Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection pt 80

"The world trembles when Revolutionaries of the Law, carrying the explosive in their hearts, rush to assault the Gates that seek to block access to a new Millennium."

 - Kurt Eggers

.................................

....................................

As the US and corporate media cry over burning oil, millions of dying Yemenis, including at least 85,000 children, continue to be ignored. Yemen

@MintPressNews

................................

..............................

“Those pretended cosmopolites, who in justifying their love for the human race, boast of loving all the world in order to enjoy the privilege of loving no one.”

Rousseau

...........................

In Ireland at the present time there are at work a variety of agencies seeking to preserve the national sentiment in the hearts of the people.

These agencies, whether Irish Language movements, Literary Societies or Commemoration Committees, are undoubtedly doing a work of lasting benefit to this country in helping to save from extinction the precious racial and national history, language and characteristics of our people.

Nevertheless, there is a danger that by too strict an adherence to their present methods of propaganda, and consequent neglect of vital living issues, they may only succeed in stereotyping our historical studies into a worship of the past, or crystallising nationalism into a tradition – glorious and heroic indeed, but still only a tradition.

Now traditions may, and frequently do, provide materials for a glorious martyrdom, but can never be strong enough to ride the storm of a successful revolution.

If the national movement of our day is not merely to re-enact the old sad tragedies of our past history, it must show itself capable of rising to the exigencies of the moment.

It must demonstrate to the people of Ireland that our nationalism is not merely a morbid idealising of the past, but is also capable of formulating a distinct and definite answer to the problems of the present and a political and economic creed capable of adjustment to the wants of the future.

This concrete political and social ideal will best be supplied, I believe, by the frank acceptance on the part of ail earnest nationalists of the Republic as their goal.

Not a Republic, as in France, where a capitalist monarchy with an elective head parodies the constitutional abortions of England, and in open alliance with the Muscovite despotism brazenly flaunts its apostasy to the traditions of the Revolution.

Not a Republic as in the United States, where the power of the purse has established a new tyranny under the forms of freedom; where, one hundred years after the feet of the last British red-coat polluted the streets of Boston, British landlords and financiers impose upon American citizens a servitude compared with which the tax of pre-Revolution days was a mere trifle.

No! the Republic I would wish our fellow-countrymen to set before them as their ideal should be of such a character that the mere mention of its name would at all times serve as a beacon-light to the oppressed of every land, at all times holding forth promise of freedom and plenteousness as the reward of their efforts on its behalf.

To the tenant farmer, ground between landlordism on the one hand and American competition on the other, as between the upper and the nether millstone; to the wage-workers in the towns, suffering from the exactions of the slave-driving capitalist to the agricultural labourer, toiling away his life for a wage barely sufficient to keep body and soul together; in fact to every one of the toiling millions upon whose misery the outwardly-splendid fabric of our modern civilisation is reared, the Irish Republic might be made a word to conjure with – a rallying point for the disaffected, a haven for the oppressed, a point of departure for the Socialist, enthusiastic in the cause of human freedom.

This linking together of our national aspirations with the hopes of the men and women who have raised the standard of revolt against that system of capitalism and landlordism, of which the British Empire is the most aggressive type and resolute defender, should not, in any sense, import an element of discord into the ranks of earnest nationalists, and would serve to place us in touch with fresh reservoirs of moral and physical strength sufficient to lift the cause of Ireland to a more commanding position than it has occupied since the day of Benburb.

It may be pleaded that the ideal of a Socialist Republic, implying, as it does, a complete political and economic revolution would be sure to alienate all our middle-class and aristocratic supporters, who would dread the loss of their property and privileges.

What does this objection mean? That we must conciliate the privileged classes in Ireland!

But you can only disarm their hostility by assuring them that in a free Ireland their ‘privileges␁ will not be interfered with. That is to say, you must guarantee that when Ireland is free of foreign domination, the green-coated Irish soldiers will guard the fraudulent gains of capitalist and landlord from ‘the thin hands of the poor’ just as remorselessly and just as effectually as the scarlet-coated emissaries of England do today.

On no other basis will the classes unite with you. Do you expect the masses to fight for this ideal?

When you talk of freeing Ireland, do you only mean the chemical elements which compose the soil of Ireland? Or is it the Irish people you mean? If the latter, from what do you propose to free them? From the rule of England?

But all systems of political administration or governmental machinery are but the reflex of the economic forms which underlie them.

