Policy Clarification: on Religion

In the Policy Outline there has been a section dedicated to Religion. This section stated;

"We understand that people feel a need for a connection to the spiritual. We understand that there is more to life than pure economics. We favour the study of our ancient spiritual traditions, including the Pagan, Druidic, Odinist, Roman, Norse, Greek and other religions indigenous to Europe. We reject the dictatorial exploitative religions of the East. We will actively discourage the belief in the monotheistic religions originating from the Middle East, favouring instead those who are Euro-polytheistic or are not interested in pursuing any faiths. We recognise the harmful nature of organised Christianity, Judaism and Islam to the English nation and will make religion a matter of conscience for people to engage in in private. We will not tolerate organised globalist religion pushing its agenda in public. No Mosque, Synagogue, Sikh Temple, Church etc will be left to continue pushing the belief systems of Globalism.  For Christians, we will encourage the rejection of Protestantism, Catholicism and Unitarianism in favour of Orthodoxy, which we respect for its solidarity with the People. Buildings of outstanding architectural beauty such as Cathedrals and some of the more architecturally impressive churches, will be turned into centres of culture for the people.  We are Socialists. This means we believe in our Society. We are not liberals and we have no sympathy with 'political correctness' which is globalist treason hidden behind well-sounding slogans and fake smiles, and we will not allow decadent clergymen to use their pulpits to promote ideological policies which are harmful to the people.."

This section has now been revised to emphasise our belief in the importance of spirituality as an individual matter. We oppose those who use religion to impose their authority over others, but we do not oppose religious belief itself. The whole issue is a contentious one and we only continue to have a religious policy at all so as to make it clear that we do not follow the cult of atheism which is a trap so many Socialists fall into.

Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection pt 93 - festive special

Following from last years Yuletide, this Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection will have a look into religious themes as well as others. As a party we have members who naturally differ in how the spiritual is experienced. We have Atheistic, Agnostic, Monotheistic and Polytheist members, and we respect the right of everyone to his or her own way of experiencing (or not!) the non-material aspects of everything.  Today is the Winter Equinox and of course this time of the year is Yuletide, Saturnalia, Christmas as well.  We reproduce these quotes, for reflection and consideration.  Take what you will from them......






Karl Marx:

Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man, the state, society. This state and this society produce religion, an inverted world-consciousness, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of that world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in a popular form, its spiritual point d'honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realisation of the human essence because the human essence has no true reality. The struggle against religion is therefore indirectly a fight against the world of which religion is the spiritual aroma.

------------

HG Wells:

In view of what he plainly said, is it any wonder that all who were rich and prosperous felt a horror of strange things, a swimming of their world at his teaching? He was dragging out all the little private reservations they had made from social service into the light of a universal religious life. He was like some terrible moral huntsman digging mankind out of the snug burrows in which they had lived hitherto. In the white blaze of this kingdom of his there was to be no property, no privilege, no pride and precedence; no motive indeed and no reward but love.

Is it any wonder that men were dazzled and blinded and cried out against him? Even his disciples cried out when he would not spare them the light. Is it any wonder that the priests realised that between this man and themselves there was no choice but that he or priest-craft should perish? Is it any wonder that the Roman soldiers, confronted and amazed by something soaring over their comprehension and threatening all their disciplines, should take refuge in wild laughter and crown him with thorns and robe him in purple and make a mock Caesar out of him? For to take him seriously was to enter upon a strange and alarming life, to abandon habits, to control instincts and impulses, to essay an incredible happiness.

---------------

The Levellers:

The relation of Master and Servant has no ground in the New Testament; in Christ there is neither bond nor free. Ranks such as those of the peerage and gentry are “ethnical and heathenish distinctions.” There is no ground in nature or Scripture why one man should have £1000 per annum, another not £1. The common people have been kept under blindness and ignorance, and have remained servants and slaves to the nobility and gentry. But God has now opened their eyes and discovered unto them their Christian liberty.
--------------

The Digger, Gerrard Wnstanley:

In the beginning of Time, the great Creator, Reason, made the Earth to be a Common Treasury, to preserve Beasts, Birds, Fishes and Man, the lord that was to govern this Creation; for Man had Domination given to him, over the Beasts, Birds and Fishes, but not one word was spoken in the beginning, that one branch of mankind should rule over another.

And the reason is this, every single man, male and female, is a perfect creature of himself; and the same Spirit that made the Globe dwells in man to govern the Globe; so that the flesh of man being subject to Reason, his Maker, hath him to be his Teacher and Ruler within himself, therefore needs not run abroad after any Teacher and Ruler without him, for he needs not that any man should teach him, for the same Anoynting that ruled in the Son of Man, teacheth him all things.

But since humane flesh (that king of Beasts) began to delight himself in the objects of the Creation, more than in the Spirit Reason and Righteousness . . . Covetousness, did set up one man to teach and rule over another, and thereby the Spirit was killed, and man was brought into bondage and became a greater Slave to such of his own kind, than the Beasts of the field were to him.

---------------

The Chartists' Great Charter of 1842:

The great Political Truths which have been agitated during the last half-century, have at length aroused the degraded and insulted White Slaves of England, to a sense of their duty to themselves, their children and their country. Tens of thousands have flung down their implements of labour. Your task masters tremble at your energy, and expecting masses eagerly watch this great crisis of our cause. Labour must no longer be the common prey of masters and rulers. Intelligence has beamed upon the mind of the bondsman, and he has been convinced that all wealth, comfort and produce, everything valuable, useful, and elegant have sprung from the palm of his hand; he feels that his cottage is empty, his back thinly clad, his children breadless, himself hopeless, his mind harassed, and his body punished, that undue riches, luxury and gorgeous plenty might be heaped in the palaces of the taskmasters, and flooded into the granaries of the oppressor. Nature, God, and Reason have condemned this inequality, and in the thunder of a people’s voice it must perish for ever.

-------------

A modern Druidic position:

Regardless of who you are you can genuinely honor any cultural tradition as we do not believe in cultural appropriation and disapprove of cultural mocking as well as curvature. 

Everyone has the same privilege as we do not believe in positional privilege and disapprove of inequality.

Love speech is the national language as we do not believe in divisive speech and disapprove of separatism. 

We are all in the same block together as we do not believe in intersectional detachment and disapprove of specific power and supremacy.

Positivity is the dominant environment as we do not believe in unbalanced negativity and disapprove of tearing down other group supporters.

You never have to worry about being persecuted as we do not believe in intimidating others and disapprove of any sort of bullying.

You are free to share your virtues and not expect to be virtue signaled by someone in obeying them as we do not believe in identity politics and disapprove of any specific political validity.

There there is no shaming because of the way you think as we do not believe in shaming others and disapprove of one idea being worth more than another.

Ideas are added upon as we disagree with ideas being subtracted from and disapprove of silencing other voices.

Heart and soul, make up the sum of you not any one part of you as we do not believe in damaging interactions and disapprove of hypercritical analysis that is derisive.

Mind and spirit unify with others as we do not believe in tearing down any other person by spinning information as we disapprove of false consequence philosophies.

One's voice will not be shut down by any other person as do we do not believe in blatant accusation and disapprove of Salem Witch Trials.

Unfair judgement is not permitted as we do not believe in blatant accusation due to appearance and disapprove of codirectional any "ism", "phobia", and "ist".

