Remembrance Sunday - Remember those who murdered our menfolk for their own profit

Today is Remembrance Sunday.  Today we remember the fallen.  Today is a day when we hear much propaganda about how we must be grateful to those who have died in war, for making our countries what they are today.  This propaganda is an insult to the memory of those who were killed in conflict.

On the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month in 1918, the First World War ended.  The war was contrived by Capitalists on every side as a means to create wealth and to reduce the population of the countries they controlled.  Although Remembrance Day has been extended to include all wars since 1918 - proving that the 'war to end all wars' was nothing of the sort - the timing of the ceremony reflects the official end of the First World War, when the Capitalists could no longer keep the bloodshed going.

War means profit for some and misery for most.  The armaments industry of every country increased their already staggering riches by keeping the carnage in Europe going for four years, giving the governments under their control the excuse to purchase more implements of death, at prices which ensured that each individual country was plunged into debt.  The usurious banks loaned money to the governments at interest - interest which is still being paid off even now - ensuring that the stranglehold of the usurers over so-called democratic governments, was complete.  Britain was effectively out of the war in 1917, but with the bankers' securing of the Balfour Agreement, the funds flooded in to keep British people dying in France and the Low Countries.  The acquisition of debt in 1917 was achieved with a promise by the British government to give land which Britain had no right to, to people who Britain had no right to give it to.  The Great War expanded to include citizens of the USA, brought in to keep the blood flowing into the fields and the profits flowing into the coffers of the usurers.

Debt is debt, and can easily be written off if the people have the will to tell the usurers that they will not get another penny from those they have extorted.  The British Ruling Class is so tied in with the usurers, that the will of the people has no impact on any decisions made in the mother of all fake democracies.  The usurers own the government of the UK, and until every last member of the Capitalist Class is expelled, they will continue to steal from the people to fund their partners in crime.  The UK Ruling Class is synonymous with global usury.  SWPE would honour the Balfour Agreement and expel all the usurers and those who aid them to the land which was stolen at the cost of so much British blood.

By far the worst aspect of the First World War was the destruction of the best of Britain and the British territories of Canada, Australia and New Zealand.  Men of courage and honour were lied to by corrupt politicians.  Many volunteered to fight a foe which had been created by the propagandists in order to generate wealth for their masters.  When the volunteers had been slaughtered and people across the British world began to see that the war was a tool of finance and big business, conscription was brought in.  Anyone who refused to fight for the benefit of Capitalism was libeled as a coward and judicially murdered.  The loss to the British gene pool was immeasurable.

Following the catastrophe of 1914-18, the Capitalists plunged the world into an economic crisis, to facilitate the next stage of their drive to annihilate the best of Europe, World War Two.  In the interim period, the people who had been promised that the old exploitative order would give way to a land fit for heroes, were summarily abandoned, only to be called upon again when the militarists needed them to rejoin the slaughter to further enrich themselves.

World War One was a catastrophe, but World War Two was worse.  The gene pool suffered in both, but so terrible was the destruction of Europe in the Second World War, that those who came after were the 1960s generation of liberal Trotsykites, self-haters and traitors to the very idea of Society.  Free Love and Abortion replaced Family.  Absolute Capitalism replaced Social Responsibility.  Liberalism replaced Respect.  The Semitic religion pushed aside the native sense of self respect, duty, honour, loyalty and protection of own, and in its place raised weakness, globalism and decadence.

On this Remembrance Sunday, remember the Fallen.  Remember how they were lied to.  Remember that everything they were promised has been reneged upon.  Don't blame them for the world we live in - they did not fight to make Britain into an Islamic shit hole in which soldiers returning from foreign wars are made homeless while foreign terrorists are given homes, benefits and children to rape, all in the name of 'morality'.  They did not fight to give total control to the bankers and to bourgeois Etonians who play the soggy biscuit game and have sex with dead pigs while telling us that we have to accommodate our enemies because it is 'right' to do so.  They didn't fight so that Britons could be replaced in employment by moslems; so that our NHS could become a place for foreigners to work and Britons to die; so that our education system can lie to our children and train them to become the rape-puppets of those who wish to make the UK submit to Shariah.

Never Forget and Never Forgive.  Rise up and honour the Fallen by avenging them in a Native Revolution, in which the blood of the Ruling Class and the Invaders will flow into a sea of cleansing to make way for a return to sanity and an obliteration of liberalism.

Happy Samhain. Reclaiming our past is the first step to reclaiming our future

Today is the first day of Samhain - the two day period which marks the end of summer and the beginning of winter.  The festival of Samhain has been commercialised, with the traditional wearing of natural skins replaced by the wearing of expensive costumes.  The spirit of reflection and reverence for those who came before us, has been replaced with hedonism - in children the pursuit of sweets (trick or treat), in adults drunken revelry in parties for overgrown children.  But in spite of the shifts of focus, the centrality of the spiritual aspect remains the same.

Samhain (or to use the Semitised name, Halloween), marks the point in the year when the veil between the physical and spiritual realms is at its thinnest.  It is a time to remember those who have gone before us in our own lifetimes, and to ponder our place as links in a fragile chain joining the past, present and future.  Our Celtic ancestors (England is at its core Celtic, with every native Englishman and woman having Celtic ancestry, no matter how diluted by the later addition of Germanic genes), understood the spiritual basis of reality, and used festivals to keep that understanding alive.  SWPE keeps this tradition alive, with our proclamation of loyalty to our pre-Semitic culture, rejecting the church and its toadying to usurious alien ways.

