The United States has made a monumental miscalculation.

The following post was written by Ray J Politics, from Florida, USA.  As an American, Ray writes as a patriotic citizen who wants what is best for his country. 

There is a tendency amongst those who oppose the Unipolar Rules Based Order, to treat the USA as the enemy and to regard its people as accomplices with the Ruling Class. Coming from the British Isles, we in the Socialist Motherland Party understand that the ordinary people are not responsible for the tyranny of the regime which misrules our country - and the same is true in the USA and indeed every country.

Thanks to our friend and comrade Ray for his excellent post which expertly summarises the destructive and self-destructive path of the collective west:

https://rayjpolitics.com/

THE UNITED STATES HAS MADE A MONUMENTAL MISCALCULATION 🇺🇸👉😮

The “boogie man” before President Donald J Trump was Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin. Ever since President Putin took power on May 7, 2000, the “Rules Based International Order” has had a target on his back…🇷🇺👉🎯

Do you as an American realize how absolutely fragile our Ponzi scheme economy is? As I mentioned before, the US and EU stealing Russia’s 300 billion dollars worth of foreign reserves has caused a chain reaction around the world, now moving at lightning speed. The West has weaponized currency, a HUGE no no in international relations. China has now reached a point economically to be a serious threat to the US. A very scary perfect storm is coming directly for the US economy within the next 3 years. Liberal economies are all totally interconnected with the US economy.

THE WEST

🇺🇸 GDP-26.3 trillion Debt-31.7 trillion

🇯🇵 GDP-4.5 trillion Debt-13.3 trillion

🇩🇪 GDP-4.2 trillion Debt-3.3 trillion

🇬🇧 GDP-3.5 trillion Debt-3.7 trillion

🇫🇷 GDP-2.9 trillion Debt-3.7 trillion

🇮🇹 GDP-2.1 trillion Debt-3.6 trillion

🇨🇦 GDP-1.8 trillion Debt-2.3 trillion

🇪🇸 GDP-1.4 trillion Debt-1.9 trillion

🇧🇪 GDP-614 billion Debt-757 billion

🇵🇹 GDP-266 billion Debt-384 billion

🇬🇷 GDP-231 billion Debt-525 billion

What is the common denominator within these top tier Western economies? DEBT.

THE EAST

🇨🇳 GDP-17.6 trillion Debt-14.3 trillion

🇮🇳 GDP-3.4 trillion Debt-3.3 trillion

🇷🇺 GDP-2.2 trillion Debt-423 billion

🇧🇷 GDP-2.0 trillion Debt-2.1 trillion

🇮🇷 GDP-1.6 trillion Debt-674 billion (2021)

🇸🇦 GDP-1.1 trillion Debt-359 billion

🇿🇦 GDP-419 billion Debt-289 billion (2021)

How long do you think these NATO nations and their Pacific drag alongs will last funding this Ukraine proxy war? The US Dollar, as we speak, is in the process of being dumped as the world’s reserve currency. Countries all over the world are pledging to use the Chinese Renminbi and Indian Rupee. Saudi Arabia is dropping the Petrodollar and allowing multiple currencies to purchase its oil, a mega blow to the US Dollar. Japan, a slave of the Rules Based International Order, just broke its chains and started purchasing oil from Russia against the oil embargo. Brazil just today agreed to use the Renminbi in trade with China. As less and less nations utilize the US Dollar, the less we will be able to export our domestic debt and inflation to other countries.

US🇺🇸

•Astronomical debt

•Unbalanced budget (overspending)

•High inflation

•High fuel costs

•Death of global reserve currency status

•Blowback from economic sanctions

•Focused on societal division and political vendettas

The Federal Reserve Bank will be forced to raise the interest rate so high to combat this tsunami of economic factors hitting the US economy, it will destroy it.

Russia🇷🇺

Vladimir Putin though ever stoic, has become a worldwide symbol of defiance against the Rules Based International Order. More and more nations are giving the middle finger to the US and its crony Liberal order. If you haven’t noticed, countries are starting to tilt towards Russia as this war progresses in Ukraine, not vice versa. Europe is being de-industrialized, the US economy is being destroyed by its own idiotic government, and Russia’s economy is on a full war production footing. China, India, Iran, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Argentina, and Russia’s usual allies will remain beside Vladimir Putin.

CONCLUSION 📙

Vladimir Putin’s position has only strengthened on the world stage as time has passed. Russia WILL win this war because the nations of the Global South will never allow Russia to lose it. Russia’s cause is THEIR cause! ✊

#PutinPower🇷🇺

Time to Overthrow the Collective West

The Socialist Motherland Party has resolutely stood in support of the People of the Donbass to live as they wish to. This has put us in direct opposition to the regimes of the UK, EU, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand - which for simplicity can be referred to as the Collective West.

The party standing in opposition to the Ruling Class and puppet politicians of the Collective West with regards to the Nato-Russia proxy war in the Ukraine, DNR, LNR and Crimea, is a continuation of our permanent position of standing for freedom against tyranny.  What makes the current situation different is the censorship of corporations such as Google, Microsoft and Facebook, which makes open discussion of the machinations of the Collective West difficult.

We have been banned on numerous sites, but even so, are still able to reach out to like-minded people. 

Fight back.

What YOU can do to help us in the fight against censorship is to post our articles, spread the ideology of freedom and actively create a sea of profiles which can be activated whenever our presence is threatened.

But far more importantly than just keeping our Internet activity going, we must get back into leafleting, postering and communicating in the real world.

The old order is crumbling.  We stand against the nato proxy war, the manufactured cost of living crisis, the assault on childhood and biological reality, and so do a growing number of people.  This is a time of possibility for us. We can build the Party, spread the ideology, and save the nation.  But only if all of us do are part.

The SMPBI stands with Donbass and against the 'liberal world order'

The SMPBI stands unapologetically with the people of the free sovereign nations of the Donetsk People's Republic (DNR) and the Lugansk People's Republic (LNR) and the heroic fighting forces of the Russian Federation and Allies.

We wholeheartedly oppose the culture-destroying 'liberal world order' and its military formation, NATO.

To understand the current proxy war against the free world by the corrupt collective west,  it is important to understand the background to the conflict:

Timeline of The Ukrainian Coup

The background and implications of the 2014 far-right coup in Kiev, which overthrew the pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, is critical for understanding the current Ukraine-Russia war. This coup was openly supported by US and European imperialism and implemented primarily by far-right shock troops such as the Right Sector and the neo-Nazi Svoboda Party. 

It represented the temporary culmination of long-standing efforts by US imperialism to install a puppet regime on the borders of Russia and brought the world a major step closer to a war between the largest nuclear powers, the US and Russia. Ukraine has since been systematically built up as a launching pad for a NATO war against Russia.

The regime change prompted the outbreak of an ongoing civil war in the east of Ukraine, between Russian-backed separatists and the US-backed Ukrainian army, that has claimed the lives of tens of thousands and displaced millions. 

In the US, the coup was a catalyser for an ever more aggressive campaign against Russia and a significant shift to the right among layers of the upper middle class. US imperialism and NATO have funded the Ukrainian state and far-right forces with billions of dollars.

The German ruling class seized upon the coup as a pretext for aggressively stepping up its campaign to remilitarise and justify the crimes of fascist forces. For the first time since the end of World War II, representatives of a German government were seen on photos with avowed Ukrainian neo-Nazis.

Internationally, pseudo-left forces such as the International Socialist Organization (ISO) in the US, the New Anti-capitalist Party of France (NPA), and the Russian Socialist Movement (RSM) supported the coup, falsely proclaiming it a “revolution.” The ICFI and WSWS alone advanced a principled, socialist opposition to this imperialist operation, warning the working class of its dangerous consequences.

Why is Russian President Putin talking about “denazifying” Ukraine? It is necessary to reconstruct the last ten years of the history of that country to understand how politics, shows and military formations of Kiev have been assembled, step by step, towards a unique project, a project that feeds on Nazi fanaticism. It is a true story, which even the Western media have told in the past but today they brand it as fake news. Oligarchs, showmen and military leaders have brought the Ukrainian people under a government that is openly inspired by National Socialist dogma.

First of all, a step back in history: during the Second World War the Nazis and the Ukrainian Nazi gangs of Stepan Bandera killed 1.6 million Jews. Today Stepan Bandera is celebrated in Ukraine as a national hero. The Nazi-inspired military formations are part of the Ukrainian National Army and their pennants often depict the face of Stepan Bandera. As the Wiesental Centre noted, from the end of the Second World War to the present day, not one of the Ukrainian Nazi war criminals has ever been prosecuted.

2011, Burisma Group

Since 2011, the match between Kiev and Washington has been played on oil, gas and dollars. Burisma Group, a Ukrainian energy company, keeps a low profile. Burisma is an oil and gas company that has been operating on the Ukrainian market since 2002. The head office is located in Limassol, Cyprus. The company holds 20 licenses for hydrocarbon production in all major Ukrainian oil and gas basins. This company was founded by Mykola Zlochevsky who sold Burisma to Igor Kolomoisky’s Privatbank group in 2011. 