The only agenda that is lobbied is fairness as we do not believe in personal agenda and disapprove of profits associated with ideals that aren’t aligned with ours.

Diversity is not what we look like as we do not believe in appearance being the sum of us and disapprove of promoting what we look like over our heart and soul, mind and body.

--------------------

The Pagan Socialist, 4th May 1912:

It is not an uncommon thing to hear on the part of persons who consider themselves Socialists, and hence ought to know better, deprecatory references to something or other as “pagan.” Not merely with those who call themselves Christian Socialists, but with many who repudiate this designation, there often seems to linger a feeling as though Socialist and even general humanitarian sentiment were something specially alien to Paganism. Why this is so it would be difficult to say. In a sense, of course, the modern spirit of which Socialism is the logical outcome stands apart from the world-outlook of older creeds outworn, as it does from the world-outlook of the traditional Christian theology. But there is, I contend, no reason to regard it as in any special manner opposed to the outlook of Paganism more than to that of Christianism. On the contrary, there is a sense, I maintain, in which the spirit animating modern Socialism represents a return, with a difference of course, but still a return, to the pagan view of the world and of life.

Let us analyse for a moment what the mental attitude of Paganism – of the ancient heathen world – connoted. Before everything else it supposed a corporate life, In Paganism the end of the individual life was always the family, the clan, the tribe, or the city. The sentiment and rites constituting the Pagan’s religion, which did not involve, be it remembered, any system of dogma, or theological tenets, maybe summed up in one word – absorption in, and devotion to, the life of the community in one or other of its forms. This, in contradistinction to the Christian idea, according to which the corporate life of man here below is a matter of small concern compared with the future life of the individual soul up above. What the Pagan, as such, cared for, was not so much the fate of the individual soul after death as the continuity and prosperity of the society to which he belonged on this earth. Of course, in the later ages of Paganism its whole vision became dimmed, and the potter with which for ages it had moulded the minds of men weakened. The new spirit, on the soil of which Christianity took root and grew up, asserted itself at the expense of the Pagan spirit. But the Pagan spirit finally disappeared only with the extinction of the life of the ancient world itself. Indeed, in the true sense of the word, it did not even then finally disappear, continuing as one of the deeper under-currents of life throughout the Middle Ages. Now, surely this Pagan outlook upon life is more akin to that of modern Social-Democracy than is Christianity with its spiritual-individualistic point of view.

Another aspect of Paganism in which it should have an affinity with the healthy spirit of modern Socialism is that of the “joie de vivre.” The increasing tendency of the modern man, atendency in which the great bulk of Socialists share, is towards what is sometimes called “the rehabilitation of the flesh” – that is, towards an antagonism to the sordidly ascetic outlook of the industrial and middle classes, especially the small middle class, to which the name of Puritanism is commonly given. The attitude of mind embodying the latter tendency has always been conspicuously that of the classes named. But the working classes, in their earlier stage of development, as an off-shoot it the small middle class, naturally shared its intellectual and moral outlook to a great extent. With the workmen of the modern great industry, from whom the main body of the modern Socialist Party is drawn, the hold upon them of middle-class ideals of life has progressively weakened, as a separate class-consciousness has sprung into life. It is the task of the Socialist thinker to press home the truth not only that Socialism has no part or lot with Puritanism, but that the latter is the enemy of rational living and personal liberty. One of the tasks of that spirit which finals its ultimate expression in the Socialistic view of life in the rehabilitation to a modern form of the joyous, nay, if you will, sensuous, ideal of the ancient world, which was but the reflection of its corporate life, before the individualistic spirit of self-introspection, of self-brooding, cast its baneful and morbid shadow over human society.

An economically free community cannot fail to be the foundation of a free social life, a life free from the shackles which Christian theology, in conjunction with the sordid struggle for gain; or for the bare means of subsistence, have between them contrived to impose on mankind. The Socialist who looks beyond the immediate present should lose no opportunity of combatting an ideal of life proper to a section of the exploiters of the modern proletariat and expressed in the word Puritanism. The Puritan, with his arrogant self-assertion, his tyrannical attempt to impose his theory of conduct upon the world at large. His sordid hypocrisy, must be hit as soon he appears upon the scene, He can never be sufficiently exposed. Where he is possessed of no strong influence, he may be safely left to be suppressed by the weapon of ridicule. If he becomes dangerous, where he imposes, as he sometimes does, on the very elect, he must be encountered with sterner argument if need be. Every new movement aiming at serious new changes in social life has to run the gauntlet of the Puritanical pest. The old Adam of asceticism in man is always there latent if not active. It is altogether a mistake to suppose that the tendency of human nature is exclusively towards self-indulgence, as is often assumed. The strain of asceticism, of useless self-mortification, which feeds on human vanity, love of domination, any stray particles of cruelty present in character, is also as constant, if somewhat less frequent, an ethical phenomenon than the self-indulgence we hear so much about

This strain of asceticism, this old Adam of Puritanism, is one of the enemies we have to combat. In the past men have spent quite enough of their best energies in attempts at repressing their nature, in striving to attain the false ideal of self-mortification. Upon this false ideal the man of the future will have to turn his back definitively if humanity is to be saved from being swamped once again in the back-wash of reaction – the more treacherous, since it occupies the ground of conscience, duty and noble endeavour. Puritanism is the cuckoo of ethics. It seeks to lay its eggs in every new movement. Let us, before all things, keep our ideal of social service based on economic reconstruction free from any admixture with the old individualist ideal of mere personal self-immolation. The man who is best fitted for social service will be assuredly he who has not wasted his energies on useless repression, but who fully recognises the reasonable right of the “appetites,” even the purely animal appetites. An open and frank recognition of this truth which, as above said, has sometimes been termed the “rehabilitation of the flesh.” is the central point in the new Paganism. The ancient world, before its decadence, recognised openly and without reserve the rights of man’s animal nature.

This healthy Pagan view of life became gradually superseded by the ascetic ideal of the early centuries of the Christian era. The new morality, if it is to correspond to the needs of modern man, must be, before all things, sympathetic, sympathetic towards all sides of human nature, certainly not excepting those sides whose claims have been unduly repressed, and which have hence had to seek their own satisfaction furtively as a thing forbidden. The new order, we would fain hope, will recognise in theory, no less than in practice, the full claims of human nature once for all, branding with its disapproval all attempts to crush man into Spanish boots. Socialism means the proclamation of the “joy of life” as the right of all. The sourness, the crabbedness, the hardness of the Puritanic spirit is the enemy for the annihilation of which the Pagan should hold all means justifiable.

E. Belfort Bax

--------------

The Christian angle:

44 And all that believed were together, and had all things in common; 45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

Acts 2: 44, 45

32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
35 And laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus,
37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles’ feet. 

Acts 4:32-37

31 When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory.
32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.
33 He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
34 Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.
35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in,
36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
37 Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink?
38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you?
39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
40 The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’
41 Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink,
43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’
44 They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45 He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
46 Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” 

Mathew 25: 31-46

1 Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.
2 Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.
3 For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended.
4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.
5 Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.
6 This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing.
7 Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor. 

Romans 13:1-7

13 But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you. 14 You will be repaid at the resurrection of the just.

Luke 14:13, 14

If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven.