English rule in England is but the symbol of the fact that English conquerors in the past forced upon this country a property system founded upon spoliation, fraud and murder: that, as the present-day exercise of the ‘rights of property’ so originated involves the continual practice of legalised spoliation and fraud, English rule is found to be the most suitable form of government by which the spoliation can be protected, and an English army the most pliant tool with which to execute judicial murder when the fears of the propertied classes demand it.

The Socialist who would destroy, root and branch, the whole brutally materialistic system of civilisation, which like the English language we have adopted as our own, is, I hold, a far more deadly foe to English rule and tutelage, than the superficial thinker who imagines it possible to reconcile Irish freedom with those insidious but disastrous forms of economic subjection – landlord tyranny, capitalist fraud and unclean usury; baneful fruits of the Norman Conquest, the unholy trinity, of which Strongbow and Diarmuid MacMurchadha – Norman thief and Irish traitor – were the fitting precursors and apostles.

If you remove the English army to-morrow and hoist the green flag over Dublin Castle, unless you set about the organisation of the Socialist Republic your efforts would be in vain.

England would still rule you. She would rule you through her capitalists, through her landlords, through her financiers, through the whole array of commercial and individualist institutions she has planted in this country and watered with the tears of our mothers and the blood of our martyrs.

England would still rule you to your ruin, even while your lips offered hypocritical homage at the shrine of that Freedom whose cause you had betrayed.

Nationalism without Socialism – without a reorganisation of society on the basis of a broader and more developed form of that common property which underlay the social structure of Ancient Erin - is only national recreancy.

It would be tantamount to a public declaration that our oppressors had so far succeeded in inoculating us with their perverted conceptions of justice and morality that we had finally decided to accept those conceptions as our own, and no longer needed an alien army to force them upon us.

As a Socialist I am prepared to do all one man can do to achieve for our motherland her rightful heritage – independence; but if you ask me to abate one jot or tittle of the claims of social justice, in order to conciliate the privileged classes, then I must decline.

Such action would be neither honourable nor feasible. Let us never forget that he never reaches Heaven who marches thither in the company of the Devil. Let us openly proclaim our faith: the logic of events is with us.

: James Connolly, Shan Van Vocht, January 1897

.............................

In our days, the worst illusion that a militant of the left can hold is to continue to believe that the capitalist system he claims to fight essentially constitutes a conservative, authoritarian, and patriarchal order, whose fundamental pillars are the Church, Army, and Family.

Jean-Claude Michéa

...................................

“The only solution to Palestine is that matters should return to the condition prevailing before the error was committed—i.e. the annulment of Israel’s existence.”

- President Gamal Abdel Nasser

Defend your language, fight liberal Newspeak

Etymology is a fascinating subject. Languages are natural living entities which change and adapt as the culture in which they are based develops. The exception is dead languages, which through lack of usage become frozen in time. Looking at how words gradually alter their meanings is am interesting way of understanding the fluidity of the national culture they reflect.

Consider the question as to the reason why the chess-piece known as the 'Rook' is so named. Although Chess experts frown upon the use of the word 'Castle', insisting the word 'Rook' be used, 'Castle' is the word which the vast majority of ordinary Britons use. Why is this? Quite simply, in English, a Rook is a bird, whereas the chess-piece looks like one of the many castles we have in our country. Why then is the piece we call the castle able to make such manœuvres? The reason lies squarely with the etymology of the word 'Rook'. Rook, when used in chess, has absolutely nothing to do with the bird which shares the same name. It has nothing to do with rooks being birds which are often seen in castles. The word when seen in the context of its original meaning makes a great deal of sense. Chess is a game which has existed for many years. In modern times, it can be dated back to the seventh century Gupta empire in India, and to Persia, although its origins probably go back further. The Persian word for the piece we call the castle, was رخ (rokh). This is the Persian word for a chariot. The Chariots of Persia were high speed vehicles, made to resemble small buildings. In Italy, the word rokh became rocca, which means a siege tower - again a castellated vehicle. This morphed into the English word Rook. Thus it can be seen that the high speed long range chariot of old, which resembled a small castle (and not a bird), is indeed a Rook.

The origins, meanings and natural development of words is fascinating.

Since the middle of the twentieth century, the healthy gradual change of the English language has been hijacked for political motives. It is true that this has occurred before, notably in the time of Shakespeare, when a group based around Francis Bacon created a wealth of new words, which simultaneously enriched the English language and united the regional variations. The new manipulation of English is, however, not beneficial to national cohesion, and certainly does not enrich the language. The modern engineering of our language is destructive, detrimental to its users and dangerous to society. George Orwell called it NewSpeak. We have come to know it as Political Correctness.

