Imperialism, Nation and Class Struggle

National-Revolutionaries - "Red Nazis", "Bolsheviks in disguise", "Nazi-Maoists", "Stalinists of the Right" or "Conservatives of the Left"? Our political opponents have been confused since the post-war national revolutionary movement came into being. Ideological pigeonholes and old dogmas no longer hold true and the old taboos of the traditional political camps are shaken when confronted with national revolutionary positions. There are nationalists who make no secret of their nationalist radicalism, but at the same time have elevated the class struggle against the capitalists to the highest principle. How is this possible? How can a nationalist stand for the class struggle against the capitalists? A revolutionary socialist class struggle for the nation? "They are controlled by the East!" cries the so-called "nationalist" right, for whom the protection of private property over the means of production has always taken precedence over the freedom of the nation. They have always seen the class struggle as a tool of an enemy foreign power, intended to destroy the so-called unity of the people. "They are Nazis in a new guise!" cry both the Marxists and the liberals, for whom people and nation have at best a tactical meaning and whose dream goal is the levelled "one world", free of ethnic and cultural differentiations, without independent nations. However, new problems require new questions and new questions require new answers. The fronts of the 19th century (which on closer inspection were also different from what school historians would have us believe), are no longer the fronts of today. The world of the last twenty years of the 21st century is at a point where these new fronts are becoming increasingly clear. Classes, ideologies, social forces, they are all in turmoil.

The New "One World" Imperialism

Today, when we speak of the nation, when we fight for its liberation, when we see nationalism as a progressive, emancipatory force, our opponent is different from the one who confronted the nationalists of the 19th century. It is no longer a question of freeing the merchant and the industrial citizen from the shackles of feudal restrictions; it is no longer even primarily a question of freeing some "small" nation from the rule of a "large" one. Even the concept of imperialism as the antithesis of national liberation can no longer be defined exclusively in terms of individual states.

Certainly, there is American imperialism, the imperialist neo-colonialism of England and France, there are also imperialist elements in German politics. However, all these phenomena, which the socialists of the 1960s were still railing against, are today becoming more and more evident for what they really are: different aspects or facets of one and the same multinational globalist corporate imperialism that penetrates into the very ends of the globe!

The capitalism of the 19th century was the grandfather of this corporate imperialism. It began as the competitive capitalism of individual entrepreneurs. Family fortunes were invested, increased, strengthened by bank loans, and factories were built that in the Netherlands are associated with names like Philips, Unilever, Shell, and so on. The origin, development and inner regularity of this were excellently described by Karl Marx in his economic works. This stage of capitalist development had already been completed for several decades when Lenin wrote his book "Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism" in 1916. In it he accurately described what Marx had already foreseen: the course of capital concentration in the industrialised countries, which at the end of the 19th century gradually began to replace competitive capitalism. This was caused by the concentration of the economy under conditions of free competition, as Marx had described in his work "Das Kapital". The imperialist phase of capitalism was characterised by the concentration of productive forces as a result of ruinous competition, which led to the formation of cartels, trusts and monopolies, as well as the increasing incorporation of bank capital and industrial capital and thus the complete placing of national state apparatuses at the service of the capitalist classes. While competitive capitalism was still characterised by the export of goods, imperialism was characterised by the export of capital: investments were made in so-called "backward" countries; wages, land and raw materials were cheap here, new markets could be developed locally.

The imperialist states, which primarily included England, France, Germany and the US, secured these interests through military aggression ("gunboat policy") and the colonial conquest of entire continents. In this period, for example, British and French colonial rights were extended to large parts of North and Central Africa, parts of Africa and Oceania were colonised by the German Empire, and the third-ranking former colonial power Spain was crushed by the US, with the establishment of US colonies on former Spanish colonial soil (Philippines, Puerto Rico, etc.). Conflicts of interest between these national imperialisms and their national capital groups then led to the First World War; a thoroughly imperialist war, for which the blame must be laid not on one nation (e.g. Germany), but on the interests of conflicting national capitals.

The period from 1914 to 1945 can be seen as a time of great upheaval, as a transition phase to the nocturnal phase of capitalism. Lenin was mistaken when he considered the imperialism of his time, represented by individual states, to be the highest and final stage of capitalism. On the contrary, the human mill was turned further, the bulldozer was driven even more brutally over tribes, peoples and nations, even more nature and raw materials, people, material, soldiers and citizens, workers and peasants were sacrificed to the Moloch of capitalist industrial development. The revolutionary-socialist hope of Lenin and the Bolsheviks for the end of times proved to be false.

At the end of the Second World War, the USA had become the dominant power in the imperialist camp, the former European competitors had torn each other apart and eaten each other up. However, European capital was still there, in the colonies, in the production units, stocks and real estate that had remained intact, in the money that had been invested in neutral countries. Thus, although the US took over the political and military leadership of the Western world and was certainly the most powerful economically, the US capitalists could not easily absorb European capital. On the contrary, after a phase of increasing export of US capital to Europe, a phase of increasing reciprocity in the export of capital began, the creation of joint subsidiaries (not only in the Third World) and the amalgamation of the largest banking and industrial groups around the world through a thousandfold network of holdings and cooperatives. After competitive capitalism and old imperialism, the third stage of the capitalist system has been reached, multinational imperialism, or globalism!

"One World" of Dead Souls

This new type of imperialism created globalist instruments to coordinate its activities and gain complete control over all the peoples of the world. These instruments include:

- NATO and friendly/allied pacts such as SEATO, ANZUS, etc. as military instruments of domination.

- The World Bank and the infamous "International Monetary Fund" (IMF) as the central levers of global economic control, which have brought almost all the nations of the world into dependence through their lending policies and all manner of financial manipulations.

- Associations such as the "Trilateral Commission", "World Economic Forum" and the "Bilderberg Conference" as consultative bodies of important state, economic and trade leaders, media representatives etc. from the Western industrialised countries.

The goal, the "One World" controlled by inscrutable multinational globalist bodies is now within their grasp! It is not the result of an ominous "world conspiracy", but results from the development logic of capital (which was never understood by the right-wing parties; the reason why they had to resort to mystifications of conspiracies to explain simple processes). The interdependence of capital increases day by day, as does the dependence of the peoples on the decisions of the IMF and the big banking centres. For the sake of higher profits, the importance of capital utilisation cries out for globally standardised production processes, consumer behaviour, ways of life; for global psychological calculability and thus for the disappearance of all mental and cultural differentiations.

This 'brave new world' of the multinationals will be a world without cultural diversity, without national sovereignty and regional autonomy, without democratic decision-making and without workers' rights. It will be planned and structured down to the smallest detail, realising Ernst Jüngers' chilling horror vision of "planetary planned landscapes". It will reduce the human being to the functions of production and consumption, it will leave no room for individuality, creativity outside the global culture industry and no self-determination for the people. Its supreme principle will be the rationality of capitalist profit. Their ideologies are - even now - liberal cosmopolitanism, progressivism and the idolisation of industry and technology. Their archenemy is and remains: NATIONALISM!

Class Struggle as Revolutionary Task

If nationalism is anti-capitalist, it must finally free itself from the reactionary imagination of the political right. This means, above all, that all ideas of the "peoples community" (volksgemeinschaft) and "national solidarity" under the umbrella of the capitalist system must be definitively rejected. For the people are divided into the stooges of imperialism and its ideologies, on the one hand, and those who suffer and partly fight against imperialism, on the other. This division is - from its objective causes - a division into social classes since the basis of imperialism is determined by one class alone, namely the capitalist class from whose womb it emerged.

The class struggle is therefore not a Marxist "instrument of division" against the people, but exists objectively and is perceptible every day in the conflicts between the different social classes. Today, more than ever, it is the task of true national revolutionary politics to make people aware of this class struggle, to intensify it and to orientate it.