This Samhain, we send greetings to our Heathen members and supporters, emphasising our commonality, regardless of whether we are closer to the Celtic ways, the Norse or the Anglo-Saxon.  Socialism is by means of being an expression of the will of the people, an expression of the spiritual essence which sets us apart from the globalisers with their middle eastern propaganda which they take for 'religion', even if like many liberal atheists they do not know it!

Happy Samhain.  Reclaiming our past is the first step to reclaiming our future.  Celebrating that which is truly ours, rather than some Semitic piffle, as taught in churches, mosques and synagogues, is an important part of that vital first step.

Open response to question about SWPE and 'National Socialism'

The following was prompted by a question asked about SWPE and how it relates to pre-Night of the Long Knives 'National Socialism.'  As pointed out by the questioner, National Socialism died in the summer of 1934. The brutal war of 1939-45 with all the horrors that were part of it, were by the design of Capitalists in London, Washington and Berlin, with the addition of the USSR as combatants fighting initially out of self defence as the territories they governed were attacked.  By the outbreak of the Second World War, all the genuine National Socialists were either dead or marginalised, or had betrayed the ideology and become paid accomplices of the Capitalist war machine.   Thank you to Steve for your question.

Our ideology is what we term Real Socialism.  We say Real Socialism because what often passes for socialism is nothing but decadent liberalism, hedonism and forced globalism.  Very often, the so-called socialists of today (such as the UK Labour Party and the rapist-apologist moslem-hugging SWP) are pushing ideologies based on nothing but economics, making them a variant of the capitalists they feign to oppose.  Real Socialism puts economics in its correct place as a part of the bigger picture, and not as the over-riding factor.  Where the confusion comes in with people who call themselves Socialists, but are really globalist liberals, is that they fail to understand that a country is more than just a geographical area, but an area with a people tied to it.

Socialism is National in every aspect because it is a belief in achieving the best which is possible for the maximum number of people in the Nation.  The Nation is the extended family - the Nacio / the People.    We fully endorse Walther Darré's concept of Blood and Soil.  Ironically and which must be to the chagrin of any globalist liberals who bother to look into the origins of their ideology, Darré's work can be seen as the blueprint for the sensible aspects of the Green movement.  Mass migration is damaging to the planet, destroying the ecology of each place that the locust like mass of people moves to.  A sustained environment needs a constancy of population, not the addition of millions of outsiders who are an extra drain on natural resources, and who add to the criminal waste of agricultural land through the increase in building of accommodation to house them.  Borders are beneficial to nature. Open borders allow for global exploitation and the ruination of the planet.

Socialism is International because it supports the continuity of free Nations, as opposed to the nation destroying fraud of the globalists.  International cooperation is beneficial to everybody involved.  We support a free Europe of free nations, in which each country acts in the way which best suits its own people.  Peace is beneficial to the people, war is only beneficial to the Capitalists in the armaments industry and speculative markets.  We would abolish the EU and after that the UK.  We support a Europe in which England sits side by side with our neighbours (Ireland, Scotland, Wales, France, the Netherlands, Flanders, Wallonia etc), as free and mutually respectful neighbours, not as inmates of the same prison cell.

We oppose the free movement of people and goods because both undermine the ability of each country to be self-governing.  The Strasserites were anti-war and favoured International cooperation.  Hitler was a Capitalist Imperialist who favoured a war of aggression to build an empire in eastern Europe on the corpses of the rightful peoples of that area and the Germans he would use to secure it.  The hated EU is Hitler's legacy and like the real National Socialists who Hitler had murdered, we want nothing of such anti-people entities.

The National Socialists post-1934 betrayed the Socialist Revolution of the previous year, and adopted a Germanised version of Italian Fascism.  We are not Fascists - we are anti-Fascists, understanding that Fascism is Corporatism, which means the rule of the corporations over the people (which is what we have today in what many term the New World Order).  Because Hitler was a Fascist and a wrecker of the original (national) Socialism of Germany, we have no truck with his distortion of Socialism.

The Strasserites were good people who paid the ultimate price for staying true to their ideals.  They held fast to the principles of Socialism as a means of overthrowing the usurious exploitative system of Capitalism.  The much slandered Ernst Röhm was amongst those murdered in 1934 - officially for his homosexuality (which was blatantly hypocritical considering many of those around Hitler were of the same sexual orientation), but really because he was a danger to the Capitalist backers of Hitler, and unlike the man who ordered his brutal murder, a genuine revolutionary.  The Strasserite faction was heavily influenced by the works of Ernst Niekisch, who we also have points in common with, but that doesn't make us National Bolsheviks or Strasserites!

Our ideology is rooted in the English soul, and in the greater European family, which is why we are proud of the Germanic, Nordic and Celtic strands which make up our people.  We do not limit ourselves to just Englishness, but we do see the need to keep ourselves anchored in our heritage.  This again steers us towards Strasserism, as the ideal of the Revolutionary National Socialists was for Germany to be restored to a federation of free nations which existed before the German State was created.  We propose the return of the ancient nations of Mercia, Kernow, Kent, Northumbria, Anglia and a federalised pan-Saxon nation including Wessex, Essex and Sussex, all under the umbrella of England.  Hitler went so far as to abolish Austria and the Sudeten territories, crushing native diversity in a drive for uniform obedience to his 'thousand year empire', which under close examination would have become something similar to the EU had it succeeded.

We don't use the term National Socialism, because to do so is to needlessly duplicate two terms which are really indistinguishable:

Nationalism which doesn't put the people first, is not Nationalism, and the same can be said for Socialism - the two are one.  Hitler was a Capitalist who wore the clothes of nationalism but made the people in his care into servants of the global war machine.  Corbyn claims to be a Socialist but wants open borders which will crush the Working Class under a flood of parasites who we will be forced to pay for, whether through taxes to pay their benefits lifestyle, or in jobs taken by them at our expense.


Further Reading:

Blood and Soil, by Anna Bramwell: http://aryanism.net/downloads/books/anna-bramwell/blood-and-soil.pdf
Hitler and I, by Otto Strasser (complete text): http://mailstar.net/otto-strasser-hitler.html
Otto Strasser's "New Europe", by Kerry Bolton: http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/05/otto-strassers-new-europe-part-one/ http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/05/otto-strassers-new-europe-part-one/
Ernst Röhm: http://spartacus-educational.com/GERroehm.htm
The Anti-Hitler Underground within the German Conservative Revolution, by KR Bolton: http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2015/volume_7/number_2/the_anti_hitler_underground.php

The Semitic roots of liberalism, Globalism, Capitalism and all we suffer under

 

The new leader of the fake socialist UK Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, epitomises the cancer of liberalism which has been allowed to enter the political spectrum at all points, but especially on the left.  In a recent speech, he pontificated about the need to combat discrimination wherever it may appear.  Corbyn is a typical atheistic liberal who takes his ideology from the Semitic religions and probably doesn't even realise that he is regurgitating religious dogma albeit minus any spiritual aspect.

The Semitic trilogy of Judaism, Christianity and Islam share a common belief which the liberal atheists have taken to heart, that belief is that all people are created equal.  For religious people with a belief in an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent deity which controls every aspect of reality, it is simply taken as self evident that the deity is the creator of everything.  For Jews, the deity has created all humanity as equal beings, and all non-humans as creatures who exist to serve humanity.  The same goes for Christians and Moslems.  The subtle difference between the three aspects of the Semitic religion can be summarised as follows:

• for Jews, humanity is simply another word for the Jewish nation, with all non-Jews considered as non-humans and therefore in existence only for the benefit of the Jewish nation.  Certainly there are Jews who consider the purpose of the Jewish nation is to act as a beacon of light to guide the lower creatures, but regardless, the strict divide between Jews as humans and non-Jews as less than human (sub-humans) applies

• for Moslems, humanity is defined as all Moslems, but this definition is crafted in such a way as to believe that everyone is born Moslem and that those who do not adhere to the Moslem way, have broken away from the original path and made themselves into enemies of the deity who must either be returned to humanity through conversion (or more properly, reconversion), or killed.  The relationship between Moslems and Jews is clouded and confused, with some Moslems calling for Jews to be exterminated and others considering the Jews a special people chosen by the common deity.

• for Christians, the definition of humanity is exactly the same as the liberal one.  Any featherless biped with the ability to communicate beyond the level of a chimpanzee, is considered human.  Christians see it as their mission to save the world, bringing all peoples to accept their beliefs as the only way forward (very much like the Jewish mission as the saviours of the world, but without the us and them divide) and consider those who will not accept this self evident (to them) truth, as heretics who must be converted and failing that annihilated (as put into practice in the Inquisition and supported gleefully to this day by those who cheer on the wars in the Middle East (killing for the good of humanity), putting Christians in the same bed as Moslems, no matter how much they protest to the contrary.

Jews, Moslems and Christians are one and the same.  They all believe in the story of Adam and Eve and the bizarre creator father who made a beautiful garden for them to live in and placed inside it some fruit trees which he told them they couldn't eat from.  Rather than placing his favourite fruit in an enclosed area where he could pig out and they couldn't get to, he then created a talking snake and got it to convince them to eat the fruit, for which crime all humanity must be punished forever!  Talk about bad parenting - 'hey kids look at this lovely fruit, listen to my pet snake telling you to eat it, damn you you scum, get out of my garden and be punished for eternity, those are my apples!' - the story is pathetic, yet billions of Jews, Moslems and Christians believe it.  (After getting kicked out of the garden, Adam and Eve have two sons, one kills the other, so they have a third son, then they find a village which has never been mentioned before (and for which no attempt at explanation is made), and get breeding with the local women, oh yeah and the Earth is flat!)  Drivel, puerile drivel.

When the Semitic trilogy is examined, it is obviously the product of a sick imagination.  The lunacy can only be believed with the intervention of a caste of Priests/Rabbis/Imams who interpret the rubbish in the Bible/Talmud/Koran in order to make it appear relevant and plausible.  The entire structure of the Semitic religion (in its many varieties) is the same; it is a structure which glorifies the Ruling Class and justifies the idea that everyone must know his or her place.

The Class System only exists because of religion.  The all powerful deity speaks in riddles which only the priest caste can understand and the priests are allied to the Ruling Class (with the Pope having parity if not supremacy over the leaders of Christian nations, and Ayatollahs occupying a similar position in Islamic countries).  For the Jews, as a collective whole, they have a higher status than everyone else by virtue of being chosen by their deity to rule the world, as we know to be true because it says so in their infallible religious texts (or at least that's what their religious leaders claim!)  The royal family in the UK claim descent from king David of Israel (of pre-Christian times), which automatically gives them the divine right to control and own the people who come under the jurisdiction of the government which acts of their behalf while dictating to the world about the virtues of democracy.