The destruction of the English language is so fast paced that anyone born after the Second World War who has grown up immersed in the Americanised liberal impostor which calls itself 'English' will have difficulty in understanding the language spoken by the previous generation. Political Correctness is also making English grammatically nonsensical. It is practically forbidden to describe an individual as male or female. A basic sentence such as 'he asked her to dance' has become 'they asked them to dance'. This makes no sense! Describing someone by physical characteristics is now classed as discrimination and can result in imprisonment. Indeed the word 'discriminate' has been corrupted into meaning to treat in a detrimental manner. If offered a raw chicken or a cooked chicken to eat, failing to discriminate could result in hospital treatment!

The defenders of Political Correctness would have us believe that the manipulation of the language and the legal punishment of transgressors, is for the benefit of all - is to help the underprivileged(!) and protect disadvantaged minorities. They have a dishonest lexicon to 'spin' their destructive assault on culture through the control of our language, into something positive. Don't be fooled. Political Correctness is NewSpeak. The self-appointed Language and Thought Police, through front groups such as Common Purpose, are destroying our beautiful and poetic language. Humans think using words and symbols. By reducing the number of words and symbols we have, they reduce the potential for thought, and in turn curtail our freedom. They could not care less for minorities or any particular group. They use political correctness to pit Male against Female, Northerner against Southerner, Welsh against English against Scot against Irish etc.  In effect, they turn each of us into a Political Policeman to do their dirty work for them.

What is the solution to this despicable attack on all we hold dear? For once, the solution is simple: educate yourself! Study your language, refuse to use pc terms, refuse to get drawn into the Thought-crime apparatus. The PC/CP commissars are few. We are many. Without our co-operation, they cannot destroy our language. With a vibrant flourishing language at our disposal, we can enjoy absolute freedom of thought and make their attempts at mind control impossible. A technique they use is to instil a belief that those who use a variety of words are 'snobs', 'poofs' etc. This discourages many people from increasing their vocabularies and enjoying the enhanced freedom of expression this brings. Don't fall into their traps! Don't become an unwitting agent of the enemy.

Our language is the key to our freedom. Defend it. Use it in its organic sense. Refuse to surrender a single word to the linguistic oppressors. Take pride in the roots of your language - for therein you will find the foundations of your self. This is a battle we can win. This is a battle we must win.

Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection pt 79

.......................

Trotsky exists in a very well arranged and coherent kingdom, namely the realm of the intellect. There he has great significance, and his abilities are extraordinary. It stands to reason that a consciousness such as his must encounter a kind of vertigo when all of a sudden a realm following its own, different laws that cannot be captured by the tools of logic opens before him. In this case, it is the Russian realm that suddenly opens like a bottomless abyss under his feet. That is his destiny: the powers of the intellect are defeated by the powers of the soil. And this is the meaning of his book: the intellect tries to prove that the soil was wrong, yet its logic blows over the soil like smoke without leaving a trace.

Ernst Jünger on Leon Trotsky's My Life

.....................

.....................

“The Juche Idea is the ideology respecting human beings and the Philosophy of Independence.”

 - Exposition of the Principles of the Juche Idea 1.

From Kim Jong Il’s “On having a correct understanding of nationalism”...

It is important to have a correct understanding of nationalism. Only when they have such an understanding can people achieve national unity, champion the interests of the nation and contribute to the shaping of its destiny.

Nationalism came into being as an ideology for defending the interests of a nation in the course of the latter’s formation and development. Although nations differ from one another in the period of their formation, every nation is a social community which has been formed and consolidated historically on the basis of a common kinship descent, language, residential area and culture, and is composed of various classes and strata. There is no person in any country or in any society who exists outside his or her nation, separate from it.

Every person belongs to a class or stratum, and at the same time to a nation, endowing that person with both a national and a class character. Class character and national character and the demands of classes and nation are inseparable from each other. As a matter of fact, the classes and strata of a nation entertain different demands and interests owing to their different social and economic functions. However, all the members of a nation have the same stake in championing the independence and character of the nation and attaining national prosperity without distinction of the interests of their classes and strata.

This is because the destiny of a nation is precisely the destiny of its individual members; in other words, the latter is dependent on the former. None will be happy with the sovereignty and honour of his or her nation being trampled upon and national character disregarded. It is the common ideological feeling and psychology of the members of a nation to love their nation, cherish its characteristics and interests, and yearn for its prosperity. Nationalism reflects this feeling and psychology.

In other words, nationalism is an ideology that advocates love for the nation and defence of its interests. Since people carve out their destiny while living within the nation- state as a unit, genuine nationalism constitutes patriotism. The progressive nature of nationalism lies in the fact that it is a patriotic ideology which advocates the defence of national interests.
.............................

............................

"Throwing a stone is a criminal offence; Thousands of stones are thrown, this is a political action. Setting a car in fire is a criminal offence; If hundreds of cars are lit, that's a political action. - Protest is, when I say that and that does not suit me; Resistance is, when I make sure, that what I do not like, no longer happens!"

 - Ulrike Meinhof

....................................

Separatism is a tool of Globalism

Separatism is a sickness which is being encouraged across the globe by those who seek to destroy all resistance to global capitalism.  In China, liberal degenerates are being funded and incited as a tool to break down Chinese sovereignty, and to balkanise the country to make it easier to absorb into the bankers' system.  In the British Isles, this sickness is just as dangerous, and needs to be confronted.

On the British mainland, history is being distorted, with people encouraged to rally to the flags of long-dead ruling class families, and to use local differences as fuel for racist/cultural/linguistic hatred.  The focus of the separatist bile is England and the English people/language.  The lunacy exists in the county of Cornwall where people are being misled into attacking their British brothers and sisters across the rest of the country.

In the -three regions which together make up the fallacy known as 'Wales', the hatred of all things English is being stoked to the point where the economy of two of the three regions (the exception being the area around Cardiff-Swansea) is being sacrificed in the pursuit of a fantasy about the historical mass murderer and ruling class parasite, Owain Glyndwr (rehabilitated as some sort of saviour!) as a rallying point for the enemies of the Working Class who seek to divide us so they can then manipulate our weakness to consolidate their misrule.

The Socialist Motherland Party was previously known as the Socialist Workers' Party of England.  As is evident by that name, English particularism has played its part in the movement.  This has been a thorny issue, which after a lot of internal debate has now been conclusively resolved.  We have sat on the fence for too long, but are now eager to take a positive position in defence of the Working Class against all who would divide us.  The Socialist Motherland Party position on sovereignty is absolutely clear: we stand in opposition to separatism, and seek to unify our people by a series of practical measures which will end the power of those who benefit by pitting us against each other.

The likes of Mebyon Kernow, Plaid Cymru, Llais Gwynedd will no longer go unopposed.  We are taking the battle to them!

Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection pt 78

“Most of the luxuries, and many of the so-called comforts of life, are not only not indispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind. With respect to luxuries and comforts, the wisest have ever lived a more simple and meagre life than the poor. The ancient philosophers, Chinese, Hindoo, Persian, and Greek, were a class than which none has been poorer in outward riches, none so rich in inward. We know not much about them. It is remarkable that we know so much of them as we do. The same is true of the more modern reformers and benefactors of their race. None can be an impartial or wise observer of human life but from the vantage ground of what we should call voluntary poverty. Of a life of luxury the fruit is luxury, whether in agriculture, or commerce, or literature, or art. There are nowadays professors of philosophy, but not philosophers. Yet it is admirable to profess because it was once admirable to live. To be a philosopher is not merely to have subtle thoughts, nor even to found a school, but so to love wisdom as to live according to its dictates, a life of simplicity, independence, magnanimity, and trust. It is to solve some of the problems of life, not only theoretically, but practically. The success of great scholars and thinkers is commonly a courtier-like success, not kingly, not manly. They make shift to live merely by conformity, practically as their fathers did, and are in no sense the progenitors of a noble race of men. But why do men degenerate ever? What makes families run out? What is the nature of the luxury which enervates and destroys nations? Are we sure that there is none of it in our own lives? The philosopher is in advance of his age even in the outward form of his life. He is not fed, sheltered, clothed, warmed, like his contemporaries. How can a man be a philosopher and not maintain his vital heat by better methods than other men?”

 ~ Henry David Thoreau

..............................

"Muammar was the solution to a hundred refugee crises. He took in more people than most First World countries. And he didn't just assimilate them or cram them in camps. He trained them then sent them back with truckloads of guns to fix their own countries. Half of Africa has a street named after him in the capitals he helped liberate from European colonialism. His ghost cannot be erased. He will haunt his killers to their last breath."

