Transgenderism doesn't exist: Mental Illness does

by Warwick Alderman

An extrapolation made by some Maoists is to support the LGBT fantasists, believing it to be in sympathy and spirit with his ideas.

But, it must remain their interpretation:  Not Mao's.  The false agenda of:  "Transgenderism," which divides the proletariat was not extant in his lifetime.  There is simply no way of stating what his view on such a modern plague would be.

This assumption is about as sensible as declaring what Marx's view of smartphones would be.
Racial oppression existed in Mao's lifetime:  And, I think that there is every justification for US Maoists seeking an alliance with black people:

But, Maoist support for LGBT is going too far.  One can question rigorously, the idea of this community being oppressed:   Is it not a fetish of white, middle class people:  I.e.  The bourgeoisie?
People who are genuinely oppressed, don't worry about their birth sex, or question it.  Such indulgent nonsense comes with wealth, prosperity, idleness and confusion.

Transgenderism is a mental disorder, that should be treated psychiatrically, with a psychopharmacological intervention that attacks it, and treats it as it does depression (Melancholia).
"Body Dysmorphia," should be filed alongside.  These are both modern plagues, to which there is no solution within the paradigm of the delusion:

For a Body Dysmorphic patient, no amount of plastic surgery will bring lasting happiness:  Merely temporary relief from self - hatred.  There is no cure to be gained by feeding and supporting the delusion.  Confusion arises from lack of faith and purpose.  To indulge mental delusions is not compassion.

Transgenderism is a delusion: 

God/nature allocates sex:  And he doesn't make mistakes.
The idea that one is inhabiting the wrong gender is psychosis:  Therapeutic intervention should work towards seeking acceptance of the Client's birth sex.

To use public funds, from our hard-pressed NHS to indulge this sickness to the point of surgical mutilation, is a social crime against all genuinely sick people in Britain.

The NHS cannot afford to treat invented diseases:  Real disease grows exponentially.  Type Two Diabetes, Morbid Obesity, Childhood Obesity, as well as many real conditions that require resources, such as:  Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease.  Newer drugs are always being streamed:  But, there is a limit to what our NHS can afford.


The Cultural Revolution was genius:  Surely, it is one of the only episodes in world history wherein the established leader proved more radical than the bureaucracy that supported him, and radicalised the proletariat to affect change?

In Britain, Oliver Cromwell would have been capable of such a thing:  But, it is surely a rare phenomena?  He didn't side with his revolutionary army:  But, he was capable of it.

Hitler's revolution of 1944 was forced upon him by an assassination attempt, not his innate radicalism.  An act of revenge against the German bourgeoisie;  of completing a chapter according to his logic.  But, his actions towards the SA describe the limits of his creativity.  He didn't believe that a motivated, revolutionary army could compare to the professional one.  He must have had cause to regret.

My theoretical knowledge of Maoism is almost nonexistent.  This is heresy to an ideologue:  But, this position has enormous potential.  To know too much about a subject, is to kill it, creatively:
When you learn to play electric guitar:  You are at your most creative at the beginning.  As your theoretical knowledge increases, your command of scales etc, your playing becomes less creative and more formulaic.

Once you have become expert:  Your creativity is dead.

"In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's there are few."
- Shunryu Suzuki


It is my intention to save Socialism in Britain:  To rescue it from the degeneration of Trotskyism, of:  "Political Correctness," that it has been engulfed by since the early 1980's:  And to return it to the working class, in a form that they can both understand and support.

In order to achieve this:  We must attack everything that is not Socialism:  That means Identity politics and especially Transgenderism.  We must assault it, ideologically, on behalf of the masses:  The larger proletariat.  These unfortunate, depressed people are:  0.000 (something) of the population.  It is not reasonable to expect the larger community to suffer because of them:  In allocating nhs resources to treat a fictional condition.

We all have an instinct, about what real Socialism consists of:  It looks like the 1970's milieu.  It looks like the Britain before Thatcherism, when British Socialism was ascendant.  The voice of the proletariat was strong:   The unions were strong:  It worked:  Why else would Thatcher and Heseltine pledge it's destruction?

Feminism and anti - racism were not fetishised, according to the Trotskyist bent.  There was no war on Smoking, no social reconditioning, no abjuration to healthy eating or exercise.  Free speech was absolute:  We called it:  "Freedom." It was a healthier society:  And we must work towards it.  It is not just our past:  It must become our future.

Notes (with credit to The Red Cebuano):

[People often confuse] Third Worldism [with] Maoism.

1. It's theory does NOT deal mainly with third world countries nor does it claim that first world countries have no potential. Maoism is an international theory first synthesized by the Communist Party of Peru and Abimael Guzman and is being followed in many movements today, most especially in the Philippines, India, Canada, Bhutan and others. It does say that first world countries have lesser revolutionary potential, sure, but it does still have some.