Sexism is inherently Semitic.  The religion claims that the deity created Adam in his image and only created Eve when Adam complained that although he did enjoy having sex with the animals in the garden, he would like a female version of himself just as the animals had male and female versions of each other (its in the texts, look it up!)  Eve was created solely so that Adam didn't have to have sex with dogs, pigs, etc (unless he wanted to), making the subordinate role of women as sex objects something the deity himself ordained (and something which Moslem men in particular are keen to impose on the entire world).  When the Semitic deity tried to trick his children into eating the forbidden fruit so that he would have an excuse to take his belt off and beat them, he sent his talking snake to do his dirty work.  Adam didn't listen to the snake, but his spare rib, Eve, did, and thus the term Woman, contains within itself the phrase 'woe of man'.  It was a woman who disobeyed her supernatural father by having a bite of his favourite fruit (which he purposely put on display and schemed to be eaten) and therefore it was a woman who condemned all men to have to be self reliant and work for their own food, rather than sun bathing in a garden, getting everything for free, and engaging in rampant bestiality.

Feminist liberals take the concept of women as sex objects and run with it, glorifying sex as the be all and end all of existence, adding the right of women to be slaves of the Capitalist system into the mix.  The decline of the family is a shift in emphasis from women as sex objects for their husbands, to sex objects for everyone.  The brutalisation of men as instruments of the economic machine, to be worked to death has been extended to include women.  Feminism in its liberal incarnation is complimentary to religious sexist dogma.

Globalism is Semitic.  The invasion of Europe by millions of economic parasites hiding behind the lie of being refugees, is justified by the liberal belief in all people being created equal, which we can see is a product of the Semitic faith.  The justification for the refusal to do anything about the destruction of nation states can be split into the following aspects:

• all people are CREATED equal therefore we are all the same and Nations are social constructs so we have no right to protect the space we live in
• the 'three main religions' (fragmented but same system of control) have the same deity so we cannot object to people coming to our lands who have a religious belief that women and children exists for their sexual gratification, likewise we cannot object on animal rights grounds, as to expose cruelty is to be racist
• the birthrate in Europe is in decline so we need millions of immigrants to put on  the yoke of capitalism to pay taxes and to keep our economies going (even though there isn't enough work for Europeans anyway and most of the invaders are coming here to live parasitically, not to mention that we should be doing all we can to destroy Capitalism, rather than prop it up)
• for the invaders, entry into Europe is seen as a return to Eden, where they can live without working legally, can rape at will and can use the dumb natives to pay for their luxurious lifestyles
• we have a moral duty to turn the other cheek to the brutality of the invaders, because after all, we are all god's creatures and Jesus told us that we must love our neighbours 

The last point is perhaps the most salient.  Christianity rests on a belief that the all powerful deity (yes, the one who needs a religious strata and special religious buildings to communicate with his creations, because although he is everywhere and knows everything, he can't manage to talk to us directly!) somehow managed to lose the respect of his creations, who started doing outrageous things like thinking for themselves.  In desperation, he manifested in human form, went about performing miracles (which no documented except the priests of the Ruling Class hundreds of years after he was alleged to have walked the Earth), and then in order to save us from sin (a concept he created himself back when he got his pet snake to con Eve into biting his apple), he got himself executed and came back from the dead three days later to tell a select handful that he had survived death, and has since not bothered with as much as a telephone call to say he's alright! 

The CruciFiction story has the deity in human form crying out to himself in supernatural form, 'why hast thou forsaken me', and begging to be saved!  This is supposed to emphasise his humanity, but really only makes it obvious that an all powerful deity he aint!  Why was he crucified?  Because the people he came to save didn't want saving, which is why Jews and Christians have traditionally hated one another, although the current pope doesn't see the foundation of his religion as that important!

The Christ (Jewish saviour) preached about turning the other cheek.  He tolerated whatever was thrown at him, even to the point of being killed.  This shouldn't be something to inspire people, it should be a warning.  The Christ tolerated the intolerable and for his weakness he was tortured and murdered, with his friends and followers persecuted for their equal weakness.  What we should take from this lesson is to tolerate nothing, rather to stand fast to our ideals and to defend our people and home.  If we fail to be strong, if we let in millions of people who despise us, we will be crucified, or at least subjected to ethnic and cultural genocide.

SWPE is not anti-religious.  We support the unity of culture and people with a spiritual cement.  What we do not support is the spiritual cement consisting of a belief in submission to a despotic rapist animal abusing deity (Islam), or one which defers to a racial supremacist deity who seeks dominion over other people through economic and legal control (Judaism), or one which rests on a level of weakness and tolerance which if taken seriously will lead to the annihilation of everyone who follows it (Christianity).  We oppose the entire Semitic religion, regardless of the form its adherents choose to follow.

There are people who call themselves Christian who believe that the ancient Druids embraced the religion of the Israelites and that this justifies the British people being Christian.  SWPE position on the Druids is that if there are similarities between the monotheistic form of Druidism and the Israelitish faith of pre-Christian times, then that is most likely due to the theft of other people's ideas by the people who wrote the texts of the Semitic religion. 

We welcome people who are interested in the native spiritual faiths of Europe and of the ancient world.  We welcome students of Odinism, Asatru, Romuva, native Druidism amongst others.  We welcome everyone who recognises that the great thinker Carl Jung correctly identified the unity of ethnicity and spirituality, and that therefore it is absolutely imperative that we do not tolerate any non-native spiritualism, especially, but not exclusively, the Semitic religions.