- Nicky Reid

"He was very moderate in a religious sense and Islamic fundamentalists were constantly trying to destroy the Jamahiriyan system in favour of an imposed theocracy. This is why the West was eventually able to overthrow the country by cobbling together an army of embittered criminals and jihadists who had either been jailed or expelled. Qathafi was always opposed to religious extremism and the whole idea of the Jamahiriya was to create a societal balance."

- Troy Southgate

...............................

........................

"Only when we have Socialism in Germany, [...] only then the needy and oppressed People will have a Fatherland, a Fatherland that belongs to us and only then will they have a socialist homeland."

- Ernst Thaelmann

......................

"Either we are a revolutionary people or we will suffocate in the swamp and finally stop being a free people."

 - Ernst Niekisch

.........................

..........................

"Revolutionary nationalism is anti-fascist because fascism, apart from the features of foreign nationalism, does not understand how to incorporate the leaders of the proletariat, in its economic order is merely a reform of capitalism, in its stealthily disguised form of government a dictatorship over the working people and thus the Division of the nation into sovereign and dominated immortalised."

 - Karl Otto Paetel, "The National Bolshevist Manifesto", Berlin, January 1933

.............................

"Where there was once one nation, now there are many nations. The world map has been fragmented. This is the paradoxical effect that is taking place because of this Fourth World War. Instead of being globalised, the world is fragmenting, and, instead of this mechanism hegemonising and homogenising, more and more differences are appearing. Globalisation and neoliberalism are making the world an archipelago. And it must be given a market logic."

 - Subcomandante Marcos, Leader of EZLN

.............................

“To establish Juche in ideology means having the consciousness that one is the master of the revolution and construction, thinking and doing everything, centring on the revolution in one’s own country, and acquiring the viewpoint and attitude of solving all questions by one’s own talents and initiative.” - Kim Jong Il

In order to establish Juche in ideology, it is necessary to arm oneself with independent ideological consciousness that reflects independent demand and interests of the people as well as with policy of one’s revolutionary party.

To know one’s things well does not mean to be ignorant about other countries.

It is necessary to know about other countries in order to perfect one's own revolutionary struggle and efforts to realise socialist construction. However it is harmful to do so at the expense of knowing one's own conditions and history.

To establish Juche in ideology has three meanings: that is, to have the consciousness that one is the master of the revolution and construction; to think and do everything, centring on the revolution in one’s own country; and to acquire the viewpoint and attitude of solving all questions by one’s own talents and initiative.

To have the consciousness that one is the master of the revolution and construction means to have standpoint and attitude that the revolution and construction is for the people and should be done by the people.

That is because the revolution and construction is the work to realise the people’s independence. The people should have standpoint and attitude to take part in the revolution and construction as masters. Only then, can they devote themselves to the revolution and construction.

As each country has links with other countries, revolution in one country may have influence on other country and can help others. But masters of each country are the people in that country. If the people, masters of the revolution do not rise, it is useless as if watering the dead tree, however big others’ support.

The people in each country are masters of their revolution, which is their main task. Under this condition, they should have the consciousness that they are the masters of the revolution and construction and should think and do everything, centring on the revolution in their country and acquire the viewpoint and attitude of solving all questions by their own talents and initiative.

It is also necessary to establish Juche in ideology because when each country has success in revolution, it accelerates the world revolution and liberation of humanity.

The world revolution is the struggle for people’s independence in international arena.

The world revolution wins final victory in the process in which each country wins its revolution.

......................

Ode To A Scab

After God had finished the rattlesnake, the toad, and the vampire, He had some awful substance left with which He made a scab. A scab is a two-legged animal with a corkscrew soul, a waterlogged brain, and a combination backbone made of jelly and glue. Where others have hearts, he carries a tumour of rotten principles.

When a scab comes down the street, men turn their backs and angels weep in heaven, and the devil shuts the gates of hell to keep him out. No man has a right to scab as long as there is a pool of water deep enough to drown his body in, or a rope long enough to hang his carcass with. Judas Iscariot was a gentleman compared with a scab. For betraying his Master, he had character enough to hang himself. A scab hasn't.

Esau sold his birthright for a mess of pottage. Judas Iscariot sold his saviour for thirty pieces of silver. Benedict Arnold sold his country for a promise of a commission in the British Army. The modern strikebreaker sells his birthright, his country, his wife, his children, and his fellow men for an unfulfilled promise from his employer, trust, or corporation.

Jack London, 1913

.........................