Tactics will however be different. A united front will be built from the workers and the most oppressed classes. For example in the Philippines, you have the basic workers-peasant alliance which is allied with the petty and national bourgeois because those classes are also oppressed through imperialism. Other than this, there is also emphasis on youth, women, LGBT, indigenous people and fisherfolk which are also very oppressed. In the US, Maoist collectives are trying to unite the workers with the black, native and LGBT community which is a correct line since those communities are also pretty oppressed.

2. Maoism does not propose utopian socialism. Ie it does not say workers necessarily have to build their own services. I think this is sort of a misunderstanding of what "building a people's government through the people's war" is.

3. What Maoism is. There are 5 main tenets of Maoism:

• 1. The Law of Contradiction
• 2. The Mass Line
• 3. The People's War
• 4. The New Democratic Revolution
• 5. The Cultural Revolution

1. The Law of Contradiction says that the most important law of dialectics and its real main law is that contradictions are universal. The negation of the negation, quantity into quality, individual to universal, all those are just examples of the law of contradictions. From here, Mao developed the theory of the two worlds outlook - that people either think with the proletarian outlook or the bourgeois outlook. Proletarian ie serving the people, bourgeois ie serving themselves.

Mao also developed the theory of antagonistic and non-antagonistic contradictions which basically says that some contradictions don't have to be solved through tough antagonisms and that some can actually just be solved through other, peaceful means. You can read more about that in "On Contradiction" and "On the Correct Handling of Contradictions"

2. One of Mao's more famous contributions is the mass line which can be summed up in "learn from the masses, then teach them." The basic idea is that the masses always know what's wrong with society and that you have to integrate with them, understand their struggles and sentiments and apply Marxist-Leninist analysis into real life practice. Once you have this understanding, you synthesize it with a scientific approach through Marxism-Leninism and turn it into an actual political line. This political line will be rallied for by your legal front and will be implemented by your illegal front which will be explained in the next section.

3. The People's War is often mistakenly said to be "surround the cities from the countryside" which is wrong. If that were the case, it would just be called agrarian war. The people's war is an effective method of revolution which had closely brought socialism to Peru before the Shining Path's forces were defeated by the reactionary Peruvian army and to Nepal before Prachanda's revisionist line came to power, and it is currently being used to bring in socialism in the Philippines, India, Manipur, Bhutan, and elsewhere. The people's war is divided into three stages - strategic defense, where your forces are small while your enemies are large, strategic equilibrium, where your forces are big enough to take on your enemies, and the strategic offense where your people's army is basically already marching down the streets of victory. As you go through the stages, you build what are called "base areas." In the strategic defense, these are usually just small or big guerilla areas.

In the Philippines, for example, nearly all of Far South Mindanao Region is a base area of the New People's Army but you usually don't see in the streets or whatnot because they're constantly moving. The tactic is mainly guerilla warfare. In the strategic equilibrium, these base areas are more consolidated and less easily penetrated by the army. When the Shining Path was in its strategic equilibrium before, there were base areas where you could clearly see forces from the people's army and they launched larger attacks, even being able to take own a military base.

During the strategic offense, you basically just expand these bases into the final areas that haven't been taken yet and win the war. These bases are to be consolidated with a people's government. This government may be "moving" sort of. For example, in the Philippines, they have "people's courts" and guerilla hospitals which move around. They do have people's barrio committees already so that's already a sign that the movement is already heading forward.

With the people's war, there is what we call "Mao's Three Magic Weapons" ie the Party, the United Front and the Army. The Party does the leadership of the revolution, basically Leninist vanguardism. The United Front consists of the Legal parties and the illegal fronts. The party has to unite with other revolutionary and progressive forces in one way or another. For example, in the Philippines, the CPP has legal parties like youth organizations, women's rights organizations, trade unions, etc. and these are mainly left-wing nationalist, Maoist parties that follow the line of the CPP but the CPP can also stand with the Moro democratic nationalists because they also fall under the national question.

The legal fronts are used to gather more people, to implement the mass line and to rally the party's line. The illegal fronts, including the army, are used to implement the party's line. In the Philippines, again, the legal fronts stage protests and encourage people to support land reform, while the NPA already gets rid of landlords (sometimes the landlords can be talked into it but not often) and distributes the land to peasants already which give them popularity.

4. The New Democratic Revolution, this mainly revolves around semi-feudal countries. Semi-feudal countries can finish the bourgeois stage under proletarian leadership. The proletariat has to ally with revolutionary bourgeois classes and finish what needs to be done in the capitalist stage such as industrialization. Once this is done, the allied bourgeois classes slowly turn proletarian as they pass through the socialist stage, therefore removing the need for two revolutions.

5. The Cultural Revolution states that people with bourgeois mentality can get into the party and give out bourgeois laws and therefore a conscious struggle must be regularly launched to get rid of bourgeois mentality and bourgeois ideology.: