  The liars-in-chief, of course, argue that deregulating the green belt areas will boost the construction industry and allow first time buyers to get on the property ladder.  There is already a massive amount of vacant property which could be bought by the state under compulsory purchase orders, then redistributed to people in need of housing.  The Socialist Motherland Party sees the confiscation of second homes (including all homes rented out by private landlords) and vacant properties as the first step towards abolishing housing as a means of unearned income, with the later stages being the total end of private ownership, with free housing allocated by the state in a manner fitting each individual case in need.  The so-called housing shortage is a myth and could easily be ended by seizing empty housing alone.  But of course, the deliberate destruction of the land serves to make us reliant upon imports of food for our survival, and locks us into the global economic system; this is the real reason for this despicable policy.

As if to further infuriate the people, the hated government is crucifying people who are impoverished by the capitalist system, and require Universal Credit to top up their paltry income.  This year-on-year inflation-led cut in the safety net for the poorest in society is accompanied by a periodic rise in the tax thresh-hold for the richest people (including the government itself).  The scum at the top who haven't the faintest idea of what real work actually is, are so condescending that they openly declare those impoverished by the State's economic policies, to be 'scroungers'.  First they abolish the borders which protect the Working Class from an excess population which drives down wages and wage demands by the fear of unemployment, then they destroy any meaningful minimum wage by allowing the criminal practice of Zero Hours Contracts, then they crucify those they have thrown onto the dole by slashing social security assistance, and by introducing such sick and unacceptable measures as the 'bedroom tax'.  These people despise us, and take great joy in letting us know it.

We are being attacked on every front.  It is not enough to type on a keyboard, to whine in the privacy of our homes (away from the all-pervasive police surveillance state), or to take the electoral path for any reason other than to gain publicity for our ideology; we must take ACTION.

They want to screw us financially?  OK, then we must reciprocate.  We must do everything we can to exist outside their tax system, and we must ensure that wherever possible we only trade with our own class and not liberal class traitors who we should see as worse than the bourgeois filth they emulate; we must especially seek to trade with those who are self-employed and not a part of the international corporate menace.  At a practical level we can take such simple measures as buying our eggs and milk from a local milkman, rather than a supermarket (although this admittedly is becoming mor difficult as local dairies go to the wall).  The days in which supermarkets were vastly cheaper than independent traders are over; having crushed the majority of the competition through under-cutting prices, the supermarkets have increased them to the point where a pint of milk at a supermarket is maybe only a penny cheaper than from a local dairy, and eggs cost more!  On an ecological level, buying milk from a milkman is better, as dairy-produced milk comes in glass bottles which do not leach plastic into what we drink, and do not contribute to landfills which despoil our land.  The advantages of shopping locally range from keeping our own in work, to buying fresh produce which is safer than the chemically-poisoned rubbish sold by the corporations.  Local farmers should also be supported, as should all independent tradesmen who stand in opposition to the globalist menace.  Even those who live high up in tower blocks can grow a few herbs for cooking; it takes practically no work to do and starves the corporations of a little more money.  If we take the easy option of buying from big businesses because they are financially a little cheaper, then we support our own demise.  If we aren't willing to sacrifice a few pennies here and there, we really don't deserve to escape our plight.

Buying from our own should be operated in tandem with boycotting the shops and businesses of the globalisers.  Financially supporting those who are stealing from us is not only stupid, it is treacherous.  We must boycott all Coloniser businesses and only trade with our own class.  Wherever possible we must take actions which will harm the enemy businesses and benefit our own people.  The globalisers are burglars stealing what is ours and destroying what belongs to our children.  We must take action to firstly stop their economic growth, then ultimately to put them out of business.

The destruction of our countryside requires more physical action to halt.  Machinery can be broken; building materials can be taken off building sites; sites can be picketed so that work cannot commence.  All these things make building unprofitable, and without profit, businesses will not operate.  But, more than halting the building industry, we must research viable alternatives, and lobby the building companies to renovate existing properties, or to develop urban land.  If we can get these people on side, then we can defend our land at the same time as helping small businesses.  Multinational firms deserve no such courtesy and should be sabotaged as a matter of principle.

There is much we can do.  Huntingdon Life Sciences reign of terror was exposed by activists refusing to comply with the laws of the enemy; the company continues, but not without many problems.  SMPBI members were active in the initial struggle against HLS and continue to fight this despicable industry.  If those opposing the vivisectionists were a little bolder, the company could be closed permanently in the UK.  Why is it that people can be motivated to save the lives of animals, but will do nothing to end the genocide of our people?  We need a level of compassion for the Working Class people which matches our love of animals.

From growing our own food, to trading outside the tax system, to dealing exclusively with local independent businesses, to boycotting and taking action against the globalist corporations, there is a wealth of action we can take.  If we do nothing, we deserve the fate which awaits us.  Those who come after us do not deserve to suffer as a result of our cowardice.  The fight is now, and we have to be in it.  This is not a spectator sport, and those who see the struggle as entertainment, are worse than those who do nothing because they are ignorant.