In the past, we had a trade, today we seek a job. A trade and a job are not the same thing. With the trade, one saw what one created and frequently consumed what one produced. It’s a form of autonomy. With the job one is employed, it’s a form of dependency, of dispossession - and one only consumes what others have created.
[...]
The generalisation of precariousness is the advent of the substitutable, interchangeable, flexible, mobile, disposable man. It’s the reduction of the entire person to his labour power, that is to say to this part of himself that can be treated as merchandise. It’s submission to the imperative of production, the sale of oneself extending to all aspects of existence.

Alain de Benoist, "Contre le libéralisme", éditions du Rocher, 2019, p.309 et 319

...........................

The degenerate idiocy of capitalism’s apologists knows no bounds. Comfort and luxury has made weaklings and fools of billions! Those who celebrate the triumph of capitalism often claim the insipid abundance and comfort it’s provided are among its greatest benefits. What are they arguing for if not the gross and unprecedented debilitation of all bodies, minds, and spirits? This article is a perfect example of this self-destructive and contemptibly chicken-hearted mentality. A mentality which, to one degree or another, has made almost every modern westerner into a blubberous, domesticated, artificial, flaccid, sickly, pusillanimous, hyper-sensitive, (to pain both physical and psychological) Epicurean mockery of humanity.

Anthony Crowley

.......................

Daily reminder that the establishment left and establishment right are both owned by corporations who flood their countries with immigration to create an inflated supply of labour force.


Be wary of whenever you see an article in your local town that says “Mayor says we need more immigration for labour shortages”. Remember a labour shortage is a benefit to you and all workers as you are more valuable, immigration to solve labour shortages are the attack words against the working class. The economy is there to serve us, it is not an altar which we are to sacrifice everything upon it.


-The National Bolshevik

......................

Democracy is dead. Socialism is the only path to sanity

Events in the farcical puppet show known as Westminster continue to ever more move against the will of the People.  For those who have forgotten, during the ensuing years of lies and patronising propaganda, on the 23rd June 2016 (over three years ago!), the Europhile toadies in the houses of parliament gave the people a very straight choice in the UK Independence Referendum:

"Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?"

• Remain a member of the European Union
• Leave the European Union

To make matters absolutely crystal clear, the then Prime Minister 'Dave' Cameron made the barely veiled threat that should the Working Class fail to deliver a vote in favour of continued servitude, we would face the following consequences (immediately, the second the result was read out):

“The British public would be voting if we leave would be to leave the EU and leave the single market. We’d then have to negotiate a trade deal from outside with the European Union...  But if we leave the EU and the German finance minister was very clear, you’re either in or you’re out, leaving the single market, you’ve then got to negotiate a trade deal.” (source)

"We should be outside the single market [if we vote Leave]. We should have access to the single market, but we should not be governed by the rules that the European Court of Justice imposes on us, which cost business and restrict freedom." (source)

So, in a nutshell, leaving the EU would restore sovereignty - no EU courts, no EU parliament, no EU currency, no EU army, no EU economy, in fact no 'deal' whatsoever.  We voted to get out of the Empire, and those who say we voted for a change in relationship are outright lying vermin.

So after all the lies and threats against the people of the nation, we voted with our hearts,minds and souls, and sent a 17.4 million strong clear message to the EU: 'Brussels! Fuck off!'.

Sadly, this message fell on deaf ears, or rather it was ignored by EU-owned traitors.

The scum in parliament have kept the UK trapped in the EU for over three years. Now they have made it impossible to get out without a 'deal', or to put it another way, they have used legalistic mechanisms to make sure that the UK stays in the EU and to hell with what we voters told the politicians to do.  The vile Jeremy Corbyn has turned 180 degrees to become an advocate of vassal status for the UK, and has even relied on the unelected, anti-democratic house of lords to stop our nation breaking free from the empire of Brussels.

Democracy is dead in the UK. The only way forward is to completely erase the fake democratic system, and install a Revolutionary Dictatorship of the Proletariat.  The solution to the problem of the parasitic bourgeois political class is to overthrow the corrupt UK and Ireland, replacing the decadent globalist liberal nightmare with a regime 100% in the hands of the Patriotic Working Class.  We demand the dawn of the Socialist Motherland.  Anything less is treason to the People.

Socialist Quotes for Sunday Reflection pt 77

“Bourgeois man is a slave without a master. He is a slave spiritually, because there is nothing he is willing to die for.”

- Alexandre Kojeve

.....................