The beneficiaries of the imperialist system in each country are the direct representatives of the multinationals, the directors, commissioners and managers of the respective banks and companies, as well as their accomplices in political parties, trade unions, the media and the cultural sector. The deceived are the broad strata of the people, the workers who have been deprived of their identity and culturally enslaved. They are economically exploited and politically impotent. It is necessary to persuade these misled people to fight against the globalists. This can be done on the basis of the objectively existing economic contradictions, which have become increasingly evident in recent years.

The economic contradictions of the working class in particular against the capitalists have been elaborated excellently by Karl Marx: the workers produce surplus value which the capitalists appropriate. The producers are thus deprived of the fruits of their own production. Moreover, in the capitalist production process they are constantly exposed to the constraints of profit maximisation for the capitalists, with all its consequences: rationalisation, high work pressure, industrial accidents and waste of personal labour power. In times of crisis, the capitalists and their state withdraw previous social concessions, resulting in poverty and impoverishment. From these contradictions arises an anti-capitalist potential for conflict, which can manifest itself in daily small-scale wars in the factory, but also in mass actions of the workers, employees, etc. on the streets. That is where the national revolutionary struggle can and must begin!

Imperialism is based on a system of continuous industrial production, creation of surplus value, reinvestment, increased production, etc. The bearers of production are the workers, without whose labour there would be no existence. The carriers of production are the workers, without their labour the system could not exist. There can be no war in the world without weapons produced by the workers. No ship, no aeroplane, no car is available, no electricity flows through the wire without the power of the labourer. Thus the worker has in his hands the weapon to pull the rug out from under imperialism and thereby liberate both himself and the nation, the people. The sharpening of the antagonisms between the exploited and the exploiters, the raising of the class struggle to a higher level, can lead to the working class refusing to work in one country or another and thus attacking the basis of the system. Political strike, general strike, factory occupation are thus among the main instruments of the class struggle, which must ultimately lead to the national liberation struggle.

The political-strategic awareness of the link between personal suffering and the imperialist world system arises no more or less spontaneously today than it did 80 years ago, when Lenin, in his writing "What to do?", pointed out the necessity of the link that the spontaneous (economic) workers' movement must make with revolutionary theory. The lever for establishing this link is the revolutionary organisation, the creation of which is an increasingly urgent task for national revolutionaries.

It is the workers and the other simple layers of the people who have every interest in freeing themselves from this system, which means social liberation from the capitalist economic system and thus liberation from the imperialist world system. The bourgeoisie, on the other hand, is today anti-national to the bone (and that means, above all, liberal), because everything it has to lose after a socialist workers' revolution, it has gained through this globalist system. This also applies to the much-quoted 'small', 'medium' and 'anti-monopoly' capitalists, even now that their days are numbered due to the wave of bankruptcies. What is overlooked, however, is that these capitalists also benefited to the end from the ruling system, which guaranteed them private ownership of the means of production, protection from exploitation and, in most cases, a decent living. They are allies of the system and not of the people; for the sake of profit they have always been prepared to betray their nation. One cannot serve both the moneybags and the nation. Individual pursuit of profit is liberalist behaviour and service to the nation is socialist behaviour (the former characterised by individual, the latter by collective interests); both are mutually exclusive.

Conclusion:

Capital has now organised itself internationally and is striving for the completion and unification of the world. The struggle for the preservation of peoples and cultures as a national revolutionary task must therefore be directed against international capital, globalism. Nationalism is thus an anti-capitalist struggle; a class struggle!

National revolutionaries must recognise the objectively existing contradictions between the workers and the capitalist system and mobilise the enormous power of the working class for the national liberation struggle. They must make the workers aware that social liberation cannot be achieved without national liberation, the task of which is to liberate one country after another from world capitalism. The escalation of the class struggle is in no way directed against the interests of the nation, but rather serves them. If capital today is internationalist and its ideology globalist, then the working class as a counterpart of capital must be nationalist (in the sense of anti-imperialist solidarity of the people fighting for liberation). And vice versa: the class struggle of the workers against capital is directed against an internationally intertwined power and thus benefits the liberation of the peoples from this power!

NO NATIONAL LIBERATION WITHOUT THE LIBERATION OF THE WORKING CLASS!

NO SOCIALISM WITHOUT THE LIBERATION OF THE NATION AND THE RECONQUEST OF NATIONAL IDENTITY!

PEOPLES OF THE WORLD, UNITE IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST GLOBALIST CAPITAL - NATIONAL LIBERATION EVERYWHERE!

Globalism weaponises migration. Sovereign Socialism defends humanity everywhere.

Open borders fanatics - whether liberal capitalist globalist, dribbling idpol globalist, or liberal trotskist globalist (there isn't much difference really) - scream hysterically when Working Class people do not share their fetish for destroying sovereignty and making the entire world a slave state utterly defenceless against the greedy parasites who think only in terms of how to use human beings to make more money for them.  The Socialist Motherland Party has a policy of closing the borders, so that our country becomes self-sufficient in economic, cultural and all other important areas.  We do not have this policy because we are xenophobic, but rather because we understand that borders protect people.  Borders protect the Working Class from greedy capitalists who use immigrants as cheap labour to drive down wages and working conditions.  Borders protect people in other countries from exploitation and from the brain drain of the most skilled being stolen by corporations who are more than happy to leave untrained Workers on the scrap-heap in one country while trained Workers from another country are removed, thus weakening the country they leave.

Socialism is about what is best for the people.  Internationalism is a spirit of cooperation and mutual respect, which can only exist between Free Socialist Nations with absolute control of their own borders.  Internationalism doesn't exist under Capitalism.  What exists is the opposite of Internationalism - and that is Globalism.  Globalism means the end of sovereignty, the end of security of labour, the end of a standard of living which is liveable, and the end of culture as all peoples are reduced to economic units to be used and abused and ultimately thrown away when they no longer make profits for the global ruling class.

The following post by Peter Freitag sums up what it means to be against unlimited migration, and how this isn't a racist issue, but an anti-Capitalist one which Socialists who have not been blinded by identity politics and menshevik lies, fully understand.......

OK lets be fucking clear about this whole migration topic. It is not because people do not care for these poor people that they don’t want masses coming in.

It is first off, because the actual poor people don’t want to see more of the already insufficient resources spent on them, as not a single fucking EU country strays from maintaining a certain level of poverty to give companies and employers leverage, divided amongst even more people.

If the EU and it’s member states really wanted to make morally integer decisions, they would first off, abolish poverty on their own territory, they would actually trial every company and it’s shareholders, if involved into slavery and/or destabilisation of another country/region for the sake of maximising profits.

This way, the resistance of residents of the EU would be reduced and there would be drastically less people needing to flee.

Another issue, be it just felt or not, we Europeans take pride in our freedoms and our free to chose lifestyle. So it should be absolutely no surprise, that if some backward preachers and/or religious activists, from any religion those people bring with them, are trying to convert people to a lifestyle that we successfully rejected centuries ago from our own predominant christian churches, there is anger flaring up.

I for my part will absolutely never allow any whatsoever fricking belief to dictate my sexlife for one or how men and or women need to dress and behave. To be specific, I am totally positive, that in a society, where women need to hide themselves away under garments so that men don’t get tempted, these men are all wimps.

In our society as in many other, men take pride in their ability of self-control, it is part of their showcasing of their mental and moral resilience, it is a quality for them.

So if these people who come from a background where this quality seems not to exist in men, come over here, it is their duty to step up their game and not us to lower our standards to accommodate them!

By the way, this BS about women needing to hide away, has started to be pushed by a growing number of wanna be holy men only some 50 years ago, I learned not so recently.

Everyone to their beliefs, but I will never lower my standards to make such people feel comfortable, if not for myself, it would still be that these people should never feel comfortable about this, as it is forcefully legitimised injustice through twisted belief!

Call me intolerant if you like, call me an infidel if you must, but I never killed anyone for my beliefs and I believe in such ways, that I don’t need anyone else to believe the same to be happy. First achieve what I am able to, then come and criticise me!