For too long we've taken a mild approach to this war waged upon us - forgiving the so-called 'harmless' slip-ups and oversights of our comrades, but we can't do that anymore. Every single act (or lack of action) has a consequence and it all adds up.  Government actions are, when fully considered, malevolent to the people. The only thing which convinces us otherwise is their words, and these are reported by the media. Politicians are experts at convincing us that they mean us well whilst they cause us harm. So if we stopped watching TV, or reading their newspapers, and never saw a slippery politicians face again, how would we know that they aren't overt enemies.

While we still have the power of the Internet (for now), we must use it to its maximum ability while we still can.

Spread the message everyday, and those of other awakened comrades by mass (e)mailing the contents to friends and relatives while encouraging them to do the same. Don't refrain yourself from "speaking the truth, even if your voice shakes", or in this example when your hand shakes when pushing the "send" button on your computer screen.

By doing so, you're bravely saying to your detractors ... "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" ... FREEDOM matters to me.

Party Slogans can say more than they want to!

The main parties of the British Isles all have slogans which they feel convey a message of what their intentions are.  The slogans tend to be short and to the point, but they often convey more than the authors desire.

The Liberal Democrats are, for some unfathomable reason, considered important players in Westminster.  There slogan is: 'Demand Better!'  We couldn't agree more - Demand Better than these sad deluded degenerate middle class idiots!  The 'rats have taken to cosying up to the would be dictator, Gina Nadira Singh - Miller: an egomaniacal individual, born in South America to Asian parents, she lost a court case trying to block the will of the British People to leave the European Union, and now uses the Lib Dems as a vehicle to thwart the UK democracy.  The rootless, globalist, globe-trotting bigot is at home with the Lib Dems, because like her, they too have no respect for Sovereignty and the decision of the Working Class to make Britain a free nation.  Demand Better indeed!

The Greens (whoever they may be), also get disproportionate media attention, in spite of being a Brighton and Hove party, with no support outside a very strange area of England.  The trans-fascist party is all for opening the borders and ending the existence of the UK.  Of course they are anti-democracy, openly calling for Brexit to be overturned.  Their slogan is 'For the Common Good', which fits perfectly with their policies in being vague, dull and nonsensical.

The Tories have an unofficial slogan of 'A Global Britain', which is an open statement of a desire to destroy the sovereignty of the UK, and turn it into a tax haven for Global Capitalists, and a plantation for the Working Class, who will see our already pitiful standard of living, crushed as the natural protections to our well being are smashed, and our country becomes unrecognisable as a part of a Globalised nightmare devoid of Culture, Tradition or any sense of Britishness worth the word.

Labour have the equally odious slogan, 'Rebuilding Britain For the Many', Not the Few, which is designed to give the impression that they care about the Working Class and are going to weaken the power of the parasitic Ruling Class.  Labour want to throw open the borders, build on every inch of Green Belt land, and do to the UK exactly what the Tories are doing.  The vile racist, Dianne Abbott, points to the future for the Working Class if she and her trotskyite partners-in-crime became the government, and just who the 'Few' are that they are against.  Unlike the sly Tories with their pretence of respecting the EU Independence Referendum, Labour are now openly calling for a Second Referendum, to bully us into staying in the grips of the Globalist Bloc, as a stepping stone to Total Capitalism Worldwide, with all borders obliterated and all peoples reduced to servitude.

The parties in Wales, Scotland and both sides of the division line in Ireland, also have slogans, which have the same desire of hoodwinking the people into thinking that the politicians are going to stand up for the people, rather than sell us all out to Globalisation.

There is only one party with a slogan which is honest and states exactly where the party stands.  That party is the SMPBI:

The Anglo-Zionist Ruling Class: The Enemy of the Working Class Everywhere

In the struggle for freedom, it is vital that we fight the real enemy, and do not get drawn into attacking those who are used as human shields.  We need to distinguish between the real architects of our plight, and those who may be associated through kinship or locality.  Our enemies have no qualms about sacrificing the common people in order to gain more control.

A particularly problematic issue is how to differentiate between our active enemies, the sleepers, and those who are genuinely not a part of the problem.  There is an undeniable Zionist dimension to our problems, discussion of which invites accusations of anti-Semitism.  This is a trap for to silence criticism of the Ruling Class, and it is a trap we must be careful to not fall into.  There are those who regard appealing to ordinary Jews to join in the resistance to the globalist order, as nothing short of treason.  Those who believe that all Jews are intrinsically bad, and all Gentiles good, have obviously watched too many films of the Cowboys and Indians variety.  There are many Zionist megalomaniacs who are not Jewish, and there are many Jews who do not seek to enslave humanity.  It is important to not accept the way of thinking which the media, and those who would lead us, would like to spoon-feed us.

As British citizens, we must appreciate that the deeds of the Establishment do not reflect the will of all the people.  The Ruling Class method of silencing those who oppose the rulers has the ridiculous result of labelling those who oppose the tyrants who sit in power over us, as self-haters, and terrorists.  We do not hate ourselves or our people; only the vermin who misrule in our name.  The label 'self-hating' conjures imagery of a mirror-smashing, possibly self-harming, loathsome creature who is wracked with feelings of inferiority and disgust, and who probably is justified in these feelings.  This label works well in preventing ordinary people associating with, or even listening to, someone they perceive as ill, and possibly as contagious.  However, when one looks behind the character assassination, more often than not, one can find someone who loves his (or her) own people to the point of no longer being able to accept the actions of a ruling minority who besmirch the national character through their selfish deeds.