Matthew 19:21

24 You cannot serve both God and Money.

Matthew 6:24.

Total Planetary War and the Task of Questioning

by Peter Wilberg



Imperialism: still ‘the highest stage of capitalism’
Is the EU an empire? No. Is it not rather the weak confederation of nations under US economic and political hegemony of the sort that Hitler long predicted that Europe would become in the event of a German defeat? Yes. Is China a full-fledged empire? No - and will not be for a long time yet. Is the US an empire? Most definitely and in every sense of the word 'empire' - the most powerful empire the world has ever faced - and one with a history of outright colonialism reaching back to its earliest history (Mexico, Hawaii, The Philippines etc.)

It should therefore surely be obvious by now that essentially there is only one game in town - how to respond to and resist the Moloch and monstrosity that is US imperialism and the US-raeli empire. This Empire has a long, brutal, cynical and genocidal history, responsible for 20-30 millions deaths since 1945 - and that forgetting its long history of earlier imperial war crimes, not least at the end of WW2, and including the bombing and rape of not only German but French cities and civilians).

What both the British and all other peoples of the world face today is just the apogee of that imperial history, an apogee which is also an expression of the acute contradictions and conflicts of capitalism and their expression in competing factions of the ruling elite in the U.S. and that of other countries too, including Britain and those of the EU.

In this context, therefore even to talk of terms like 'globalism' or 'globalists' is misleading. That is because the US Imperium is now openly engaged in a form of total war on the entire globe and all its nations and peoples. This includes, of course, the American people who have long been subjected to total censorship of the media, and exploited by Wall Street, The Fed., the medical-, agro- and military- or CIA-run cyber-industrial complexes such as the web, Google etc. - as well as a massive prison-industrial complex, all backed up by total militarised-police preparedness for any form of internal insurrection.

This Total Planetary War of the US Empire is aimed at all competing nations and powers, and brooks not the smallest elements of opposition or hesitation even from its vassal 'Allies' (including both the EU and Britain). And its allies even include even the Visegrad group - all of them unquestioningly pro-US, pro-NATO, and pro-Israel. Indeed Israel declared the Czech Republic its “best friend” in continental Europe and the US has forces on Polish soil.

The Empire's war is a 'globalist' war only in the sense that it is a war aimed at nothing less than total economic, corporate, cultural, ecocidal, military, intelligence, media, information and cyber control over the entire globe - using any and all means.

US Imperium is thus the sole 'spectre' currently haunting the entire world - not communism or socialism, and certainly not 'liberalism' - which only serve to disguise rampant economic neo-liberalism and militarised police violence and murder even of countless American citizens. And what a spectre it is - for this global Imperial war is an 'omnicidal' war and which now threatens all life on the planet.

Its most powerful tool is not military and financial power but media-sustained ignorance - agnosis. Ignorance not just on a political or even a geo-political level but on a profound spiritual and philosophical level - perpetuated by the destruction of all true education.

Historical knowledge and inner knowing or gnosis are the greatest enemy of the Empire. Thus it has successfully, and in a deliberate way, planned long ago, also used its universities to eradicate it. (One need only be aware that there is barely a single economics professor in the US who has even read Marx). It is for this reason that purely economic, political or even military opposition or resistance to The Empire is, by itself, futile.

Instead one question remains in this situation, long ago asked by Heidegger.

"How is it possible to preserve a tradition [the tradition of gnosis] that has been underground for so long?"

The best that Heidegger hoped for was that historical knowledge, deep thinking and gnosis would survive in small 'cells' - comparable to the small groups of monks in the Dark Ages who preserved the remnants of classical Greek philosophy preserved and enriched by Islamic scholars and left over from the burning of ancient texts, the destruction of the library of Alexandria - and the violent persecution and murder of philosophers by the wave of Christian fanaticism unleashed by Constantine's 'conversion'.

Brexit or Remain then, is not the question of the day. That question, at its heart, is, as Gilad Atzmon reminds us: Athens or Jerusalem?

But there is far more even to this question than meets the eye. For the question contains questions within questions that have not yet even begun to be touched upon in human thinking. That is why when Heidegger spoke of ‘preserving’ a ‘tradition’ he did not mean going back to it but seeking a new foundation and beginning for it - what he called ‘The Other Beginning’.


"What is to be done?"

This new and totally ‘Other’ beginning requires above all deeper and new ways of thinking. Deeper thinking, in turn requires deeper levels of questioning dialogue too - which is a quite different matter from polemical debate.

Yet questioning dialogue cannot in any way be deepened and renewed unless the entire focus of political thinking, parties and organisation is shifted from an obsession with competing ideologies and their ready-made 'solutions' or 'policies'?

Mere debates or polemics based on agreement or disagreement about political policies, positions and solutions assumes we already know what the essential questions are for which these policies or positions are intended as a solution.

Thus the old pattern of establishing and sticking to a militant party-political position or policy on particular questions - and then recruiting militant party adherents to it, needs to be unlearned. Instead it is the questions themselves that need to be rethought in a deeper way - one that transcends old frameworks, formulae and ideologies. Only in this way can a genuinely new thinking arise that prepares for ‘The Other Beginning’ - one that responds to the questions now confronting humanity - by questioning them more deeply.

Yet instead of this, what I see along the entire spectrum of Alt-Left groupings is a regression to a form of discourse based on ideological identity politics - as expressed, for example through the need for ideological brand identities such as Strasserism. Juche-ism, Hoxha-ism, Green Syndicalism, Stalinism - and, what amounts to the same thing, 'Marxism-Leninism' (a term coined by Stalin).

I do not see how any of these '-isms' can be reconciled with Marx's famous words: "I am not a Marxist" - or with any form of ideological identity politics oriented towards establishing, advancing and defending a 'position' and pitching one form of political brand identity or ‘-ism’ against some other - like 'Liberalism'. Marx himself did not present utopian recipes for change but instead sought an ever-deeper understanding of the underlying but still inadequately addressed questions hidden under the surface behind social, economic and political beliefs, systems and events.

In a word, I find myself once again affirming another saying of Marx:

"Question everything!"

A trite example: when and why did the term 'Liberalism' become the fashionable new term for Capitalism? Or when and why did the term ‘cultural Marxism’ become a new ‘meme’ within the Alt-Right and Alt-Left - when in reality those figures most often associated with it were among the most hard-hitting critics of degenerate capitalist pop-culture, i.e. of cultural capitalism and its global mono-culture of consumerism and commodification - a phenomenon which has now reached a point at which even personal identity has now become a mere marketplace of gender identities to be invested in, exchanged and flaunted like shares or personal commodities!

As in advertising capitalism offers an illusion of ‘diversity’ that conceals a homogenous uniformity. A 100 brands of identical toothpaste or washing up liquid - no different in principle from varieties of branded gender identities all manufactured from the same virtue-signalling ingredients!


Politics and Philosophy…

Even the geopolitical question posed to humanity by the rampant destructive hegemonism and tyranny of the US Empire is therefore far from being a merely geopolitical question, as even 4PT of Dugin recognises - why else would he write a book on Heidegger, now censored (see Alexander Dugin Martin Heidegger, the Philosophy of Another Beginning), like his other books, by Amazon? Because he recognised that politics and philosophy cannot in any way be separated - that all philosophy is political and all politics is philosophical - rooted in metaphysical assumptions and beliefs.