Defend your language, fight liberal Newspeak

Etymology is a fascinating subject. Languages are natural living entities which change and adapt as the culture in which they are based develops. The exception is dead languages, which through lack of usage become frozen in time. Looking at how words gradually alter their meanings is am interesting way of understanding the fluidity of the national culture they reflect.

Consider the question as to the reason why the chess-piece known as the 'Rook' is so named. Although Chess experts frown upon the use of the word 'Castle', insisting the word 'Rook' be used, 'Castle' is the word which the vast majority of ordinary Britons use. Why is this? Quite simply, in English, a Rook is a bird, whereas the chess-piece looks like one of the many castles we have in our country. Why then is the piece we call the castle able to make such manœuvres? The reason lies squarely with the etymology of the word 'Rook'. Rook, when used in chess, has absolutely nothing to do with the bird which shares the same name. It has nothing to do with rooks being birds which are often seen in castles. The word when seen in the context of its original meaning makes a great deal of sense. Chess is a game which has existed for many years. In modern times, it can be dated back to the seventh century Gupta empire in India, and to Persia, although its origins probably go back further. The Persian word for the piece we call the castle, was رخ (rokh). This is the Persian word for a chariot. The Chariots of Persia were high speed vehicles, made to resemble small buildings. In Italy, the word rokh became rocca, which means a siege tower - again a castellated vehicle. This morphed into the English word Rook. Thus it can be seen that the high speed long range chariot of old, which resembled a small castle (and not a bird), is indeed a Rook.

The origins, meanings and natural development of words is fascinating.

Since the middle of the twentieth century, the healthy gradual change of the English language has been hijacked for political motives. It is true that this has occurred before, notably in the time of Shakespeare, when a group based around Francis Bacon created a wealth of new words, which simultaneously enriched the English language and united the regional variations. The new manipulation of English is, however, not beneficial to national cohesion, and certainly does not enrich the language. The modern engineering of our language is destructive, detrimental to its users and dangerous to society. George Orwell called it NewSpeak. We have come to know it as Political Correctness.

The destruction of the English language is so fast paced that anyone born after the Second World War who has grown up immersed in the Americanised liberal impostor which calls itself 'English' will have difficulty in understanding the language spoken by the previous generation. Political Correctness is also making English grammatically nonsensical. It is practically forbidden to describe an individual as male or female. A basic sentence such as 'he asked her to dance' has become 'they asked them to dance'. This makes no sense! Describing someone by physical characteristics is now classed as discrimination and can result in imprisonment. Indeed the word 'discriminate' has been corrupted into meaning to treat in a detrimental manner. If offered a raw chicken or a cooked chicken to eat, failing to discriminate could result in hospital treatment!

The defenders of Political Correctness would have us believe that the manipulation of the language and the legal punishment of transgressors, is for the benefit of all - is to help the underprivileged(!) and protect disadvantaged minorities. They have a dishonest lexicon to 'spin' their destructive assault on culture through the control of our language, into something positive. Don't be fooled. Political Correctness is NewSpeak. The self-appointed Language and Thought Police, through front groups such as Common Purpose, are destroying our beautiful and poetic language. Humans think using words and symbols. By reducing the number of words and symbols we have, they reduce the potential for thought, and in turn curtail our freedom. They could not care less for minorities or any particular group. They use political correctness to pit Male against Female, Northerner against Southerner, Welsh against English against Scot against Irish etc.  In effect, they turn each of us into a Political Policeman to do their dirty work for them.

What is the solution to this despicable attack on all we hold dear? For once, the solution is simple: educate yourself! Study your language, refuse to use pc terms, refuse to get drawn into the Thought-crime apparatus. The PC/CP commissars are few. We are many. Without our co-operation, they cannot destroy our language. With a vibrant flourishing language at our disposal, we can enjoy absolute freedom of thought and make their attempts at mind control impossible. A technique they use is to instil a belief that those who use a variety of words are 'snobs', 'poofs' etc. This discourages many people from increasing their vocabularies and enjoying the enhanced freedom of expression this brings. Don't fall into their traps! Don't become an unwitting agent of the enemy.

Our language is the key to our freedom. Defend it. Use it in its organic sense. Refuse to surrender a single word to the linguistic oppressors. Take pride in the roots of your language - for therein you will find the foundations of your self. This is a battle we can win. This is a battle we must win.

Transgenderism doesn't exist: Mental Illness does

by Warwick Alderman

An extrapolation made by some Maoists is to support the LGBT fantasists, believing it to be in sympathy and spirit with his ideas.

But, it must remain their interpretation:  Not Mao's.  The false agenda of:  "Transgenderism," which divides the proletariat was not extant in his lifetime.  There is simply no way of stating what his view on such a modern plague would be.

This assumption is about as sensible as declaring what Marx's view of smartphones would be.
Racial oppression existed in Mao's lifetime:  And, I think that there is every justification for US Maoists seeking an alliance with black people:

But, Maoist support for LGBT is going too far.  One can question rigorously, the idea of this community being oppressed:   Is it not a fetish of white, middle class people:  I.e.  The bourgeoisie?
People who are genuinely oppressed, don't worry about their birth sex, or question it.  Such indulgent nonsense comes with wealth, prosperity, idleness and confusion.

Transgenderism is a mental disorder, that should be treated psychiatrically, with a psychopharmacological intervention that attacks it, and treats it as it does depression (Melancholia).
"Body Dysmorphia," should be filed alongside.  These are both modern plagues, to which there is no solution within the paradigm of the delusion:

For a Body Dysmorphic patient, no amount of plastic surgery will bring lasting happiness:  Merely temporary relief from self - hatred.  There is no cure to be gained by feeding and supporting the delusion.  Confusion arises from lack of faith and purpose.  To indulge mental delusions is not compassion.

Transgenderism is a delusion: 

God/nature allocates sex:  And he doesn't make mistakes.
The idea that one is inhabiting the wrong gender is psychosis:  Therapeutic intervention should work towards seeking acceptance of the Client's birth sex.

To use public funds, from our hard-pressed NHS to indulge this sickness to the point of surgical mutilation, is a social crime against all genuinely sick people in Britain.

The NHS cannot afford to treat invented diseases:  Real disease grows exponentially.  Type Two Diabetes, Morbid Obesity, Childhood Obesity, as well as many real conditions that require resources, such as:  Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease.  Newer drugs are always being streamed:  But, there is a limit to what our NHS can afford.


The Cultural Revolution was genius:  Surely, it is one of the only episodes in world history wherein the established leader proved more radical than the bureaucracy that supported him, and radicalised the proletariat to affect change?

In Britain, Oliver Cromwell would have been capable of such a thing:  But, it is surely a rare phenomena?  He didn't side with his revolutionary army:  But, he was capable of it.

Hitler's revolution of 1944 was forced upon him by an assassination attempt, not his innate radicalism.  An act of revenge against the German bourgeoisie;  of completing a chapter according to his logic.  But, his actions towards the SA describe the limits of his creativity.  He didn't believe that a motivated, revolutionary army could compare to the professional one.  He must have had cause to regret.

My theoretical knowledge of Maoism is almost nonexistent.  This is heresy to an ideologue:  But, this position has enormous potential.  To know too much about a subject, is to kill it, creatively:
When you learn to play electric guitar:  You are at your most creative at the beginning.  As your theoretical knowledge increases, your command of scales etc, your playing becomes less creative and more formulaic.

Once you have become expert:  Your creativity is dead.

"In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's there are few."
- Shunryu Suzuki


It is my intention to save Socialism in Britain:  To rescue it from the degeneration of Trotskyism, of:  "Political Correctness," that it has been engulfed by since the early 1980's:  And to return it to the working class, in a form that they can both understand and support.

In order to achieve this:  We must attack everything that is not Socialism:  That means Identity politics and especially Transgenderism.  We must assault it, ideologically, on behalf of the masses:  The larger proletariat.  These unfortunate, depressed people are:  0.000 (something) of the population.  It is not reasonable to expect the larger community to suffer because of them:  In allocating nhs resources to treat a fictional condition.