There are good Israelis who should not be spoken of in the same breath as the likes of Netanyahu, the MOSSAD, and the MOSSAD-created Hamas rocketeers in Gaza.  The same goes for many ordinary Britons in relation to war criminals such as all recent Prime Ministers, the MI6 architects of the 07/07/05 London Bombings, and to the MI5 murderers who created the IRA as a method of dividing the peoples of the Isles against one another, with the people in the north of Ireland taking the brunt of the propaganda campaign.  The temptation to see everything in black and white, as good or evil, is human, but it is not realistic.  It is unpleasant to have to admit that some of one's own kind are such foul specimens that their existence is an affront to human decency.  we in the SMPBI love our people, but we are not blinkered to the fact that the world is a more dangerous and unhappy place due to the actions of people who are of our nation and country.

It is not self-hatred to fight against internal domestic enemies; indeed the enemy within is more dangerous than the enemy without.  The Monarchy are at the heart of the globalist agenda, and have been instrumental in the destruction of Europe.  If supporting the Monarchy is patriotic in the UK, then UK patriotism is in more desperate trouble than one would fear.

The UK Establishment murdered over One Million people in the Great Hunger of the 1840s, and caused a further Two Million to flee their Irish homeland.  The Monarchy did nothing to stop the murders, but rather sent in police and army units to crush a much needed revolt.  The resentment against the British is still evident today, but as reasonable as it is to despise the British Establishment for its murder of the Irish (by stealing their food and manufacturing starvation), it is not acceptable to blame all the British for this crime.

At the time of the Great Hunger, life for ordinary Britons was no picnic; the industrial revolution had destroyed the peasantry.  The Establishment had stolen their land and forced them into soul-destroying work in which life expectancy was low and wages lower.  Child labour, press-ganging (naval slavery), murder of trade unionists, unsanitary urban slum dwellings, work houses, police brutality, exile or execution of dissidents, malnutrition, and even the right of the Establishment land owners to take the virginity of all girls (in other words to rape children); these and other horrors were the lot of the common people.  Those who label the British as evil, really need to take a moment to reflect on the brutalisation of the British people by the Establishment.  The crimes of the rulers against the world outside the UK mirrored those against the people of these Isles.

For the Jewish people, the same situation presents as for the British.  The Second World War is often cited as an anti-Jewish war, but the truth differs from the propaganda.  There were no Homicidal Gas Chambers in Nazi-controlled Europe, and until the end of the War when food and medical supplies were cut, the occupants of the transit (concentration) camps were actually less likely to go hungry or to perish than those outside the camps.  The Jews were terrorised and forced to leave their homes; often they had assimilated and in some cases were unaware of their Jewish ancestry.  The Jews were put into the camps in order to fulfil the Zionist goal of populating Palestine with Jews and turning it into a hub for global Zionist rule.  Whereas the propaganda of the 6 million is an outright lie, the suffering of the common Jews was genuine.  Indeed, it would not be surprising to find that the deaths of around 700,000 (not 6,000,000) Jews at the end of the war were allowed by the Zionists who controlled both sides, in order to make their propaganda more realistic.  Ordinary Jews - like the Working Class of all origins - have always been pawns to be sacrificed as needs be.  All that matters to the Establishment is that their wealth and power increases.  The ordinary people are insignificant.

It is said that the life of every Palestinian isn't worth a single Jewish fingernail.  If this was the genuine policy of the Israeli State, then from the perspective of national preservation, (its location in Palestine aside), this is laudable.  However, the policies of the Zionist regime are now steering Israel to war; a war in which millions of Israelis could perish.  A Zionist policy for the defence and strengthening of a Jewish homeland, kept distinct of all others and secure within its borders is a reasonable objective, when one understands the ethnic-solidarity of the Jewish people.  Without the Talmudic hatred of the Goyim, there would be no problem with the Jewish State.  The Talmudic infiltration of Europe and much of the non-Jewish world has proven that there is no worthy National Zionist ideal but only the programme of Zionist Imperialism.

Zionist Imperialism utilises the following weapons: Political Correctness; Multi-Culturalism; Mass Migration; Pro-Transgenderism; Anti-Indigenous Rights; Supremacy of Materialism over the Spiritual.  National Zionism rightfully keeps these poisons away from the nation.  It would be naïve to think that Zionism has been hijacked by imperialists.  Zionism is the political expression of the Talmud, and at its core is based on the lunatic notion that the Jews are God's Chosen People and have a right to rule over the whole world, with the non-Jews existing only to serve them.

The idea that opposition to evil is self-hatred, highlights just how far our enemies have progressed in turning from a virtue to a vice, allegiance to what is morally right.  The British Establishment has been thoroughly Zionised since at least the time of the arrival of William Stadholder (1748), although the roots of the decay can be traced to William the Bastard (1066).  With the next William soon to take the throne, this process is now so far developed that the UK would be unrecognisable to the people living under the previous despotic Williams.

There is a tendency to view the people of a country and its ruling elite as one and the same.  This is certainly not the case in the UK.  In Israel, the rulers may at least be of the same stock as the people, but are their aspirations the same?  The 'self-hating Jews' who love their people so much that they are willing to endure the venom of Organised Jewry, in order to expose the evils of the Israeli regime, are an asset to the struggle for freedom worldwide.  Those who vilify them are as much enemies of humanity as those who sing God Save the Queen and wave their shiny red white and blue rags.  We need to accept the fact that loyalty to the Establishment is treason to the people, and the only loyalty which matters is loyalty to the people.