In April 2014, Hunter Biden, son of the current US president, joins the Burisma board of directors. Biden Jr, who doesn’t speak a single word of Ukrainian and has no idea about the oil business, is guaranteed a salary of $50,000 a month. As of April 2014, Burisma’s board of directors was made up of at least 6 members: 2 Ukrainians and 3 Americans 1 Polish. Anzelika Pasenidou and Riginos Kharalambus directly represented Kolomoisky. The others were David Apter, Devon Archer and Hunter Biden, the youngest son of then US Vice President Joe Biden. Hunter Biden joined the Burisma board in April 2014. Peter Flaherty, president of the National Legal and Policy Center, (NLPC) a US government oversight group said, “Even though there was no conspiracy or coordination between the two, Hunter Biden was clearly in Kolomoisky’s network ”. Ukraine’s Attorney General Viktor Shokin will open an investigation into Burisma’s accounts and salaries paid to the board of directors. At an event at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York in 2018, Biden seemed to boast about it, saying that during a visit to Kiev – likely in December 2015 – he told Ukrainian officials: “We’re leaving in six hours . If the prosecutor’s not fired, you’re not getting the money. ” “Well, son of a bitch,” Biden continued. “He got fired.” Shokin was indeed fired, but not until March that year.

Another council member becomes Aleksander Kwasniewski, former president of Poland. Under his presidency, Poland first joined NATO in 1999 and then joined the European Union (EU) in 2004. 

Former Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski acknowledged in 2014 that his country left the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA ) of the United States operated a secret prison on its territory after 9/11. The European Court of Human Rights ruled in July 2014 that Poland had allowed the CIA to torture al-Qaeda suspects in a secret detention center in 2002 and 2003, when Kwasniewski was president.

February 2014

Coup d’etat in Kiev. The change of regime is caused by the clashes in Euromaidan square. Nazi-inspired paramilitary formations also participate in the combat. Among these there is also the Azov battalion: after the change of government, it will be integrated into the Ukrainian army.

Regime change in Kiev is favoured by interference in Ukrainian internal affairs in Washington, Warsaw, Berlin, Paris and London. The Russian-European border has once again become a line of friction that highlights rival sides on the verge of entering a collision course. Albania, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, the Baltic States have already joined NATO. Russia is surrounded.

In early March 2014, US President Barack Obama issued an executive order stating that anyone who challenged the legitimacy of the new Ukrainian government was subject to US sanctions, including US citizens.

May 2014

The US approves the “Russian Aggression Prevention Act of 2014” which authorises the President to provide direct military assistance to Ukraine worth $100 million, including anti-tank and anti-aircraft weapons and small arms, based on a needs assessment and the capabilities of the Ukrainian armed forces. It also encourages intelligence sharing with Ukraine. The law provides for the recognition of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova as “Major Non-NATO Allies”, effectively equating them to Alliance members.

The role of George Soros

In May 2014, three months after the Kiev coup, George Soros revealed to CNN reporter Fareed Zakaria that he was responsible for setting up a foundation in Ukraine that contributed to the coup against President Viktor Ianukovitch and the establishment of a US-backed junta:

“I created a foundation in Ukraine before the country became independent from Russia. This foundation has continued to operate and has played an important role in recent events, ”Soros explained.

The role of the Azov Battalion

The unit was formally founded by Andriy Biletsky in May 2014. But Biletsky acts in a context of continuity having been the leader of both the Patriot of Ukraine (founded in 2005) and the SNA (founded in 2008). The SNA is known for carrying out armed attacks, murders, violence and terrorist acts. In 2010, Biletsky claimed that Ukraine’s national purpose was “to lead the white races of the world in a final crusade … against Semitic-led Untermenschen [the lesser races].” The Azov Battalion is the only neo-Nazi-inspired military unit framed in a regular army in the world.

It was privately funded, together with the far-right Pravy Sector party, by Igor Kolomoisky (credited with triple citizenship with Ukrainian, Cypriot and Israeli passport), a billionaire energy magnate and then governor of the Dnipropetrovska region. Igor Kolomoisky was the owner of one of the largest Ukrainian financial institutions – PrivatBank. Kolomoisky financed the killing of every Russian-speaking pro-independence fighter in Donbas with $ 10,000 in bounty (Kolomoisky was governor of a district) and was subsequently pursued by a war crimes arrest warrant issued by the Russian authorities. Kolomoisky was only one of the main financiers of the neo-Nazi Azov battalion and the Ukrainian neo-Nazi party Pravyj Sektor but he would also have financed the neo-Nazi volunteer battalions Aidar, Donbas, Dnepr 1, Dnepr 2 and Carpantian Sich

March 2014

Begins his activity in Ukraine. On March 3 Brigadier General Joel Harding, a thirty-year career behind him in the American secret services, just a few days ago was appointed director of the NATO NSE Strategy Centre for Ukraine. Harding wrote the white paper on which the US military’s cyber defence doctrine is based, pioneered the field of cyber warfare, developed NSA means and methods. Its task is the management of the IIO (Inform and Influence Operations) which consists in developing communication activities capable of making “the public think and act in a way that is favourable to the objectives of the mission”. This is done through the application of perception management techniques that target the emotions, motivations, and reasoning of the public. A schedule that could explain Zelensky’s journey from TV star who plays “The good president” to “effective president”

May 2014

The Azov unit is formed as a military group of volunteers by the ultra-nationalist Patriot of Ukraine gang and the neo-Nazi group of the National Social Assembly (SNA). Both groups engaged in xenophobic and neo-Nazi ideas and physically assaulted migrants, the Roma community, and people who opposed their political views.

November 2014

The Azov Battalion is officially integrated into the National Guard of Ukraine. It is the only openly neo-Nazi military unit framed in a regular army in the world. The main financier of Azov Battalion is Igor Kolomoisky.

November 2014

The United Nations General Assembly approves a motion presented by Russia condemning the attempts to glorify Nazi ideology and the consequent denial of war crimes committed by Nazi Germany, including the Holocaust. Only three votes against United States, Ukraine and Canada. Europe abstains. The resolution also noted and condemned the increase in racist attacks around the world and proposed universally applying the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, adopted at the UN in 1969 but never actually applied by the signatory states. The votes registered 115 votes in favor, 3 against and 55 abstentions. The United States, Canada and Ukraine opposed this resolution, while abstentions came mainly from EU countries (including Italy) and some North African countries.

December 2014

The Ukrainian parliament renounces Ukraine’s non-aligned country status by stating that the previous non-aligned status “has proved ineffective in ensuring Ukraine’s security” and has decided to deepen Ukrainian cooperation with NATO “in order to achieve the criteria required for membership in the alliance “.

2015

Dmytro Yarosh, the leader of the neo-Nazi “right sector” party, was appointed military adviser to Colonel-General Viktor Muzhenko, then Ukrainian chief of staff. Yarosh is the commander of the paramilitary branch of the Right Sector, the Ukrainian Voluntary Army, which has never come under government control.

April 2015

In Yavoriv, Ukraine, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt are present at the start of combined training between American soldiers and Ukrainian National Guard troops. Numerous military exercises between NATO members and Ukraine were planned in 2015. Among these was Operation Fearless Guardian (2,200 participants in total, including 1,000 US troops). The training centre is the Yavoriv Training Centre, near Lvov, under the responsibility of the 7th Army Training Command of the United States, based in Grafenwöhr, Germany. The goal is to transform Ukrainian ground forces from Soviet doctrine to Western doctrine in order to meet NATO standards. The forces for this initiative are usually deployed by the United States Army National Guard. Initially, support was provided by the 173rd Airborne Brigade, as it was based in the European Theatre. Upon completion of the first rotation, the 173rd Airborne was replaced by elements from the California National Guard and 3rd Infantry Division.

April 2015

Personnel and equipment from the 173rd Airborne Brigade arrive in Yavoriv, in the Lvov oblast, on the border with Poland, to launch the “Fearless Guardian” operation. The Fearless Guardian is reported to have trained the fledgling Ukrainian National Guard (INCLUDING THE AZOV BATTLE) under the Congress-approved “Global Contingency Security Fund”. Under the program, the United States was to train three battalions of Ukrainian troops over a six-month period between April and October 2015. Colonel Nick Ducich, commander of the 79th Combat Squad of the California National Guard Infantry Brigade, agreed. is deployed in Ukraine with 54 instructors to train Ukrainian ground forces. Ducich headed the Joint Multinational Training Group-Ukraine, (JMTG-U), in Yavoriv for 14 months. The California National Guard, troops from 6th Squadron, 8th Cavalry Regiment and 2nd Brigade Combat Team of the 3rd Infantry Division of Fort Stewart, Georgia, and multinational partners also participated in the training operations. of Canada, Lithuania, Poland and Great Britain.

US funding

Since the outbreak of fighting in 2014, 2015 and 2016, the United States has committed $266 million in training and equipment to help Ukrainian forces secure the border and operate more effectively. NATO sources reported in 2021 that US-led JMTG-U troops had trained over 20,000 troops for Army Force Ukraine so far.