"This Europe, in its unholy blindness always on the point of cutting its own throat, lies today in the great pincers between Russia on the one side and America on the other. Russia and America, seen metaphysically, are both the same: the same hopeless frenzy of unchained technology and of the rootless organisation of the average man. When the farthest corner of the globe has been conquered technologically and can be exploited economically; when any incident you like in any place you like, and at any time you like, becomes accessible as fast as you like; when you can simultaneously ‘experience’ an assassination attempt against a king in France and a symphony concert in Tokyo; when time is nothing but speed, instantaneity, simultaneity, and time as history has vanished from Dasein of all peoples; when a boxer counts as the great man of a people; when the tallies of millions at mass meetings are a triumph; then, yes, then there still looms like a spectre over all this uproar the question: What for? – Where to? – and what then?"

- Martin Heidegger: Introduction To Metaphysics.

...........................

"There can be no organised economy without a strong state, and it can only be strong without being tyrannical, the state that serves a destination unit. Behold how the strong state, server of unity consciousness, is the true guarantee of the freedom of the individual."

Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera

...........................


...........................

A revised, social-revolutionary draft programme for the NSDAP, written by Karl Otto Paetel and supporters in late 1929

Karl Otto Paetel is most well-known today for his 1933 National Bolshevist Manifesto.The Manifesto was written in a period when Paetel was a leader of the ‘Group of Social-Revolutionary Nationalists’ (GSRN), an organization which, inspired by the Communist Party of Germay’s (KPD) 1930 ‘national-communist’ programme and its nationalist-oriented propaganda journals like Aufbruch, centered much of its activism on encouraging nationalists to forge links with the revolutionary Left. The GSRN’s heavily pro-communist orientation in part stemmed from earlier, unsuccessful attempts by Paetel to reform the National Socialist movement. Before the GSRN was founded on Ascension Day, 1930, Paetel was involved in an informal grouping called the ‘Young Front Working Circle’. While still focused on promoting cooperation between left and right, the Young Front at the time regarded the NSDAP as being the key source for potential social-revolutionary change, directing most of its energies towards supporting the ‘left-wing’ opposition within the NSDAP and encouraging internal Party debate over its policies and direction. It was for this purpose that Paetel and other Young Front members wrote the short draft programme reproduced below. A revised version of the NSDAP’s original 25-Points (a number of the items are almost word-for-word identical), the Young Front’s draft programme is more explicitly social-revolutionary, including demands for mass nationalization, land expropriation, and a German-Soviet alliance. The programme was first distributed clandestinely at the August 1929 Nuremberg Party Congress before its formal publication in nationalist journal Das  Junge Volk on October 1st. The document, inevitably, had little real impact – in May 1926, in the wake of the Bamberg Conference, Hitler had already officially declared the 25-Points “unalterable”, and the Young Front’s programme made no headway in encouraging debate among the leadership. It did generate interest among some of the Party’s grass-roots, however, leading to stronger links with members of the NSDAP, many of whom would later go on to form the core of the GSRN. 

Social-Revolutionary Nationalism:A Proposal for the Revision of the Programme of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP)

First published in Das Junge Volk, XI, 1st October 1929.

The NSDAP is a nationalist party. Its goal is the free German nation.

The NSDAP is a socialist party. It knows that the free German nation can arise only through the liberation of the working masses of Germany from all forms of exploitation and oppression.

The NSDAP is a workers’ party.  It professes itself to the class-struggle of the productive against parasites of all races and creeds.

The NSDAP therefore demands:

1. The integration of all Germans, on the basis of peoples’ rights to self-determination, into a Greater German Reich;

2. Equal status for the German Volk with other nations; the annulment of all the treaties, obligations, and debts of the prior capitalist government;

3. That only he who is a folk-comrade should be a citizen, – folk-comrades can only be those of German blood. Jews, Slavs, Latins [Welsche] can therefore not be German citizens; non-citizens to be classed as guests and placed under legislation governing foreigners;

4. That the right to determine the leadership and laws of the state may be conceded only to citizens; therefore, the NSDAP demands that every public office of whatever kind, whether in Reich, state, or municipality, may be occupied by citizens alone;

5. Elimination of the corrupting parliamentary state of affairs; realization of the self-government of the working Volk on the basis of enterprises, with the dismissal and destruction of the organizational apparatus of all parties; the organizational form of self-government is the Peoples’ Council-State [Volks-Rätestaat]; the council structure is organized from the bottom up through indirect elections from the council formations;