The British ruling class of Monarchy, Financiers, Freemasons and Bankers have trodden on the people for centuries.  They are the ones who created Israel as a base for the transformation of the world into a fully controlled mass of producer-consumers, ruled by unseen depots. There is a level of Zionist control over the British Establishment which makes an attack on the Establishment an attack on Talmudism.  In these days of political policing, it is dangerous to point to the enemy, and clearly state that it has an identity.   But to cower in the face of danger is to allow our enemies to win.  Much of the Establishment of the UK is Zionist by politics.  Herein lies the problem: it is often assumed that Israel controls the UK, but the relationship is not so simple; the same Establishment controls both countries.

Due to the rôle of Zionism in the UK, criticism of Israel is forbidden.  The attacks on Jeremy Corbyn for 'anti-Semitism' are attacks against a decent human being who understands the nature of Zionism, and who until recently, had the courage to stand up to it.  He has weakened and bowed his head in submission to the global financial ruling class.  We have stood firm.  Our attack against the Establishment cannot avoid attacking certain Jews, but there are Jews by radition who have awoken to the lies of their self-appointed leaders and should be fighting alongside us.

There is a natural knee-jerk reaction to go on the defensive when one feels one is being attacked.  For the reactionaries in Britain, this manifests as a rallying to the Monarchy, jingoistic support of the soldiers who are killing for the multi-national corporations.  For Jews, it is Israel to which they rally, and the IDF butchers who they defend.  It doesn't have to be this way.

In the UK there are growing numbers of people who can see how evil the Establishment is.  When such people are attacked as a part of a general attack on Britain, this only harms the opposition to globalism.  We who live inside the beast are as much victims of the globalist cabal as those who are openly attacked outside our borders.  And so it is with Israel.

In an ideal world, Israel would return the land stolen from Palestine and relocate to Birobidjan.  The best that we can realistically hope for is that decent Jews who rightly wish to live amongst their own will either relocate to the real Jewish State, or at least put pressure on the Tel Aviv regime to make peace with Israel's neighbours.

Maybe one day the Talmudists will be defeated, then National Zionism can become a reality and the Jewish State can thrive as a distinct land in which lunatic religious bigotry is contained (or better still vanquished), and can no longer threaten the rest of the world.  We can but hope.  For this possible outcome, we need to take the serious step of focusing our attacks on the globalist Establishment in Tel Aviv and London, and not on the ordinary people, who by and large just want to get on with their lives and look after their families.  We need to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with all who oppose globalism and all who believe in a free world of independent, self-sufficient, ethnically-distinct, culturally-strong nation-states.

Attacking all Jews or all Britons only serves to bolster the support for the Establishment of those who are neutral in this conflict, or are only partly aware of the internationalist menace.  We cannot afford to strengthen our enemies in any way.

The English Civil War (1642-1649)

Detail from the statue of Oliver Cromwell by Sir William Hamo Thornycroft RA, unveiled outside the House of Commons on 31 October 1899. Photo Loz Pycock (CC-BY-SA 2.0).

A war unique in our history: a remaking of our country was fought not only on the field of war but also in people’s hearts and minds…

There have been power struggles before and since among rich elites or between rival aristocratic houses. The English Civil War was entirely different, actively involving whole swathes of society normally excluded from control.

In England, Charles I’s reign witnessed rising discontent almost from his succession in 1625. Costly, failed wars led to inflation and taxation. Religious reforms were unpopular and seen as taking the country towards Catholicism. And there was an underlying sense that the country was not being ruled in the best interests of its people.

Bankrupt

In 1640 Charles summoned parliament. He was bankrupt, but wanted to raise an army to suppress opposition in Scotland, where he was equally unpopular. The House of Commons in the Long Parliament (as it became known) represented a cross-section of the ruling class establishment: gentry, merchants, lawyers. But almost for the first time in English history, elections were contested on political issues.

The real strength of those opposed to the king in the House of Commons came from outside parliament, across a wide cross-section of society. Generally support for parliament came from the economically advanced south and east of England, whereas the king’s support came from the economically backward areas of the north and west. In Yorkshire, Lancashire and Sussex, there was a clear division between parliamentarian, rebellious industrial areas and royalist agricultural areas.

There is no simple reason why opposition to the king and his ministers moved from protest to armed revolt in the First Civil War (1642-46). It is likely that popular discontent over a range of different political and religious issues produced such a heady and powerful mix that trust in the king and his government totally collapsed. The “humble respect and awful reverence which is usually given to nobility, gentry and clergy”, as Edward Chamberlayne put it in 1672, crumbled in these tumultuous times.

Memorial near Skipton, Yorkshire, to one of the heroes of the Civil War. Photo Workers.

In November 1641 parliament passed the “Grand Remonstrance” setting out their many grievances against Charles. The king’s next move was disastrous and prompted open revolt. He went to parliament with a body of soldiers intending to arrest the five leading members of the parliamentary opposition. Warned beforehand, they had left the Commons by the time Charles arrived. The king’s bungled attempt at a coup made them heroes.