We all have an instinct, about what real Socialism consists of:  It looks like the 1970's milieu.  It looks like the Britain before Thatcherism, when British Socialism was ascendant.  The voice of the proletariat was strong:   The unions were strong:  It worked:  Why else would Thatcher and Heseltine pledge it's destruction?

Feminism and anti - racism were not fetishised, according to the Trotskyist bent.  There was no war on Smoking, no social reconditioning, no abjuration to healthy eating or exercise.  Free speech was absolute:  We called it:  "Freedom." It was a healthier society:  And we must work towards it.  It is not just our past:  It must become our future.

Notes (with credit to The Red Cebuano):

[People often confuse] Third Worldism [with] Maoism.

1. It's theory does NOT deal mainly with third world countries nor does it claim that first world countries have no potential. Maoism is an international theory first synthesized by the Communist Party of Peru and Abimael Guzman and is being followed in many movements today, most especially in the Philippines, India, Canada, Bhutan and others. It does say that first world countries have lesser revolutionary potential, sure, but it does still have some.

Tactics will however be different. A united front will be built from the workers and the most oppressed classes. For example in the Philippines, you have the basic workers-peasant alliance which is allied with the petty and national bourgeois because those classes are also oppressed through imperialism. Other than this, there is also emphasis on youth, women, LGBT, indigenous people and fisherfolk which are also very oppressed. In the US, Maoist collectives are trying to unite the workers with the black, native and LGBT community which is a correct line since those communities are also pretty oppressed.

2. Maoism does not propose utopian socialism. Ie it does not say workers necessarily have to build their own services. I think this is sort of a misunderstanding of what "building a people's government through the people's war" is.

3. What Maoism is. There are 5 main tenets of Maoism:

• 1. The Law of Contradiction
• 2. The Mass Line
• 3. The People's War
• 4. The New Democratic Revolution
• 5. The Cultural Revolution

1. The Law of Contradiction says that the most important law of dialectics and its real main law is that contradictions are universal. The negation of the negation, quantity into quality, individual to universal, all those are just examples of the law of contradictions. From here, Mao developed the theory of the two worlds outlook - that people either think with the proletarian outlook or the bourgeois outlook. Proletarian ie serving the people, bourgeois ie serving themselves.

Mao also developed the theory of antagonistic and non-antagonistic contradictions which basically says that some contradictions don't have to be solved through tough antagonisms and that some can actually just be solved through other, peaceful means. You can read more about that in "On Contradiction" and "On the Correct Handling of Contradictions"

2. One of Mao's more famous contributions is the mass line which can be summed up in "learn from the masses, then teach them." The basic idea is that the masses always know what's wrong with society and that you have to integrate with them, understand their struggles and sentiments and apply Marxist-Leninist analysis into real life practice. Once you have this understanding, you synthesize it with a scientific approach through Marxism-Leninism and turn it into an actual political line. This political line will be rallied for by your legal front and will be implemented by your illegal front which will be explained in the next section.

3. The People's War is often mistakenly said to be "surround the cities from the countryside" which is wrong. If that were the case, it would just be called agrarian war. The people's war is an effective method of revolution which had closely brought socialism to Peru before the Shining Path's forces were defeated by the reactionary Peruvian army and to Nepal before Prachanda's revisionist line came to power, and it is currently being used to bring in socialism in the Philippines, India, Manipur, Bhutan, and elsewhere. The people's war is divided into three stages - strategic defense, where your forces are small while your enemies are large, strategic equilibrium, where your forces are big enough to take on your enemies, and the strategic offense where your people's army is basically already marching down the streets of victory. As you go through the stages, you build what are called "base areas." In the strategic defense, these are usually just small or big guerilla areas.

In the Philippines, for example, nearly all of Far South Mindanao Region is a base area of the New People's Army but you usually don't see in the streets or whatnot because they're constantly moving. The tactic is mainly guerilla warfare. In the strategic equilibrium, these base areas are more consolidated and less easily penetrated by the army. When the Shining Path was in its strategic equilibrium before, there were base areas where you could clearly see forces from the people's army and they launched larger attacks, even being able to take own a military base.

During the strategic offense, you basically just expand these bases into the final areas that haven't been taken yet and win the war. These bases are to be consolidated with a people's government. This government may be "moving" sort of. For example, in the Philippines, they have "people's courts" and guerilla hospitals which move around. They do have people's barrio committees already so that's already a sign that the movement is already heading forward.

With the people's war, there is what we call "Mao's Three Magic Weapons" ie the Party, the United Front and the Army. The Party does the leadership of the revolution, basically Leninist vanguardism. The United Front consists of the Legal parties and the illegal fronts. The party has to unite with other revolutionary and progressive forces in one way or another. For example, in the Philippines, the CPP has legal parties like youth organizations, women's rights organizations, trade unions, etc. and these are mainly left-wing nationalist, Maoist parties that follow the line of the CPP but the CPP can also stand with the Moro democratic nationalists because they also fall under the national question.

The legal fronts are used to gather more people, to implement the mass line and to rally the party's line. The illegal fronts, including the army, are used to implement the party's line. In the Philippines, again, the legal fronts stage protests and encourage people to support land reform, while the NPA already gets rid of landlords (sometimes the landlords can be talked into it but not often) and distributes the land to peasants already which give them popularity.

4. The New Democratic Revolution, this mainly revolves around semi-feudal countries. Semi-feudal countries can finish the bourgeois stage under proletarian leadership. The proletariat has to ally with revolutionary bourgeois classes and finish what needs to be done in the capitalist stage such as industrialization. Once this is done, the allied bourgeois classes slowly turn proletarian as they pass through the socialist stage, therefore removing the need for two revolutions.

5. The Cultural Revolution states that people with bourgeois mentality can get into the party and give out bourgeois laws and therefore a conscious struggle must be regularly launched to get rid of bourgeois mentality and bourgeois ideology.:

The Socialist Motherland response to the twitter and other social media clampdown

The Socialist Motherland Party is no stranger to conflict with social media censors.  The party was repeatedly forced off Facebook, and has been temporarily banned from Twitter on a number of occasions. Although we have had no problems on Facebook for some time, Twitter is a different story; the party is now permanently banned there.

So what did the SMPBI twitter team do to earn the ire of the free speech destroyers?


Taking a stand against Rapists

The party has an unwavering line with regards to a number of important issues, many of which twitter takes an opposite position on.  The social media tyrants waste no opportunity to promote degeneracy and to silence any opposition to the slide into absolute self-focused ego-maniacal individualism.  As a truly Socialist party, we naturally stand against all that is harmful to the people. Twitter has forced us to take down tweets condemning paedophilia in its direct sexual form and also in its brain-washing form which the government, media and education systems utilise.

Exposing Terrorists

We helped to expose the Al-Nusra Front / Al-Qaeda / White Helmets terrorists.  This did not go down well.  Twitter promotes these vile murderers who have slaughtered vast numbers of people in North Africa and the Middle East as mercenaries serving the US/UK and the capitalist corporations which control these and other countries.  Twitter is a part of the globalist control network, and doesn't take kindly to people speaking about the enemies of freedom who do the dirty work of the fake democracies.  The illegal UK regime is bringing White Helmets scum to the UK, housing them and by doing so, making the waiting lists longer for people in genuine need, as terrorists are literally being flown in and given accommodation as part of their pay for destabilising free Libya, Iraq, Syria etc.

Fighting the Transgender Industry

Another key point that we have been keen to insist upon, is the fact that lipstick is not a magick wand which when applied to a man has the power to change him into a woman.  Using hash tags such as #TransWomenAreMen, #TransMenAreWomen, #OnlyTwoGenders, Fight #TransFascism, etc, we joined forces with a considerable number of twitter users to stand up for the rights of people who are same-sex attracted to not be forced into feeling ashamed of their sexuality by an industry which makes vast sums from hormone 'therapy' and surgery designed to 'realign' gay/lesbian people's bodies so that they can pretend to be heterosexual.  The transgender propagandists are using the outright lie that sex and gender can exist independently, to make vast sums of money from un-necessary surgery by shaming homosexual people into believing that something is wrong with them and that they need to be 'cured' of their psychological illness by having body parts removed.