Zelensky’s climb

In 2015, the 1 + 1 TV channel began broadcasting “Sluha Narodu”, “Servant of the People”, the TV serial with which Zelensky began the rise to power that will make him, as an actor, president. The owner of the television network is Igor Kolomoisky. The San Tommaso srl real estate is based in Cantù in Italy, whose total shares have been held since 2015 by the Cypriot company Aldorante Limited, owned by Zelensky. Sole director of the real estate whose only assets, as revealed by the Ukrainian investigative journalism organization Slidstvo, appear to be a luxurious 15-room villa in Forte dei Marmi. The administrator is the 44-year-old Ukrainian Ivan Bakanov, friend, partner and future coordinator (2019) of Zelensky’s electoral campaign who, after taking office, will appoint him head of the state security services.

2016

In October 2016, Andriy Biletsky (Azov Battalion) founded the far-right National Corps party, whose main base is Azov veterans. Throughout the year at the Yavoriv Combat Training Centre, on a rotating basis, units of the US National Guard continued the training of the Ukrainian military in order to adapt the Kiev troops to NATO compatibility.

2017

The training of the Ukrainian military continues in order to adapt the Kiev troops to NATO compatibility in Ukraine. The 45th Combat Team of the Oklahoma National Guard Infantry Brigade replaced the 79th Combat Team of the California National Guard Infantry Brigade at the Yavoriv Combat Training Centre.

October 2017

After specific training at Fort Bliss, Texas, the unit, consisting mainly of soldiers from the 2nd Squadron, 101st Cavalry based in Niagara Falls, arrived in Ukraine to take over from the 200 departing members of the 45th Guard. Oklahoma Army National Infantry Brigade Combat Team.

November 2017

Since November 2017, soldiers from the Syracuse-based 27th Brigade have been serving in Ukraine to help train and mentor Ukrainian army units. The New York soldiers are part of the Joint Multinational Training Group – Ukraine, known as JMTG-U.

2018

In January 2018, Azov launched its road patrol unit called National Druzhyna, a kind of neo-Nazi military police, to “restore” order in the capital, Kiev. Instead, the unit carried out pogroms against the Roma community and attacked members of the LGB community, anti-fascist militants and human rights activists. Ukraine is the only nation in the world to have a neo-Nazi background in its military and police forces.

The Centuria Group is born

Centuria is an organisation made up of cadets and alumni of the Academy that describes itself as an elitist “military order” and has expressed the goal of reshaping the Ukrainian army along far-right ideological lines. Academy cadets and graduate officers who are part of this organization add the white supremacist symbols Sonnenkreuz and Wolfsangel (or Doppelhaken) to their insignia. The Wolfsangel, in addition to being the symbol of the Azov Battalion, was widely used in Nazi Germany. It was the symbol of various Nazi military organizations and units, including the 2nd SS Panzer Division “Das Reich”, the 4th Panzergrenadier Division of the SS Police, the 34th SS Volunteer Grenadiers Division “Landstorm Nederland”, the Nazi guerrilla movement “Werwolf ”, as well as a number of Wehrmacht units and the Wehrmacht’s“ People’s Charity ”. The display of these symbols has the function of creating a patriotic aristocratic scale among the officers. The slogan of the Centuria organisation is “Virtus et Honestas”.

March 2018, Zelensky from TV to politics

The political party “Servant of the People” is born, a name “copied-pasted” from the name of Zelensky’s show on Kolomoisky’s TV. Throughout the year at the Yavoriv Combat Training Centre, on a rotating basis, units of the US National Guard continued the training of the Ukrainian military in order to adapt the Kiev troops to NATO compatibility.

January 2019

Soldiers from the 278th Armored Cavalry Regiment of the Tennessee Army National Guard at the Yavoriv Combat Training Center were “actively involved” in assisting military training, base renovations, multinational relations and “To raise awareness of the community”.

April 2019

Zelensky is elected president. After years of exile, first in Israel then in Geneva, to escape the investigation into the bankruptcy of Privabank and money laundering, Zelensky’s victory means for Kolomoisky, owner of the channel that broadcasts the TV series that made Zelensky famous and created his party , the possibility of returning home. Zelensky’s first act on his first day as President of Ukraine was to appoint Andriy Bogdan, a lawyer and close friend of Igor Kolomoisky, as his cabinet chief. That is, he placed him at the head of his presidential administration. (In office until 11 February 2020). The second act is the appointment of Ivan Bakanov, a friend and partner in the administration of his offshore companies, as head of the security services. They are his people of absolute trust.

Zelensky and Kolomoisky again

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meets billionaire oligarch and former business partner Ihor Kolomoisky. Prime Minister Oleksiy Honcharuk, Chief of Cabinet Andriy Bohdan (Kolomoisky’s lawyer) and Energy Minister Oleksiy Orzhel at the formal meeting table.

April 2021

A march was organised by the far right in central Kiev to honour the Nazi military unit that harks back to the acclaimed national hero war criminal SS Bandera. The President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky condemned it via his official website, without however taking any concrete measures within the armed forces.

December 2021 Ukraine and NATO

Between 20 and 30 December 2021, NATO’s Combined Resolve XVI international military maneuvers took place in Germany in Hohenfels, Bavaria. Thousands of NATO troops participated but also troops, which should not have been there: those of Ukraine which, of NATO, are not and should not be part of. Purpose of the exercise? “To test the capabilities of the United States and its allied forces, including Ukraine, on their ability to work in a joint and multinational environment against adversaries.”

This was the most advanced training phase following years of activity of NATO’s Joint Multinational Training Group-Ukraine. On the pitch men and vehicles from the United States, Italy, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Slovakia, Serbia, Lithuania, Greece, Bulgaria and Poland. How to be surprised by the Russian reaction? “10 days to recreate the battlefield without any break,” said 1st Sergeant Patrick Flanagan, senior observer at the Joint Multinational Readiness Centre.

“From start to finish you are completely immersed in this operational environment.”

The exercise was handled by the Joint Multinational Readiness Center, the only US Army combat training centre located outside the United States. A centre that provides mobile training capability to the European military and Ukraine and trains leaders, personnel and units up to the level of Brigade Combat Teams, the multinational partners, to dominate in the conduct of Ground Operations anywhere in the world, now and in the future. ”

Anti-Trump Carnival: A Distraction From Issues That Matter

The President of the USA has arrived in the UK for a State Visit.  This is the case of a politician from one country, coming to meet politicians from another.  It doesn't have any real impact on the Working Class at all.

A group of Middle Class agitators, with a remarkable access to funding (!) has organised a carnival, so that bourgeois wasters can walk the streets, amongst people just as foolish as themselves, to make a gesture which will have absolutely zero impact on anything.  They know that their singing, dancing, silly banners and idiotic antics, will be dutifully picked up by the media, and broadcast as the voice of the British People.  The British People couldn't give a toss about what Donald Trump does in the USA, but the Soros-aligned media will distort events to present a different picture.

According to the 'Stop Trump' group, they are organising to protest against his policies which "threatens steps towards tackling:

Inequality

Peace and disarmament

Climate change

Fighting discrimination, particularly against already marginalised groups like migrants and Muslims

Corporate greed"

Lets have a look at these claims that 'Trumpism' is a diabolical ideology.

Inequality - a catch-all term which could be used to mean anything

Peace and Disarmament - Trump's election stopped the war-plans which the Clinton side would have implemented.  The Syria catastrophe is ending. The DPRK has not been invaded.  Of course the rhetoric against Russia and Iran is escalating, but all in all, there is no more war under Trump than proposed by his opponents,  There may even be a little less.

Climate Change - Under Capitalism there will always be pollution and waste. Until Capitalism is gone, there will always be environmental damage. The protesters aim to blame one man for environmental damage.  They don't point the finger at the industrial pollution giants of India and China.  Really, they are doing harm themselves by simplifying the issue to a single man, and by not looking at global polluters.

Migrants and Muslims - By this they mean that Trump is not an Open Borders Extremist.  This indicates that they are!  The hypocrites do not see (will not see) that Globalisation causes pollution, destroys peace between people and only benefits the rich who can use people as commodities - cheap labour.  The Trots and Liberals are the biggest hypocrites on the planet.  If he wants to keep his country safe and maintain its culture and way of life, then fair play to him.  The Muslim bit refers to him seeing the tragedies in Europe, with Islamic State terrorists posing as refugees, murdering and raping across the continent, and not wanting the same for the USA. What lunatic would?  The lunatics who want Open Borders and easy access for terrorists, will be on display this weekend! And of course, using the word 'migrant' is a lie - he is not against Migration, but Illegal Immigration, which are two different things that the Open Borders idiots cannot grasp.

Corporate Greed - Capitalism is a system of Greed. Trump is a part of the system. Like the statues in Ancient Rome, when the head is removed, another takes its place and nothing changes. The system has to go.