King Charles left London and shortly began to raise an army against the rebellious parliament. In turn, parliament decreed that they did not require Royal Assent to make laws, taking control of local militias and a growing volunteer army. And so in 1642 war began.

Dissatisfaction about the conduct of the war led Oliver Cromwell setting up the New Model Army in 1645. Its composition was unusual, including a broad cross-section of society in contrast to armies elsewhere at that time. The broader social origins of its soldiers provided literate, argumentative soldiers with easy links to friends in civilian political movements.

The first armies of both sides had been formed largely of volunteers. Although diluted by conscription from the second year of the war, this sense of fighting for a cause they believed in remained a strong factor amongst parliamentary armies, and was transferred to the New Model Army.

Organised

The New Model Army was disciplined and well organised, averse to looting. Quite soon promotions to officer rank were on merit rather than social rank. It took a major political battle in parliament to ensure acceptance of these forms of military organisation.

Parliamentarian forces eventually gained the upper hand and in May 1646 Charles surrendered to the Scottish army. He was handed over to parliament when the Scots withdrew from England in January 1647.

‘THE OFFICE OF KING WAS FORMALLY ABOLISHED ON 17 MARCH 1649.’

In April 1647 parliament tried to disband the New Model Army but failed. Soldiers refused to disband. After months of dispute with parliament, they declared, “We were not a mere mercenary army” and would not disband without settlement of both their own grievances (including arrears of pay) and the people’s political and religious liberties.

In June 1647 a troop of 500 cavalry seized the king and brought him to Newmarket where the rest of the army was. In August the army occupied London. That October the Council of the Army, with representatives of the rank and file as well as officers, debated the settlement of the kingdom, known as the Putney Debates. They even discussed An Agreement of the People, a manifesto produced by radical Levellers.

The escape of Charles from detention brought the debates to an end and opened the Second Civil War. The New Model Army had to put down scattered mutinies and then fight a Scots army enlisted to support Charles. That was defeated in August 1648, ending the war.

Tyrant, traitor

Charles I was put on trial in January 1649. Condemned as a “tyrant, traitor, murderer, and public enemy to the good people of this nation”, he was executed on 30 January. The office of king was formally abolished on 17 March.

After the Putney debates the heyday was over for the Leveller cause. The momentum of the republican side veered towards the wealthy, anxious to protect the interests of property. Gradually the New Model Army became ever more a professional body and the days of sermons, lectures, leaflets, agitators and citizens in uniform passed.

The Levellers, Diggers and Ranters disappeared from view and lost their impact on the public arena. But the English people’s view of the world had changed forever.

Related Content
Capital vs. workers
Devolution – a failed idea from a failed era
Let's get on with leaving
The NHS at 70: all to play for
The great betrayal? Don’t let the EU steal our fish

Re-published with Permission from, and Thanks to, the CPBML

9/11: A Capitalist Crime that has been used as an excuse to Murder Millions.

Seventeen years ago on what was an incredibly hot and sunny day in the UK, the weather was not the major topic of discussion for the weather-obsessed Brits, but rather what was on practically everyone's minds was the horrific events unfolding across the Atlantic Ocean in New York.

On the 11th of September 2001, aeroplanes were crashed into the two World Trade Centre towers, with massive loss of life and with the collapse of not only the towers, but other buildings not hit by the aeroplanes.  The massacre was immediately blamed on Saudi Arabian CIA agent, Osama Bin Laden, and his Al Qaeda (Al CIAda) network of terrorists.

Interestingly, although the blame was lain on a Saudi, the USA did not take the logical step of attacking Saudi Arabia, in order to bring down the brutal regime which sponsors Wahhabi/Salafi terrorism world-wide - and which has since been proven to have been guilty of funding the WTC massacre - but rather, the USA launched an attack upon the nation of Afghanistan, under the pretext that Bin Laden was in that country at the time of the attack!  One man was focused upon.  The organisation he fronted (Al Qaeda) had been created by the USA to undermine the USSR's attempt to defend itself from Islamic terrorists operating on its borders, but was now redefined as a terrorist threat to the USA.  Afghanistan was duly invaded and seventeen years later is still occupied by Yankee imperialists working for the benefit of the global capitalist corporations.  The Taliban had never been a threat to the USA, other than a threat to its criminal trade in heroin, which they had began to disrupt before their country was invaded.  Heroin production and the resulting human misery thus caused is at an all time high thanks to the US occupation - as are the profits of the scum who put money before people and see nothing wrong in the despicable trade in death.

After the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, came the great lie that Iraq was a terrorist menace and that it too had to be 'liberated' from its legitimate government.  The infamous Weapons of Mass Destruction lie was created - along with the War Criminal Tony Blair's 'dodgy dossier' to justify the destruction of a safe secular country, which seventeen years on is a wasteland, recovering from the US-created Islamic State terrorist regime, which began there as a staging post for the attack on Syria.  Iraq under Saddam Hussein had been a rich and peaceful country, which policed Islamic extremists with the rigour necessary to keep their insanity from corrupting the masses. After Saddam Hussein was illegally judicially murdered by the puppet regime serving the US imperial occupiers, the fundamentalist lunatics were encouraged to grow in strength, and the new bogeyman of IS was the result.