This is one reason why I wrote an essay critiquing the standard 'medical model' approach to politics. For what this model forecloses is any attempt to question and understand the deeper nature and meaning of the 'illness' symptomised by political and geopolitical events and realities. Idealistic or utopian political 'cures' for this illness, old or new, are, from this perspective merely a form of ideological pill-popping or drug-pushing - and the political militancy that accompanies them is all-too-often a mere symptom of despair in the face of still unthought questions - unthought because they involve, at least in part, also essentially deep metaphysical and philosophical questions - many of which have also remained unthought throughout human history.

This history is of course far more than just a political-economic history or a history of class struggle. It is also a history of theo-political cultures and conflicts. That is why, as I argue in From New Age to New Gnosis, it is no accident that today’s Iraq had its roots in the ancient Sumarian civilisation of Mesopotamia, Syria in the Assyrian civilisation, Europe in Greek civilisation - and Iran in Persian civilisation.

And what is capitalism itself if not a theopolicial cult or religion itself - combining a monotheism of money with the worship of technological know-how serving cyber-control and the corporate arms industry. And what is modern 'science' except an anti-religious cult which has become a new religion and cult in its own right? Today however, it is only in Russia and Iran that we see the struggle against The Empire of Money understood - if only by just a few clerics and prominent thinkers such as Dugin - as a spiritual-philosophical and religious struggle and not a merely 'national' one.

Thus in contrast to the cult of Juche - which seeks to turn the nation itself into an artificial and atheistic state religion, and its Leader into a god - the Islamic Socialism of Iran has deep roots in the gnostic tradition of Shi-ite Islam. It is not a godless 'modernist' socialism of the ‘Marxist-Leninist’ sort - and nor does its supreme leader claim omniscience or divinity of any sort - something that goes entirely against the grain of Shi-ite orthodoxy, which respects knowledge and truths still hidden from view by the so-called 'occultation' of the 12th Imam.

That is why it is also important to understand that it is only in Iran and to some extent also in Russia that we see some recognition that the battle being fought is a spiritual one. No wonder that Iran was the main target to be taken out at the end of the list of less challenging regime-changes hatched by the Imperium well before the Mossad-CIA false flag of 9/11 - and as preparation to seize the wealth of Russia.


On Brexit again...

Long ago, I made my position on Brexit pretty clear. It was a way to turn Britain into an overseas territory of the US-raeli Empire, one which supports the economic war being waged against not just North Korea and China but primarily against Iran and Russia. Is this not now perfectly clear for all to see?

Is the EU the enemy? Or is it the ZIO-US-EU-NATO alliance against Russia. Does the EU have independent nukes that can strike Britain. No. Does Israel have submarines that can nuke both Britain and Europe. Yes. Something to think upon maybe? Is the EU or Russia engaged in a military encirclement of Britain. No. Is it engaged in the military encirclement of Russia? Yes. Is the EU imposing economic sanctions on Britain? No. On Russia? Yes.

And what an irony it is to have just seen Britain itself seizing an Iranian oil tanker on the grounds that is was ignoring oil sanctions on Syria that apply only to EU countries!

Is it not time therefore, to sign up for a spiritual-philosophical jihad against the US-raeli Empire, instead of protecting British Imperialism - along with its centuries old strategy of doing everything to prevent the emergence of a new Eurasian civilisation, one unburdened by the waves of migration fostered by The Empire's wars of aggression, military-backed coups, and corporate neo-colonialism - and that in every continent of the world?

My biggest question to the SMPBI therefore: what good is talk of socialist proletarian nationalism if this nationalism is not fundamentally and primarily anti-imperialist - anti-USraeli, anti-Zionist, anti-Ziocon, anti-ZOG? This question is also what makes Iran so important. For the Trotskyists would have us believe that Iran is a reactionary capitalist theocracy. In fact its economy is now more socialist than that of Cuba! See: https://thesaker.is/what-privatisation-in-iran-or-definitely-not-that-privatisation/

And so it is that Iran now finds itself in the same position that Cuba has always been in and that Germany found itself in already in 1939 - under economic blockade, and explicit threat of 'obliteration' (total obliteration through of Germany having (see Germany Must Perish, 1941!) having heen the main goal of Churchill and his Zionist backers). No wonder then, that the Iron Curtain of brazen Amazon and now also YouTube censorship has come down not only on so-called 'Holocaust deniers' but also on any challenge to the mainstream US., British and Zionist account of the 20th century and its two world wars.

Summary: one does not need to be a Muslim or Islamic socialist to sign up for an educational, cultural and philosophical as well as political jihad against the Empire - instead of ranting against and scapegoating its meek and subservient EU vassal states. One only needs to expose, as Goebbels taught, the 'Big Lies' of the Zionist press, media and cyber-giants that prevail as much (if not more) in Britain that in the countries of the EU. The big problem with the Europe - as with Britain - it that it still tries to ensconce itself in a blind and delusory bubble world - one in which the total global war being conducted by The Empire is not even recognised by a media-indoctrinated populace, let alone fiercely resisted or fought. And yet all other issues - ecological, environmental, social and economic - are secondary to this War - being mere effects of it. The only exception to this the understanding that even to conduct any fight against Imperialism and for sovereign nationhood is ultimately impossible without sovereign national and public money creation - something both Iran and Russia still need to learn.


So what can be done?

The basis of all ‘evil’, even that of the Imperium itself - is ignorance - agnosis. This takes two forms: firstly unquestioned belief systems such as neo-liberalism, Christian Zionism, US exceptionalism and ‘Manifest Destiny’ etc., i.e. those of the warmongers in the ‘Deep State’ - and, secondly, the economic, cultural, philosophical and historical ignorance that both lies behind and is necessary to sustain these belief systems.

‘Trumpism’ is nothing but the fully revealed face of this ignorance in both its sides. For the ignorant rulers of the Imperium, ignorance is therefore also their biggest ally - and sustaining their own and other’s ignorance is their main weapon of defence. Hence the censorship, distortion and erasure of historical knowledge. Indeed the clearly stated plan of the Imperium is now is to use the media and cyber-censorship to eradicate all sources of historical knowledge that could expose the lies - and lies by omission - being constantly being churned out by the media. Yet the sad fact is that even many of these lies are an expression of ignorance on the part of ruling elites and the media themselves.

Yet given current plans for total global cyber-censorship via Google and other cyber-giants, perhaps we need to consider preparing to return to old-fashioned low-tech method of paper leafleting on the streets. Not in order to rant against Trotskyism to a youth population most of whom (even here in the Czech Republic) have never even heard of a man called Stalin!) but in order to lay out in simple fashion the historical facts surrounding each of any number of issues given - or not given - publicity in the Imperial Media - whether this be the 'Holocaust', Israel and Palestine, Russia, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, the arms industry and the Sauds, the deaths caused by both austerity politics and The Empire's economic sanctions and blockades, the concentration camps which constitute the corporate prison industry in the US, not to mention the whole history of Anglo-US-Israeli war crimes - or the really existing magic 'money-tree' of central banks such as the Fed (which feeds an annual 36 billion dollars of interest payments to Wall St at taxpayers expense - and at the expense too of even the most minimal investment in the real economy).