Silent about Zionism

The Stop Trump agitators have said nothing at all about Trump's Zionism.  They couldn't care less that he has moved the US Embassy to Al Quds in the West Bank of Occupied Palestine.  They have no interest in his family ties to the Meyer Lansky crime syndicate. They are silent on his blatant subservience to Likud and the Chabad Lubavitch sect.  If the Stop Trump people cared about the powers behind Trump, they would be speaking about Zionism, but as good little Soros puppets, they fail to mention any of this.

The Stop Trump Carnival is Irrelevant

The Working Class do not care about Trump and what the Middle Class feel so aggrieved by.  The SJW Identity Politics crowd have fallen for a smoke-and-mirrors propaganda exercise which keeps them focused on one man, while the decline of living standards continues on a global scale without them seeing anything but Trump.  They believe that the President of the USA is the most powerful man in the world, and not just another figurehead.  That is naivety in the extreme, and is the product of a life of swallowing the make-believe of Hollywood and the BBC. 

Trump is irrelevant.  

What the Working Class care about is the traitors in government betraying Brexit.  We care about the NHS being sold to the highest bidder.  We care about our joke of a border being so wide open that our resources, infrastructure and land cannot cope with the influx of economic migrants and fake refugees.  The Stop Trump crowd not only ignore our concerns, but in their protest walks, they mock us, call us racist, xenophobic, thick, bigots etc, for wanting our Borders shut, our People safe (physically and financially) - much of what they will be screaming at Trump, they are screaming at us.  The Stop Trump organisation is an anti-Working Class, anti-Sovereignty collection of idiots, fantasists and Europhile traitors.  If they cared about the British Isles, they would be marching on Parliament in the spirit of the October Revolution!  But in truth, they have more in common with the traitors in Parliament than the People of the Isles.

The 'baby Trump' blimp is indicative of their mentality. Like the blimp they are full of hot-air and are only fit to be laughed at.

Trump is a politician - no worse, no better than the rest of the corporate whores.  Attacking the figurehead but ignoring the system is pointless and stupid - which again sums up the protest and those taking part in it.

The DPRK is safe - For now.

The US and the DPRK have reached an agreement which transforms the ceasefire of 1953 into Peace.  Today's Summit is a historic occasion in which the aggressors of the USA have finally recognised the right of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to be a sovereign nation.

The key points of the summit declaration statement are as follows:

• The United States and the DPRK commit to establish new U.S.–DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.
• The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.
• Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work toward complete denuclearising of the Korean Peninsula.
• The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering POW/MIA remains, including the immediate repatriation of those already identified.

SMPBI cautiously welcomes the outcome of the Summit. However, there are worrying parallels to be drawn with other countries which have effectively disarmed themselves in the pursuit of peace with the USA.

Iraq and Libya are key example of nations which were threatened by the USA.  In both cases, following the destruction of their defensive capabilities, they were invaded and destroyed, They sought peace, and to prove their sincerity made themselves vulnerable. The US criminals took full advantage, and now Iraq is an occupied country, and Libya is in ruins.

If the US modus operandi follows as it always has, then Kim Jong Un (just as Saddam Hussein and Muammar al Gaddafi before him), may well have just signed his own death warrant, and opened the path for his country to be wrecked by a fake 'colour revolution' and/or a military attack.

The DPRK has started down a dangerous path. Creeping economic liberalisation threatens to let the Capitalist parasites back into the country. The existence of a McDonalds in Pyongyang is an illustration of the backwards steps away from the Juche idea.

Has Kim Jong Un saved his country from destruction by the USA, or opened the path for just that?  We hope that this summit is the path to peace.  Ideally this could be the starting point for reunification of Korea under the ideals of Juche, not the barbarism of Capitalism.  We will probably not have too long to wait to see if this was a superb piece of diplomacy, or the leadership of the DPRK walking into a trap.

The USA is a Zionist One Party State. American Socialists need to rise up against the Zionist menace

In the USA, the Zionist President, Trump, has moved the US Embassy in Occupied Palestine to Al-Quds.  There is a temptation to see this move as out of step with ordinary US politics, but if we look back over past anti-Palestinian and pro-Zionist actions by the democracy in name only, US One Party State, the actions of Trump are just more of the same:

Six years ago in September. at the Democratic National Party Convention, former Governor of Ohio, Ted Strickland, put forward a motion enshrining in the party's official platform, recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel.  The motion was as follows:

'This summer, I was proud to serve this party as the platform drafting committee chair. I came before you today to discuss the two important matters related to our party's national platform. As an ordained United Methodist Minister, I am here to attest and affirm that our faith and belief in God is central to the American story and informs the value we have expressed in our party's platform. In addition, President Obama recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and our party's platform should as well. Mr. Chairman, I have submitted my amendment in writing and I believe it is being projected on the screen for the delegates to see. I move adoption of the amendment as submitted and shewn to the delegates.'

By linking God and Jerusalem, Ted Strickland continued the one-party-state policy of unrelenting Zionism: under the Republican administration, the Mosaic Law was more-or-less the modus operandi, the Democrats simply followed suit.

The vote at the Convention was farcical.  The oral vote had to be taken three times, and each time a clear majority voted NO to the amendment to the party platform.  Each time the vote was taken, the voice of the Democrats was clear: the will of the party was to keep the issue of God excluded from party policy, and for Jerusalem NOT to be recognised as the capital of Israel.  In a display of sheer arrogance, Convention leader (Mayor of Los Angleles)  Antonio Villaraigosa, declared that the requisite two thirds majority had been obtained, and that the motion had passed!

The USA is the face of Globalism, and certainly its military power, but it is not the over-riding power. To see what that is, just look at the decisions taken by government after government, regardless of party affiliation.  The US regime is Zionist. The UK is the side-kick of the USA. 

Although our focus is obviously on the British Isles, we do see the need to overthrow Zionism worldwide.  Our Comrades in the US sections of the SMPBI are working to promote a Free USA where Zionism has no place.  Any supporters in the USA should get in touch, so that we can pass you on to our Comrades in that country. 

THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE WEST AND RUSSIA: A DELIBERATE PLAN BY THERESA MAY, JEAN CLAUDE JUNCKER AND THE EU ESTABLISHMENT TO DERAIL BREXIT. - An alternative view

THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE WEST AND RUSSIA: A DELIBERATE PLAN BY THERESA MAY, JEAN CLAUDE JUNCKER AND THE EU ESTABLISHMENT TO DERAIL BREXIT. - An alternative view

[Editor's note:
SMPBI is a Party in which differing views are not stifled - unless of course they are put forward by pro-Capitalist pro-Globalist infilTRAITORS!  In this reply to Pietro's post, Peter offers an alternative analysis. The media circus, (controlled official and controlled opposition) have painted varied accounts which both muddy the facts.  To get as close to the truth as we are likely to, it is important to be open-minded. The lengthy response is published in full with the intention of creating a debate.

Theresa May is the enemy of the UK. She is backed by all manner of scum in the USA, UN, EU, NATO, IMF and other Globalist entities.  The confrontation between the West and Russia is a contrived piece of propaganda with no basis in reality - the UK, not Russia, is responsible for any nerve gas attack (if there even was one) - but what is the purpose?

Responses by comment, or by email are welcome. The situation is serious, and it requires serious thought.]



“The confrontation between the West and Russia: a deliberate plan by Theresa May, Jean Claude Juncker and the EU Establishment to Derail Brexit”.

Really? Deliberate plan by May and JUNCKER of all people?

Point 1: Juncker is the man who has always just insisted to May that “Brexit means Brexit”.

Point 2: If May and Juncker are in collusion then why has Juncker been vilified for NOT supporting “the confrontation between the West and Russia”?

“European Union boss Jean-Claude Juncker has been criticised after his "nauseating" letter of congratulations to Russia's Vladimir Putin failed to mention the Salisbury nerve agent attack. The European Commission President wrote to Mr Putin on Tuesday to congratulate the Russian leader on his recent re-election. However, the top Brussels official immediately was attacked for NEGLECTING TO INCLUDE a reference to the attempted murder of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia using the chemical weapon Novichok.

In his letter, Mr Juncker sent Mr Putin his "congratulations on your re-election as President of the Russian Federation". "I have always argued that positive relations between the European Union and the Russian Federation are crucial to the security of our continent," he wrote.  "Our common objective should be to re-establish a cooperative pan-European security order. I hope that you will use your fourth term in office to pursue this goal. I will always be a partner in this endeavour. I wish you every success in carrying out your high responsibilities."

However, the leader of Conservative MEPs in the European Parliament, Ashley Fox, branded the letter "disgraceful" as he accused Mr Juncker of "appeasing" the Russian President. "To congratulate Vladimir Putin on his election victory without referring to the clear ballot rigging that took place is bad enough," he said.

"But his failure to mention Russia's responsibility for a military nerve agent attack on innocent people in my constituency is nauseating.”