Between the brutal genocidal invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the US quietly moved to attack the nation of Yemen for the benefit of the brutal madmen in Saudi Arabia (the kingdom behind 9/11!) The genocide of the Yemen is ongoing although there is virtually a media black out on this tragedy, with most people not even knowing that the country is being obliterated by the House of Saud and its US allies.

The US terror train did not stop in the Middle East, but next went to Africa, interfering in country after country, to ensure that the economic power of the USA was upheld, making a string of African countries vassals of the US Empire in all but name.

Using the pretext of the environmental disaster in Haiti, the USA invaded Haiti in order to 'help' the country to deal with the 'natural' catastrophe besetting it.  Haiti has not since gained real autonomy from the US Empire.  The natural disaster saved the USA from having to create a political pretext for invasion.  In Venezuela, the legitimate Socialist system has been undermined to create great profits for the globalist capitalists, at the same time as great misery for Venezuelans.

Returning to their War OF Terror, the USA returned (although they never left!) to Africa in 2007 to invade Somalia. The result was the fracturing of the country and the explosion in Islamic (Wahhabi) extremism. Somalia became the Islamic State of Africa, all thanks to the supposedly anti-terrorist US intervention!

In 2011, the brutal butchers of the USA, under the order of puppet president Obama, invaded the rich and friendly nation of Libya, the bread basket of Africa and great hope for the continent. The much beloved father of Libya, Muammar Gadaffi, was murdered by the cold blooded butchers of Al Qaeda - the ones hated by the USA for 9/11 but now loved by them as liberators of Libya's oil(!) - and the country ruined.  The Gold Dinar proposed as a currency for an Africa free from the IMF was scrapped, and secular rule was replaced by rival religious terrorist lunacies.  The on-going invasion of Europe by economic migrants and wahhabi terrorists claiming to be 'refugees' was unthinkable with Libya acting as a barrier to them, but under US control it is accelerating for the benefit of global capitalist filth, who trade in human misery and in the destabilisation of the planet to make their misrule harder to fight against. 

Since 2014, the USA has been aiding Al Qaeda terrorists (back in the good books, all is forgiven, 9/11 is in the memory hole!) in their barbaric assault of the free people of Syria. The US creation of Islamic State was spread into Syria from the US base in Iraq.

Seventeen years after 9/11, the US terror machine has broken country after country, creating Islamic terrorist states across the globe. Poverty and the power of the IMF has increased. Manufactured waves of 'refugees' have made Europe unsafe, creating job insecurity which the globalist corporations have exploited to boost their own profits whilst making the indigenous Working Class fear for our futures.  Austerity is a part of the War OF Terror.

In the Ukraine, the US puppet regime has murdered vast numbers of Russians and Free Ukrainians as the US Empire spreads its terrorist army of NATO to the borders of Russia and Belarus.

The world in 2001 was a happier and safer place. The Saudi/US/Global Capitalist menace has destroyed, or is destroying, the following countries using 9/11 as the excuse:

Afghanistan
Yemen
Iraq
Somalia
Sudan
Chad
Libya
Syria
Ukraine
Cameroon
Kurdistan
Palestine

It is occupying by stealth many other nations, impoverishing and brutalising vast areas of Asia, Africa, South America and Europe.   The stateless globalist Empire is destroying free countries everywhere.  The spread of fear in the EU and UK is a result of the combined terrorist weapons of economic Austerity and fake Refugees created by the puppet Islamic State in occupied Iraq and Syria.

The War OF Terror has created Islamic terrorism on a scale unthinkable before, yet curiously, just as with the fortuitous failure of Israelis to go to work in the WTC on the day of the massacre, Israel itself has not been attacked by the alleged enemies which encircle it!  Israel is the centre of operations of Global Banking Capitalism, adding another dimension to the US terror machine.

There is an undeniable wealth of evidence to prove that 9/11 was contrived to justify the creation of an unofficial Global Corporate and Finance Capitalist Empire.   The following are a sample of videos which cover some of the material concerning the atrocities of and since 9/11.  These videos have so far survived the Youtube purge, although that may change:

Those who fell on '9/11' were the first of many many thousands more to die at the hands of the Globalist tyrants. It will take a Global Revolution to overthrow the capitalist system and the foundation ideology which hides behind it.

Seventeen years have passed since the World Trade Centre Massacre on the 11th September 2001.  The atrocity has been referred to as an event which changed the world, and that certainly is the case.

The world of 11.9.01 was a happier place than the world we live in now.  There were problems, but none as extreme as the ones we accept today as part of normal life.  In Afghanistan, the Taliban government had just scorched all the Opium Poppy fields and it looked as if the scourge of Heroin and its associated crime would become a thing of the past, or at least reduced.  Things were looking good.

Following the 9/11 murders, President Bush Jr announced that a mysterious group known as Al Qaeda had carried out the attacks, and that their leader, a certain Osama Bin Laden, was hiding in Afghanistan.  He maintained that the Taliban were supporters of Bin Laden and that the USA would deal with these killers once and for all.  The problem was that this story was a lie.  Unbeknownst to the world at large, the Taliban had warned the USA about the 9/11 attacks before they occurred.  They were also implacable enemies of Bin Laden who did not trust the man or his version of Islam.  The idea of them harbouring the man the USA claimed was responsible for the attacks was ludicrous.  There must have been an ulterior motive for targeting the Taliban.