To save Europe from the globalist social/political/economic/ethnic genocide which is now underway, we have to fight the enemy on every front, including the spiritual.  Identify and destroy the enemy within, for that is the most dangerous enemy.  A post revolutionary England will be an England in which the concept of turning the other cheek is one which is taught as a warning and in which tolerance of the intolerable will be rightly viewed as treason to the people.  If you accept this as the only way forward, join us.  If you cling to the religions of the oppressors, you need to look at your beliefs and see how they aid those who are creating a global prison for us all.

There can be no Equality except in the Society of the Extended Family

There is a great deal of nonsense written about and spoken of in left-wing circles about the fabled holy grail of equality.  The notion comes from the Semitic religion, where it is stated that 'god created all men equal', and despite the fact that the majority of people on the left are atheists, this religious idea is upheld in secular circles as an unquestionable fact. 

There are Christians of the Identity variety who will argue at great length that the Semitic deity was only speaking of his chosen people of Israelites and that the real Israelites are the peoples of Germany, the USA and UK.  We in SWPE do not get involved in such religious gymnastics as we reject the entire Semitic religion (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) as a middle eastern obsession which has no place in any part of the European world, including England.  Thus we have no issue with stating that the foundation of the Equality idea is nonsense and that we do not need to argue about it, we just reject it.  We reject every aspect of the Semitic trilogy, the Equality story no less than any other.

OK.  Now that we have made it clear that we have no truck with the idea that everyone is the same, does that open us up to accusations of being some variety of ethnic/cultural/linguistic/gender supremacists?  No it doesn't.  We believe that the great diversity of humanity is something to be cherished and to be protected.

The State has to be representative of the people. Equality comes with the realisation that globalisation is a capitalist tool to smash the nation states and create a one world slave plantation. Socialists understand that Internationalism (the good neighbourliness of free nations) requires the continued existence of nations.   Inter-nationalism is the very opposite of Globalism.  The deliberate confusing of these two opposing concepts as being one and the same, is at the very heart of the problem facing those who come to the Left with a desire for Social Justice and are led astray into supporting the capitalist destruction of Society - creating a phantom 'justice' with nothing social to apply it to!  Just as the liberal atheists have a devotion to the religious concept of all men being CREATED equal, so those who push for an end to nations and borders unwittingly are fighting for the globalist agenda which will see an end to all international cooperation and the imposition of a global tyranny of an all powerful Ruling Class and a downtrodden subjugated mass - precisely what the Capitalists have always wanted.

Mass migration is destruction - it creates mass unemployment and lowers the standard of living for the Working Class. We only need such liberal buffoonery as equality legislation when we allow mass immigration of people who have no place in our society. The State under Socialism exists to protect the people from financial parasitism and from globalism. Under Socialism, the State IS the people. Just as the family is master of its own home, so is the people master of the nation.

It would be lunacy for a family to give equal rights to people who break into the home by kicking in doors and smuggling themselves in with the post! The family would rightly tell these burglars to piss off and take their sob stories of persecution with them. So it is with the nation. A Socialist State will not allow people to break into the homeland, will not truck with idiot liberal notions of equality and rights, but will get on with the task of looking after the people to whom the State belongs to by virtue of being an extension of them.

Without a strong state to protect us all, we will have open borders through which the forces of exploitation and imperialism (cultural, religious, economic) will rush in and enslave us all.  This is happening right now, as the liberal capitalist state is allowing it to happen by speaking of a moral duty to help people who have made their way through several safe countries to lands in which they can live as parasites, with free housing, free healthcare, free money (with no obligation to work) and the access to children and vulnerable adults (made vulnerable by an education system which teaches them to feel guilty because in far off lands in history, other people were treated harshly by the governing class (a governing class brought down by military action involving the sacrifice of the grandparents of those who are made to feel ashamed for even existing)!)  David Cameron speaks of morality, whilst refusing to comment on information about him having sex with a dead pig!  The Ruling Class speak of the glorious RAF fighting off the invasion of the UK in the Battle of Britain, whilst demanding that those now invading are given priority in housing, education, etc.  Morality is yet another concept which the Ruling Class and the liberals have twisted into a caricature in order to beat us down.

A Socialist State would encourage its neighbours to adopt their own form of Socialism, just as Stalin did with his philosophy of Socialism in One Country. It would adopt measures to protect the cultural distinction of the inner tribal indigenous minorities (the Bretons in France, the Orcadians in Scotland, the Cornish in England etc) just as Lenin did in setting up the inner republics in the Soviet Oblasts.

Traditionally allied to varying degrees with those who favour a Socialist approach to the government of the country, Anarchists have been misled by liberals into supporting open borders and seeking after the illusion of equality for all.  Anarchists need a strong Socialist State to give them the protective freedom to explore their own chosen lifestyles. Sadly, the favour is not returned by Anarchists who would destroy the ability of Socialists to defend the people, and make all of us - themselves included - prey to outsiders acting as agents for global and internal parasites.

There can be no such thing as equality when speaking of diverse peoples.  A Socialist England must be an English England, with shared culture, ethnicity, tradition etc.  The organic diversity which comes with the restoration of the ancient pre-English lands of Mercia, Wessex etc is a diversity which allows for equality of respect, as it deals with peoples who are the same in general and different in detail.  Equality outside the extended family is an impossibility and we do well not to fall into that trap.

Jeremy Corbyn: Kosher Socialist and Enemy of the People

Jeremy Corbyn has been elected as leader of the UK Labour Party by 60% of the voters in that party.  The media is hailing him as a Socialist, but does the man really stand for the Working Class of the UK?  His politics have been compared with those of Syriza in Greece.  Considering that the ruling party in Greece has betrayed the people, giving them a free vote (overwhelmingly taken up) against austerity which was followed up by more of the same, the comparison does not bode well for the UK.