"The European Commission President is appeasing a man who poses a clear threat to Western security.” Tory MP Sarah Wollaston

“Asked if the Prime Minister was disappointed Mr Juncker had not referred to the Salisbury attack in his letter to Mr Putin, Theresa May's official spokesman said: "What I would point to is the strong response which you have seen from across the EU, from leaders in condemning what happened in Salisbury and standing with the UK." Wishful thinking from Theresa May. Whilst many in the EU are nodding politely to May, much more is going on behind the scenes in the EU. Just a few ‘minor’ points:

Millions of Euros are being spent by the EU to prevent Libya being used as a principal migrant route to Europe via Italy.

There are those in the EU who see a united European Defence Force as a way of disentangle Europe from NATO and the U.S.

The EU is also working behind the scenes to block predatory ‘inward investment’ from the USA - which Britain will be WIDE OPEN TO after Brexit.

Europe has no interest in paying for high-priced gas from the US - and Germany has just approved the construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia.

KEYPOINT: the EU is NOT the monolith it is made out to be. There are even those in the EU ‘Establishment’ as well as the EU Member States who are against anti-Russian sanctions - or even wish Europe to have the united military and economic power to stand up to the US Atlanticist Empire and its Anglo-Zionist and Polish lapdogs. There is much more that could be written on this subject. We must just learn to research thoroughly,  ‘read between the lines’ - and see those current and future trajectories of geopolitical development in Europe and Eurasia which defy simplistic readings.
For a stronger Europe - a union of autonomous European nations free of U.S. hegemony!

EU Member States in favor of lifting Russian sanctions:
Bulgaria: Bulgaria considers the sanctions regime against Russia an obstacle to its own economy. 72% of Bulgarians have a positive view of Russia.
Cyprus: The Cyprian government has opposed sanctions against Russia, especially on the basis of the two countries’ economic ties, although the actual economic impact of the sanctions has been limited.
Czech Republic: The stance of the Czech Republic towards Russia changed significantly following the crisis in Ukraine and Russia’s subsequent annexation of Crimea. Despite the ambivalent positions of some individual politicians, as well as a high dependence on imports from Russia. President Miloš Zeman has repeatedly criticized the EU sanctions against Russia. Zeman also retains strong ties to Russian business.
Greece: Greece has historically been one of Russia’s advocate within the EU, advocating for the Kremlin’s interests in Brussels.  The current Greek government maintains exceptionally close ties with the Kremlin and other prominent Russian figures. Greece has typically expressed opposition to any EU measures that could alienate Russia. Greece is best described as one of the EU’s three ‘Kremlin friendlies’, together with Italy and Cyprus. 66% of Greeks have a positive view of Russia.
Italy: Though traditionally a country with deep economic ties to Russia, Italy has shown strong support for a common EU and NATO stance on Russia. At the same time, Italy does not wish to completely alienate Russia, and continues to believe that a dialogue is possible. Italian politics is full of pro Russian elements and many politicians believe that the EU sanctions are harmful to Italy and should therefore be lifted.
Slovenia: After the annexation of Crimea, Slovenia fully supported Ukrainian integrity and fulfilment of the Minsk agreements, but it has also maintained pragmatic energy-focussed economic ties with Russia. For this reason, Slovenia supports lifting the sanctions against the Russian Federation
Hungary: The government of Prime Minister Viktor Orban uses good relations with Russia as leverage in Hungary’s relations with Brussels, and in order to support his own domestic . After the annexation of Crimea, the Prime Minister sought to weaken European sanctions against Russia.
EU Member States in favor of Dialogue and Compromise
Austria: Austria’s bilateral relationship with Russia is between ‘friendly pragmatist’ and ‘strategic partner’  Austria’s most successful far-right political party, the FPÖ, has exceptionally close ties to Russia . Austrian relations with Russia have not suffered significantly due to the conflict in Ukraine. In particular, energy interests continue to shape the two countries’ relationship and remain a cornerstone of Austrian diplomacy with Russia. For this reason, Austria is skeptical about the EU sanctions regime against Russia .
Finland: Finland is the one Nordic country that has always sought to find compromise with Russia due to its dependence on Russian fossil fuels and deep economic ties with Russia. Finland still sees hope in rebuilding EU-Russian relations.
Luxembourg: Luxembourg has close economic and financial ties to Russia, and is therefore reluctant to alienate Russia with punitive measures. Due to high levels of investment from Russia (and vice versa), Luxembourg is reluctant to implement EU measures aimed at restricting financials from Russia.
Netherlands: The major dimension of Russo-Dutch relations is economic.  The Netherlands did raise concerns that Russia’s behavior threatens international order and the integrity of the EU.  Furthermore, the Netherlands are hesitant but generally supportive of the common EU stance on Russia.
Spain: Being located far away from Russia and not affected by the same fears as the easternmost EU member states, Spain remains focused on engaging in dialogue with Russia. Spain remains skeptical about possible European expansion, and Russia’s status as a strategic partner in the fight against terrorism has marked Spain’s attitude of hesitance in making strong moves to counter perceived Russian threats. Economy wise, Russia does not play a significant role in Spanish energy imports, but Russian tourism plays a big role in the Spanish economy. Thus, Spain was one of the several countries to voice criticism against anti-Russian sanctions.
Other types of analysis: http://press.ecpr.eu/documents/sampleChapters/9781785522796.pdf

THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE WEST AND RUSSIA: A DELIBERATE PLAN BY THERESA MAY, JEAN CLAUDE JUNCKER AND THE EU ESTABLISHMENT TO DERAIL BREXIT.

by Pietro

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF WESTMINSTER AND BRUSSELS NEVER ACCEPTED THE RESULTS OF THE REFERENDUM SINCE THE MORNING OF THE 24th OF JUNE 2016. DAVID CAMERON RESIGNED AND GOT REPLACED BY THERESA MAY.

AFTER JUST REPEATING "BREXIT MEANS BREXIT" LIKE A PARROT SHE IS TRYING HER BEST TO BE IN THE EU IN ALL BUT NAME.

DESPITE THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE ABOUT THE KREMLIN'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE ATTEMPTED MURDERING OF A SPY AND HIS DAUGHTER IN SALISBURY (IT WOULD ACTUALLY BE AGAINST THEIR INTEREST) THE ENTIRE WESTERN ESTABLISHMENT AND THE SOROSES OF THIS WORLD ARE PUSHING REALLY HARD TO START A NEW WAR AGAINST RUSSIA IN ORDER TO KEEP NATO, THE UN AND THE EU ALIVE AND KICKING.

WITH THE EXEMPTION OF AUSTRIA, BULGARIA AND HUNGARY (And even these have sent home a token Russian in support of this lunacy) EVERY WESTERN COUNTRY STARTED THE MAD WITCH HUNT AGAINST RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS.

THERESA MAY, EMANUEL MACRON AND ANGELA MERKEL HAVE HAD A JOINT CONFERENCE IN ORDER TO INCREASE THE HOSTILITY. UNLIKE IN 2014 WHEN CRIMEA RETURNED HOME THIS TIME THE EU IS EVEN MORE WARMONGERING THAN THE US

IN A MOMENT IN WHICH ALL THE MAINSTREAM POLITICAL PARTIES IN BRITAIN ARE AGAINST BREXIT: I MEAN THE FAKE SOCIALISTS (IN FACT GLOBOS) OF PLAID CYMRU, THE STRASBOURG NATIONAL PARTY, LABOUR (JEREMY CORBYN DITCHED HIS PREVIOUS EUROSCEPTICISM), MOST OF THE TORY PARTY AND DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THE LIB DEMS - ALL WANTED TO REMAIN. THE GOVERNMENT ARE YET AGAIN TRYING TO TAKE AN EXTRA STEP INSIDE THE EU.

THE 2017 SNAP GENERAL ELECTION WAS IN FACT AIMING AT UKIP. THEY WANTED TO BRING UKIP DOWN BECAUSE AT LEAST ON BREXIT AND ON IMMIGRATION THEY HAD SOMEONE TO ANSWER TO.

UKIP HAS AT THE MOMENT GOT NO CHANCE AS LONG AS THIS CLOWN (HENRY BOLTON) IS IN CHARGE OF THE PARTY.

NOW THERESA MAY AND HER CORRUPTED CABAL ARE USING THE SCARE-MONGERING OF THE RUSSIANS IN ORDER TO GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT BRITAIN CAN'T HAVE IT'S FREEDOM AND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY BACK.

THE EU IS NOTHING FOR THE EUROPEANS. IT WAS SET BY A GROUP OF AMERICANS DURING THE COLD WAR IN ORDER TO OCCUPY ALL THE NATION STATES THAT FELL UNDER IT AND IS THE ECONOMIC WING OF NATO.

NOW THIS GLOBALIST INSTITUTION IS ALLOWING THE MASSES OF THE THIRD WORLD IN EUROPE IN ORDER TO CREATE IT'S OWN ELECTORATE, IT'S OWN "europeans" AND GENOCIDE ALL THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES BY CREATING A GLOBALISED MAN.
...... WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE TROTZ, THE SJWs, THE MULTINATIONALS AND THE MISSIONARIES USEFUL IDIOTS.