The world only had to wait until the next month for the USA to attack Afghanistan, and not much longer to discover the real motive behind the libelling of the Taliban as the 9/11 butchers.  It was, in  a word, Opium. In 1999, NATO had bombed the European nation of Serbia in order to establish the criminal vipers nest of Kosovo.  Kosovo was established to facilitate the importing of Heroin into Europe.  The mercenaries used to defeat the people of Serbia were the terrorists used to undermine the Soviet forces in Afghanistan in the 1980s.  They were designated by their CIA handlers, 'The Cell', or to use the Arabic term, Al Qaeda.  Given their own criminal state in Europe, these vile creatures were responsible for ensuring that Europe was flooded with Heroin; the sale of which would be laundered through the banks.  The destruction of European lives and the vast profit made thereby was interrupted by the Taliban's burning of the Opium fields.

The Taliban had initially made use of Al Qaeda to eject the Soviet imperialists from their country.  As long as they played along with the demands of the criminals in London and Washington DC, the Taliban were left alone to conduct their affairs as they saw fit.  Football stadia were turned into public execution centres for undesirables but the hypocrites of the liberal-Establishment said and did nothing.  As long as the Heroin flowed out of Afghanistan, the rulers could behave as they pleased.  Seventeen years after 9/11, Afghanistan is certainly a different place. The soil is littered with more dead foreign soldiers than the total number murdered in New York City as an excuse to invade that country, and there are well over twelve times that number of dead Afghans.  The country continues to be a battleground with the Afghan Resistance fighting on to liberate their land.  In contrast to 2001, Heroin production is running at near capacity, protected by internationalist servicemen to benefit the political-economic elite and to destroy the home nations.

In 2003 the elusive Bin Laden was forgotten for a while, with the spotlight of the US-UK aggressors being focused on Saddam Hussein in Iraq.  It was alleged that the Iraqi nation was preparing to use 'Weapons of Mass Destruction'  against poor little Israel, and maybe even against targets in Europe .  This was a display of the most outrageous chutzpah by the war-mongers in the internationalist alliance centred on the UK and USA.  The infamous 'dodgy dossier' used by Prime Minister Blair to justify attacking Iraq was a complete forgery.  Even after the forgery was finally admitted, the aggression continued.

Iraq was an advanced nation which could trace its civilisation back to Babylon and Sumeria.  It was rich in culture and had vast oil reserves.  President Saddam Hussein had fought against Islamic extremism in Iraq, maintaining near secular rule, and even having Christians such as Tariq Aziz in his Government.  As part of his campaign against extremism he had waged war in the Kurdish Northwest of Iraq, murdering 182,000 people in the 1980s.  Alike to neighbouring Turkey where Kurds were also butchered, these crimes against humanity were conducted unhindered by the UK-USA cabal. Turkey continues to this day to butcher the people of Kurdistan, but like Iraq was, Turkey is an ally of the USA and allowed to murder at will.

Saddam Hussein prevented the rise of Wahhabi/Salafi Islam in Iraq, understanding that it would threaten the balance of Sunnis and Shi'ites.  He had commissioned research into the origins of the Wahhabists and found evidence proving they were a sect of non-Muslim origin which had infiltrated Islam with the objective of perverting and destroying the religion.  They were proscribed in Iraq and the Baghdad government had begun circulating information exposing the truth of the sect, and of Al Qaeda's ties to the USA.  Attempts to link Bin Laden and Hussein were as ridiculous as the WMD story, and equally deceitful.

The UK-USA coalition have systematically stripped Iraq of anything of economic value.  They have stolen the invaluable ancient Cuneiform Library (much still to be translated).  They have also taken control of oil production, which was the major reason for the invasion, rather than the nonsense of phantom WMDs.  Much has changed in Iraq since 11.9.01.  In 2001 Iraq was a vibrant modern nation, rich in culture and resources, with a tough ruler but one who maintained order for the majority; much of it now resembles a wasteland with depleted uranium scattered across the country from coalition artillery.  The death toll for the invaders runs to nearly 5000; for the inhabitants of Iraq, the death toll stands at a staggering quarter of a million ordinary Iraqi civilians murdered by the invaders or killed as a consequence of the invasion.  Is it any wonder that the people in neighbouring Iran are wary of the USA? Donald Trump's intermittent slandering of Iran and thinly veiled threats, do not help!

Public opposition to the Iraq invasion saw massive protests across Europe and elsewhere.  In order to keep people terrified by the spectre of Islamic extremism, on the 12th March 2004 Madrid was bombed (exactly 911 days after 9/11), followed on the 7th July 2004 by another copycat atrocity in London and then on the 1st October 2005 in Bali, bringing the fear of Islamic extremism to Australians.  Every case mirrored the 9/11 massacre insofar as Muslim extremists were blamed and ordinary civilians were murdered by agents working for their own governments.

As well as fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, the 'internationalist brigade' of the USA/UK and others, has been active in Somalia, the Sudan and other nations.  Using the pretext of fighting a War on terror, the globalists have no compunction about invading sovereign nations and initiating 'regime change' to replace governments who resist the globalist cabal, with compliant stooges.  This is done in the name of democracy, and scarcely anyone in the mainstream media remarks on the total hypocrisy of the rulers in London and their partners-in-crime.