What does Corbyn stand for?

• No renewal of Trident Nuclear Weaponry
• An end to NATO expansionism in the east of Europe
• An end to UK involvement in the wars in the Middle East
• Open Borders to allow refugees to enter the UK at will
• Education to be tailored to the procurement of work
• Palestine to be recognised as a nation-state
• People's Quantitative Easing, using the Bank of England to print money for massive construction programmes
• Building millions more houses
• Nationalising the Bank of Scotland
• Taxing the rich and introducing a National Maximum Wage 
• Increasing the Welfare State
• Creating a National Education Service for all from toddlers to the very aged
• Abolition of the charitable status of private schools
• Abolition of University Tuition Fees
• Nationalisation of the Energy companies
• Staying in the EU in order to expand the Social Charter 
• Rent control to allow people to stay in London
• Continuation of the monarchy, in spite of being a Republican
• Protection of the BBC
• Promotion of the Arts
• Reuniting the province of Ulster inside the Irish Republic
• Reversing the privatisation of the NHS
• Nationalising the Railways
• Provision of Universal Childcare to encourage Women into the workplace
• Introducing Women only railway carriages
• Guaranteeing that Men and Women receive Equal Pay for Equal Jobs

So where does SWPE stand with regards to the new direction which the Labour Party will take under Corbyn?  Firstly, we do not expect an Establishment party to move far from the managed flow which all the controlled parties are subject to.  But if we allow ourselves to accept that Corbyn will be more than just controlled opposition and that there is a chance that his ideas will go beyond rhetoric, then we have to say that his leadership is a mixture of positives and negative.

The positive aspects of Corbyn's ideology and how they fit with SWPE ideology:

Nationalisation (Socialisation) of the Railways, Energy companies and the Bank of Scotland: It is obscene that private companies are allowed to make profits from the provision of essential services.  SWPE would go further than Corbyn and demand the immediate Socialisation of the entire transport network (Railways, Airports, Ports, Buses, Taxis, all public travel involving land, sea or air in which the individual is not the driver/pilot).

The negative aspects of Corbyn's ideology and how they contrast with SWPE ideology

The NHS / Welfare State: Both would be fully re-nationalised by SWPE and importantly made for the native population only.  Corbyn would happily see immigrant tourism increase and would allow for non-medical treatments to continue, we would not.  The Welfare State is too large as it stands, and although we support its protection in general, we would erode the Nanny State, which has become a safety net for the Capitalist system.  We want a country of proud, self reliant people, not of lazy lumpenproletarian parasites, the likes of whom joined Labour in their droves to promote a man who sees no problem in people exploiting other people, whether it is his chums in the Ruling Class, or his supporters in the immigrant occupied ghettos.

Protection of the BBC:  The BBC is the propaganda machine of globalism and liberalism.  It is funded by a tax which is extracted from the people with the threat of prison for those who do not pay it.  The extortion racket is not the worst thing about the BBC, but rather its blatant anti-native bias and its emotional programming to instil guilt in the people if they do anything short of embracing the globalist destruction of the country.  The BBC is too far gone to be saved.  The BBC is rotten to the very core.  SWPE policy towards the BBC is that its programmes be sold commercially to the highest bidder, returning some money to the people, that all its equipment be sold off, that all its buildings be transferred to the ownership of the people (for use in the promotion of native culture or in the service of the native economy) and that once it is thoroughly stripped, it is closed down forever, with everyone who has ever worked for it forbidden from ever having any role in the cultural development of the country, with legal action taken to punish those who have damaged the people of the country by aiding the Ruling Class and the immigrant invaders.

Education (and art) policies:  His National Education Service would at first sight appear to be very much like the SWPE Community Education Programme, which would give all people of all ages the right to pursue education in their own towns, to the highest level attainable.  However, with further scrutiny, Corbyn's education strategy is one which serves the interests of capitalism, not the people.  SWPE would abolish Universities, seeing them as remote factories of liberal elitism, which is of course why the liberal globalist, Corbyn, wants to protect them.  Our education system would see every town in every region made into a place of excellence for real education in the pursuit of cultural greatness (including real art and not the 'modern' decadent art favoured by the liberal Corbyn), Corbyn's would see education reduced to that which serves the economy and keeps the people shackled to the slave mentality (keeping the status quo, with a little financial tinkering to appease those who think that dragging the masses into the elitist system will benefit anyone).  Removing the charitable status of Private (so-called Public) Schools would make them liable to taxation.  It would do nothing to weaken the Class System.  We would abolish all Private education and create a single unified system of Community Education, in which the concept of Class would be eroded.  If Corbyn really was a Socialist, he would call for the destruction of the Ruling Class, not for financial tinkering.  This ties in with his outspoken Republicanism, but his acceptance of the Monarchy.  We are not hypocrites!  We would expel the entire Ruling Class from our shores, and not baulk at the use of capital punishment for traitors to the people such as the royal family.