WE NEED TO EXPOSE THE EU FOR WHAT IT IS, BRING IT DOWN TOGETHER WITH NATO AND THE UN, AND CREATE AN ALLIANCE OF FREE SOVEREIGN AND IDENTITARIAN NATIONS WITH RUSSIA AND BELARUS.

DOWN WITH GLOBALISATION!
DOWN WITH CAPITALISM!
DOWN WITH THE KALERGY PLAN!

SAY NO TO THE WHITE GENOCIDE (the first blow in a war for total ethnic genocide)!


note:
MAY AND JUNCKER ARE IN COLLUSION.THEY PRETEND TO BE BICKERING AGAINST EACH OTHER BUT IT'S ALL PART OF THE SHOW! EVEN IF JUNCKER IS NOT AS OUTSPOKEN THE ���� IS PART OF THE GLOBALIST PROJECT. MAIDAN IS THE FINEST EXAMPLE OF THE RUSSOPHOBIC ATTACK. THERESA MAY EVERYONE CAN TELL SHE FEELS MORE COMFORTABLE IN BRUSSELS THAN IN BRITAIN, AS SHE WAS A REMAINER IN THE REFERENDUM.

Support Our Military - Bring Them Home

The British and Irish militaries have been working ever more closely together since the 2015 signing of the 'Memorandum of Understanding'.  The Memorandum in itself was not such a bad thing, drawing as it does the military forces together in areas of defence for the Isles.  SMPBI would like to go further and create a Military of the Isles, with all Service Men and Women united under one banner, and all stationed in our territory, for the defence of the Isles, and for that purpose alone.

Unfortunately, British and Irish military personnel serve as part of NATO.  Ireland is officially neutral, but despite this does supply the NATO Terrorists with soldiers and trainers.  They have been in place in Afghanistan since the fraudulent 'September 11th' bombing, which was blamed on country after country as a pretext for invasion, occupation and theft of oil and other valuable commodities and resources.

The death toll of people whose countries NATO has devastated is staggering.  The North Atlantic Terror Organisation has murdered over 20 million people since 2001.  The criminals have attacked 37 countries, making their atrocities cover an area which would justify this being called a World War - which it is, although the puppet media won't label it as such, so officially we live in an era of peace!

NATO routinely engage in their immoral action with illegal weaponry. They are routinely using munitions which have depleted uranium incorporated into them. This means the levels of cancer caused by radiation will be phenomenal. For the Iraqis, birth defects are now commonplace. Military action is turning whole swathes of Iraq and Afghanistan into nuclear wastelands.  NATO are the greatest hypocrites alive. They slander the Syrian Government as using Chemical Weapons on civilian, while they actually do so themselves (including in Syria, where the Chemical attacks have been undertaken by NATO proxies to justify more NATO brutality).

The wars across the globe are not about confronting 'terror', whatever that may be. They are about expanding the military occupation of the Global usurious elite into strategic areas. The staged atrocity of 9/11 was used as an excuse to 'get' Osama Bin Laden. In truth he was never a target. The wars are about building bases, increasing opium/heroin supplies and taking control of oil reserves. They are not just wars of liberation. They are wars of occupation and aggression.

The military in the present conflicts are being encouraged to commit all manner of atrocities against the indigenous peoples. By doing this they are becoming desensitised to the suffering of humanity. Having got used to torturing, raping and murdering civilians in one region, they will be able to do it anywhere.  Of course, US forces have been raping civilians for decades. The My Lai Massacre in Vietnam (16.3.68) has become widely known, but it was not the first such atrocity.  The US military in particular has a long history of raping and murdering civilians. That our militaries fight alongside these people is shameful.  There are good servicemen and women in the US military - people who refuse to obey orders which are insane. Sadly, there are all too many who will look the other way as atrocities occur, and a frightening number who will happily partake in such actions.

Our military have earned the respect of the people for defending our nations from external threats. These wars are destroying the high standards of the military. The Globalists are trying to turn the best of the nation into blood-thirsty animals. They are sadly having a measure of success.

Support the Troops. Protect the decency of the men and women who put themselves forward to defend our nations. Save them from the insane and cruel leaders who view them as 'dumb stupid animals' and cannon fodder. Put an end to war for global profit. Restore the cherished honourable name of our Men and Women in uniform.  Make Defence the only legitimate use of the Military.  In a Socialist British Isles, our armed forces will be the best trained, best equipped, and fiercest of warriors. But they will not be butchers in the pay of Capitalism, murdering and plundering sovereign nations to maximise the profits of the global criminals.

Support the Troops. Bring them home.  After 69 years of tyranny, it is time to say enough is enough and to close down NATO and the UN and restore Sovereignty and Freedom to the World.

Short circuit and endless shame.

Short circuit and endless shame.
by Federico Pieraccini

Syrians, Hezbollah, Iranians, Houthi and Russians are bombing al Qaeda. The same organization that perpetrated almost 17 years ago the 9/11 attack in NYC, according to the CIA.

How does the mainstream media react to what is going on in the middle east? Ignoring the Saudis bombing the Houthi, ignoring the Western coalition that has killed more than 30,000 civilians in Raqqa and Mosul and obviate ignoring Israel that has been exterminating Palestinians for more than fifty years.

Naturally the same mainstream media are ready to defend al-Qaeda (al nusra) in the east of Ghoutha in order to pursue their campaign of lies and disinformation.

Summing up, between Afghanistan in the 80s, Libya in 2011, Syria and Yemen today, the media is always on the side of Islamist terrorism.

Now go take a look at the news coverage of 9/11 and how the media reacted when it was the US struck by terrorism: tears and despair.

What’s the moral? For the media al Qaeda is bad only if it hits the US and Europe, in any other case it must be protected by deliberately changing terminology from 'terrorists' to 'moderate rebels'.

Yet, despite this idyllic relationship between the media and jihadists, Anderson Cooper and his cronies haven’t managed to go to Aleppo 2 years ago or in east Ghoutha to interview their 'heroes'.

Why is this you ask? Because these 'rebels' are so moderate that they usually behead their journalist friends and post these atrocities online.

Journalists and politicians are willing to lie and cover up for this scum in the vain and ridiculous hope that their jihadist friends will reach Damascus to displace Assad and reap further deaths.

Despite being proven in every possible way that al Qaeda are not 'moderate rebels', western humanitarian fanatics and other scum prefer to see the civilian population at the mercy of these beasts, rather than Damascus triumphant.

Rather than the fight against terrorism and the defense of civilians against bloody regimes, Washington and its cronies ARE the bloody regime that uses terrorism to exterminate defenseless civilians.

When the next attack hits the West, remember those politicians who armed and trained Islamic terrorists, stamping them as 'moderate rebels’.

To the next journalist who speaks about human rights and Assad, remember that he is not an impartial voice, but an al Qaeda spokesperson

Reject anti-Fascism and anti-Communism. Everything For Class And Nation

There are aspects of the fourth political theory which are disagreeable, but this excerpt is very important and very true. The anti-fascist prejudice mentioned exists to such an extent that few even realize that there were different tendencies within fascism (or even within the different forms of "fascisms"). And on the other hand the anti-communist prejudice mentioned is obviously manifest in fools who label anything they dislike as being "communist", someone like David Duke is a good example of this. He sees himself as a revolutionary against the system, but in fact unwittingly defends the system of liberal capitalism by attacking an imaginary communist boogeyman. The tendency to label everything reactionary as "fascist" (from the left perspective) and the tendency to label everything postmodern as "communist" (from the right) are identical. They fail to realize that the real enemy is capitalism and liberalism (in all of its forms).

What we need as Americans and is a near complete makeover of culture and priority. We have a government but no state as so many writers (especially Spengler and his progeny) have said before. We need to abandon capitalist economics and Trotskyist Geopolitics.

....After much trouble, Ozymandias Drakes is back on the Facebook Front. By his writings above, he has joined the fight with a determined will. Welcome back Comrade.

A Response to the debate on the Journal of Progressive Nationalism - Wilberg on Wednesday

[Editor's introduction: This is Peter's response to the ongoing Dialogical Journal of Progressive Nationalism.  For people who do not check into the Journal, this response will have been missed.  That is unfortunate.  It is reprinted below so that more people will see it, and to spur readers on to join in the debate on the Journal! 

To Anon specifically, thank you for your contribution, and please continue in this interesting discussion.  By examining ourselves we grow, and often it is necessary that in order to develop, we need to have light shone on particular aspects which we may have not been aware of. 

Anon has not stated who Anon is - and what (if any) relationship he or she may have with the party, but that is of no importance.  Discussion and examination from the perspective of another can be the catalyst we need to we see ourselves more clearly]

To Anon.

First of all, thank you for making a serious, critical contribution to The Journal of Progressive Nationalism.