Our twitter campaign has been a thoroughly anti-homophobic one.  We have also pointed out that impressionable children are being targeted as victims for the industry to exploit.  Children of idiotic bourgeois liberal parents obsessed with identity politics, are especially vulnerable to being labelled as 'trans' - they have suffered enough being raised by trots and similar fools, they need to be rescued from the trans insanity, not operated on in order to make their liberal trendy families feel fashionable.  The school system, media, government, social services, police etc are all part of the attack on children - the paedophile assault on the innocent - and we have consistently taken a stand against this madness.

Defending the Unborn

Like Stalin before us, we believe that Mothers should be supported for the vital role they play in raising the next generation.  We oppose the Capitalist system which sees the unborn as an obstacle to women becoming wage-slaves.  We say that raising children is not a barrier to a career, it IS a career.  The infanticidal trotskyite/bourgeois fake feminists who promote killing children as a 'right', are commonplace on Twitter, and we took the battle to them.

Exposing racist bigots

We were more than happy to retweet the racist bigots, David Lammy and Diane Abbott (labour mps) and other bigots who hide behind their skin colour to racially abuse people of a different skin colour.

Calling for restoration of the Death Penalty

The Death Penalty was abolished in the UK in 1969 largely due to a campaign by the hypocrite Sydney Silverman, who had been a conscientious objector in the Great War, refusing to fight on the grounds that he disagreed with killing, but an advocate for sending British men to their deaths in the Second World War, which he rightly saw as a means for advancing the Zionist theft of Palestine.  We called for the execution of the Islamic State terrorist, Shamima Begum, and for all dual nationals who had similarly served the UK-proxy armies (Al Qaeda, IS, Al-Nusra etc) to be returned to the UK to be killed, or better still, for the Islamic State terrorists in the Al Hol refugee camp in Syria to be bombed to ashes .  Begum has become a media celebrity, with all the liberals falling over each other to have her brought 'home', given a house (yet again pushing good people further down the housing list to accommodate a servant of the state).  We pointed out that all the crocodile tears over her dead babies were a contrast to the silence for the many more children she is responsible for killing (her own through neglect, the rest through terrorism).  Twitter used this as the excuse to ban the SMPBI permanently.  Twitter loves terrorists who serve the globalist agenda.  The Socialist Motherland Party believes in justice, not compassionate 'rehabilitation', we believe in defending the people and destroying our enemies.  Twitter ironically concurs on this, hence banning us!

So. What to do now?

We have been permanently banned from Twitter.  The level of censorship is so extreme that it is inadvisable for anyone to use that site.  We advise comrades with accounts on there to remove themselves before a Twitter ban becomes a visit from the thought police.

We have looked at alternatives such as Gab, and found that the site is home to reactionaries who despise the word Socialist and who will fight to the last typed letter to defend the slave masters of the capitalist economy.  We have an account, which will stay there as a redirection point should anyone with an open mind happen to encounter it.  We will not be wasting time on a site which is populated with people who have closed their minds to the solutions to capitalism.

The SMPBI Forum is being updated more regularly, and we hope that people will come on board to debate.  We have a hidden members only section, but the forum is large enough for anyone to come and discuss matters with us.  We will be banning liberals/trots though - the site is for open discussion, not for arguing with bourgeois puppets!  We have had members join various other forums, with the result being bans from the identity politics obsessed left and right.  Our own forum is the way to progress.

Two Fingers to Twitter!

We have saved the last two months of the Twitter account (an account which would have been in operation for 6 years had it not been banned last month).  You can see for yourselves the 'offensive' tweets which the twitter thought police can not tolerate - although they tolerate paedophiles, racists, trans-homophobes, terrorists and many more varieties of scum.  We will trawl through the tweets to keep a list of decent websites so we can keep in touch with people and organisations who have fought alongside us.  Sadly, most twitter users do not have other sites linked to their twitter ones, and as a result many contacts will be lost.

For an archive of the final days on twitter, visit:
https://bannedontwitter.blogspot.com/


Please comment at: https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/smpbiforum/the-socialist-motherland-response-to-the-twitter-a-t127.html

Comic Relief - Yet more 'charity' transferring the crumbs from the poor to the rich

In 1984 in Æthiopia, one million people starved to death, with another six million at risk of starvation. The BBC began pushing images of starving children to get the public into a state of shock. Arch-europhile globalist liberal, Bob Geldof, organised the Live Aid concerts to raise money and to ensure that he gained publicity after his music career collapsed. The result was a massive £100 million raised by the general public, with more tax-payers' money given by Government. The money dispatched to Africa was syphoned off by the ruling class for funding their war against the people of Æthiopia. However, just about enough money got through to feed the starving multitude.

The masters of heart-rending propaganda at the BBC used every underhand trick to make the British people feel guilty if they didn't give money to feed the hungry. At the same time, millions were unemployed in Great Britain, and sporadic riots were breaking out. The focus of attention on Africa helped take the public gaze away from the ills afflicting the nation. Bob Geldof received a knighthood for his services to the Crown. Indeed, his help in playing on the natural empathy of the British people for the suffering of others allowed the Government to continue its globalist agenda. The people of Britain, including many of the Live Aid organisers, were manipulated for political gain.

In 2002, four million Africans were in danger of starvation.  Again the begging bowls went out, culminating in the 2005 Live8 concerts.  The result of charity globally, has been to foster a dependency culture in Africa and parts of Asia.  The constant influx of money has bolstered brutal regimes, allowing them to wage war on their own people. Food has become used as a weapon to keep the ordinary people oppressed. Another result is that many more Africans are leaving their homelands to seek a safer existence elsewhere. These people tend to be the most motivated as they are the ones who put in the effort to leave their lands. This is effectively a drain of the very people who could, if encouraged to stay, help their nations.

The BBC has been a mouthpiece of the globalist-imperialist ruling class since its inception. The propaganda they use to get people to give money to the starving millions is cynically designed to appeal to the heart, not the head. If Africans had been allowed to run their own affairs, the theft of resources by multinational capitalist corporations would have been possible and in 1984, one million people would not have been in such hunger that they died.  Many more millions who have subsequently died due to hunger or conflict would have been able to live decent lives.  Capitalism is responsible for the genocide in Africa, and indeed across the world. The people of Africa need to take control of their lands, oust the oppressive globalist-compliant corporate puppet regimes and become self-sufficient. Obviously the BBC would not want their globalist owners to lose control.

The rulers of the capitalist order want mass starvation and ignorance as it displaces indigenous populations, leading to civil disruption in the lands to which the emigrants flee. The people of Africa are being used to destroy the social cohesion of Europe, the Americas and other lands. Charities who beg for cash for food are fuelling this global catastrophe.

The BBC fund-raiser, Children In Need, is another begging mechanism which transfers money from the compassionate poor, to the parasitic rich. The modus operandi of Children In Need is to emotionally blackmail hard-pressed working class people, inculcating a feeling of guilt for not being close to starvation.  As food banks become a means for survival for many people, as homelessness becomes a massive problem, and as people are now literally starving to death in the British Isles, this emotional abuse is an absolute outrage.  Britain is one of the most highly taxed countries in the world. There is no excuse for poverty in the UK. Children In Need claims to be for the benefit of poor families in Great Britain. In reality much of the money goes abroad. Of the money which stays in the country, a substantial proportion goes to unhealthy politically motivated causes, such as funding pro-transgender sex-education (liberal brainwashing) for the very young and other trotskyite identity politic insanity.  The 'charity' Mermaids, is funded by the national lottery as well as other organisations which steal money from the most financially vulnerable - it is just one of many organisations whose actions are destructive to the youth of the nation, promoting unnecessary surgery and paedophilia.  Amnesty, Children In Need, Live Aid, Comic Relief etc - all have dark side, in fact, all have very little positive about them.