Women's policies:  Corbyn is a reductionist liberal.  He sees women as different from men only in terms of anatomy.  His idea that there should be Universal Childcare is based solely on the idea that women have the right to be enslaved in the same manner as men.  SWPE seeks a better England in which every family has a home, enough land to grow food, a workshop to create goods for barter, access to free energy / utilities and in other ways is removed from the necessity to work.  Removed from Wage Slavery, the people will have the freedom to explore their potential.  Corbyn is trapped in the Slave Master mentality.  He espouses freedom on some levels, but betrays his inner capitalist by demanding that children be handed over to strangers in order that their mothers can be enslaved.  Women are NOT men.  Women have a natural role in the stability and growth of the nation.  That role is motherhood.  SWPE would elevate motherhood to the highest position in society.  Corbyn would have us believe that motherhood is a burden which prevents women from entering the system of serfdom and exploitation which men have been forced to endure for centuries.  The idea of equal pay for men and women is fair enough, but it still rests in the wage slave mentality in which all people are producer-consumers and cogs in the wheel of the economy.  Corbyn's anti-male policy of women only carriages on trains is pandering to Shariah immigrants, it is accepting that men have the right to rape women if they are not kept separate from them, it defames the entire male gender as rapists.  Corbyn is an apologist for Islam.  If he was not, he would see that it is not native men who are culturally and religiously predisposed to rape, but immigrants from outside Europe, who should not only be in separate railway carriages to mative families, but in separate countries.

Military policies:  Corbyn is opposed to NATO expansionism, as are we.  However, his idea is for the creation of a European Defence Force, which would essentially be NATO without the USA (but of course with moslem Turkey).  SWPE stands for an end to NATO and the UN, not for a strengthening of a regional military force for Europe as a building bloc of a global army and a one world government.  Corbyn is anti-war, which so are we.  Corbyn is motivated by the desire to protect moslems and to allow for the spread of Shariah.  We are motivated by the desire to defend our people and to allow others to do things in their own way, killing each other if they so desire, but without any of our blood being spilled.  Corbyn would see the military involved overseas as global policemen.  His anti-militarism is a smoke screen for his globalism.  His inter-nationalism is a lie.  Inter-nationalism demands the existence of free sovereign nations, but Corbyn's ideology would see all nations ended and replaced with an all powerful global state.  On Trident, we agree, but only because what we have is enough, not because we wish to leave our country defenceless.

Class War / Money:  As previously stated, unlike the hypocrite Corbyn who speaks of a Republic but accepts the monarchy as figure head of the Ruling Class, we would annihilate class divisions.  We would not tolerate Private schools, elitist Universities or anything else which allowed the Ruling Class to remain in power.  We would abolish the aristocracy and make their titles obsolete.  We would not tax the rich and put a ceiling on their highest possible wages, we would create a system of guaranteed wages and prices for all , wiping out in a single stroke the wage disparity between the Working and Middle Classes and also ending the existence of inflation.  We would aim to gradually abolish currency, forever terminating the Capitalist mentality.  Corbyn has betrayed himself as a Champagne Socialist and is clearly a part of the enemy camp, not of the camp of the revolutionaries.  His People's Quantitative Easing is Capitalist economics.

Housing / the Environment:  Corbyn claims to be an Environmentalist, but he wants to build millions of new houses, borrowing money from the Bank of England and thus creating debt which will be pushed onto the Working Class.  You cannot protect the Environment when you are building on the land!  You cannot defend nature when you are destroying the habitats of the wildlife.  You cannot maintain the healthy link of the land and people when you are building new cities on the dead land which was once the countryside!  Corbyn is NOT an Environmentalist, he is a liberal globalising materialist.

Open Borders / Palestine:  Corbyn needs to build millions of house on the corpse of the English land, because he envisions a world without borders in which millions of his animal torturing, child raping moslem friends will be welcomed into England and will have to be housed (at our expense).  His love of Palestine is a part of this toadying to Islam.  Corbyn is as much an Islamophile as his equally sickening liberal partner in crime, George Galloway.  His support for Turkey in NATO fits this pattern.  SWPE would expel all moslems, close the borders and make England a safe haven for the native English and related peoples.  We would not recognise Palestine because we have no interest in the politics of Islam and Judaism which we find equally abhorrent.

Ulster:  Corbyn wants to create a United Ireland.  We see Ulster as a distinct region, in the same way as Connacht, Leinster or Munster.  The future of Ulster is for the people of Ulster to decide.  We seek an independent England, which would necessarily end the UK, but that doesn't mean forcing the north of Ireland into becoming a part of the Irish Republic.  Let the people of Ulster decide their own fate, not politicians in Dublin, London or elsewhere

European Union: Corbyn wants to keep the UK inside the EU.  He wants to do this so that he can unite with his fellow liberal globalisers, such as the hated Syriza of Greece.  Corbyn is not content with creating a liberal hell on earth in the UK, he wishes to spread the misery across the EU and to then link with comparable anti-humans across the globe to create a single global slave state in which he is a part of the bureaucratic Ruling Class

Our verdict of Corbyn should be quite clear.  He is a danger to the people of the UK.  He is a friend of moslem terrorists, of financial immigrants masquerading as refugees, of the exploiters of the Ruling Class, of the parasites of the lumpenproletariat.  We will not be working in support of this man.  According to the mainstream media, the ability of a dyed in wool Trotskyite to become head of the official opposition has turned it instantly into a vehicle of his own Trotskyite lunacy.  There is only one answer to likes of Trotsky, and that is Stalin!  Ice Picks to the fore comrades!

Stop those who aid the invasion of Europe

The invasion of Europe continues apace.  Parasites from Africa and Asia are flooding in at a rate which if unstopped will see the death of our homeland.  The invaders are criminals, mostly men of working age, mostly moslems, entirely motivated by theft.