"A preliminary definition of progressive nationalism: national, socialist, and therefore necessarily monetarily sovereign, but also non-racist and protective of national minorities - even whilst being fundamentally assimilatory in relation to national values, laws and cultures." Wilberg

You argue that “this roundly contradicts what has been written on the SWPE site where white separatism is promoted, not just European values and culture but it would appear that the DNA thing is central.” It would have - and still would be be - useful for me in responding if you had cited those elements on the SWPE site which you see as standing in contradiction to my remark - in particular but not only your impression that for the SWPE “the DNA thing is central”. But let us move on to the conclusion you draw re. SWPE policy:

“The result seems to be in terms of policy that the SWPE wishes to send all non-white people and of course some white non-British people away with what is called voluntary repatriation. This idea might have been a goer 50 years ago, possibly, but things have changed hugely since then. Getting nostalgic about the old NF policies as if they have standing outside of historical context is foolish. That's not to say that it is in and of itself a bad idea and that it wouldn't have any effect, but ultimately if you wanted to whiten Britain a bit more, you would end up with non-voluntary repatriation, inevitably. So please, don't try to sweeten the pill, the results would be violent and ugly.”

Again, I  find myself largely in sympathy with what you write here, although in SWPE policy outline, I could come find only one statement in the policy outline  that appears to confirm that repatriation is part of SWPE policy:

“We will use the profits of the multinational corporations to pay for the resettlement of people in their homelands.”

The question for me is that what is meant by “people” here remains a bit unclear. European whites or non-white non-European “people”? Recent, young and first generation immigrants or also second, third or fourth generation ones?  To use a personal example, my German wife, who, speaking fluent English, lived and worked in England for 30 years, did not form part of any German ‘minority’ community, and was perfectly happy to assimilate with British people and culture without giving up her German nationality.  Then again, living as I do in Prague, I see no tension whatsoever between native Czechs on the one hand, the large Ukrainian and Russian immigrant communities - which effectively form part of an intra-white and intra-European form of ‘multiculturalism’. Here also, the Vietnamese population, despite a lack of social or even linguistic assimilation, constitutes a perfectly harmless ‘national minority’.   

On the other hand, I believe there are strong arguments for the repatriation of particular groups of young, wholly un-assimilable, aggressively native-hostile or criminal first-generation non-white male immigrants in Germany, since a result of the dire conditions and demographic explosion in Africa  there will, within decades there may soon be literally hundreds of millions of Africans on their way to that country and others. And in a German context also, I believe there are also good grounds for offering aid to those recent immigrants who wish to return to their homelands - including many Syrians who have a deep attachment to their homeland, and whose return is only obstructed by continued Israeli and U.S. military provocations and attacks upon Syria. 

I am also in sympathy with your reference to Strasser and agree with the view that:

“....even if immigrant groups do exist within the social national state, they can choose to assimilate which as has already been explained is not multiculturalism, or can form a national minority group which absolutely must accept that the public, majority national culture is the dominant one and that their scope is very much limited to their own community. This, I would propose is also not multiculturalism, there would be a dominant culture, unapologetically so. This cultural self confidence would I imagine express itself in the fact that our legal system is formed by the dominant, British culture and would start to be applied without fear or favour across the land and in every quarter.”

Again, with reference to Germany, the idea of maintaining an “unapologetic” dominant national culture or Leitkultur in the terms you describe it has considerable and justificable support, and I agree with you that such a policy should be applied in Britain also - but only if we do not confuse “national culture” with the imperial nostalgia of the English ruling caste, which has, since the end of the 19th century, based its policy towards Europe on the sole principle of doing everything possible to aggravate national conflicts and bring about wars between European nations and peoples - and above all to keep Europe and Russia divided.

Returning to your critique, however, I do see a problem in ensuring through the British legal system that what you call the “scope” of national minorities  is very much limited to their own community. Throughout ancient and modern history - including American, British and Russian history, there has been a problem of ethnic minorities exerting a wholly disproportionate influence (albeit not always negative) on the economic, financial, political and social systems of their host countries, and also on their media and cultural values. Thus the entire history of American economics was effectively a history of struggle with Jewish banking interests and Zionist political interests - a struggle decisely lost with the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve bank in 1913 as well as the Zionist-pressured entry of America into both World wars and its wars of aggression in the Afghanistan and the Middle East. Similarly, the disproportionate role of Jews in the Russian revolution, as well as in the NKVD, Gulag system etc. cannot in any way be underestimated. As for Britain, the power of the Zionist-Jewish lobby - and its growing influence on even the legal system today also cannot be underestimated. This influence too, has a very long history going back many, many centuries. In the 20th century, Zionist groups were the chief backers of Churchill and Roosevelt’s warmongering against Germany  (even Churchill’s much beloved cigars were paid for with Zionist money). The there were the Zionist-backed plans - the Kaufman (1941), Hooton (1943) and Morgenthau (1944) plans - for the extermination of Germany and the Germans. I do not refer to all this to justify the wholesale expulsion of all members of a ‘national minority’ such as the Jews (and certainly not to a land - Israel - seized at gunpoint through the occupation and ‘ethnic cleansing’ of its native population). 

Having said this however, I believe that there are important further questions to be addressed in relation to your post. You offer  reasonable definitions of ‘multiculturalism’ and of ‘assimilation’ - though I believe there are more questions that can be asked about the use of these terms. Thus there is true and fake ‘assimilation’. Just think of the Zionist lobby and neocons in the U.S. - who from the outside appear assimilated, and may even be secular Jews - but whose prime loyalty is to Israel and their own international ‘tribe’.  In contrast, many German Jews were assimilated to the point of seeing themselves primarily if not only as German patriots - cherishing its culture and even fighting for it in both world wars. The German-Jewish relation could have become a model of a most fruitful symbiosis - were it not for those internationalist Jews and Jewish elites who sought only to exploit, profit and exert disproportionate power over their Gentile compatriots.     

You write also of  “national cultures” and the  “cultural self-confidence” of nations - or even simply of ‘nations’ as such. Here I see another question that still needs addressing. For if we think of the “cultural confidence” of Germans and the immense contribution of German culture European culture as a whole - we must not forget that this long preceded the establishment of Germany as a nation state. The question I see here is too complex and deep to go into here, but I would suggest there are grounds for distinguishing what has been called a national ego (whether in the form of the state, political institutions, a prominent leader etc) from the national soul - by which I do not mean anything that can be reduced to biology or DNA, but rather embraces all those distinctive or core values and qualities of different peoples which first gave birth to ‘nations’ (a word whose earliest root meaning is simply ‘to be born’). ‘Nationalism’ based on what I call ‘the national ego’ and the political state can serve to defend or even bring about a renaissance of the national soul. But it can also serve as a form of (over-)compensation for the loss of that soul, i.e. for the disensoulment of nations and their cultures which is the mark of  U.S. based global capitalism - which, through its global ‘pop’, gender and celebrity-obsessed culture industry seeks imposes its own soulless, wholly homogeneous commercial monoculture - including, paradoxically, a homogeneous monoculture of ‘diversity’ - on the media and culture of Europe and other regions. 

It is unfortunate that even the term ‘progressive’ nationalism still retains connotations of a soulless and purely ‘progress’ oriented modernism, in response to which the attempt to merely revive and mimic the symbols and rites of ‘traditional’ cultures and religions has given rise to a mere marketplace of New Age forms of pseudo-spirituality - and constitutes yet another form of superficial identity politics. 

Finally, an important question I hope to write a lot more about, but feel a need to provisionally state. The question has to do with the way in which so much political discourse in the U.K  today takes the form of virulent and vituperous debates about what the best and most correct ‘answers’ are to particular issues - rather than deeper discussion and debate of what the most essential QUESTIONS are that might lie beneath these issues.

Thanking you again for your comments,

Peter Wilberg

The New Socialism - Wilberg on Wednesday

Anti-War Anti-Wage

Anti-Waste

Anti-McWork

Anti-McWorld

For Spiritual Individualism

For Deep Values not Brand Values

For Total Pacifism and Non-Violence

For a Revolution in Human Relations

For the Re-ensoulment of Life and Science

For Free Creative Labour not Wage Slavery

For Equal Remuneration of all forms of Labour

For an End to the Medicalisation of Social Dis-ease

For Free Associations in Cooperative Enterprises

For the Global Levelling of Living Standards

For Total Respect towards all Life Species

For Quality of Life not Quantity of Profit

“From Each According to their Ability, To Each according to their Need.”

Karl Marx

The New Socialism is ‘anti-world’ – against the sham global ‘world’ of corporate capitalism – a ‘McWorld’ that turns everything of spiritual value in the human soul into a commodity.

The New Socialism is also anti-wage and anti-work. For ‘work’ in capitalism is neither creative nor fulfilling. Instead it is wage-slavery and it is also waste manufactured in the name of economic growth – the waste of both natural resources and creative human potentials in the overproduction of near identical and often entirely unnecessary consumer products.

The New Socialism is anti-waste and anti-war, war being itself the waste of human and non-human life and the waste of economic and natural resources for the manufacture and marketing of military hardware - all in the service of competition for those resources and for economic markets. 