For when all is said and done, what chance has any European or British political party of leading a process of social transformation among a populace that is steadily but surely being reduced in a highly planned way and using the most advanced technologies to a state of almost total historical ignorance of the sort we already see in the U.S. itself - where literally millions of Christian Zionists, ignorant even of the history of Christianity itself, regard Trump as 'the chosen one' - and so are gagging for global Armageddon through the likes of Pompeo (himself a Christian Zionist). Never has it been more important to see our struggle as a war for knowledge and truth, even if only based on the simplest leaflet-style listing of historical facts. For what use is a 'Workers' Party' without even the most elementary workers' education?

For what use a vehemently anti-Trotskyist platform to people who have never heard the name Trotsky or Stalin in their lives? What appeal has a pro-Palestinian or anti-Zionist stance for the masses who know nothing about the Nakba - or even the nature and history of Zionism itself? The list could go on and on... So maybe it is time to forget the political and ideological dressing on the cake - and begin by just informing people of historical knowledge and facts they don't and increasingly won't have a chance to learn from anywhere else (including the internet). In a word, less preaching to the converted and those ‘in the know’ and instead just talking to people - by which I simply mean all those (and there are many who I am sure that each of us know personally) who don't even know what they don't know. Yet even this is not enough…


Making ‘another beginning’ …
For any individual or group of individuals wishing to find ways of responding to the challenges facing the world today, the greatest danger I see lies in the need, borne of insecurity, to cobble together or latch onto an admixture of ideological and political ‘answers’ or ‘policies’. Instead the first step should be to humbly admit to there being many questions that remain to be asked and formulated. To admit to the existence of important but still unasked questions is not a mark of ignorance but of courage.

Therefore I suggest to any individuals or groups of individuals such as the SMPBI with an earnest and passionate desire to change the world that they should begin by each seriously asking, and seeking to formulate as best they can, what they regard as the most important questions that they still have. Only by pooling and then discussing a set of questions can they then truly work together, through dialogue - in making ‘Another Beginning’. Finding the right questions requires thought and effort of another sort entirely to coming to or debating a set of ideological positions or political policies. Yet if a political group were to begin its life and work again in this other way - by first coming to a decision on what they see as the most important but still unasked or unanswered questions are (whether to do with socialism or anything else) then stating those questions publicly and inviting authentic dialogue around them would indeed be something revolutionary in itself. The ‘other thinking’ that Heidegger spoke of is all about questioning. It transcends the polemics of mere agreement or disagreement on what policy or political stances to adopt or decide upon. Instead it is all exploring the most decisive questions.

Liberal-extremism is a Disease of the Mind

Psychology is a much mocked science.  Captured early on by the charlatan, Sigmund Freud, Psychology will forever be tainted by its association with the plagiarist and sexual deviant, and by those who followed in his wake.  However, whereas the presence of shysters is undeniable, the willingness to reject the study out of hand, is a reaction we undertake at our peril.  The motley collection of cranks and politically correct psycho-social engineers hiding behind the claims to be academic researchers, have done much to aid the advance of liberal extremism, but this truth only underlines the validity of the science itself.

Carl Gustav Jung began in the shadow of Freud, but soon realised that the entire direction of psychology was wrong, and that an understanding of the workings of the mind could not be generalised to everyone, regardless of cultural background.  Understanding that at our very essence we are spiritual creatures, Jung's greatest gift to our understanding was his emphasis on the inner psychic/spiritual unity of culturally kindred peoples.  Absolutely rejecting the imposition of Freudian Psychological analytical techniques on anyone except people raised under the debilitating conditions of a neurosis founded on a persecution AND superiority complex, Jung understood that each culture can be said to have a distinct soul - its very own collective unconscious - and that attempts to analyse others through the looking glasses of our own origins, are futile.  Whereas Freud is a key tool of the Globalists, Jung stands as a staunch defender of freedom in a multipolar world.

The deliberate muddying of the science of Psychology, by elevating the theories of certain personalities, and ridiculing those of others, has been a part of the politicisation of science.  Just as social anthropologists and ecologists can be bought to serve the globalisers, sadly, so can a significant number of scientists of every discipline.  The internal debates and the public mockeries which shroud our perception of the study of ourselves, masks the most fundamental fact; that the Bourgeois Ruling Class fully appreciate how the scientific method can be applied to understanding how we think, and to using that knowledge against us.  The deliberate denial of a biological basis in how we think, is pure politics, and whilst demanded of the masses, is not practised by the ruling parasitic class.

The basic psychological predisposition of the British Working Class is towards fairness, and tolerance of ideas.  One of our most clearly identifiable traits is our love of freedom.  We espouse Freedom of Speech, Thought, Expression etc; not because we are ideologically conditioned by our leaders to do so, but because we internally know that Freedom is right.  We sense it at a level which is beyond intellectual; it is a part of our spiritual outlook.

Liberal extremism has perversely corrupted our inner sense of fair play.  Our inner desire to see real justice for everyone, has become the tool by which to make us weak.  Liberal extremism only exists because our enemies have taken a wholesome desire for everyone to be treated with respect, and turned it into a way of beating down those who oppose the replacement of all we hold dear with a 'culture' of bland consumerism .  The sense of fairness which opposes the exploitation of those weaker than ourselves, has become the sick diseased liberalism which promotes all manner of degeneracy and social suicide.  The enemy has studied us, and found a weak spot by which to undermine us, whilst simultaneously appealing to our inner soul.

The vipers who are destroying us, have cunningly corrupted the foundations of our societies by attacking the very core of how we feel.  They have attacked us at a level which undermines our ability to obey our instincts and to fight back.  Rather than expending energy trying to accommodate people who are clearly not a part of the majority society, we need to accept that they cannot be - nor should they.  We need to use the Science of Psychology as Jung intended; to understand ourselves, and to defend and develop our own culture as a Class; to harness and embrace our own collective unconscious.  Psychological manipulation has been used to turn us against ourselves.  Once we can see this attack, we can protect ourselves from it.

Liberal extremism is a bourgeois sickness. Once we see it as a mental disease, we can understand that there is as no point in trying to reason with those who suffer from it. Rather, we must quarantine those who have fallen victim to this toxin, in psychiatric institutions where they can be contained.  In the cases of members of our class who have fallen victim to the machinations of the anti-reality media and educational indoctrination system, it is possible that some of them may be rescued from the sickness - through intensive re-education / deprogramming - and be helped to reach a level of mental health where they are no longer a danger to society, and may have the potential to re-enter it as useful contributing members

Christianity is Pagan. The pope wants to jettison the Pagan. Pagans must jettison the pope

With the 'pope' befouling the streets of Ireland, what better time than to look into the cult of the Church of Rome, and the broader christian ideology which has come from it.  This pope has overseen massive changes in dogma, but so have the previous ones over the past century.  When the Church changed a series of 'set-in-stone' rituals (such as penance for confession), that made many sit up and notice that what they had been told was an institution created by God, was very much one ruled by Men and subject to change as politics, fashion and other factors dictated.  The rapid shift of direction which has made the policy-makers in the Church of Rome almost indistinguishable from their counterparts in the Protestant sects must raise questions about the entire faith of Christianity.  Roman Catholicism is a mixture of indigenous and alien mythology, weaved together in a web of fabrication, with truths embedded in a great tissue of fiction.  The Pagan aspects are the strength of the religion, but without them, Catholicism becomes just another branch of the fantasy of the ancient Hebrews, and totally alien to the British mindset.