The hysterical media has published imagery of a young child who died when his family got on a boat and left the safe country of Turkey, where they faced no danger, to illegally enter Europe in order to get their snouts into the trough of Welfare handouts and free healthcare.  Such was the greed and lack of care for their child that they were happy to put his life in danger in order to gain material benefits, such as free housing, free money, the right not to work, a pathetic politically correct legal system which allows foreigners to rape native children, etc.  Their child died, drowning in the sea, and the fault is entirely theirs.  Are these criminals being punished for what amounts to murder by neglect?  No, the corpse of their son is being used as a poster boy to make liberals demand that such sick and degenerate people are allowed into Europe, and the treacherous politicians (who want Europe to become a mongrelised global region to make it just another part of the global capitalist prison state) are bending over backwards to use the opportunity to speed up the rape of Europe and the destruction of the already meagre standard of living of the native Working Class.

The native peoples of the UK are not rallying to call for more invaders to be admitted to our countries.  The media would have us believe that we have become hell bent on our own destruction and are now calling in our millions for masses of invaders to be brought here, for every inch of our beloved green and pleasant land to be concreted over to house them (whilst our own homeless and impoverished get pushed even further to the back of the queue for assistance), for our laws to be twisted so as to resemble Shariah and other similar religious dogmas, for our women to be forced into single sex railway carriages (as demanded by the liberal stooge and fake Socialist, Jeremy Corben) lest they tempt foreign misogynists into raping them by the act of not being covered head to toe in the manner of a cadaver in a body bag, for our children to have their futures taken away as childhood is abolished to appease those who find nothing wrong with making children into sex objects, for terrorists to walk the streets protected by the British Police, for those who dissent to be punished for daring to question the genocide of an entire continent.

There are people calling for Hell on Earth to be unleashed upon all of Europe.  A notable member of the UK Ruling Class, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has made the ridiculous statement that we have a moral duty to welcome the invaders, claiming that

"The people of these islands have a long and wonderful history of offering shelter and refuge, going back centuries – whether it be Huguenot Christians, Jewish refugees, Ugandan Asians, Vietnamese boat people or many, many more. It has always been controversial at the time it happened, always been seen as too difficult. Yet each time we have risen to the challenge and our country has been blessed by the result."

The Huguenot Christians were fanatics who embroiled France in religious wars.  their brand of religion was similar to that of the hated Oliver Cromwell, who enriched England by banning food with any flavour and evil sinful activities such as singing, playing music, dancing and otherwise having pleasure.  They brought skills involved in the fabrication of finery for the benefit of the Ruling Class, but for the ordinary people, they were an addition of more miserable pious bastards who helped to keep the impoverishment of our natural ways of life intact long after Cromwell was gone.  The Jews are the backbone of the banking industry and of the financial system of Capitalism, so their arrival brought us no benefits.  The Ugandan Asians have enriched our country by bringing with them a rape culture which sees little children as objects for sexual gratification, and they have also brought with them more hysterical religious lunacy which has made our cities unsafe to live in.  The Vietnamese boat people have brought with them heroin and crack cocaine (as if the Ugandan Asian / Pakistani trade in death wasn't doing enough harm!), they are largely unemployed, living courtesy of the tax payer, they suffer from mental illness in such percentages as to make them dangerous to the public, they are involved in triad-like gang warfare!  Well done Archbishop - the enrichment of these immigrants has been of benefit to the Ruling Class in some cases, but of incredible harm to the Working Class in every case.

We are told that the people want the invasion of Islamic Terrorists, Rapists, Murderers, Thieves, Scroungers, Welfare State destroyers, Animal abusers, and all round destroyers of Society and the every land we live on .  To prove this, the media has pointed to the various charities giving aid to the invaders (which is a crime as it makes those involved accomplices to the crime of crossing Europe illegally).  Amongst those who are said to be representative of the British people are:

Stand Up To Racism (headed by moslem anti-native, Maz Saleem) which has organised a 20 car Convoy of Hate to take materials to Calais to help more moslems to invade and enrich the UK a la Doncaster;

World Jewish Relief's Refugee Crisis Appeal, whose chief executive has remarked that the Uk is the way it is today because of rescuing Jewish refugees (yet still thinks we need to bring more non-natives here!);

Islamic Relief, which raised £50,000 in 24 hours to help bring in reinforcements top help turn the UK into an (ISIS like) Islamic State; 

MOAS - a criminal organisation which provides boats to bring the invaders from Africa in the first place;

Medecins Sans Frontieres - a body which lets Europeans rot and channels money into aiding those who would not attempt to invade otherwise;

Dulwich Hamlet Football Club (organised by Nisha Damji, a Pakistani moslem who couldn't give a damn about anything but helping others like her to get to the UK).

The invaders who are already here are working tirelessly to bring in more invaders to bring about the total annihilation of the UK as we know it.   Liberal lunatics are of course aiding and abetting them, although they probably get a warm and cosy feeling from helping those who are trampling on the NHS, destroying the Welfare State, creating Mass Unemployment and Homelessness.

SWPE sent a group to see the immigrants in Calais first hand.  What the immigrants already here and the liberal idiots who help them are bring to the UK is death, misery and religious bigotry.  If you hear a liberal idiot speaking glowingly about helping the invaders, remind them that there are homeless people here already, there are poor people here, there are hungry people here, there are people here who cannot get work but want to.  The addition of more people will only make the misery harsher and more wide spread.  Those from amongst the native population who want more immigration are racists who despise their own and relish the end of our people.  Stop those who aid the invasion, stop them permanently.