Other charities raise millions for globalist identity politics pushing causes. Oxfam is openly dedicated to transferring money to regimes in far off lands. For those who wish their money to be spent in that way, Oxfam is fine. Cafod is of a similar vein. Cancer Research funds vivisection but is at least honest about this. The problem lies with think-tanks like Common Purpose, and charities such as British Red Cross, Help the Aged etc, who purport to look after people in Britain, which to an extent they do, but not exclusively. A lot of money is diverted to politically motivated causes which ordinary people would probably not support, and to other countries. Even animal charities are not exempt from corruption and misuse of funds.

How do we deal with this misappropriation of funds? There is a saying 'Charity begins at Home'. This is where it must end too. People need to look after their neighbours, friends and relatives. By building a support network, decent people would be helped keep out of poverty. Unworthy sorts, such as heroin addicts who are given housing, benefits, food parcels etc almost as a reward for their anti-social and criminal lifestyles should be left to either sort their lives out or face the natural consequences.  As Socialists, we of course stand by fellow Socialists in every land. What we will not do, is support causes which prop up capitalist regimes and keep the working class down at home and abroad.

Ordinary people must refuse to give tax-money to prop up the banking system, fund illegal wars in the Middle East, pay for the European Union and push the degenerate liberal brainwashing of the masses. We must gird ourselves to say NO when the begging bowls come around. Even giving ten pence to these gangsters is unacceptable. Every penny given pays for our own exploitation.



If government was refused the funding and the permission to engage in political and military atrocities at home and abroad, the taxes which would otherwise go to undermining our society could be used to help our own people. The government gains its power from us. We must take that power back by refusing to give them unquestioning obedience. We must refuse to donate to charities. we can help our own people by being decent citizens. We can look after animals by giving food to the shelters, or housing those we can. We don't need faux-charities who are bleeding us white whilst helping destroy us. We are on course to living in a complete dictatorship. The choice is stark - either stand up to the petty dictators of the State and their friends with the begging bowls, or accept the absolute tyranny of the global capitalist order.

In 1984, the BBC broadcast harrowing images of Africans in Æthiopia dying of starvation. The politicians were quick to jump into the fray, stating that 'something had to be done' to alleviate the hunger, and then the phenomenon of Live Aid sprang into action, with pop music celebrities releasing the original 'Feed the World' single, followed by the massive trans-global concerts to raise money ostensibly to feed those starving to death in Africa. In 2014 we had a repeat of the 1984 Feed the World single hitting the charts (albeit one with different 'celebrities' fronting it and the emphasis on ebola rather than hunger). People in Africa were and are still dying of hunger and disease and people in the West are still being told that it is our fault. 

In 1984, the Live Aid phenomenon was used to justify external interference in Africa. Using the malleable publicity-seeking musicians to fleece the gullible general public with emotional propaganda designed to make us feel guilty for not starving whilst others were, the politicians in the 1980s used Live Aid to enact regime change across Africa in order to remove any protection the people had from globalising corporations. The largest share of the vast amount of money extracted from the working class of the European world was syphoned off by corrupt politicians and industrialists in every part of the globe, with the people in Africa receiving a meagre fraction. The causes of the Æthiopian famine were not addressed, so nothing changed to prevent future hunger and associated problems.

Just like the an Gorta Mór in Ireland, the Æthiopian Famine was not the result of natural conditions, but was caused by the theft of food from the people by those who controlled the economy; just like in Europe, the despots who condemned ordinary people in Africa to a painful death by lack of food, were people motivated by financial greed and the lust for political power. The liberals who shouted 'racism' from the rooftops and tried to make Europeans feel guilty because Africans were starving, were either indoctrinated idiots who sincerely believed that evil White people were starving Black people due to the colour of their skin, or simply liars. The starvation of the Æthiopians was motivated by a belief in money over people, and if there was an element of racism involved, it was not White versus Black (as was blatantly evident by the massive donations from ordinary White people who often themselves had very little money), rather it was the old supremacist hatred of the zionist bigots who believe they are 'chosen' by their 'god' to rule over the rest of us and profit from us even when that means killing us.

The 'race card' has been played to death in African-European relations. African-Americans in particular are taught to hate Europeans for the treatment of their ancestors in the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Europeans are taught that we must feel remorse for what our ancestors did to the Africans. The truth of the matter is that although there were some Europeans who profited by the misery of the Slave Trade, they were members of the European ruling class, and as such were people who had no concern for any members of humanity whatsoever, and rather than acting out of 'racism', their persecution of the Africans was simply a natural progression from their persecution of ordinary Europeans.  When David Lammy spouts drivel about Comic Relief being offensive because it allows white to feel they re doing something to help non-whites, his racist rubbish is just more of the same drivel which the liberal regimes have pushed for many many years.

The hated Normans who invaded England in 1066 under the leadership of William the Bastard, enslaved the Britons and others who lived in the country. The industrialists of the English, then later, British Empire, brutalised the common people, using their puppets in power to create a legal system which to this day still designates us as property of the ruling class (Subjects of the Crown). Africans were enslaved simply because they were a cheaper commodity, insofar as their enslavement didn't require a convoluted contractual and policing system . Ordinary Europeans were just as brutalised as ordinary Africans, and to suggest that we should be made to feel guilty because the people who owned us owned others with different skin tones, is incredibly offensive.

The eminent Trinidadian researcher, Professor Tony Martin, undertook painstaking research into the African Slave Trade. His conclusions vindicate the common European people from all blame, and prove that the Ruling Class in Europe, along with their Jewish, Arab and African counterparts, are wholly to blame for the evil and indefensible persecution of human beings and the treatment of ordinary people as items of property. Tony Martin was not a 'racist' or a 'white supremacist', but a sincere academic researcher. The fact that he was of African descent does silence those who seek to label all who question the official story of the Slave Trade as racists, but not because they will listen to a non-European exposing the slander against us, but because they refuse to listen! If Tony Martin had been White, he would have been defamed and attacked by the liberal bigots who form the foot soldiers of identity politics; because he was Black, he was simply ignored. To the fake anti-Racists, the work of a Black man is obviously less important than comparable work of a White man! The irony doubtless doesn't register with the globalisers whose only real contribution to the pursuit of mutual respect and equality of care, is to hate all people who oppose the destruction of sovereignty, culture, and all natural diversity, equally.

Tony Martin's lecture on the Jewish role in the Slave Trade is vital viewing as it systematically deals with the racist anti-European guilt propaganda which has been used to justify the further economic exploitation of Africa and the fleecing of ordinary Europeans by the same globalising concerns. The direct link to the video is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ut7I75Q_-zA

The exploitation of the good will of ordinary working class people worldwide in 1984, was a reprehensible display of arrogance by the people who created the famine in the first place. The Ruling Class used the racist supremacist superstitious drivel of the monotheistic religions to justify the occupation of Africa in the first place. National boundaries were torn up by imperialists who had no respect for the natural diversity of Africa. Tribes were thrown together in new States created by bureaucrats drawing lines on maps; the breakdown of these false States was an inevitable outcome if the indigenous peoples were ever to have control over their own territories again, thus the wars which have devastated Africa can be seen as a direct result of the imperialist policies of the 'European' Ruling Class. The 1984 interference in Æthiopia did not address the fundamental problems effecting that land; rather, it consolidated the rule of the corrupt African Ruling Class which is just as subservient to the capitalist money power as the enemies of the people who infest the places of power in our own countries.