The Ancient Druids knew a spirituality which included many aspects of the Christianity which was to follow. The Druids believed in a Holy Trinity of Creator of the Past (Beli), Saviour of the Present (Taran) and Recreator of the Future (Yesu); these three were as one and were the ways in which the Supreme Higher Power was understood by humanity.  The Hebrews of Palestine/Judæa/Israel traded with the peoples of Europe and so would have come into contact with the Druidic traditions.  The theory that the Druids adopted Christianity because of the similarities such as the Trinity, is one which Christian Israelites hold dear.  It is a desperate argument of a cult of people absolutely obsessed with the Bible, to the point that they will twist and distort history to 'prove' that the Israelites settled in the west of Europe, becoming the Celts, and thus took to Christianity because of the similarities it had with their own faith.   This ideology, which borders on insanity, can be dismissed by simply pointing out that the Trinity of the Druids predated that which the Roman Church sanctified many centuries after the time of Christ, when the Gospels were voted upon (and rewritten) for inclusion in the Bible by the Imperial Church of Rome.

We now know for a fact that the Ten Commandments were a part of the Code Law of King Hammurabi in Babylon and that it is obviously from this man-made legal system that the authors of the Old Testament/Torah stole the 'Commandments' of their god.  The falsification of the entire Jewish 'religion' insofar as the person of Moses is concerned, is such that only the blindly faithful will deny it.  According to the Jewish mythology, 'Moses' led 600,000 Jews out of Egypt, after his 'god' massacred the first born of that land and brought great suffering to the common people.  This drivel is taught as fact, yet nowhere is it recorded except in the Jewish supremacist propaganda sheets of the Torah/Talmud/Old Testament.  One would have thought that the plagues and the scarpering of 6,000,000 600,000 workers would have merited some comment by Egyptian historians, but apparently it wasn't important enough for that!  The idea that the Jewish 'slaves' (to use their own pity-seeking word) built the pyramids is laughable, considering that they are far older than the entire 'history' of the Jewish people and were long finished before the mythical figure of Moses is supposed to have walked the Earth.  We know that the Elders of Organised Jewry made up the story of Moses and his amazing travels across the Sinai and his spectacular walks up and down the mountain with great slabs of rock after chatting with his god, so it really isn't a stretch of the imagination to see that the similarities of Christianity and the Trinitarian branch of Druidism are more than likely the result of more Rabbinical theft of other peoples' ideas and ways.

The theft of ideas doesn't make the ideas themselves wrong.  The Code of Hammurabi is a valid document, protecting people from the selfish and vile behaviour of all too many people.  Realising that it was not crafted by the diabolical entity, Jehovallah - a deity whose adherents happily claim ordered the destruction of new born children because they didn't bow and scrape to its chosen pet people - if anything gives the document more credibility, not less.

The concept of the Trinity is one which is found in nature.  The Earth is divided into land, sea and air; the very essence of everything can be expressed by the trinity of space, time and matter.  These can be broken down into three more trinities:

• Space: Depth, Width, Height
• Time: Past, Present, Future
• Matter: Solid, Liquid, Gas

The idea of a Higher Being existing in the form of a Trinity, is one which predates Christianity and could very easily have been 'borrowed' from the Europeans who the authors of the Bible came in contact with.  In the Asatru/Odinist faith, there is a pantheon of deities, but they exist in a subordinate position to the Creator, just as the lower divine beings in Christianity are subordinated to the Creator.  The Christian Trinity very much resembles the Asatru one: Father, Son and Holy Spirit equate to the Jaffnharr, Harr and Thridi.  Indeed, the Three Spheres in the Angelic Hierarchy of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite's work, 'De Coelesti Hierarchia' (with each of the three spheres subdivided by three), make yet another trinity of trinities.  It could be argued that the far earlier Asatru concept of the Nine Worlds fits this pattern.

Wherever we look in Christianity, we see Pagan spiritualism with the toxic addition of Judaism.  As the Church is now hell-bent on removing the ancient spiritualism of Christianity and stripping it of all that is palatable, isn't it time for Christians to consider that the attraction to the religion is due to it being based upon our ancient ways?  The Christian Israel movement is right to see links between Paganism and Christianity, but they are looking in the wrong direction.  The Trinitarian Odin of Asatru may have inspired the Church to write of the Trinitarian Holy Father/Son/Spirit.

It is wonderful to see the Church discrediting itself by cosying up to Judaism and Islam, preaching a globalist universalism which erases the Pagan core of itself.  This gives us the opportunity to reunite with our own ways; to look back to the Golden Age before the coming of the infiltrators who have lied to us about our own spirituality and have made us persecute those of our own kin who have held true to the forbidden beliefs.

If everything good that exists in Christianity also existed in pre-Christianity, then what purpose does Christianity serve!? Paganism is closer to the golden age we seek than Christianity is, and Christianity has overseen the destruction of Europe where Paganism had protected it.

Stripped of the middle eastern Hebraic toxin, Christianity is Pagan.  Let the Church of Rome and the Organised Protestant Churches forge ahead with their descent into a global religion where Bible, Talmud and Koran sit side-by-side as indisputable books of lies.  Let us reject these outlandish works of propaganda, enforced on us by a Ruling Caste which despises us in every aspect, and return to the ways of our ancestors; to a time before the liberal disease, when we would not tolerate those who attack us spiritually, mentally or physically.  Wake Up all Britons on both sides of the Irish Sea, and cast off the cult of Christianity, returning instead to our Pagan roots.  The reign of the proto-Zionist Roman system is more obvious than at any prior time; now we must ensure it falls.

Boris Johnson, Tommy Robinson: Smoke and Mirrors Merchants Deflecting from the Real Danger to the People

If anyone has any doubts at all about the demise of the nation, one need look no further than the pathetic morons who support the ex-leader of the English Defence League. Comprised every conceivable type of brain-dead reactionary, the EDL was a gift to those who wish to see all opposition to globalism silenced. Far from existing to defend Englishness, these malcontents were the epitome of everything which is wrong with England.  Tommy Robinson is a hero to the people who think that people who follow the Koran are the greatest threat to the UK.  The EDL is now a mere shadow of what it was in its heyday, but even though small in numbers, its influence continues, as can be seen by Boris the toff Johnson's public statement that Women in Islamic dress resemble bank robbers.  The spirit of the EDL is still worthy of attention.

The EDL claim to oppose Sharia Law. Their opposition to Islam is a mindless unthinking hatred of a religion they have no understanding of. The reactionaries of the EDL get their information about Islam from the war-mongering tabloids. Following the Establishment propaganda that there is a War on Terror as a result of Muslims destroying the World Trade Centre, these 9/11 devotees are little more than boot-boys for the Crown and the globalists who seek to destroy all sovereign nations so to more easily rape them financially and culturally. That the EDL believe the 9/11 lie should be adequate evidence of their sub-normal level of intelligence.