Public dissent has become all but a criminal offence in many countries.  It has become common place for whistle blowers to die in mysterious circumstances, such as was the case with Dr David Kelly who questioned the London regime's WMD fantasy and was found dead shortly after.  His case has become one of many.  In 2001, one could be forgiven for believing that the UK was a free country; only a fool would believe that now.

Our streets are covered by a sea of CCTV cameras; our Police are armed with every non-lethal gadget imaginable (although many have died from Police use of these weapons); the everyday happy-go-lucky Briton of 2001 is a shadow of his or her former self, replaced by a timid and fearful soul who dare not use politically incorrect language or offer a serious opinion on any matter lest he or she be dragged off in the night.  This is not an exaggeration, if anything it downplays the tyranny in the UK.

In 2001 it took a contrived tale of a bogeyman in a cave to scare people into accepting war.  As we have seen by the invasion of Libya, and the involvement of UK military forces in attacking free Syria, the people will now accept any aggression without anything more than a tabloid færytale.  In Libya, tens of thousands of people have been murdered by NATO and their NTC stooges; this figure is an estimate from the NTC and certainly will not include the Black Africans butchered by the racists allied to NATO.  Ironically, the NTC contains Al Qaeda mercenaries.  Yes, the very same people who we are still told we are at war with.  In topsy turvy post 9/11 reality, what would provoke outrage in 2001 barely raises a murmur.  People have learnt to keep quiet and only have interest in trivial matters such as Reality TV, Celebrities and Sport.

Another result of the 9/11 New York Massacre has been the dæmonisation of Muslims.  Every Muslim is now perceived as a potential extremist.  There is no understanding that the Wahabbists of Al Qaeda (our allies in Libya!) are loathed by decent Muslims and are far from representative of Islam as a whole.  Groups such as the pro-Israel, English Defence League were created post-9/11 as anti-Muslim distractions, ramming Zionist propaganda into the minds of dis-satisfied English youths.  The EDL is all but gone, and in its place there are myriad grouplets of competing fantasists who imagine themselves as soldiers winning the Battle of Stalingrad, and Muslim-hating Zionists who cannot defend European Culture because they do not understand it.

In 2001 Europe and the USA were respected by the world, and the people were generally free to speak as they found.  As a direct result of the 9/11 Massacre, our nations have become Police States with total surveillance in all matters.  Criticism of authority has become equated with terrorism.  Fearful self-censorship has replaced freedom of expression.  Perpetual War has become a reality.  The upshot for the economy?  The richest people in society have profited massively from the theft of resources and commodities in occupied lands; the rest of us are suffering economic hardships which we would not have imagined possible in 2001.

2018 is not only seventeen years after 2001, it is a world apart, and not for the better.  Imperialist wars have made the world a much more dangerous place.  The global cabal could not have achieved the occupation of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya without the staged 9/11 attacks; nor could  Israel have continued its occupation of Judea and Samaria, and its siege of Gaza.  The prospect of a One World State is becoming a reality; bombed into place by NATO.  Without the 9/11 justification all this would have been much harder to accomplish.

Lest we forget the human face of the soldiers killed to further the interests of global finance, pictures of the British dead in Afghanistan and Iraq can be found here. These are joined by fellow Britons in the wars in Libya and elsewhere.  Others have died, not to mention servicemen from the USA and around the globe.  They died not in vain, but worse, for the global Ruling Class to gain more control over the Working Class worldwide.

Dying in vain is bad enough, but these men and women have died in order to extend the grip of power of the global financial parasite class; they have died as casualties in a war to crush freedom the world over, and they were unwittingly on the side of the enemies of humanity.  They are victims of globalism in a similar manner to the people they were fighting.  Similar, but not the same, as the people attacked by the globalist forces died fighting for freedom, or were simply murdered in cold blood without any justification.  'Our' soldiers are fighting for capitalism, and anyone who supports them in any way except demanding they come home, is an accomplice in the global march to serfdom for all except the self-perpetuating Ruling Class.

2.4 million people have been murdered as a result of the initial 9/11 massacre.  That is the reality of Capitalism.  Millions have been displaced, including those who have entered Europe as refugees and economic migrants.

Theresa May, Tony Blair, David Cameron, and the rest of the crocodile tear politicians, have the blood of millions on their hands. The attack on freedom through the IHRA definition of anti-semitism, serves to criminalise criticism of the forces behind 9/11 and the resulting wars.

On this day, the SMPBI stands in defiance of the parasites, and calls out the enemies of humanity. The Tories, Labour, Lib-dems, UKIP, Greens etc are happy to take the pay of the Globalist Capitalists and parrot the lies of the official 9/11 fable.  The deaths of millions and destruction of lives of many millions more, is the result of towing the line.  We will smash the Capitalist system in the Isles, destroy Zionist power and bring in a Socialist order which will not tolerate a single lie mouthed by the global enemy of humanity.  We have no doubt that this will provoke the ire of the global enemy, but we are sure that an educated and armed population of the British Isles, united with revolutionaries across the globe also throwing off the shackles of the capitalist system, will prevail.  Capitalism has slaughtered millions since 9/11 alone.  It has to be wiped from the globe.  SMPBI is a part of the international fight for freedom.