Foreign Aid to Africa has increased dramatically since the 1984 Live Aid propaganda ploy of the globalist mafia. In the UK, the Government of the Bankers has ring-fenced Foreign Aid, whilst cutting back services for the general population of the country. A staggering £10.3 BILLION (0.7% of taxes extracted from the people) is given to overseas despots, with criminal and corrupt regimes taking a sizable chunk of the money stolen with menaces from people in the UK by the criminals in Westminster with the help of their uniformed thugs in the UK police. In Æthiopia, the raping, torturing and burning alive of ordinary people by the security forces of the State, has increased in direct correlation to the amount of money given by the UK Taxpayer. The brutalisation of ordinary Africans has been largely funded by Foreign Aid. But, that isn't all that Foreign Aid pays for.

The great con of Foreign Aid is nothing but redistribution of wealth from the poor in the UK to the rich in the IMF and in the multinational corporations which are destroying the entire world. The World Bank and IMF have issued loans across Africa, on the condition that everything owned in the countries to which loans have been given, is privatised. The result has been that the economic rape of Africa has accelerated, with massive deforestation, the destruction of wildlife, obliteration of indigenous culture and the theft of natural resources and food by multinationals who don't give a damn about anything other than profit. This is pretty much what has happened in Europe as well with the EU's austerity policy.   In addition to losing everything which belongs to them, the people of Africa still have to pay back the loans issued by the IMF; the money from the loans having been squandered and stolen by the corrupt politicians - again, exactly like in Europe.  Foreign Aid is used by the corrupt politicians as a means of supplementing payments to the IMF for loans which haven't benefited anyone other than the corrupt Ruling Class and the globalist corporations. For example, in Zambia, the privatised copper mines create great wealth for the overseas speculators, whilst the people of Zambia, despite living in a land which has the third largest copper reserves in the world, live in absolute poverty, with 80% living on about £1.50 per day. Africans are taxed to the hilt to pay the IMF debt, and Foreign Aid, rather than helping the people, also goes to the same despicable enemies of humanity.

The 1984 'Feed the World' song was reissued in 2014 with new puppet performers and a few different lyrics. In 1984 the song stated 'Thank God it's them instead of You', but this line was ditched. Perhaps it was due to the fact that the UK in 2014 as now, was subject to a degree of poverty previously unimaginable, and so for many people, the misery of poverty is not something which happens to others, but something which happens to us. We have people relying upon food banks to survive; we have people dying of starvation or of hypothermia due to having to make a choice between eating or having heating; the UK is suffering 'austerity' to pay the IMF money which they have no right to anyway, whilst the Ruling Class sip champagne and laugh at us all. In spite of the hardship we are all enduring, people who have less than nothing are still scraping together money to give to the poor in Africa - and we are still being called racist!

The solution to world poverty is not pop songs, charity, or the IMF, it is jettisoning the entire apparatus of globalisation. The Banking System and Global Trade are at the root of all our woes. If the IMF debt was cancelled by means of ending that organisation in its entirety, the entire world would be better off.  In the UK, just as in Africa, the solution to poverty is the complete socialisation of the entire economy - from the largest concerns to the smallest - and the prohibition of all unearned income. This means that the Stock Exchange must be closed down, the Banks must not only be closed but those behind them punished for their crimes against humanity (in the way dictated at Nuremberg), all foreign ownership must be outlawed and the entire market ethos must be overturned in favour of a restoration of the indigenous ethos of organic British Socialism. Obviously, this isn't going to happen unless we make it happen - and there is no chance it will ever happen unless we have a complete change of outlook. We need to shed the race hatred which sees others as inferior to us and as therefore not important; we need to make a stand in favour of a real solution to the woes of Africa - absolute decolonisation and a restoration of the entire continent to its own people and of the people of the continent back to their homeland as a part of a global relocation of all peoples to their own lands.

Today is Comic Relief Day. Beginning in 1988, by 2017 over £1bn had been extorted from the working class, with poverty in Britain and abroad increasing in the same period, rather than coming down as we were led to expect.  Charity is a con.  We need to look after our own - by bring food to the homeless, by taking over squats to house people, by helping our human and animal population. none of this requires giving a penny to the BBC/State-sanctioned charity muggers. Did anyone in his or her worst nightmares ever truly imagine that the UK in 2019 would be as awful as it is? If we allow the descent into hell to go unchecked, we will look back at these days with fondness. We cannot allow that to happen.  We need a lasting solution  a revolutionary solution. We Need Socialism, for the British Isles, for the World.



Please comment at:
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/smpbiforum/comic-relief-yet-more-charity-transferring-the-cru-t118.html

The Twitter ban and a clarification of our position on child-rapists, aka, paedophiles

Happy New Year to all SMPBI Comrades and Supporters.

We begin 2019 with a response to the bigots on social media who have banned our twitter team no less than three times in the past few weeks, for our uncompromising position on paedophilia in all its forms, with particular emphasis from twitter on our opposition to the attack on children which is underway disguised as 'gender self-identification'.

On the 23rd December, one of the team got into a debate with a paedophile, telling the disgusting abomination that he is the lowest of all human life and that his desire to rape children is unacceptable.  This apparently goes against twitter rules, as it is 'hate speech' against an individual because of his 'sexuality'. Wow, just wow. So now twitter is banning people for confronting paedophiles!  Here is the 'offensive' tweet:

To clarify matters. The official position of the Socialist Motherland Party regarding child-rapists, aka paedophiles, is that we oppose them 100% and view their behaviour (whether in the fantasy stage or in the active rapist stage) as deplorable.  We see it as our duty to expose them whenever we encounter them, and to attack them in every means possible.  This can include exposing them on social media, campaigning in the streets against known nonces, getting them sacked from employment, and other more imaginative means.  It is our duty to defend our people from all destructive influences, and to fight for a better future. Paedophiles have no part of the future. If we do not oppose them they will be emboldened by lack of opposition and become an even greater menace.  The Socialist Motherland Party is 100% anti-paedophile.  This position is an official position and is not negotiable.

The Socialist Motherland Party has taken a strong line in protecting women from men who use the self-id so-called 'trans' agenda to gain access to women's and girls' spaces.  This too has led to problems on twitter.

Our first twitter ban was for the following:

As stated previously, our Twitter account was temporarily suspended by the biology denial bigots of Twitter, for stating the undeniable fact that an individual born with ovaries is female, and an individual who can at any time in his life produce sperm, is male. The identity politics obsessives will use all manner of pseudo-scientific gymnastics to justify an ideology which is effectively the enshrinement of paedophilia and a cross-dressing fetish as a virtue.  Cross-dressing in itself - like any other fetish - is a matter for individual adults. But the trans-agenda is not concerned with adults, but more and more with children.  It is the sexualisation of children which we condemn, and the vile industry which seeks to encourage children to undergo harmful procedures (surgery, hormone therapy) which will ruin their health permanently.  We are now at the stage where girls who are tom-boyish or boys who likes pink, will have this used against them as a justification for gender realignment butchery.  Traditionally, pink was for boys and blue for girls, but fashions change and the colours reversed.  The idea that children must be mutilated because of how they play, is an outrage.  The SMPBI stands up for sanity, nature, and the protection of children.  We will not bow to transfascism and to the identity cult which push the nonsense that 'feelings' matter more than biology.  This puts us at odds with the liberal extremists who dominate social media, and this is something to take pleasure from.

Tellingly, although on the first occasion in which our account was put on a ban, the mentally ill men who made threats of violence against the party, were not sanctioned.  The sooner the diseased liberal society is replaced by the wholesome healthy Socialist Motherland we crave, the better.

Now, after the second ban (as written of at the top of this post), our twitter team has again fallen foul of the twitter bigots.  On attempting to post for the first time this year, the following censorship was displayed:

The first tweet is a response to a question by a man calling himself TranimeGirl (with emphasis on the Girl, as in female child, which this man certainly is not).  With the intention of creating an excuse to censor dissent to the transfascist cult, he deliberately asked if 'terfs' hate transgenderists - using the liberal slur 'terf' to attack any women who dare to state the obvious facts that men are men regardless of how they dress, that lipstick is not a magic wand which reverses the laws of nature, and that those who engage in biology denial are transfascists who prey on children, making them an especially repugnant variety of paedophile.