The New Socialism is thus also anti-weaponry – in particular all those Weapons of Mass Destruction hypocritically monopolised by the major capitalist world powers. The destruction of other life species and the endangerment of the human species itself is conducted by global capitalism in the name of world economic progress. Thus today it would seem inconceivable for a politician, political party or movement to advocate a retreat from this ‘progress’ - from economic growth, employment, individual consumption and ‘living standards’ in the industrialised capitalist world. Yet this is precisely what is required to overcome the vast intra- and international inequalities of wealth and living standards generated by global capitalism, and to create genuine quality of life for all those whose lives are dominated by uncreative work compensated only by wasteful consumption.

The New Socialism is anti-world, anti-war, anti-waste, anti-wage, anti-work and therefore also anti-worship. For the only ‘god’ that capitalist culture recognises is Mammon – the god of quantitative economic value. Its only true commandment is to worship that god by any and all means possible – up to and including the total devaluation of all authentic spiritual values, the total degradation of the human being, and the total ecological devastation of the earth. But the most important form of worship that capitalism demands is ‘work’ or ‘employment’ – in other words wage slavery. Hence its greatest religious sin is ‘non-employment’ or ‘economic inactivity’. In a sick world, sickness and disability have become forms of bodily protest against spiritually debilitating work. The human body has become the principal 'conscientious objector' to all that is soul-destroying in our society - hence the endless attempt to wage war on illness through new drugs, genetic manipulation and medical technologies rather than understanding its social meaning.

The New Socialism recognises that what is religiously promoted as 'freedom' and 'democracy' by the champions of global capitalism disguises outright economic totalitarianism - not only the subordination of politics and politicians to the economics of the market but the daily subordination of individual wage- and salary-slaves to their executive autocrats and to the totally undemocratic corporate cults and dictatorships they are forced to labour for. As for 'freedom of expression' or even 'freedom to protest', this disguises the outright censorship and brainwashing brought about by corporate media monopolies and the corporate interests they serve - not least the military-industrial complex of U.S. global imperialism with its intrinsic investment in war and in the expansion of U.S. economic and cultural totalitarianism.

Long Live the DPRK. Freedom from Yankee Imperialism

Today marks what would have been the 105th Birthday of the founder of the free sovereign Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

The capitalist multi-millionaire president of the USA has threatened the DPRK with war for daring to have its own system of government and to live as a shining example of the fact that it is possible to have an economy which serves the people and not global bankers.

We salute the people of the DPRK and pledge our friendship and our support for all who are fighting against the terrorist maniacs who are pushing the USA and its criminal Zionist collaborators to threaten the DPRK with war.

The 'crime' of the DPRK is its determination to maintain its own way and to not submit to the tyranny of global finance capitalism and multinational corporate slavery.  The DPRK is one of only a very few countries without a Rothschild Central Bank.

As stated on the DPRK's website:

"The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a genuine workers' state in which all the people are completely liberated from exploitation and oppression. The workers, peasants, soldiers and intellectuals are the true masters of their destiny and are in a unique position to defend their interests."

It is for providing living proof that the despotism of globalism is not all powerful that the DPRK is lied about and threatened. Unlike the war-mongers of the globalist west, the DPRK has never invaded another country, seeking only the unification of its own territory in the 1950 war of liberation, which would have freed the south of Korea but for the interference of the USA - the very country which had created the lapdog south in 1945 as a part of their continuing war of aggression against the peoples of Asia.

The declaration that the DPRK will go to war if the USA chooses the path of war, is not a statement of aggression, but of resistance to aggression. The DPRK will not be bullied by the terrorists of the USA into surrendering the freedom and way of life the people of the DPRK hold dear.  We salute their resilience and stand with the DPRK should the enemies of humanity attack that nation.

Long Live the Democratic People's Republic of Korea!  May you continue to give inspiration to the world.  May you outlive your enemies and form a cornerstone of a free Socialist world in which the sickness of capitalism is swept away.

Party Statement on US attacks on Syria

Last year, SWPE commented on the election for President of the USA.  With Bernie Sanders out of the race, and with Jill Stein squeezed out by a system which ensures only a Democrat or Republican can win, the only candidates left with any chance of winning were Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.  There was no chance of a decent President coming from a choice between two such awful people, so our advise was for people to vote for the lesser of two evils.

There were issues of concern from the Trump camp, including the declaration of intent to end the provision of Health Care (Obamacare), although Trump spoke of replacing it with an alternative which would be more affordable, rather than simply scrapping it.  Obamacare remains in place and this broken promise stands as an early indicator of how his term in office has become - a series of u-turns on pledges; a continuation of the policies of the previous regime, directly against the wishes of the people who voted for him.

Domestic politics apart, the main reason we saw Trump as the lesser of two evils, was his declaration for peace.  The USA has long been a notorious agent of global corporate imperialism.  The USA has been the driving force behind the destruction of Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, the Sudan, the Ukraine and many other sovereign nations.  Trump spoke of ending this imperialist aggression; Clinton spoke of war with Russia.  We advised people to vote for Trump to avert the catastrophe of war for corporate interests, with profits being gained at the cost of human lives.

While Hillary Clinton was screaming hysterically for blood in the Middle East, Trump spoke of the need for the USA to mind its own business and not interfere in the internal problems of sovereign nations.  As has been seen by the War Crimes inflicted upon the Syrian Arab Republic this week by now President Trump, the only difference between the two candidates on this issue was that Clinton was more than happy to proclaim her blood lust, Trump chose to hide his.

Trump made a point of declaring that he believes Jerusalem must be recognised as the capital of Israel.  Jerusalem is a city in the occupied territory known internationally as the West Bank, to the Israelis as the twin provinces of Judea and Samaria, and to the Palestinians as home.  Trump's declaration is an affront to the people of Palestine, who were seeking a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine problem, even being ready to give up the majority of their country by recognising Israel as a sovereign entity, in return for the recognition of the much smaller territories of Gaza and the West Bank as the sovereign nation of Palestine.  His toadying to global Zionism has encouraged the Zionist state to build more settlements in Palestine, pushing the people of that land deeper into despair and subjugation.

The Global Zionist agenda is for the creation of 'Greater Israel' on land stolen from the peoples of Palestine, Jordan, Egypt, the Lebanon, Iraq and Syria.  The Zionist States of Turkey and Saudi Arabia are working alongside Israel itself to achieve this goal, with the full military backing of their vassal, the USA, and the assistance of the Kurds who see the opportunity for the creation of a sovereign state of Kurdistan from the ruins of the nations smashed by the Zionist war machine.

The contrived wars of aggression against the free Arab Republic of Iraq, under Saddam Hussein were a part of the destabilisation of the Middle East for the strengthening of the Zionist centre of global operations.  It is no coincidence that the lying War Criminals, George 'w' Bush and Tony Blair used the propaganda of (chemical) Weapons of Mass Destruction being used by the government of Iraq against the Iraqi people to justify the invasion and destruction of Iraq, and now the equally deceitful Donald Trump is using the propaganda of chemical weapons being used by the government of Syria against 'rebels' (Terrorists) in that country.  In both cases, the propaganda is a complete fabrication.

There were no WMDs in Iraq, and the Sarin weapons in Syria which killed a handful of people during an air strike by the government against a terrorist controlled area, were weapons held by the Terrorists which were hit in the air-raid.  If the Syrian air force had not hit the Terrorists' store of chemical weapons, they would have been used against ordinary Syrians - not by the government, but by the Terrorists!  Trump has just launched an attack on the victims of global Zionist aggression, to defend the very people who were preparing to murder Syrian civilians with a stockpile of chemicals which was hit by a fortunate airstrike.

The criminal attack on the sovereign nation of Syria is a part of the drive to subjugate the entire Middle East to global capitalism, including the control of the monetary supply by the Zionist Rothschild banking mafia.  The Islamic State is just Al Qaeda renamed and redeployed as a fake Muslim operation to destabilise Muslim nations and create an image which justifies the deployment of the military of the West and Zionist states in order to confront it, until it is needed elsewhere for more destabilisation operations.  If Islamic State was really the anti-Semitic Islamic extremist entity it is purported to be, then why do its fighters get medical and military support from Israel?  Why also do they never attack Israel?  Why do they concentrate their attacks on Muslim countries and do everything they can to justify the dehumanisation of Muslims in general?  It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure this one out.

Trump is just another stooge. He is the same as Clinton.  He is not the lesser of two evils. He is the equal of two evils.  Democracy is a sham. The solutions to the woes of the Working Class can only come through Revolution, not through Reformism from the ballot box, and certainly not from the presidency of a multi-millionaire oil-loving, Israel-worshipping liar.  The people of the USA have been lied to, and they are not the only victims of the lies - the greatest victims are the peoples of the Middle East who ae being murdered for the agenda of increasing Global Zionist Capitalist power.

So what is to be done?  We must make sure that no one in  military uniform is allowed to go unchallenged. We call for all our military men and women to mutiny rather than shed any blood for profit. The Revolution needs the support of our Military, and we need to support their refusal to fight for the Ruling Class.  We need to bring the Military into the Revolutionary fold, and to let them know that anyone who wears the insignia of NATO or who fights for the Capitalist cause against our brothers and sisters in any part of the world, declares him/herself an enemy of the People, and as an enemy combatant, with all that entails.