The EDL do not exist to defend England, but rather to attack Islam. They argue that Sharia Law denies women the right to dress as they wish. The EDL's propaganda features women dressed as whores. The notion that it is a good thing for a woman to dress like a prostitute and behave as one (albeit having anonymous sex for free) highlights the mental illness of the EDL - and, one would suspect, indicates that these 'men' are unable to maintain a relationship with a woman and so due to sexual inadequacy and lack of respect for women, these verminous excuses for men seek to turn all women into whores in the hope that they may procure sex from the women who have absolutely no standards, and will stoop so low as to have sex with even the lowest of all low lifes.

Is Islam really the enemy of the British way of life? Traditional British society is founded on the supremacy of the family - Women are respected and motherhood is honoured. One of the most fundamental aspects of Britishness is a belief that women are to be protected and that sex is something to be cherished within marriage, not something which is cheap and to be considered with as much thought one would afford the choice of sauce on a fast food takeaway meal. Women have always been valued as the cornerstone of the family, and thus of society. To this end, in order to protect women from predatory ego-centric materialistic males, it has been a requirement that women dress modestly. This requirement is borne of a desire to protect women from those who see them as nothing more than sex objects - people such as the cretinous materialists of the EDL.

The EDL tenet that women should go around dressed in the manner of prostitutes is anti-British. The sexual revolution of the 1960s which overturned the natural decency of society was ushered in by globalists opposed to the all culture. It was not Muslims who smashed our families and turned our people into sex-crazed lunatics. Muslims did not push a toxic liberal belief system into our schools and public sector, creating an anti-society of respectless and valueless consumer-producers. No, this atrocity was instigated at the behest of a minority group which has been striving to take over the entire economic system of the world: the Ruling & Corporate Class are to blame, most of whom are not in fact Muslim!  The EDL take pride in supporting the architects of the destruction of Tradition. The moronic EDL are complicit in the destruction of Britain, which they blame on Islam. Traditional Christianity and Islam are almost identical as regards the protection of women through dressing modestly. Dressing as whores is not the British way, but rather the anti-British way of the people who view Money and Power as everything.

Christianity and Islam are based on the primacy of the spirit, as they see it. The EDL despise the notion of faith in a higher power than humanity. Christianity and Islam are opposed to promiscuity, abortion, and all manner of sexual degeneracy. The two religions are ardent defenders of the individuals right to live without the fear of having one's possessions taken away by the State of by thieves. Real Christianity enforces the Ten Commandments with a vigour which equals that of so-called fundamental Islam. Christianity and Islam differ in respect of how Jesus and Mohamed are considered. The EDL are not campaigning to have Jesus honoured as more than a Prophet, nor are they campaigning for the status of Mohamed to be reduced from such. The EDL attack Islam without examining it. Their ignorance of the true nature of Christianity is astounding. If the EDL were to examine the religious influences impacting upon life in Britain they would realise that the perverted liberalism which is breaking the back of our country comes from a diabolical cult which is dedicated to the overthrowal of Christianity as well as Islam.

The EDL are fervent supporters of the Israeli occupation and brutalisation of Palestine. A true patriot has no choice but to support the Palestinians in their struggle for sovereignty. Freedom from the globalist menace can only be accomplished by mutual support for all who are under the yoke of globalism. The EDL are simply following the Establishment agenda by labelling as terrorists and extremists anyone who takes a stand against Zionism. The greatest menace in Britain is the financial oppression of the banking and financial system and the elite who sit atop it. When the EDL chant 'God save the Queen' they are chanting for one of the financial elite and a key enemy of our nation, and in fact of all nations.

The British Isles ARE in danger, but the likes of the EDL are aiding those who are brutalising our way of life. Multi-culturalism (anti-culturalism), Liberal Feminism (anti-Female-ism!), Trans-Fascism (child abuse/denial of nature), Sexual Liberation (promiscuity/abortion), and all the other ills which afflict our nation are liberal in origin, not Christian nor Islamic. The EDL are too stupid to see that they are being used to further that cause. If they were to look back at the impact of Islam in Europe they would see that countries such as Spain fell to Islam but later freed themselves. Nations which fall under the heel of the culture destroyers never recover. If the EDL really wanted to defend Britain they would campaign against banks, rather than mosques, and they would support Gaza rather than insult the victims of Zionism. If Britain was to adopt Sharia Law it would not remain Islamic for ever. If the British Isles fail to stop the liberal globalism so favoured by the EDL we will lose everything and never return to sanity.

Britain does not need the EDL. We do not need Islam either. However, with analysis, the danger of the creed being pushed by the EDL is far more dangerous than Islam. The Islamic posters which demand that those who insult Islam be beheaded may appear extreme, but in reality it is not long ago that Christianity was of a similar vein. SMPBI calls for a return to Tradition which throws off all the Abrahamic faiths. SMPBI takes no sides in the Judaeo-Christian / Islamic power struggle - we oppose them all.

Family as the Socialist Foundation

Family is the fundamental building block of society. A real family consisting of a Husband, Wife and Child (or Children) provides a barrier against the intrigues of the State. Fidelity is the keystone of the family. In order for the Establishment to destroy all opposition to its machinations, Family must be destroyed.

The natural role for a man is to protect his wife and offspring. The natural role of a woman is to look after her husband and any children. The media have pushed the lie that adultery is OK, in order to weaken the bonds between man and wife. Women and Men who seek sexual gratification outside the family are enemies of society.

Hugh Hefner introduced Playboy in the 50's. While most women were still trying to full fill their traditional roles, this toxic magazine had men wanting the whore, linking as a way to to their own sucess to have a tart instead of wife (or in some cases both - Mad Men) Unless we men and women find common ground instead of finger pointing, we will never defeat the "powers that be". Women are jealous of other women, if we see one getting all the attention we want to be her. So shame on the men for elevating the whore to her status and leaving real women who refuse to plastic themselves up in the lurch.

Women have been especially targeted by the Establishment. The media teaches that women are merely objects and that every concern should be material. Whether it is buying clothes which fit a prepared stereotype (trendy, Goth or other), or spending hours studying make-up and 'perfecting' a certain look, women have become victims of a system which reduces us to consumers and to little more than showroom dummies. Men are not immune from this. The trans madness is mainly men who are obsessed with what they look like (or what they think that they are supposed to think they should look like!)

Girls are conditioned to emulate pop stars, who are nothing more than glorified prostitutes. Modern pop music (whether R&B, Goth or whatever) is built upon the use of repetitive lyrics which act as a form of mind control. Lyrics which speak of sexual promiscuity implant in the mind of the listener the acceptance of promiscuity. Lyrics which speak of hatred of men and of the desirability of self-harm, condition the listener to self hatred and hatred of others. These sick distortions of normality push the listener into a position of confusion and split identity. It is from such evil that schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder take root. Whether the medium used to break the spirit and mind of the individual is in musical form or in visual form, the result is an undeniable destruction of the self.

By implanting a diseased outlook in the minds of men and women, and undermining the traditional roles of both sexes, the Establishment has lain the seeds for the crushing of the family. By creating the conditions in which friction becomes inevitable, the door is open to further State interference for the breaking of the family. It is at this point that the Establishments role in destroying the Family takes a lead overt role - in steps Social Services, the Family Courts and all the other atomising institutions.

Men and women need to unite and fight this assault on the natural masculine man and feminine woman. The only solution to our sick society is a return to traditional Socialism, to the sanctity of marriage, and to the overthrowal of so called Social Services. Adultery is not a right, but a disease created by the Establishment, and for this evil the Establishment must pay the ultimate price.