The 'offensive' (to bigots) tweet stated that it is wrong to hate people for suffering from mental illness (which the trans issue clearly is), and that rather than indulge in the delusions of the ill, people should be campaigning for better healthcare for people with psychiatric problems (the autocorrect changed the word 'campaigning' to 'damaging' but the intent was still clear.)  The Socialist Motherland Party believes in health care, not identity politics, and is disgusted at the way that the pharmaceutical industry is using an ideology based of the ridiculous concept of sex being changeable, to destroy the lives of vulnerable children with unnecessary surgery and highly profitable hormone 'treatment'.  The vast majority of transgender people are autistic, making the industry an attack on people who are already damaged - making the business not only paedophile (which is NEVER an excuse) but also a direct assault on the most vulnerable of children.  Our stance against the sick people who abuse children, gained us another ban!

The second part of the third ban, was regarding a tweet in response to a man in Spain winning a sexually exploitative 'beauty contest'.  As was stated, it is bad enough that women are pressured into believing that all that matters is physical appearance.  How many lives have been ruined by the sexualisation of girls, by the pressure to look like air-brushed, photo-shopped (and therefore unrealistic) images of anorexic (physically and mentally unhealthy) women?  That a man has won such a degrading competition only spreads the sickness to include boys who have been mentally devastated by the entertainment media and the school system to believe that they are secretly girls and need surgery to realign mind to body!  The transgender ideology attacks same-sex attracted children, teaching boys who like boys that if they are mutilated and wear make-up (or even if they are not mutilated!), that they become girls and are therefore heterosexual!  They are not!  Gays and Lesbians are who they are: they are not in the wrong bodies, and they cannot be 'cured' of their sexual attraction.  Twitter considers opposition to two disgusting exploitative industries (beauty contests and the trans industry) as 'hateful', so we were given a third ban!

The Socialist Motherland Party is not going to remain silent on any issue which harms the working class.  If the bourgeois lunatics were content to limit their identity politics madness to their own class, we would celebrate their self-destruction!  But they are using the law, the media and the education system to push a deranged ideology on our children.

The trans-agenda is a part of the paedophile agenda.  We condemn it regardless of the era, the location, the victims, the perpetrators etc.  We can talk about the likes of Jimmy Savile, and indeed we have done for a number of years (see posts here) , but he is dead and safe from justice.  What matters now is to deal with paedophiles in any way we can. As stated above, we will find out where they work and where they live, and do what we can to get them sacked and moved away from access to children.  We cannot get to the establishment rapists in any way other than exposing them.  Our focus has to be on what we can do to protect our children. When the Socialist Motherland comes, there will be merciless justice meted out to the ruling class for how they have treated us. Liberal collaborators will be treated just the same as their paymasters.  Obeying orders has never been an excuse for doing wrong.  We will fight the rapists wherever we can - on a paedophile by paedophile, rapist by rapist basis.  Some call this lynch mob mentality. So be it. Today a mob, tomorrow a bigger mob, building to a revolutionary mass which will sweep away the liberal sickness and destroy the ruling class and the entire degenerate capitalist system.




Please comment at:
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/smpbiforum/the-twitter-ban-and-a-clarification-of-our-positio-t92.html

Hope Not Hate - The UK Government's Censorship Police

Dave’s Free Speech Club was targeted by extreme pro-censorship activists and entirely false things were reported about Dave and the club on the website of “Hope Not Hate.”

Dave is a marvellous example of the English eccentric. He is a multi-faith practitioner with a deeply spiritual perspective on life. He is also the Rev Dave Parry, ordained priest of the Old Catholic Church. For us in the SMPBI, Davis is our Comrade, and our Cultural Officer, standing up for Working Class culture in the face of bourgeois cultural theft.  And his motive to facilitate opposing groups talking to each other is funny notions like “if we listen to each other we can understand each other and solve our common problems”. Dave is a Liberal in the true classic sense, someone into Freedom: for everyone.

As he tells THA TALKS: “I am very cross and unhappy. This is lying, mis-representation, this odious and poisonously toxic invective, aimed at myself, without the slightest regard for professional ethics or accuracy”

“Extremists club” started in the summer of 2014, and for 3 years it operated completely harmlessly and non-controversially. A crowd of around 30 would gather in the pub, listen to speakers, and challenge their positions in Questions & Answers. Beer was drunk, commerce was engaged, everyone was happy, and people listened to each other.

And the name “Extremists club” was just a joke, in the 17th century Britain had “radicals” clubs and the idea was just a new version of that. Left wing and Right wing would meet and seek common ground where they could find it, and in that, Dave Parry was certainly about “good work”.

But perhaps that is a frightening thing for some people. In the summer of 2017 a young man started to attend, who introduced himself as Eric Helstrom: although it now seems very unlikely that was his real name. For “Eric” wasn’t there for fair play. He covertly recorded people and re-edited them salaciously, then tried to interest Channel 4 in broadcasting his footage. Fair play to Channel 4, they told him to beat it, but it seems Helstrom’s accusations reached other ears.

Especially, Helstrom’s tall tales are being reported unquestioned on the website of “Hope Not Hate”… “Hobson also spoke on the same subject at The Extremists Club in October 2016, a small monthly discussion group based in Soho, founded by Turner and prominent right-wing occultist David Parry. Raymond was seen entering an Extremists Club meeting in April, which was addressed by veteran anti-feminist and Nazi-apologist Claire Khaw, who was due to speak on the importance of establishing a one-party theocracy in the UK to eradicate the “matriarchy.” (and they also had a go at free speech podcast THA TALKS).

^ Which is the typical “we don’t like people being allowed to speak” talk from them!

Hope not Hate is a sinister “political charity” that also gets payments from the British State and the European Union to maintain a private surveillance database of UK “Extremists”. “But Hope not Hate” has extreme positions of its own: Extreme Globalism, Extreme Europhilia, Extreme activism for mass uncontrolled immigration. And in their eyes, to be “Extreme” is to commit the simple offence: of disagreeing with THEM!

HNH is a globalist left wing pressure group based in the United Kingdom founded in 2004 by Nick Lowles, a former editor of the "anti-fascist" Searchlight magazine. It is a registered charity and receives its funding through donations and from the Department for Communities and Local Government.

 Through 2017 they assigned and heavily financed a number of journalists to infiltrate various right wing activist groups and spread the content over the Internet and use for documentaries, seeking to "expose" the Alt right, as well as attacking other far left wing groups.

 One of these journalists named Patrik Hermansson decided to report Rev. Dr. David Parry's "Extremists Club" as a supporter of far right extremism, partly due to Paul and David both being invited by former guests on THA Talks to some right wing seminars and public dinners to meet other potential guests. He also included an infiltration and filming of a separate publicly promoted open pagan ritual that Paul often attends which they dramatically described as an "Esoteric Nazi Ritual". In attendance for this ritual was a diverse and select group including Right Wing activist Stead Steadman as well as well know authors and many of which attended after it was advertised through the on line public "meetup" website.

As regularly promoted on THA Talks. The Extremist club is small monthly event founded by Rev. Dr. David Parry that involves poetry, drama, as well as outlandish talks on science, politics, religion and culture. At times offensive material that provokes views from all sides of the political and religious land scape is aired, but this is something the club has been proud of preserving. It was set it up originally as a free speech hub following Theresa Mays announcement of trying to outlaw "extremism" a very vague and subjective thing to ban. Hence the name "The Extremists Club". After a break to find a new location the club was up and running and looking forward to 2018!, only it seems "Hope Not Hate" does not like these events of free speech taking place and even after being invited to come and speak them selves, they pressured the club into closing by intimidating it with libelous claims and assassinating the character of the club, Rev. Dr. David Parry, and associates.

In this edition David and Paul discuss HNH, their attacks, and the future of the Extremists club - a future which sadly was stopped dead by the UK regime via its censorship operatives, Hope Not Hate.