6. That the state has the obligation above all to provide for the employment opportunities and living conditions of its citizens; if it is not possible to support the total population of the Reich, the members of foreign nations (non-citizens) are to be expelled;

7. That any further immigration by non-Germans is to be prevented; the NSDAP demands that all non-Germans who have immigrated to Germany since 2nd August 1914 be compelled to immediately leave the Reich;

8. That all citizens must have equal rights and duties;

9. That the first duty of citizens must be to work mentally or physically; the activity of the individual must not infringe upon the interests of the general public, but must take place within the context of the whole and for the benefit of all; – the NSDAP therefore demands:

10. Abolition of incomes unearned by work and effort, – Breaking of interest-slavery.

11. Transfer of all the country’s economic resources into the common ownership of the nation;

12. A solution to the land question [Landfrage] tailored to national requirements; nationalization of all large- and medium-sized estates, – immediate, generous settlement of the depopulated border-areas in the East, – remission for smallholders as Reich Entails;1

13. Ruthless struggle against those who harm the common interest through their activities; criminals against the people [Volksverbrecher], usurers, racketeers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed and race.

14. Replacement of Roman (private) law, which serves the materialist-capitalist world-order, by German (common) law.

15. Expansion of our national education-system; free tuition in all schools;

16. State provision for the improvement of public health; free medical assistance;

17. Abolition of the mercenary army and the formation of a peoples’ army;2

18. Legal struggle against conscious political lies and their dissemination through the press;

19. Freedom for all religious denominations, so long as they do not jeopardize the existence of the Peoples’ Council Republic [Volks-Räte-Republik] or violate the moral faculties and feelings of the Nordic race; the NSDAP combats the Jewish-materialist spirit in all its manifestations, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our Volk can only take place from within, in accordance with the old German principle of law: common interest before self-interest.

The NSDAP is aware that the ideas laid down in these guiding principles cannot be fulfilled without a fundamental rearrangement of the existing balance of power. Since total control over the entire economic resources of Germany today is in the hands of the institutions of international finance capital, the national revolution is itself targeted directly against that international finance capital. It follows from this that any revolution carried out in Germany will immediately call into action all the instruments of power of the League of Nations and America against the German Workers’ and Peasants’ State.

The first task of National Socialist foreign policy is, therefore, the organization of revolutionary defense against the imperialist powers, alliance with the Soviet Union, and support for those revolutionary movements in all the countries of the world which are directed against international finance capital.

Social-Revolutionary Left of the NSDAP

Translator’s Notes

1. ‘Reich Entails’ – In German Reichserblehen. An ‘entail’ was a form of property-ownership established in the feudal era. Declaring a piece of land an ‘entail’ placed significant restrictions upon its sale or inheritance, essentially ensuring that ownership was kept solely within the hands of a specific family group. Anticapitalist elements of the New Nationalist movement in interwar Germany and Austria typically looked to pre-capitalist, feudal organizational systems for inspiration; as a consequence, the idea of resurrecting entails in various forms was a popular one. The proposal as mentioned here by Paetel was common among the ‘left’ factions of the NSDAP and in National Bolshevik & fascist-corporatist groups: that large and small farms & estates should be nationalized, while the smallholdings of peasants should be declared Reich Entails and legally prohibited from being sold or otherwise taken out of the peasant family’s ownership. The National Socialist government actually ended up implementing a version of this policy with its Reich Entailed Farm Law [Reichserbhofgesetz] of 29 September, 1933.

2. This demand, like several others, is taken word for word from the original  1920 25-Point NSDAP Programme. The ‘mercenary army’ [Söldnertruppe] referred to is the Reichswehr, so-called because they were derisively regarded as being “paid by the Republic”. While many individuals within the Reichswehr were respected by the National Socialists, as an institution it was seen as imperfect, a mercenary force of paid soldiers serving the respective whims of changing governments rather than the needs of ‘eternal Germany’. Against the Reichswehr the NSDAP proposed instead a ‘Volksheer’, sometimes translated as ‘national army’, although ‘peoples’ army’ or ‘popular army’ is probably more evocative of its real meaning. The Volksheer would not consist of paid, professional soldiers, but would mobilize the entire population through conscription, something forbidden in the Treaty of Versailles.

TRANSLATED FROM KARL OTTO PAETEL’S NATIONALBOLSCHEWISMUS UND NATIONALREVOLUTIONÄRE BEWEGUNGEN IN DEUTSCHLAND (1965), VERLAG S. BUBLIES

Source: https://arplan.org/