There is a tendancy to whitewash the likes of Hefner and the types of men who happily go after the whore archetype. Men like this need to be exposed, and their anti-female attitude addressed. People yearn for a society where men are men, women are women, family is the highest achievement, and the peddlars of pornography, adultery and materialism are physically eliminated for all time.

This is why more and more turn to Islam. To return to morality and work. Islam is not a solution which is suitable for a Free Socialist Republic of the British Isles.  We have suffered under the yoke of Bible cults for so long, that we are susceptible to another Bible spin-off.  Traditional Socialism harks back to the days of nature-based spiritualism, and does not need a hierarchy of Ruing Class appointed clergy to act as links between the physical and the spiritual.  A return to a natural order IS a return to a way of life where we are self-sufficient in all matters, and where we reject priestcraft.

Trans-fascism is the next step in the break down of family.  It denies nature.  It denies the unity of men and women and the foundation of society.  It attacks homosexuality with the lie that Lesbians and Gays are really 'trapped in the wrong body' and can be 'cured' by radical surgery.  The T attached to LGB is an abhorence.

A return to sanity cannot occur within a Capitalist framework.  As Revolutionary Patriotic Socialists, we affirm that individualism is a major problem, and that the damage of this selfish mentality will take a massive amount of deprogramming.  We are aware of the brain-washing of the pornographers, the 'gender' dictators, the psychological warfare against the family structure.  This will require a Socialist System which rejects the divisiveness of feminism and masculism, putting focus instead on mutualism and the need for everyone to work together for what is best for all of us.  We reject liberal decay. Working Class Socialism is for Family, Tradition, and Biological Reality.  Liberal individualism has brought us to the brink, and we will not tolerate it, nor those who push it and profit by it.

Charities are Tax-exempt. Shouldn't the work of SMPBI also be?

Throughout Europe - with the exception of Iceland - the people are being forced to pay for the 'mistakes' of the Bankers.  Iceland has proven that the only way to deal with the Banking criminals is to let their businesses fail, and to arrest them for crimes against the people.  Sadly, in the rest of Europe, the grip of the Bankers is so complete that the people are being made to pay with their own money, to make up the profits lost by the greedy Banking cartels.  If any other businesses lose such vast amounts of money that they cannot operate, they close - and so should the Banks.  Indeed, the entire immoral system of usury should be closed, regardless of whether it is in debt or profit.

The Bankers' puppet governments introduced Austerity measures in the British Isles with interest rate freezes, tax hikes, and cuts in services.  Free Banking has all but ended, so now we have a situation where it is nigh on impossible to pay for one's utilities, or to receive pay from an employer, without having a bank account, but not only does it cost money to have one; the greedy profiteers no longer pay a level of interest which covers the costs of having an account!  That is theft, pure and simple.

The Bankers hide behind the governing regimes; deflecting anger from the financiers of the Ruling Class who are the real source of policy, regardless of the espoused politics of the government of the day.  The present government has made much of the idea of closing tax loopholes, and of preventing people who are not entitled to Welfare Benefits from receiving them.  As has become the norm in the UK, the spotlight of scrutiny has not fallen evenly across all those resident in the UK.

People in the UK are taxed more than any other nation in Europe, and for that matter most of the world.  We have to pay tax on every penny we earn, and every penny we spend.  The State even has the audacity to take a cut of any money we may have saved for our children, with its outrageous Inheritance Tax and Death Duties. 

As well as taxation at national level, we have local taxation.  Every household in the country has to pay 'Council Tax', which amounts to around £1000 per annum per dwelling in the least affluent areas, increasing with the value of the property.  Council tax is allegedly to pay for services provided by the local administrative authorities, but considering that almost every service has been contracted out to profit-making companies, the reality of Council tax is that it is yet another way to rob the people, and transfer what little money we have into the hands of the private companies which rule over us.  It is illegal to not pay Tax, thus the system is tantamount to an extortion racket - either we pay those who exploit us, or we are punished by their legal system, in terms of fines (more extorted money), or imprisonment.

There is an exception to the Council Tax rule.  Those who claim to live in accommodation which is used as a place of worship, do not have to pay the tax.  What this means in effect, is that all one has to do to escape the attention of the tax mafiosa (and dodge the tax system) is to register as a religious leader.  The people who benefit from the tax loophole which the Establishment refuses to close, are the liberal clergy who happily push the neo-con sjw policies of the governing regime.  In addition there are newer religions to the Isles who are happy to jump on the band-wagon, thus allowing the organisers of the religious populations to keep hold of the money they generate through extortion of the collecting tin, whilst those less inclined to listen to the organised theists - whether atheist of spiritual in a sense which doesn't rely on designated places of worship, become economically impoverished.  It is understandable that people who are aware of the tax loop-holes will take advantage of everything which they are given, and they should not be blamed for that.

Why should religion be a reason for tax exemption?  If we lived in a theocracy, and there was one religion enshrined by the State, then there would be no reason for places of worship to be given preferential treatment, as they would be an integral part of society.  We do not live in a theocracy.

If people wish to worship in an organised manner, let them pay for the costs of the places they use; it is beyond arrogant for people of any faith to expect their beliefs to be paid for by others.  Without tax exemption for religious places, those which flourish would provide income to the local authorities, and those which did not, would die.  Any religion which cannot survive without grandiose displays of material wealth, deserves to fail. 

Education centres are - like religious places - tax exempt.  The ludicrous situation exists where the state education system keeps children in  ignorance of anything which matters, and where the only real education which can be obtained is in the fee-paying sector.  The Ruling Class and their bourgeois collaborators have enough money to pay for their children to be educated away from the proletarian masses, but then the schools to which they send their children, have charitable status, and so contribute nothing to the economy.

If all so-called public (private) schools had to pay into the tax system, that would greatly enrich the coffers of the exchequer.  The existence of a two-tier education system in which the Working Class receive nothing but indoctrination and knowledge sufficient only for servitude, in institutions which the parasitic rich wouldn't consider sending their children to, is offensive to the nation as a whole.  If the State sector is not good enough for the Rulers, then it is not good enough for anyone.  SMPBI will abolish fee paying schools, faith schools, charitable schools, and nationalise all of them so that everyone gets equal education, and no-one can pay for 'better' education.

So what can we do?  We can home school and thus keep the state away from our children.  Those who can afford to send their children to the elite schools, should refuse to as a matter of principle.  There is no excuse for the class system, and anything which props it up is repugnant. 

How should we deal with the tax loop-hole?

We can register our homes as places of worship, and with-hold taxes from the Capitalist regime.  SMPBI does have a spiritual dimension, so why shouldn't we be able to meet together for reflection in the same way as the organised religious groups do?  If they refuse to accept our expressions of belief as valid, then surely that amounts to prejudice and discrimination on spiritual, political and cultural grounds?  It is worth considering, for reasons financial and moral. 

It is possible to buy religious titles from (unsurprisingly), the USA, at an initial cost which is a fraction of the annual saving.  The legal protection and financial exemptions afforded to the majority faiths should apply to everyone.  This isn't tax evasion, but common sense.  Why pay a penny to the enemy regime, if we can legally avoid it?